academic support on both campuses was also identifiedas a way to better provide access to academic resources. Drop-in tutoring with graduateassistants as well as peer tutors was organized on both campuses. The attendance at these drop-insessions is tracked for scheduling and assessment purposes.Through review of first year seminars, relevant topics and activities to help students developappropriate learning skills were identified [7-9]. These topics were prepared into a series ofmodules that could be used in a first-year seminar. To add a credit for a mandatory first-yearseminar required a broader overview of the engineering foundations courses (required forsecondary admission into the engineering programs). This review is being completed as part
on problem solving and STEM related. 3. Doing activities that hands on, messy, relevant to the girls’ world, and age appropriate (11yo to 14yo).Engineering is based on design that includes identifying a problem and finding a solution whileconsidering constraints and trade-offs. While students are introduced to STEM concepts andnotions, there is a stringent need to present them with design principles blended with open-endedproblem-solving approaches faced by engineers in real life applications.The activities presented aimed to tap into the natural curiosities of the young women for inquiry,communication, construction and expression. Inquiry into the topics presented below for processunderstanding of design, communication through peer
well as the type of math coursestaken during the student’s first year. Chen [5] discovered that taking a lighter course load withless challenging math courses while having a poor performance in those courses lead to ahigh chance of switching out of STEM. Another noteworthy result from this study: All other factors being equal, bachelor’s degree STEM entrants who first attended public 4-year institutions had a higher probability of leaving STEM by switching majors than those who started at private nonprofit 4-year institutions. Bachelor’s degree STEM entrants who were male or who came from low-income backgrounds had a higher probability of leaving STEM by dropping out of college than their peers who were female or came from
, digital analysis, sustainability, materials and state-of-the-art construction methods. Participants visit contemporary buildings such as the Millennium Bridge, St. Mary Axe, London City Hall, London Shard tower, Pinnacle tower, the new Stadium and Aquatics Center (host to the 2012 Summer Olympics). Students learn directly from architects, engineers and builders responsible for these buildings [6]. • For 2 weeks, students are immersed in Chinese culture and experience numerous culturally significant sites, visit local universities, meet with Purdue alumni, tour engineering based labs and production facilities, and meet one on one with Chinese peers in partner universities. Additionally, expert
with engineering programs did notdisclose a breakdown of faculty demographics on the latest 2018 ASEE data).The number of engineering deans signing the ASEE diversity pledge from those 113 R1institutions has reached 85 at time of writing of this paper. Given there is such an interest indiversifying the engineering professoriate, a logical question is what is the status of the tenure-line black engineering faculty 5-years after the pledge? Findings are reported by incorporatingmulti-level factors, including but not limited to gender, rank, geographical location, andprivate/public status of the institutions. Note that tenure-line in this paper refers to both tenure-track and tenured faculty. This work-in-progress does not include non-tenure
multiple team projects anddeliverables. ENGG 233 is a required first-year technical course that introduces foundationalconcepts in programming and software engineering to all students, regardless of their intendedprogram.In 2015, ENGG 233 was redesigned to focus on algorithmic thinking through exploratory andapplied learning, as opposed to syntax-focused programming education [Pears, 2007]. Thisresulted in a course format similar to ENGG 200.Both courses have a significant regular laboratory component, where students are given theopportunity to collaborate with peers and receive coaching from instructors and teachingassistants. In these laboratory sessions, students work on exploratory exercises and larger design-based projects. This interactive
Paper ID #21662Forming Strategic Partnerships: New Results from the Revolutionizing Engi-neering and Computer Science Departments Participatory Action ResearchDr. Cara Margherio, University of Washington Cara Margherio is Senior Research Associate at the UW Center for Evaluation & Research for STEM Equity (CERSE). Cara serves as project manager for program evaluation on several NSF- and NIH-funded projects focused on diversity, equity, and inclusion within STEM higher education. Her research interests include community cultural wealth, counterspaces, faculty development, peer mentoring, and institutional change.Kerice
