EducationCourse Grading and AssessmentDuring the 2001 and 2002 fall semesters, student evaluation and grading was done by solely theinstructor. Peer evaluation of group work was conducted using a paper-based form whichevaluated the contribution of other team members. Assessment included the standard NDSUStudent Rating of Instruction (SROI) form, as well as, an additional paper-based form, createdby the instructor which requested student feedback concerning the course delivery, perceivedstudent learning, and evaluation methods [3].During the 2003 Fall Semester, a different philosophy for student submissions was implemented.All student submissions (interim and final reports) would be conducted electronically throughthe use of student developed web pages
. Reinforce learning through peer interactions and discussions2. Provide relational learning experience across disciplinary topics3. Create a real world experience of cross-disciplinary working teams for studentsIntegration Process and the RoadmapThe integration process is diagrammed in Figure 1 and outlined below.1. Begin with faculty and students who understand the need for cross-disciplinary education to interaction and collaboration, which is industry driven.2. Integrate cross-disciplinary courses such as AQA and Polymer Processing.3. Define common class project as injection-molding using DOE.4. Design/develop a product and process for production, i.e., design/develop injection-molding to manufacture tensile specimens.5. Build the
long-term, on-line archives.The Internet is also a source of shopping, news, entertainment and many other diversions andconsequently most incoming students today are proficient in accessing on-line information, butnot necessarily in a professional capacity. The plethora of information available could be, at theleast, a distraction and can make it very difficult to find needed documentation.A new problem with accessing technical information on-line is that of assuring the quality andvalidity of the information obtained. Many of the reliable external mechanisms used byprofessionals over many years, such as peer-review and editorial oversight, are rarely used withInternet data sources. Professionals and students need to develop new techniques to
concerning a challenge; for example, through advanced computer-based simulations, students are able to vary parameters of a model and study the effects thatthese changes have on model performance; (5) Test Your Mettle provides a means of formativeassessment, allowing students to reflect on what they have learned thus far, and to identify anyweaknesses or misconceptions they still may have; and (6) Go Public encourages students toshare their thoughts and ideas with their peers and provides a summative assessment.HPL-inspired Course on Movement Biomechanics The senior author has previously developed and taught an undergraduate biomedicalengineering course titled “BME 342: Computational Biomechanics”. This course was designedto teach students
objective. In additionto the virtual instrumentation (data acquisition), each workstation was equipped with a digitaloscilloscope (Tektronix TDS 210), dual power supply (Agilent E3620A), digital multimeter(Fluke Model 45) and 2 MHz function generator (Leader LG 1301). To provide an ergonomicworkstation, the instrumentation was mounted on shelves on each side of the monitor (Figure 2).This arrangement also met the guidelines for the American Disabilities Act.Engineering Software. Software packages available for engineering design are readilyavailable and very useful in strengthening lecture material. The basic software for report writing(‘Microsoft Office Suite’) and data analysis (‘MatLab’, ‘TKSolver’, ‘StatMost’) was installed oneach workstation
Session 2160 Undergraduate Engineers Get Credit for Saving Venice Fabio Carrera1, David DiBiasio2, and Natalie A. Mello1 1 Interdiscipilinary and Global Studies Division 2 Department of Chemical Engineering Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA 01609IntroductionEngineering students, like their peers in other areas of study, enter college today with an openmind. They have hopes and dreams, fears and priorities . . . and when students begin theiruniversity career, their goals include
, teach each other, and learn from one another. It also has a social thread because thestudents have fun together and develop a commitment to the success of the community. An upperdivision student provides mentorship, leadership, and team building to the learning community.The version of this model implemented by Iowa State University and Monterrey Technical Institute(Mexico) involves a group of six to eight students from Monterrey Tech who study for a semester atIowa State with a group of six to eight Iowa State students. The entire group then moves toMonterrey Tech for the second semester.The experience to date has shown that students in leaning communities have an easieracclimation to a foreign culture. Peer acknowledgement, support, and
