able to live, learn, and understand othercultures and environments (NAE, 2005; Specking et al., 2013). Therefore, the sooner thislearning process for future success begins, the greater would be the benefits for both the studentsand their employers. Recognizing this need many universities in the United States offer studyabroad programs, both at graduate and undergraduate levels. Shuman et al. (2005) argue thatmanufacturing and global supply chain can best be studied “if classroom work is combined withtruly multidisciplinary team projects and well-designed field visits” in other countries.Furthermore, one of the ABET accreditation criteria (also known as ‘outcomes h’) requiresengineering programs to provide students with a broad understanding of
Paper ID #34380Study Abroad While Studying Abroad: International Students’Participation in the RSAP Study Abroad ProgramJohnny C. Woods Jr., Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Johnny C. Woods, Jr. is a Ph.D. Candidate in the Department of Higher Education and Research Group Coordinator for the Engineering Competencies, Learning, and Inclusive Practices for Success (ECLIPS) Lab in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. Johnny is also a Graduate Teaching Assistant for the Graduate School Certificate Course–Preparing the Future Professoriate. He has a Master in Educational Foundations and
Paper ID #12434Revising Mechanical Engineering Laboratories for Improved Student Out-comesDr. Andr´e J. Butler, Mercer University Dr. Butler is an Associate Professor and Chair of the Environmental Engineering Department at Mercer University. His research interests include air pollution and public health.Dr. William Moses, Mercer University William Moses is an associate professor and former chair of the Mechanical Engineering Department at Mercer University. He earned a B.M.E. and M.S.M.E. in mechanical engineering from the Georgia Institute of Technology, and a Ph.D. from North Carolina State University. Research
homework component, and the lessons were included on a trial basis(but not mandatory). Since the lessons were optional, the inverted classroom was not used in thissemester but rather a traditional lecture setting. Therefore, this semester has been included in thetraditional lecture results. Also, it can be seen in many of the results below that the data from thespring 2018 semester falls between the old (traditional lecture) and new (inverted classroom)averages, indicating that the addition of the online adaptive homework had an impact on theresults, but not as much as the full courseware package or inverted classroom experience. Basedon previous research, this was to be expected. Student retention has been a major concern for many
coveringsustainability issues within a particular sector of the chemical engineering industry of theirchoice, considering the social, economic and environmental impacts. Some examples of the finalproject topics include the pharmaceutical industry, the textile industry, metal manufacturing andrail transportation. Graduate students in the course were to prepare a report and presentationcovering sustainability issues related to their field of research. The graduate reports addressedthe material and energy requirements, human factors, sustainability challenges andrecommendations for improvement. The assignments and weight contribution of eachassignment are presented in Table 3. Table 3. Assignments and Weight Percentages for the Course Grade
Paper ID #43273Board 258: Engineering Design Thinking in the Age of Generative ArtificialIntelligenceJohn Clay, University of Texas at Austin Research AssistantXingang Li, University of Texas at Austin Xingang Li is a Ph.D. candidate working as a Research Assistant in the Walker Department of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Texas at Austin. His research interests include generative design, deep learning for engineering design, and human-AI design collaboration. He received the Philip C. and Linda L. Lewis Foundation Graduate Fellowship in Mechanical Engineering from the Cockrell School of Engineering for
Paper ID #33669Industry-University Capstone Design: How Did Students Adapt to theCOVID-19 Pandemic?Ms. Shruti Misra, Unviersity of Washington Shruti Misra is a graduate student in Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Wash- ington, Seattle. Her research interest is broadly focused on studying innovation in university-industry partnerships. She is interested in the various ways that universities and industry come together and par- ticipate in driving technological innovation at the regional and global level.Dr. Denise Wilson, University of Washington Denise Wilson is a professor of electrical engineering
AC 2007-504: NASA OPPORTUNITIES FOR FACULTY AT MINORITYINSTITUTIONS: REFLECTIONS OF NASA ADMINISTRATOR FELLOWSLouis Everett, University of Texas-El Paso Louis J. Everett is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Texas El Paso. Dr. Everett is a licensed professional engineer in the state of Texas and has research interests in the use of technology in the classroom. His technical research interests include robotics, machine design, dynamics and control systems. He began his NAFP tenure in 2006 and is presently with the Mobility and Manipulation group at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena California. leverett@utep.edu http://research.utep.edu/pacelabPaul Racette, NASA
