: Accelerating female talent in science, engineering, and Technology. Center for Talent Innovation, 2014. [Online]. http://www.talentinnovation.org/publication.cfm?publication=1420 [3] J. Williams, S. Li, R. Rincon, and P. Finn, “Climate Control: Gender and Racial Bias in Engineering?,” SSRN Electronic Journal, 2016, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.4014946. [4] R. Yonemura and D. Wilson, “Exploring Barriers in the Engineering Workplace: Hostile, Unsupportive, and Otherwise Chilly Conditions,” in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, New Orleans, Louisiana, Jun. 26-29, 2016, doi: 10.18260/p.26843. [5] E. L. Deci and R. M. Ryan, “Autonomy and Need Satisfaction in Close Relationships
protocol following a critical incident approach [31]. Senior faculty included those atthe Professor rank and Associate Professor rank for a minimum of two years. Junior facultyincluded those at the Assistant Professor rank and Associate Professor rank for less than twoyears. Participants were recruited from the top twenty largest US doctoral-granting engineeringschools, as determined by the 2021 American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE)Engineering by the Numbers report [32]. The research team contacted the heads/chairs ofengineering departments within each of these twenty institutions with a request to share a studyinvitation and screening survey link with their engineering faculty. The screening survey wasdesigned to take approximately 10
currently serves as his Department's Head, an American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) Excellence in Civil Engineering Education (ExCEEd) Mentor, and the American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE) Civil Engineering Division Freshman Director.Camilla M. Saviz (Professor and Chair) Camilla Saviz is Professor and Chair of the Civil Engineering Department at University of the Pacific in Stockton, CA where she has happily taught since 1999. She received B.S. and M.S. degrees in Mechanical Engineering from Clarkson University, an M.B.A. from the New York Institute of Technology, and a Ph.D. in Civil and Environmental Engineering from the University of California, Davis in the area of hydrodynamic and water quality modeling
teaching civil engineering. He also served as the Director, Graduate Professional Development at Northeastern University’s College of Engineering. He is the recipient of the 2021 NSPE Engineering Education Excellence Award and the 2019 ASCE Thomas A Lenox ExCEEd Leadership Award.Kelly Ann Arcieri (Co-op/Internship Advisor) Kelly Arcieri has served as the Co-op/Internship Advisor for the Civil Engineering and Computer Science programs at York College of Pennsylvania since 2017. She teaches a career training class to prepare civil engineering and computer science sophomores for their first co-op or internship. Kelly has helped 167 students to find nearly 200 co-ops or internships. With over 30 years of experience in
-Buonincontro J (2019) STEAM in practice and research: An integrative literature review, Thinking Skills and Creativity, 31: 31-43.3. Aguilera D, Ortiz-Revilla J (2021) STEM vs. STEAM Education and Student Creativity: A Systematic Literature Review. Education Sciences, 11(7): 331.4. Akçalı E, M Buraglia, A Essenfeld, J Williams (2021). Poetry writing in engineering education: Results and insights from an exploratory study, 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, https://peer.asee.org/375855. Akçalı E, J Williams, Burress R, Aguila A, M Buraglia, (2023). In their own words: Student perceptions of technical poetry writing in discipline-specific undergraduate engineering courses: Opportunities and challenges, INFORMS Transactions
engineering program, and over three years at a community college. Dr. O’Riordan-Adjah help develop the college’s strategic plan during his time at one of the community colleges. He is committed to aligning student learning to not only the strategic plan but also the real world, and employer needs. He understands how the college can serve students holistically by focusing on retention and student success initiatives, like improved advising, success coaching, and connections to employers. He is also an advocate of the Building and Construction Trades which provides a great opportunity for hands-on student enthusiasts. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 ASEE Annual Conference
Paper ID #40074The Person behind the Mann Report: Charles Riborg Mann as an Influentialbut Elusive Figure in Engineering EducationDr. Kathryn A. Neeley, University of Virginia Kathryn Neeley is Associate Professor of Science, Technology, and Society in the Engineering & Society Department of the School of Engineering and Applied Science. She has served twice as chair of the Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division of ASEE and is co-director of the Communication Across Divisions initiative. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 The Person Behind the Mann