-excused absences (and if so, how many), does their cell phone ringduring class (or even worse, do they read or send text messages during class). Class participationpolicy was not intended to be punitive, but rather, to be a reward to show students how muchvalue there is in coming to class. Coming to class on time, turning off their cell phones, not beingdisruptive, et cetera, is about showing respect for all participants, their peers, and the instructor.Portfolio: The students in ET 401 documented each of their projects by making a designportfolio showing off their work. The portfolio gave a visual and textual representation of theirprogression through each project. The design portfolio acted as a resource for others to be able tolearn from their
the role of peer mentoring andsocialization in most graduate departments 19–21. Other research at the graduate level has hinted atthe role that non-technical competencies have in the ability to complete, such as academicengineering writing 22. However, the psychological decision-making processes by which studentsdecide to leave their programs is still unknown and represents an enormous gap in the scholarship.Furthermore, it is important to employ creative sampling methods in order to study students whoare actually considering leaving or who have left their programs, but this has proven to be quitedifficult.The explicit objective of a broader project this paper represents is to capture and analyze thenarratives of engineering graduate student
this course was a course project. At the beginning of the semester, 6the instructor provided the students guideline for course project. For the course project,students were encouraged to work in groups of 2 (for graduate students) or 3 (forundergraduate students). The students were provided with a list of possible research topics andwere given guidelines to find 5 to 10 recent articles published in IEEE journals and conferenceproceedings and write a review paper. Alternatively, students were allowed to work on a hands-on project. A list of possible research topics that were provided to students is as follows: 1. Communication Security in SCADA 2. Substation Communication Standards and issues
daily Homework-12% assignments (short Free response Attendance- 3%(2003-2005) quizzes, assigned Final Exam- 25%Calculus 5th Edition problems, short(Stewart 2002) writing assignments, No additional problem passing conditions presentations, or projects)SCALE-UP (2006-2013)The SCALE-UP (student centered activities for large enrollment undergraduate programs)instructional model was implemented in Fall 2006. This method encourages active learning andminimizes lecture time in the classroom. Beichner et al. (2007
. Students presented their final designs in writing and orally before a panel whichincluded faculty members and Accuride engineers. They were evaluated on final weight, style,presentation, and analysis, with the latter making up the bulk of the score.The project provided several opportunities for students to connect directly with real world designissues in a way that wouldn’t have been possible without the industry partnership. For one, studentsfelt the pressure of competition to achieve the lightest wheel, just as Accuride must keep pace withindustry competitors to maintain or grow their market share. In addition, they were held account-able for weaknesses in their analysis process. For example, the industry panel quickly identifiedsharp corners
Camp Assistant Director for two years. In addition, he taught students in the camp as well as assisting with teacher professional development. His honors include the Lechner Scholarship and the College of Education Graduate Strategic Support Scholarship. As a graduate student, he distin- guished himself through his extensive publications on STEM teaching and learning and has participated in the writing of several grant proposals. He presented his research at several educational research con- ferences including AERA, NCTM, and SERA as well as having papers in proceedings of FIE and AAEE in engineering education. He earned several publications including journal articles, book chapters, and conference proceedings. He
location in theMiddle East, students at TAMUQ are required to complete identical coursework as their peers onthe main campus, including courses on American politics and American history. The student bodyis comprised of students from around the world, but primarily students come to TAMUQ from theArab Gulf region and Asia. TAMUQ offers Bachelor of Science degrees in chemical, electrical,mechanical and petroleum engineering. The university maintains an enrollment of around 550students, of which 58% are male and 41% are female [4]. Nearly all of the students at TAMUQspeak English as their second or third language. The faculty of the university is as diverse as thestudents, with faculty from the United States of America, Jordan, Lebanon, Egypt, Greece
instructor.Successes and Lessons LearnedThis class seems to satisfy many of the learning objectives quite well. When assessing their ownabilities, students who completed both the intro and the exit survey over the last two years showeda 20% improvement in their ability to “communicate STEM to younger students”, a 23%improvement in their ability to “manage a classroom”, a 51% improvement in “developing STEMlessons”, a 32% improvement in “classroom time management”, and a 39% improvement in“working with peer instructors.” Students were also asked about how extensive and how unjustsocial, economic, and educational injustice is (i) world-wide, (ii) nationally, (iii) in the Bay Area(California), (iv) in neighborhoods surrounding SCU, and (v) at SCU. In almost all