problem finding plays a key role in producing tangible outcomes. Problem finding tasks aremore interesting, engaging, as well as ill-structured, eliciting free associations of ideas [11].Rubenstein et al. found that students who planned to use more elaboration strategies tended toidentify more potential problems and the number of problem identification strategies significantlycorrelated with problem-solving fluency and problem-solving flexibility [12]. This finding haspractical implications for educators of mature students, as it suggests that they should incorporateexercises that promote problem finding skills into their teaching practices. Much recent research addresses the need to improve engineering education. For example, [13-15] discuss
that evaluate impact of classroom initiatives. A variety of delivery modes will be used to introduce students to methods and to educators who have successfully introduced engineering into a wide variety of classes across several disciplines. Engineering resources for teachers will be presented and discussed. A final project is required, in which students create a unit or module focused on a hands- on engineering activity for P-12 students in their licensure area.EDU 327 is a new course designed specifically for the Engineering Education minor. Theanalogous class in the graduate certificate is TEGR 528. The two classes are currentlytaught concurrently in the same classroom, with differentiated assignments, so that
Manufacturing Resource Forum - She is dedicated to researching and issuing action-provoking reports on advanced manufacturing trends, workforce development and disruptive technologies.Dr. Teresa A. Johnson, Ohio State University Teresa A. Johnson, Ph.D. is an assistant director and the Coordinator for Assessment and Curriculum Design at the University Center for the Advancement of Teaching at The Ohio State University. She earned a doctorate in Microbial Ecology at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. She has taught in the sciences at Butler University and at the College of Wooster. Her pedagogical research has focused on classroom assessment techniques and impacts of prior knowledge on student learning in the
” instead of “for” the community in need (Bennett and Rosner 2019). We have created a social innovation program called Ignite that uses the principles of human-centered and liberatory design to educate a global community of students on engineering conceptsthrough design thinking rooted specifically in the SDGs. The Ignite curriculum contains three keycomponents: (1) creation of a physical prototype, (2) a community-based design challenge centeredon the use and implementation of the prototype, and (3) peer-to-peer learning, which results in avirtuous cycle of learners who become leaders who generate more learners. The engineering conceptsfocus on the creation of a practical solution related to an SDG. The design solution is targeted at achallenge
Paper ID #20359Lessons Learned in Teaching Science using an Integrative Approach that usedthe Engineering Design ProcessDr. John M. Mativo, University of Georgia Dr. John Mativo is Associate Professor at the University of Georgia. His research interest lies in two fields. The first is research focusing on best and effective ways to teaching and learning in STEM K- 16. He is currently researching on best practices in learning Dynamics, a sophomore engineering core course. The second research focus of Dr. Mativo is energy harvesting in particular the design and use of flexible thermoelectric generators. His investigation
: “This Is Rocket Science”There is strong evidence in the literature [cf., 5, 6] that retention to graduation in highereducation is improved by interventions and engagement in the first year. Such first-yearinterventions might take the form of a “low-stakes” course that includes close interactionbetween faculty and students, and/or connecting to student clubs and university research labs.The “This Is Rocket Science” first-year seminar (FYS) is designed to provide just suchopportunities for engagement. Two faculty members, each with experience in space engineeringand research, lead the class and work with the students during the semester. The teachingobjectives for the class include: 1. Introduce first-year engineering students to atmospheric
boys3.Thus they graduate from high school with out the necessary pre-requisite skills to studyengineering in college4-5.In the past 20 years there has been a proliferation of programs designed to promoteinterest of young women in STEM careers. Yet, women hold only 12% of the scienceand engineering jobs in business and industry. Unfortunately, it is evident that trying tointerest students in STEM careers is not easy. Most of these programs are excellentprograms. However, since these programs are usually of short duration, evaluation of theprograms and specific components are difficult, and reports of evaluation efforts arelimited. Thus, it is difficult to know what works and what doesn’t work, and what thebest practices that should be replicated