threads together descriptions of six different modes of complexity that engineers andbuilders working in predominantly Alaska Native remote communities have described as beingsituationally important for designing and constructing culturally and environmentally relevanthomes. As the engineers, carpenters, builders, drafters, economists, scientists, policymakers, andhomeowners we have spoken to affirm, it is important to unpack the implications that varyingsituational forces have on building processes. In doing so, engineers and builders canintentionally “think locally” and embrace complexity rather than ignore its impact on jointactivities (Escobar 2019). As Annemarie Mol and John Law have argued, the concept of“complexity” can be used to
of ABET, and is currently Secretary/Treasurer of the ABET Foundation Board of Directors. She has also served as a program evaluator for J.D. pro- grams for the ABA, for universities’ regional accreditation for SACSCOC, and for Business Schools for AACSB. She also has served as the Chair of the ECE division of ASEE, the President of the Education Society of IEEE, and the chair of the Women in Engineering of IEEE. She served as the Treasurer and a Board of Directors member for WEPAN.Dr. Christine A. Stanley, Texas A&M University Christine A. Stanley is professor of higher education, holder of the Ruth Harrington Endowed Chair, and vice president and associate provost for diversity emerita in the College of
engagement and achievement in school,” J. Educ. Psychol., vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 22–32, 1990, doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.22.[26] H. De Loof, A. Struyf, J. Boeve-de Pauw, and P. Van Petegem, “Teachers’ Motivating Style and Students’ Motivation and Engagement in STEM: the Relationship Between Three Key Educational Concepts,” Res. Sci. Educ. Australas. Sci. Educ. Res. Assoc., 2019, doi: 10.1007/s11165-019-9830- 3.[27] G. Crosling, M. Heagney, and L. Thomas, “Improving Student Retention in Higher Education: Improving Teaching and Learning,” Aust. Univ. Rev., Jan. 2009, Accessed: Feb. 10, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://search.informit.org/doi/abs/10.3316/ielapa.159225407205474.[28] E. A. Skinner and J. R. Pitzer, “Developmental
students at their institutions,” Teach. Learn. Inq., vol. 7, no. 2, Art. no. 2, Sep. 2019, doi: 10.20343/teachlearninqu.7.2.7.[8] J. H. Waldeck, V. O. Orrego, T. G. Plax, and P. Kearney, “Graduate student/faculty mentoring relationships: Who gets mentored, how it happens, and to what end,” Commun. Q., vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 93–109, Jun. 1997, doi: 10.1080/01463379709370054.[9] W. Wright-Harp and P. A. Cole, “A Mentoring Model for Enhancing Success in Graduate Education,” Contemp. Issues Commun. Sci. Disord., vol. 35, no. Spring, pp. 4–16, Mar. 2008, doi: 10.1044/cicsd_35_S_4.[10] N. A. of S. Medicine Engineering, and, P. and G. Affairs, B. on H. E. and Workforce, and C. on E. M. in STEMM, The Science of Effective Mentorship in
future.Ms. Reya Magan, Duke University Electrical and Computer Engineering and Computer Science student at Duke UniversityDr. Ann Saterbak, Duke University Ann Saterbak is Professor of the Practice in the Biomedical Department and Director of First-Year En- gineering at Duke University. Saterbak is the lead author of the textbook, Bioengineering Fundamen- tals. Saterbak’s outstanding teaching was recognized through university-wide and departmental teaching awards. In 2013, Saterbak received the ASEE Biomedical Engineering Division Theo C. Pilkington Out- standing Educator Award. For her contribution to education within biomedical engineering, she was elected Fellow in the Biomedical Engineering Society and the American
theory.Student Learning Approach and Course DevelopmentIn the Summer of 2019 the authors participated in their Center for Advancement of Teaching’ssummer course (re)design program to design their Control Systems and Instrumentation course.During this program, the authors worked through the book, Building a Pathway for StudentLearning [13]. Before this program, the authors approached the course design as “how can wepossibly consolidate all these topics to one course?” The course changed the authors’ narrative to“what do our students look like after they have completed our course? What can they do thatthey could not before taking our course?” From this crucial change in perspective, the authorsbegan to work backwards from a final project, build an
real-time feedback onhand-drawn free body diagrams for students. The system is driven by novel sketch recognitionalgorithms developed for recognizing and comparing trusses, general shapes, and arrows indiagrams. We have discovered students perform as well as paper homework or other onlinehomework systems which only check the final answer through deployment to five universities with450 students completing homework on the system over the 2018 and 2019 school years. Mechanixhas reduced the amount of manual grading required for instructors in those courses while ensuringstudents can correctly draw the free body diagram. Keywords: FBD, sketch, statics, dynamics, engineering education.IntroductionFree body diagrams are an integral part of
Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Paper ID #33574 AACSB. She also has served as the Chair of the ECE division of ASEE, the President of the Education Society of IEEE, and the chair of the Women in Engineering of IEEE. She served as the Treasurer and a Board of Directors member for WEPAN.Dr. Kerrie A. Douglas, Purdue University, West Lafayette Dr. Douglas is an Assistant Professor in the Purdue School of Engineering Education. Her research is focused on improving methods of assessment in large learning environments to foster high-quality learning opportunities. Additionally, she studies techniques to validate findings from
Disparity in STEM Disciplines: A Study of Faculty Attrition and Turnover Intentions,” Research in Higher Education, vol. 49, no. 7, pp. 607–624, Nov. 2008, doi: 10.1007/s11162-008-9097-4.[29] K. Buch, Y. Huet, A. Rorrer, and L. Roberson, “Removing the Barriers to Full Professor: A Mentoring Program for Associate Professors,” Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 38–45, Oct. 2011, doi: 10.1080/00091383.2011.618081.[30] C. Grant, J. Decuir-Gunby, and B. Smith, “Advance Peer Mentoring Summits For Underrepresented Minority Women Engineering Faculty,” in 117th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Louisville, KY, Jun. 2010, p. 15.129.1-15.129.20, Accessed: Jun. 29, 2016. [Online]. Available: https
Engineering students.Second, the Penn State College of Engineering strives to meet the national benchmark fordiversity in Engineering set by the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) byawarding baccalaureate Engineering degrees to at least 130 African American and Hispanicstudents annually. In 2013, Penn State awarded 74 baccalaureate Engineering degrees to raciallyunderrepresented students. Therefore, our long-term goal is to achieve a net gain of at least 56Engineering degrees to racially underrepresented undergraduates. If we can improve our junior-year retention for University Park racially underrepresented Engineering students from 43% to63% (net gain of 86 students, from Table 1: 429 x .63) and our junior-year retention forAbington
several years focusing on team dynamics for first-year students and also works as a research assistant in the Daly Design and Engineering Education Research Group working on design science based research in senior-level engineering design courses. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Student Designers’ Interactions with Users in Capstone Design Projects: A Comparison Across TeamsAbstractUsers play an important role in engineering design projects, from providing the basis for userrequirements to defining how designs will be used in practice. However, student designers oftenstruggle when interacting with users to elicit requirements or solicit design feedback. This
an intersectional lens, we gain deeper insight into engineering studentpopulations that may reveal potential opportunities and barriers to educational resources and experiencesthat are an important part of preparation for an engineering career.Background and Motivation Promoting social mobility is an emerging outcome of interest for higher education – both in thepopular media and from ranking such as U.S. News, which in 2018 added social mobility measures to itsBest Colleges and Universities methodology (https://www.usnews.com/best-colleges/rankings/national-universities/social-mobility). CollegeNET also introduced a Social Mobility Index for colleges in 2019(https://www.socialmobilityindex.org/). In order to promote social mobility
. Futures and fractures in higher education. New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2019.[32] S. Jaschik, “Grade Inflation, Higher and Higher,” Inside Higher Ed, March 29, 2016. Retrieved from https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2016/03/29/survey-finds-grade- inflation-continues-rise-four-year-colleges-not-community-college[33] C. Smith, “The Influence of hierarchy and layout geometry in the design of learning spaces.” Journal of Learning Spaces, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 59-67, 2017.[34] D. Riley, “Mindsets in Engineering,” in Engineering and Social Justice. Synthesis Lectures
several professional organizations including the American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE) and American Society of Chemical Engineering Education (ASEE) where she adopts and contributes to innovative pedagogical methods aimed at improving student learning and retention.Martin A. Watkins, University of New Mexico Martin A. Watkins is a PhD student in Educational Linguistics at the University of New Mexico. He earned his BA degrees in Deaf Studies (ASL/English Interpretation) and Linguistics from California State University, Northridge, and his MA degree in Linguistics from Gallaudet University. His research em- ploys critical ethnography and discourse analysis to investigate language ideologies and language plan