affecting the ability of different students to feel socially included among theirclassmates and strive academically. To answer this question, we sent a survey to all Computer andElectrical Engineering students at Cal Poly San Luis Obispo asking about their experiences withthese types of expenses. Ultimately the survey collected responses from 114 students across theeconomic spectrum, from students facing homelessness due to education costs, to those who donot face financial burdens or the need to work to support their education.Overall some of the results of this paper were promising. Students of lower means largely do notreport feeling ostracized from their peers based on laptop ownership or the need to rely on coursepartners to pay for components
, students would not realize the need, or whether it is even possible, to write a reallycompact code desired by miniature embedded controllers. Additionally, students see real-world usageof the topics they have learned in digital electronics classes, particularly logic circuit blocks such asALUs (Arithmetic and Logic Units), registers, and data direction control blocks, etc. High-levellanguages typically do not expose students to the architecture of processors and their atomic actions.There are many concepts and techniques in high-level programming that can only be analyzed andscrutinized by assembly level actions. Assembly coding teaches them details about the processor andmicrocontroller functions, and builds their confidence to use embedded
understanding together and are working with common interests for theirteaching even if they are teaching different classes.Faculty development groups were designed to follow the SIMPLE principles, which had beendeveloped and refined during a prior project that studied a network of ongoing faculty learningcommunities in a single discipline but across multiple institutions [8]. The SIMPLE principlesare: Sustainable – groups are small, ongoing, relevant to participants; Incremental change –participants identify and implement small, manageable changes that can require only modesttime and are not overwhelming; Mentoring – participants receive mentoring from the groupleader, as well as peer mentoring form other members of the group; People-driven
Pi Epsilon honorary society.Dr. Cliff C Zou, University of Central Florida Dr. Cliff Zou received his PhD degree from Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, University of Massachusetts at Amherst, in 2005, and MS and BS degree from University of Science & Technology of China in 1999 and 1996, respectively. Currently he is an Associate Professor in Department of Com- puter Science and the Program Coordinator of Digital Forensics Master program in University of Central Florida. His research interests focus on cybersecurity and computer networking. He has published more than 80 peer-reviewed research papers, and has obtained more than 5800 Google Scholar Citations. He is a Senior Member of the IEEE
or teaching assistant support, as well as by providing students who take the course as partof their graduation, professional development, and/or teaching requirements. Finally, external in-dustry sponsors offer additional, sustainable financial support as well as some industry-perspectiveinstruction in return for the opportunity to recruit from a pool of graduate students.ActivitiesThe course consists of a weekly seminar that can be taken for one or two credit hours. Seminarsare taught in an active-learning style, with plentiful group discussions and in-class activities suchas think-pair-share. Some seminars are supplemented by reflective writing assignments. Studentswho take the course for two credits also complete a research project and
assessment of the outcome is aburden to instructors. At the time of this writing there are proposals to assign outcomes toindividual quiz questions. One commercial branch of Moodle supports this capability4. Thisallows automatic assessment of Quiz outcomes.Experimental Process and ResultsTo evaluate the effectiveness of ACAT gradebook assessment of outcomes versus manualassessment, an initial study was performed during the Spring 2015 semester. Four courses wereselected for both manual Moodle evaluation and automated ACAT evaluation. Two courses wereLaboratory group-based learning using CATME5 peer assessment. Manual assessment was basedon the individual grade computed using the CATME contribution factor. The first class, GameDesign and Development
semester and was closely tied to the concepts in thescience curriculum, while also serving as a large-scale model for the water filtrationchallenge in the engineering curriculum. Some classes attended the field trip while inthe science unit and other classes attended the field trip during the engineering unit. Methods This study was conducted in a central [state blinded for peer review] schooldistrict that serves approximately 7000 students K-12. Five teachers from threeelementary schools volunteered for this study. Four of the five teachers attendedtraining on the new engineering curriculum during the summer, and all five teachers metweekly to discuss how their lessons were going and what they