CIES, the OhioUniversity Fulbright Contact Person, and the Fulbrighters on campus were good sources forinformation, advice and critical review.The first review of the application is performed by a multidisciplinary peer review committee fromthe U.S. Criteria used to judge application include professional qualification, match of expertisewith needs of host institution, research design and methodology, and the ability to serve as acultural ambassador. In January the applications that were approved are sent to the bi-nationalcommission in the host county. This committee decides which of the approved applications will befunded. In my case there were four approved applications (three for the University of Namibia andmine for the Polytechnic) with
students were introduced to the modules, the first realintegration of the ILMs came in the fall of 2000. Students were asked to evaluate the modules andrespond to a survey (developed by the Evaluation Consortium of the University at Albany) in thefall of 2000, spring of 2001 and fall of 2001 sections. In addition, students were asked to write areport critiquing the modules and to offer suggestions for future development. The following is abrief description of how a number of the modules were used in the circuits classes at Rensselaerand UT-Dallas: Simple Resistive Circuits Lecture - The students were shown several examples using themodule to illustrate the principles of combining resistances in series and parallel. Students werethen given
of I vs. V and P vs. V are then constructed (by hand!).Experiment 5 - Electricity on Campus – A Walking Tour of Watt’s UpObjective: To become familiar with electrical distribution systems. Equipment: Feet (1 or 2), eyes,pencil or pen, pad or clipboard to write on, a curious mind. Description: The path taken by electrical Page 6.159.5energy, from the point where 3-phase power at 23 kV enters the campus, is then stepped down to 4.8 Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2001, American Society for Engineering EducationkV by a 5,000 kVA
; Exposition Copyright 2001, American Society for Engineering Educationclassroom, counting black tape markings along the way, dropping a “bomb” on a targetbelow the seventh mark, and returning to the beginning of the rope. Other challengingprojects, too numerous to list, are being used in this class. All of them have a similarbasis in creative problem solving applied to a physical device that is computer-controlled.The students in this course are required to write lesson plans for K-12 classes, journaltheir activities in the class, participate in the filed experiences with K-12 students andteachers, and, design and build robotic devices that meet the challenges laid before them.ConstructivismThe partnership among the Engineering College, the
, interpersonal development, community and college connections.Students reported working harder, being more curious, connecting learning to personalexperience, and demonstrated deeper understanding of subject matter. The quality ofplacements in the community and the degree of structured reflection were found to be importantin enhancing these positive effects, significantly so for critical thinking increases. They summedup effective service-learning principles in five C's: connection (students, peers, community,faculty; experience and analysis); continuity (all four years; reflection before, during, afterservice); context (messiness of community setting is integral to learning); challenge (to currentperspectives; not overwhelming); and coaching
connectionbetween students and the department. As a result of these activities, students indicates thatadministrators, faculty, and staff appeared more down to earth and more approachable thaninitially perceived.Students were charged with selecting several services, organizations, and facilities on campus toinvestigate. The students then interviewed someone in each area and prepared a report, whichwas later presented in class. The objectives of this assignment included:(1) Familiarizing themselves with university facilities, services, and organizations, (2) gettingacquainted with fellow students, (3) enhancing information management and writing skills, and(4) gaining self-awareness, self acceptance, and self-growth. The objectives were intended toconnect
solution in the presence of friction then modified theproblem. The friction model used could also be changed to show the effects of drag forcemore clearly. Students could then be asked to check their results against simulations providedby WM. This approach of relating simple problems to harder ones by using graphs andsimulations help illustrate the general principles that are at work. Students tend to think oftopics as more connected instead of compartmentalizing their physics knowledge in terms ofchapters in their text.One of the authors (MMS) encouraged the students in his class to submit a proposal for anexperiment of their own. The idea is that the students have to write a detailed report wherethey start out by explaining the principle they
learning methods, along with actual techniques and procedures. Performance Criteria: Conduct annual workshops and provide other opportunities that arefocused on 2nd year and more senior faculty members. Data Collection Method: Document workshops and opportunities, conduct after actionreviews, peer assessments. Goal 4: Promote an evolving curriculum development process that enhances achievingthe curriculum development portion of the Teaching and Learning Initiative vision. Objective: Learn more about curriculum design. Integrate and sequence curriculumdesign with the faculty development process. Performance Criteria: Conduct curriculum design workshops to educate faculty members.Maximize opportunities to improve
