with making science more relevant to studentsTable 5. Gains towards Project Goals and ObjectivesGoals and Objectives Gains ThemesProduce scientists, engineers, science -Valuable teaching experienceand math educators -Professional development -Personal developmentFellows realize connections between -Networking opportunitieseducation, research and professional -Value goal setting in professional developmentexperience and relate to career success -Relate teaching to career options -Realize connections between learning and practice
responsibility and deference to authority, and too many sidelinecommitments such as girlfriends/boyfriends and part-time jobs (to pay for their expensiveautomobiles and insurance) all increase the challenge of succeeding in college. Professorsare aware of the needs for rigor and excellence in the classroom and sensitivity to theabove factors that compromise such. Experienced faculty have already come toequilibrium in balancing standards versus sensitivity, and rigor versus rapport. However,NEE often have difficulty in establishing equilibrium and may start their teaching career aseither too easy and casual, or too hard and hard-line. Some will go through a series ofunder damped oscillations (flip-flops) between these extremes before reachingequilibrium
Communities (http://ceae.colorado.edu/EDC/). The goal ofthe program is to educate globally responsible students who can offer sustainable andappropriate technology solutions to the endemic problems faced by developingcommunities worldwide. The program is designed to serve as a blueprint for theeducation of engineers of the 21st century who are called to play a critical role incontributing to peace and security in an increasingly challenged world.The training that we will provide students will lead to a Bachelor of Science inEngineering, with a minor in Humanitarian Engineering. We anticipate that, even ifgraduates with these credentials do not spend their whole careers in humanitarianengineering endeavors, their multi-faceted expertise and
AC 2011-2141: GOLDSHIRT TRANSITIONAL PROGRAM: FIRST-YEARRESULTS AND LESSONS LEARNED ON CREATING ENGINEERINGCAPACITY AND EXPANDING DIVERSITYTanya D Ennis, University of Colorado Boulder TANYA D. ENNIS is the current Engineering GoldShirt Program Director at the University of Colorado Boulder’s College of Engineering and Applied Science. She received her M.S. in Computer Engineering from the University of Southern California in Los Angeles and her B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Southern University in Baton Rouge, Louisiana. Her career in the telecommunications industry included positions in software and systems engineering and technical project management. Tanya most recently taught mathematics at the Denver
connectengineering education organizations in different parts of the world is also made available.A 2010 two week course to the Netherlands and the United Kingdom presents a case study thatshowcases the introduction to concepts present in differing academic and professional cultures.The theme of “Learning to Live with Floods” provided students experience to cutting-edge floodmanagement and modeling techniques. This exposure enhanced students’ academic goals in afashion that would be impossible during the course of typical engineering curricula. The widevariety of lectures, presentations, and field trips are provided in a context that serves to acclimatestudents to a career that is increasingly likely to be multicultural and global. Surveys that
AC 2012-5477: PORTFOLIOS TO PROFESSORIATE: HELPING STUDENTSINTEGRATE PROFESSIONAL IDENTITIES THROUGH EPORTFOLIOSDr. Lisa D. McNair, Virginia Tech Lisa McNair is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where she also serves as Assistant Department Head for Graduate Programs and co-directs the Virginia Tech Engineering Communication Center. Her research includes interdisciplinary collaboration, com- munication studies, identity theory, and reflective practice. Projects supported by the National Science Foundation include: interdisciplinary pedagogy for pervasive computing design; writing across the cur- riculum in statics courses; a a CAREER award to explore the use of e
synthesizing a team solution Professional - Prepare students for successful careers and lifelong learning development and - Provide a basic innovation background to ensure the ability to effectively compete in preparation a changing career landscape in areas driven by innovation - Acquire management, communication and team skills that prepare students for industry - Network with employers through career fairs and company tours, and turn internships into full-time jobs at large and small software firms - Develop tools and confidence to create one’s own opportunities, and to
student experiences, computing education, fostering mastery-based learning mindsets, and assessments. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 (Re)visions: Approaches to Teaching Technical Communications and Professional Development in a Multidisciplinary Engineering Capstone Course1. IntroductionIntegrating writing pedagogy-based practices and instruction into capstone curriculumdemonstrates the interconnectedness of the disciplines. While engineering programs and alumniof those programs report a need for technical and professional communication skills as part oftheir career success [1]. Success in their careers will depend on their ability to