papers in peer-reviewed conference proceedings, and given 12 technical presentations. He was the 2011-12 recipient of the Armstrong State University Award for Distinguished Faculty Service to the Community. He was also the 2017-18 recipient of the Georgia Southern-Armstrong Campus Award for Distinguished Faculty Service to the University based on his work to improve campus diversity and contributions to faculty senate.Priya T Goeser (Professor)Josiah Thomas HackerThomas Dean Snyder Thomas Snyder graduated summa cum laude from Georgia Southern University in 2021 with a Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering. During his undergraduate studies he participated in numerous research projects as well as worked as a
Paper ID #15219Making History Active: Archival Interventions for Engineering EducationDr. Christopher Leslie, New York University Tandon School of Engineering Christopher Leslie is a Lecturer of Science, Technology and Media Studies at the New York University Tandon School of Engineering in Brooklyn, New York, and he is codirector of the Science and Technology Studies program there. Dr. Leslie’s research considers the cultural formations that surround technology, science, and media in the 19th- and 20th-century United States. He is the head writing consultant for the Introduction to Engineering and Design course, and
Scientific and Technical Communication program at Michigan Technological University. Her research interests include interdisciplinary theory and practice as well as the intersections of rhetorical theory and communication in the workplace.Karina Jousma, Michigan Technological University Karina Jousma is an undergraduate student earning a Bachelor of Science in Scientific and Technical Communication at Michigan Technological University. Her concentrations include writing and engineering. She joined Civil and Environmental Engineering International Senior Design this summer. Page 12.944.1
in Lafayette, IN. She enjoys partnering with Purdue University to provide unique educational experiences for her students as they consider potential college and career opportunities.Kaitlyn B. Myers, Purdue University Kaitlyn B. Myers is a mathematics teacher at Jefferson High School in Lafayette, IN. Kaitlyn teaches the honors and college-prep levels of pre-calculus/trigonometry. She utilizes her past experiences in undergraduate research, graduate-level mathematics, and teaching at a collegiate level. Kaitlyn enjoyed partnering with Purdue University’s COE to provide her students a firsthand experience with the Engineering Design Process.Prof. Tamara J Moore, Purdue University Tamara J. Moore, Ph.D., is a
requirements and other logistics.Much like an iterative research or engineering design loop, a thorough assessment andimplementation process will reveal information useful to determine the value to an institution’sslate of activities and to its diversity goals. In this context, the “problems” include theoverarching objectives or goals such as increasing the number and representation of diversestudents in the college, creating an inclusive climate, and increasing the likelihood of diversestudents graduating from engineering. Prior to designing an intervention, an “informationgathering” process incorporates a review of the literature can reveal best practices and researchresults. It can also help to discuss with colleagues at other institutions to learn
experience at K&A Wireless as a research associate in Albuquerque (USA). Additionally, he has profes- sional experience at Hitachi Automotive Systems America as an Intern in Research & Development in Detroit (USA) and Senior Product Engineer at Fiat Chrysler Automobiles in Brazil. He served as the President of Student Platform for Engineering Education Development (SPEED). Before joining SPEED, Claudio served as co-founder of the Student Chapter of the Brazilian Automation Society. Among his many achievements, his project was awarded the Best Student Initiative for Engineering Students pro- moted by Cengage Learning. He received the Leadership Award by ISTEC, and the Young Scientist Award supported by
impact students’ ethicalreasoning and decision-making abilities [15]. There is also evidence that programmaticorientations (e.g., entrepreneurship, business, and community engagement) affect students’ethical perceptions and decision-making [16]. In addition, research on a service-learning designprogram found that a human-centered approach utilized in that program helped students orient toethical considerations, motives, and decisions, yet the students tended to narrowly focus onethical concerns linked to interactions with users while struggling to explicitly see the salience ofethics for their day-to-day design work [17].Previous research continues to reveal novel insights about engineering students’ understandingsof ethics and social
professor in the College of Technology with a joint appointment in the College of Education at Purdue University. Hired as a part of the strategic P12 STEM initiative, he prepares Engineering/Technology candidates for teacher licensure. Dr. Mentzer’s educational efforts in pedagogical content knowledge are guided by a research theme centered in student learning of engineer- ing design thinking on the secondary level. Nathan was a former middle and high school technology educator in Montana prior to pursuing a doctoral degree. He was a National Center for Engineering and Technology Education (NCETE) Fellow at Utah State University while pursuing a Ph.D. in Curriculum and Instruction. After graduation he completed a one