thepopular Intro 160 course and will have teams of students solving real-world engineeringproblems with real clients. In addition, this course will offer more department involvement viaonline videos and lectures. Collectively, the online videos, lectures, and tutorials will provide a"flipped classroom" style course. Students will complete assignments that align with learningthe engineering design process including: online assignments, solve engineering problems, buildand manage teams, fabricate and test prototypes, give presentations, and write a technical report.Active Learning StrategiesActive learning is generally defined as anything in addition to the passive listening of atraditional lecture format. There is some disagreement regarding the most
of innovations, NMIMS as the director Shirpur campus and at College of Engineering Pune (COEP) as the founder head of the innovation Center. Dr Waychal earned his Ph D in the area of developing Innovation Competencies in Information System Organizations from IIT Bombay and M Tech in Control Engineering from IIT Delhi. He has presented keynote / invited talks in many high prole international conferences and has published papers in peer- reviewed journals. He / his teams have won awards in Engineering Education, Innovation, Six Sigma, and Knowledge Management at international events. Recently, his paper won the Best Teaching Strategies Paper award at the most respected international conference in the area of
what is important or relevant rather than just going through theengineering Learners motions and having [to write] answers to questions or preciselydesign define bullet points to hit.”courses Project /throughout “They allow us to take time to self evaluate and instill change for Design /your future projects.” Assignmentcurriculum? “Instructors would know what their students are thinking about [for] Class / the course or project. They could improve some points for the next Educator project
revealed that girls stated they performed poorly in school if theyattended during menstruation, due to the worry that their male peers would find out.8Additionally, studies have shown that use of unhygienic sanitary products during menses islinked to higher rates of urinary and reproductive tract infections.8 All in all, the current state ofmenstrual hygiene in India is concerning at least.Efforts have been undertaken in exploring innovative approaches to combat the issuessurrounding menstrual hygiene. Other than lack of knowledge of menstrual hygiene managementand practices, another key point of underdevelopment is access to menstrual hygiene resources.It is in these interventions where engineering and design become more apparent in
should be learner-‐centered. In addition, it is well established that assessment should be integrated into the learning process1. In-‐class assessments, such as peer teaching, minute papers, muddiest-‐point exercises, and other classroom-‐based assessments 2, can give insights into student progress. Computer technology can further integrate assessment into the learning process by offering students individualized, timely help and feedback, which is known to be beneficial 3-‐5. One effort to embed such individualized assessment into learning materials for an entire engineering subject has been the Open Learning Initiative Engineering Staticscourse. The OLI
and modes of instruction (visual, auditory, kinesthetic, and read/write) can make the students to enhance effective learning. True assessment of students learning outcomes: Students are encouraged to take responsibility for their own learning, so that they are more likely to develop higher-order thinking skills such as analysis, synthesis, and evaluation. Supportive educational environment: Because of appropriate use of information and communication technologies that have been applied in the program increases the independent learning skills of the students. Students should relevant their studies to professional, disciplinary and/or personal contexts. Demonstrate a repertoire of differentiated instructional
. Page 26.105.7 These relations are: δ1 = y1 + y3 & δ2 = y2 – y3.] Scaffold # 2 Attempting to solve for three variables (y1, y2, and y3), students developed only two equations for the free-body diagrams for the two bars, and therefore a third equation was needed. Another soft scaffold was then given to reveal a hidden key concept for the problem: [Assuming smooth pulleys, the force in the left upper spring k1 is equal to the force in the right upper spring k2. This force equality is k1*(y1+y3) = k2*(y2-y3) and is the third needed equation.] Scaffold # 3 The instructor offered this final dose of scaffolding to help students write the
cohort, andhear again about ALEKS™ in several differentways. This includes hearing about it during theopening greeting to STEM students given by aSTEM academic leader, usually a Dean, in aslide. It also includes having a poster presentin the room, e.g. see Figure 1; through thewearing of “Ask me about ALEKS™” buttonsworn by peer advisors during orientation andby having fliers available on a table duringpreregistration. Following summer orientation,approximately one week later, a second emailis sent reminding students of the opportunity;this email garners the most responses withmany students electing to receive licenses oneto two weeks following STEM summerorientation. In addition, advisors who interactwith students also receive fliers and