focuses oncommunications issues such as writing styles, written and oral communication within the groupand to others outside the group. Group organization and project management are also coveredduring this week. The next two weeks focus on small case studies in order to emphasizeproblem-solving strategies, group dynamics, and to practice written and oral communication. Page 7.96.5 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2002, American Society for Engineering EducationOf course, students should bring many of these skills to the course, but
students identify competing design project opportunities. Asthe individual students interact, design teams are formed and the teams generate white papers to insurethey fully understand the objectives and constraints of the potential project sponsor. A formal technicalproposal is then generated which contains the detailed planning the team has done in preparation for theproject. Finally, the teams create a web presence for their project so that access to pertinentinformation is available to all stakeholders. The third major objective is to expose the students toimportant areas of information that are not possible to include in the other technically-orientedcoursework. Topics such as business etiquette, resume writing, and compensation packages
an ever lighter human footprint onthe earth."Writing in The New York Times, Jay Parini endowed Orr, chair of theEnvironmental Studies Program, with the apt appellation "environmental guru."Orr led more than 250 students, faculty, and town residents in discussions withnational ecological designers during the building's initial design phase three yearsago. He also raised most of the funds for the project.For Oberlin, that knowledge has resulted in a 14,000-square-foot, $6.6 million,self-sustaining structure of classrooms, laboratories, and surrounding gardens.More than a building where teaching takes place, the Lewis Center is a place thatteaches. By virtue of the building's design concepts, students learn ecologicalcompetence and mindfulness
required writing a computer program or using a software package to solveproblems and performing a cost analysis were posted in this section. The Send E-mail and Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2001, American Society for Engineering EducationStudent Roster tools under Communication were very useful. The author could send e-mail to allstudents with a click of a button reminding them of guest lectures or ensuing tests. Many of ourmajors work full time and attend classes only in the evening and they found these remindershelpful. Also, we wanted full attendance for our guest speakers particularly when one of themwas enrolled in Fluid Power. This
stated that getting to know the campus and eachother was very helpful, as well as the math and science course reviews. When asked whatadditional services they would like to see in the future, the respondents suggested even moretime to interact with each other socially, a full campus tour, time management training, and morespecific information on individual majors and courses. The participants did not list any programitems that should be eliminated.WISE Services:In the section of the survey pertaining to the WISE services provided for entering studentsoutside of the Summer Bridge, all of the students reported having used at least one of thefollowing services: seminar series, peer advising, meeting space, computer labs, or mentoringprogramming
23 x x x 24 x 25 Page 7.338.8Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2002, American Society for Engineering Education Table 4. Approaches to success skills training used in programs HowRef. Computer Team Test- Diversity to Time Conflict # Seminar skills skills Writing Speaking Studying taking training learn management resolution 1
, ajoint engineering and architecture course was organized with half undergraduateengineers and half architects to complete the detailed design drawings of the Page 7.1102.4house. Currently, in Spring 2002, the construction phase of the project hasbegun with the cooperation of architects, engineers, and c onstructionprofessionalsThe Undergraduate ThesisIn engineering, the senior thesis provides a mechanism for the requiredinterdisciplinary collaboration. Engineering students at the University of Virginiaare required to write an undergraduate thesi s; this thesis is directed by theDivision of Technology, Culture and Communication through two core courses:TCC
problem. · Provide an opportunity to apply basic knowledge in addition to what is learned in the course to solve an engineering problem. · Learn to design and conduct experiments, as well as analyze and interpret data. · Provide an opportunity to function on multi-disciplinary teams, which requires communication with team members and to learn professional and ethical responsibility.In order to select a design project for a course, the course objectives must be clearly defined.Advanced mechanics of materials students will be able to: · develop models of mechanical components by making reasonable assumptions and writing appropriate equations, · apply appropriate failure criteria, · formulate a design methodology.For