referred to as Homefront Factor studies, local institution communitymile linkages, out of state community outreach and our preparation of in-person Saturday academy thatincludes a series of weekly hands-on activities. Students have been engaged in a variety of "hands-on,minds-on" STEAM activities that are aligned to the National Math, Science, and Technology standardsand learn about different Nuclear Energy University Program (NEUP) careers in STEAM as they delve intoeach grade level project.Key Words: Supporting Strategic Training of Adaptable and Integrated Nuclear Workforce (SUSTAIN);Nuclear Energy University Program (NEUP); Local Institution Community Linkages and Outreach;Pipeline Development; Family Forum Café; Historically Black College
Paper ID #42586Engagement in Practice: A Road Map for Academia and Non-Profit CollaborationKerrie Danielle Hooper, Florida International University Kerrie Hooper is currently an Engineering and Computing Education Ph.D. student at Florida International University. She obtained her Bachelor of Science in Computer Science from the University of Guyana in 2019 and then worked for two years in the industry as a Data Analyst & Systems Administrator, before pursuing her doctoral degree. Her research interests are in AI ethics, responsible technology in education, women’s careers in computing, and arts-based approach to STEM
informed by established theoretical frameworks and previousresearch to ensure a comprehensive assessment of students' understanding and attitudes. Section 1: Knowledge Assessment (S1) This section employed a series of multiple-choice questions aimed at assessing students'foundational understanding of renewable energy and environmental protection concepts. Thequestions were consistent across the pre- and post-survey phases, with slight modifications inphrasing or numerical values where applicable to maintain the integrity of the evaluation and allowfor a direct comparison of knowledge acquisition (Anthony, 1996; Cattaneo, 2017; Grabinger &Dunlap, 1995). Sections 2-5: Attitudes, Behaviors, Career Decisions, and Abilities These
featuring partnership acrossthree urban universities to develop effective interventions, in combination with financial support,for improving academic outcomes for engineering students. The Urban STEM project wasdesigned to address challenges faced at the three urban institutions collaborating for the project,and in particular the need for many of the engineering students to work a significant number ofhours each week, resulting in them taking fewer course hours each semester and beingdisconnected from their peers, faculty, and campus. These factors are especially concerning forstudents who are underrepresented in engineering majors, as they already leave engineeringmajors and careers at higher rates. Thus, the Urban STEM Collaboratory was designed
community.IntroductionEngineering Technology programs, including both two year and four year tracks, continue togrow. Engineering and Engineering Technology by the Numbers [3] published that there were14,312 degrees awarded in the year 2019 alone. These degrees come from 111 institutions thatgrant Engineering Technology degrees [3]. Despite the considerable number of degrees awardedin Engineering Technology disciplines, there is little research conducted on the experiences ofEngineering Technology students.Like Engineering Science degree earners, Engineering Technology students may test forprofessional engineering licensure in 35 states. Although the procedures in testing for a licensemay vary, Engineering Technology graduates may pursue careers as professional engineers
Post University.Dr. Buket D. Barkana, The University of Akron Dr. Barkana is the Margaret F. Donovan Chair for Women in Engineering and associate professor of Biomedical Engineering at The University of Akron (UA) since 2023. She received her B.Sc. in electrical and electronics engineering from the Anadolu University in 1994 and her M.Sc. and Ph.D. from the Eskisehir Osmangazi University (ESOGU), Turkey in 1997 and 2005, respectively. Before UA, she was a professor of Electrical Engineering at the University of Bridgeport between 2007 and 2023, a faculty member at Anadolu University between 1995 and 1999, and at the ESOGU from 1999 to 2001 in Turkey. Throughout her career, she has developed and taught undergraduate
. His research interests include graduate student mentorship, faculty development, mental health and well-being, teamwork and group dynamics, and the design of project-based learning classes.Dr. Karin Jensen, University of Michigan Karin Jensen, Ph.D. (she/her) is an assistant professor in biomedical engineering and engineering education research at the University of Michigan. Her research interests include mental health and wellness, engineering student career pathways, and engagement of engineering faculty in engineering education research. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Work in Progress: Design and Preliminary Results of a Survey to Explore Relationships
