Asee peer logo

Engineering First: How Engineering Design Thinking Affects Science Learning

Download Paper |

Conference

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Location

New Orleans, Louisiana

Publication Date

June 26, 2016

Start Date

June 26, 2016

End Date

August 28, 2016

ISBN

978-0-692-68565-5

ISSN

2153-5965

Conference Session

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering Division Poster Session: Works in Progress

Tagged Division

Pre-College Engineering Education Division

Tagged Topic

Diversity

Page Count

7

DOI

10.18260/p.26648

Permanent URL

https://peer.asee.org/26648

Download Count

301

Request a correction

Paper Authors

biography

Mandy Biggers Penn State University Orcid 16x16 orcid.org/0000-0003-2757-4592

visit author page

Dr. Mandy Biggers is an assistant professor of science education at Penn State University. Her research and teaching interests involve engineering education with elementary students and also preservice teachers. Her particular interests are engineering practices and engineering design thinking. Before earning her Ph.D. from the University of Iowa and her Masters degree from Texas A&M University, she was a middle and high school science teacher in Texas.

visit author page

biography

Leigh Ann Haefner Penn State University - Altoona

visit author page

Leigh Ann Haefner is an associate professor of science education at Penn State Altoona and co-director of the Childhood and Early Education program at Penn State University. She is a former junior and senior high school science teacher and her current research includes a focus on inservice teacher’s integration of the practices of science and engineering in STEM education.

visit author page

biography

Jonathan Bell

visit author page

Jonathan Bell is a graduate research assistant at Penn State pursuing a Ph.D. in Curriculum and Instruction, focusing on science and engineering education. After receiving his undergraduate degree from Hampshire college, Jonathan spent 13 years in California designing science exhibitions, teaching middle school STEM and supporting teacher professional development related to engineering education. His research interests include engineering education, design thinking and teaching failure.

visit author page

Download Paper |

Abstract

The integration of STEM disciplines has been emphasized over the past decade. These fields hold promise for filling jobs of the future, and schools across the country have developed STEM programs to meet the growing needs and interests of students. However, no research has attempted to investigate how different integration strategies affect student learning outcomes. Decades ago, there was a movement to teach physics first in the sequence of science courses. There were studies done that determined that learning physics first affected learning outcomes in other science courses (biology, chemistry, etc.).

In a similar model, this study investigated learning outcomes when engineering is taught before or after science content in elementary science classes. Although science curriculum and engineering curriculum exist, they are typically not well integrated. The disciplines in STEM are still taught as independent silos in most cases. This project explored how five elementary classroom teachers integrated engineering in their classrooms while piloting engineering curriculum.

Our specific research questions were: 1. How do teachers integrate science content into engineering design units? 1.a. What do they struggle with? 1.b. What supports do they need to be successful? 2. Does the instructional sequence (engineering first or science first) affect ease of integration?

Five fifth-grade teachers were selected for this study. Each teacher piloted engineering curriculum alongside their science curriculum. Two teachers taught the science curriculum first followed by the engineering curriculum, two teachers taught the engineering curriculum first followed by the science curriculum. One teacher integrated the two curricula during the same time period. Four main types of data were collected during this project. First, semi-structured interviews were conducted with this sample of five teachers. The interviews centered on examples when engineering was incorporated, how science and engineering were integrated, how the teachers felt about the integration, what they tried that failed and/or succeeded, and what they planned to do in the future. Second, classroom lessons were videorecorded using an iPad provided by the research project. Teachers focused on videorecording engineering lessons and science lessons, attempting to capture student talk as much as possible.

Third, we leveraged existing Professional Learning Community [PLC] meetings to incorporate focus group interviews with participating teachers. These PLC meetings were audiorecorded and transcribed to collect the teachers’ conversations to help answer the research questions. Finally, fourth, student artifacts were collected to help determine if teaching science first or engineering first affected student learning outcomes. Artifacts included science notebooks, worksheets, assessments, and in-class activities. This data was used to investigate whether teaching science first or engineering first affects ease of integration of the disciplines.

This study will have implications for teacher education, professional development providers, curriculum developers, and eventually (and importantly) classroom practice. While this study includes a small sample size of teachers, it is a first step in understanding how they integrate science and engineering content and practices.

Biggers, M., & Haefner, L. A., & Bell, J. (2016, June), Engineering First: How Engineering Design Thinking Affects Science Learning Paper presented at 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana. 10.18260/p.26648

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2016 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015