in practice. Knowledge retrieval andcodification emphasizes technology and treats knowledge as a tangible thing, while mostknowledge is acquired through experience and is often intangible and tacit. “Knowledgemanagement systems rarely reflect the fact that essential knowledge, including technicalknowledge, is often transferred between people by stories, gossip, and by watching one anotherwork. This is a process in which social interaction is often crucial.”(p. 18) A study by the Centerfor Workforce Development found that 70% of workplace learning is informal. Activities inwhich informal learning occurs include participating in meetings, interacting with customers,supervising or being supervised, mentoring others, communicating with peers
of product designprocesses and provide them with much needed hands-on experience.A hands-on cognitive apprenticeship-type training approach will be used to effectively deliverthe training material. In conventional schooling, the “practice” of problem solving, readingcomprehension and writing is not at all obvious and the thinking processes are often invisible toboth students and teachers. It is very difficult to understand the logic of programming; howeverpeople in general understand better when they see a program that makes a motor turn and asensor to react. This cognitive apprenticeship training makes the process of thinking visible21-22.Six courses in the three programs will be modified: MECH 2335 – Advanced Dynamics andKinematics, MECH
: We expanded on the instructors’ self-evaluation such that more direct assessment of students’ learning outcomes is obtained. A set of standards for instructor’s self- evaluation will be prepared by the faculty and the Board of Advisors and will be implemented with the annual assessment cycle. The main point of these standards is that the evaluation of students’ performance will based on samples of work in three categories of students: those in the upper 75 percentile, those in the 50 – 75 percentile and those below the 50 percentile populations. Thus the assessment results compiled are based on course performances and grades, exams, projects, presentations of students, and writings as required
of work 0.499. My motivation for teaching science is to promote an enjoyment of learning 0.5210. I believe DET should be integrated into the K-12 curriculum 0.5311. I am interested in learning more about DET though workshops 0.6812. I am interested in learning more about DET through college courses 0.3413. In a science curriculum, it is important to include the use of engineering in developing 0.48 new technologies14. I am interested to learning more about DET through peer training 0.5415. My motivation for teaching science is to help students develop an
twice per week basis. Thecourse modules developed for the SSED course are Introduction, Teamwork, Project Life Cycle,Scope and Concept of Operations, System Architecture, System Hierarchy and Work BreakdownStructure, Analytical Hierarchy Process, Requirements–Basics, Requirements–Writing,Requirements-Configuration and CM, Functional Analysis, System Synthesis, Design,Interfaces, Margins, Technical Performance Measures, Cost, Risk, Technology, Trade Studies,Reliability, Verification, Technical Reviews, Schedule, Management, and Ethics. All modulesare available to the students on the course website and remain available to them in the capstonedesign course.Space Systems Laboratory (SSL) The SSL is a one semester-credit-hour laboratory course
. R.C. Wilson, J.G. Gaff, E.R. Dienst, L. Wood, and J.L. Barry, College Professors and Their Impact upon Students. New York: Wiley, 1975. 4. R.M. Felder, D.R. Woods, J.E. Stice, and A. Rugarcia, “The Future of Engineering Education: Teaching Methods That Work.” Chemical Engineering Education 34(1), 26-39 (2000). 5. R.M. Felder and L.K. Silverman, “Learning and Teaching Styles in Engineering Education.” Engineering Education, 78(7), 674-681 (1988). 6. N.E. Gronlund, How to Write and Use Instructional Objectives, 6th Ed. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, 2000. 7. J.M. Haile, “Toward Technical Understanding.” (i) “Part 1. Brain Structure and Function.” Chem. Engr. Education, 31(3), 152
assemble their speakers and AM receivers. The only restrictionwas that they could not use components of an existing speaker or receiver (and eachgroup was given a diode). The student projects within this module were graded via peerevaluations. Each group received a peer evaluation of its speaker and receivercombination, with the each evaluation scoring both the functional quality and thecreativity of each artifact.Embedded computingThe second module introduced students to embedded computing using the Arduino15(UNO) microcontroller. Within this module, students were given a brief introduction tothe general area of embedded computing, followed by several well-defined tasks toperform using the Arudiuno controller. These introductory tasks were