apowerful tool to develop our future workforce, presenting evidence of enriched skillsets,increased confidence, and a broader perspective on engineering's societal role in the case of onestudent. In particularly, a case study examines the research experience of an UCAREundergraduate researcher showing her technical skills’ gain and confidence to conduct researchand her reflection on the motivator factors (female role model and sustainability topic) andimpacts of this experience on her heir career trajectory. The UCARE student worked on a projectfor 3 months on the topic of using rural area waste materials for sustainable infrastructure underthe supervision of a faculty mentor. Through this apprenticeship-style URE [11], the student andher advisor
engineers who worked on the SE3 committee, I heard similar reports about how theirfirms viewed this committee work relative to work on technical committees (like the SeismologyCommittee or the Existing Building Committee), which work to develop codes, standards, ormitigation strategies using the latest developments in research. While those involved in SE3noted the benefits that their involvement had to the career, they were not necessarily recognizedin terms of advancement in their firms for this work.Various interlocutors let me know that their work heading SE3 was valuable in terms of makingconnections with others and the work was well-regarded among others in the professionalorganization that shared the values of diversity, equity, and inclusion
-long learning; • A knowledge of contemporary issues.It is this second set of outcomes that creates the foundation for this paper. These skills have beencontroversial within the engineering community. Some individuals look at this as interference to "Proceedings of the 2005 Midwest Section Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education" 2our main purpose of teaching the hard skills. Others see them as a very necessary part ofpreparing our students for future career needs. In this paper, I will look at some of the literature that establishes the context
how the protégés and the mentors were selected. Theprotégés were selected simply by asking all new, untenured faculty memberswithin the College of Engineering if they would like to participate. All nine newfaculty agreed to participate. The potential mentors were recruited by askingmany tenured and promoted faculty who were considered strong scholars bothinside and outside the college. Many faculty were invited outside the college whowere active in research in their fields. The faculty were invited to lunch meetingwhere the program was described. The meeting provided an overview of theprogram which included a stipend and a free lunch each month. More importantly,the faculty were encouraged to participate as it will focus their career
: Construction Terminology and Accreditation, Ethical Dilemmas, Resume and Career Plan, Engineering and Tech Expo (visit and summary paper), Professional & Trade Organizations, and Guest Speakers.MethodologyThe basic methodology for the development and delivery of the revised CM&E 111 is presentedbelow. The author attended the ACCE2 Mid-Year Meeting held in Phoenix (February 2012) to discuss first-year construction management courses with construction management program directors at the Baccalaureate Program Chairs Meeting. Approximately forty- five (45) ACCE accredited schools were represented at this meeting. The program chairs approved a request for a survey to collect first-year construction management course
composition and undergraduate majorsindicates that there is some positive correlation between the number of female students and thenumber of women faculty in any given department. For example, Canes and Rosen8 compareenrollment and employment data from 1973-1989 at Princeton, the University of Michigan, andWhittier College. Although unable to show a causal relationship between the gendercomposition of the faculty and undergraduate science and engineering majors, they stress theimportance of having women on the faculty to increase diversity in science and engineeringdisciplines since the “role-model concept” will “encourage female students to pursue careers inscience and engineering by providing greater visibility for women scientists and engineers
reviewed and considered efforts toredesign first-year engineering experiences at colleges and universities across the country andidentified skills that would better prepare first-year students for success in their future coursesand careers. A major recommendation was the adoption of a new two-course sequence for first-year students. This sequence will replace the current one-unit introductory seminar course forfirst-year engineering and computer science students.A backward design process — that began with student learning outcomes and produced contentand assignments that would support these outcomes — was used by a subsequent summerworking group to develop plans for the two-course sequence. This backward course design wasfacilitated using the TiLT