Washington State University (2013-2014) and George Mason University (2014-2017). Throughout his career, his primary responsibility as a faculty member has been teaching students, for which he aspires to provide them with a quality and enjoyable experience.Dr. William A. Kitch, Angelo State University Dr. Kitch is Professor and Chair of the David L. Hirschfeld Department of Engineering at Angelo State University. Before starting his academic career he spent 24 years as a practicing engineer in both the public and private sector. He is a registered professional engineer in Colorado, California and Texas American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021Make
context.Achievement of SAChE OutcomesThe next component of the survey asked participants to rate on a Likert scale whether they feltthat their institution’s UO laboratory achieved the eight SAChE outcomes and whether theirinstitution’s general chemical engineering curriculum achieved the same outcomes. Averagedresults are shown in Table 2. Although many outcomes show a large standard deviation inachievement across institutions, some trends are apparent. For example, the best-achieved(lowest-scoring) outcome both in the UO laboratory and across the curriculum is Outcome 2(characterization of the hazards associated with chemicals and other agents). This result might beexpected since many of the course outcomes and teaching practices discussed above focus on
Paper ID #44457Work-in-Progress: Introduction of a Computational TA Role to Support UndergraduateTraining in Computational Thinking Strategies for Chemical EngineeringApplicationsDr. Leah Granger, North Carolina State University Dr. Leah Granger is a postdoctoral researcher for Engineering Education and a course instructor for the Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering Department at North Carolina State University.Mr. William Buren Parker, North Carolina State University William Parker is a graduate student at North Carolina State University working towards a degree in Chemical Engineering. He assists in this project as the
practicing engineers. Thus, developing and integrating a curriculumthat instills and fosters curiosity in engineering students is essential. To assess studentdevelopment of curiosity, a direct and an indirect assessment for curiosity were integrated intothe curriculum for a first-year engineering honors program at a large midwestern university. TheFive-Dimensional Curiosity Scale (5DC), a 25-item instrument developed by Kashdan andcolleagues, was implemented as the indirect assessment. The direct assessment for curiosity wasdeveloped by the research team and tasks students to brainstorm about a topic and then write 10distinct questions about that topic. Both assessments were administered at two time points in theacademic year. A subset of data of 54
design capstone course is an important experience for engineering undergraduatestudents. This course prepares students for industry by having students solve open-ended real-world problems1. In particular, the senior capstone course involves solving problems posedfrom industry and faculty rather than “made up” projects 2,3 to allow for real-world situationsexperienced post degree. These problems typically require simulations using controlled real-world situations designed to meet specific learning objectives, or prototyping in a real-worldenvironment2 in which students are exposed to real situations with open-ended projects. Thedesign problems posed to the students allow for the practical side of engineering design to betaught in the engineering
passions is teaching. Her area of teaching specialization is structural engineering with a particular emphasis in the analysis and design of buildings. At Penn State she currently teaches a structural analysis course, the advanced steel design course and a graduate level course in steel connections. Her approach to these courses is to provide strategies for complex problem solving and a framework for lifelong learning. She is the recipient of the Penn State Engineering Society’s Outstanding Teaching Award (2003) and the Premier Teaching Award (2008). Building on a strong teaching record and an interest in building a more diverse engineering community, Dr. Hanagan has begun to expand her research into engineering
persevering in STEM pathways is exemplified in the lowpass rates (40-55%) for additional core major requirements, such as General Chemistry andIntroduction to Programming. The lack of retention of STEM students in community collegesand the lack of growth of minority representation in the science and engineering workforce4demonstrates the need to develop strategic programs and practices that increase the number anddiversity of students succeeding in STEM.Skyline College, located in the San Francisco Bay Area, CA is a member of the CaliforniaCommunity College System and is a federally-designated Hispanic-Serving Institution. Duringthe 2014-15 academic year, the college enrolled 20,787 unique students, with white students asthe largest single group at