funding with smaller social science research grants. This compromise isboth pragmatic and unsustainable. Social science grants are considerably smaller than those inengineering, even without industry funding. This makes it difficult to build a research group thatcentres engineering culture as a topic of inquiry. If we really care about equity and social justicein engineering, we need to identify institutional strategies to fill the resource gap withoutdepending on corporate fundraising by individual faculty members.Lesson 4: Rapid-fire collective coding privileges experts over novices and practice over theoryIn 2019, I led a team of engineers and social scientists through the analysis of 29 career historyinterviews. After reading all 29
Women in Science & Engineering Speaker: A post-doctoral researcher in organic chemistry, Oct. 4 Transfer Agreement Guarantee (TAG) Workshop, Sept. 22, Sept 1, August 24 Student Panel – Student to Student: Experiences in Summer Internships, Sept. 9 Industry Speaker – Career Path from MESA to a Job! A professional Civil Engineer who works as a Transportation Engineer for the City of Menlo Park and also owns a consulting company, Sept. 2 Financial Aid – FAFSA Help – every Tuesday the Financial Aid Office helps students complete Free Application for Federal Student Aid (FAFSA), Weekly The Guaranteed 4.0 Workshop, Mar. 21-22 Proceedings of the 2011 PSW American Society
AC 2010-1957: DESTINATION UNKNOWN: GENDER DIFFERENCES INATTRITION FROM GRADUATE STUDY IN ENGINEERINGLisa Frehill, Self employed consultant Lisa Frehill is an evaluation consultant with more than a decade of experience evaluating educational programs. She earned her PhD at the University of Arizona in 1993, after which she was on the sociology faculty at New Mexico State University and then the PI for New Mexico State University’s ADVANCE: Institutional Transformation award. Current projects focus on: engineering workforce; gender and ethnic issues in access to STEM careers; and women’s international participation and collaboration in STEM.Amanda Lain, Freelance Consultant has an MA in
wasused in two of the tasks to provide both qualitative and quantitative data. Eye tracking is aninnovative method that is increasingly being used in the field of human-computer interaction forusability studies, as it can provide useful insight into the cognitive aspect of the users. Based onthe data analysis, a significant improvement was noticed in users interest after using RDS.Statistical analysis showed significant increase in career interest in science followed closely byenjoyment. Results from the analysis on learning outcomes suggest the RDS was perceived tohave high real world applicability. Results also showed an increase in knowledge gained afterusing the system. The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) constructs such as perceived easeof
Professor and was promoted to Associate Professor in 2005 and to Professor in 2009. Kono is a Fellow of the American Physical Society and was a recipient of the CAREER Award of the National Science Foundation. His current research interests include optical studies of low-dimensional systems; non-equilibrium many-body and cooperative dynamics; strong-field physics in solids; and terahertz phenomena in semiconductors.Mr. Shane M Curtis, University of Tulsa Page 20.42.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Impact on Student Learning: A Comparison of International and
reflection on both the content learned and the learning process.Problem based learning (PBL) is one effective model that is based on constructivist principles.Also called activity-based learning, PBL involves engaging the learner in an activity patternedfrom an authentic task that would be performed by a competent practitioner in the field in whichthe learner will eventually find a career position.Authentic Learning Tasks Developed by the NCE/AMEIn the work of the NCE/AME, the problem is called an authentic learning task or ALT. TheALT is designed to provide an experience in which the learner can acquire a few specificcompetencies through a process of discovery, experimentation, and generalization. A set ofALTs is combined in an instructional
diverse interests and talents. Throughout his academic journey, Kevin has been recognized for his outstanding achievements. He has consistently been named to the Dean’s List at GMU, an impressive feat accomplished in 7 out of 9 semesters. His commitment to excellence in engineering has also been affirmed through his certifica- tions as an Autodesk Certified User in both AutoCAD and Inventor. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Paper ID #40672 One notable highlight of Kevin’s academic career was his presentation of his first independent research paper on bias in generative
, Ureta & Equils, 2020; Jackson,Mohr-Schroeder, Bush, Maiorca, Roberts,Yost & Fowler, 2021). The interrelated external andintrinsic factors that guide a student to or away from developing an interest in STEM careers areimpacted by numerous facets of the student’s identity and life as well as deeply rooted cultural,racial and gender stereotypes centered around STEM and who is believed to have the potential tobe successful in a STEM field (Allen, 2022; Bryn & Allexsaht-Snider, 2008; Farinde & Lewis,2012; Killpack & Melon, 2016; Tytler, 2014).Teachers play a significant role in helping students develop an awareness of and interest indifferent career opportunities (Maltese, Melki & Wiebke, 2014; Vedder-Weiss & Fortus, 2012