collected through these tools to improve the class experience. Figure 1. Screenshots for “PrimeBot” and “WebDeveloperBot”The instructor made adaptations to his course along the way to better support students’ use ofgenerative AI and also demonstrated that he was tinkering with generative AI along with thestudents. For example, after the second session of the course, the instructor found that thestudents were asking many questions regarding the syllabus in “GeneralBot”. However, because“GeneralBot” was the same as ChatGPT and the syllabus was not included in the training data,“GeneralBot” was unable to provide students with answers. Seeing this phenomenon, theinstructor and the team created “SyllabusBot” and introduced it in the next
Paper ID #29904Improving student accessibility, equity, course performance, and labskills: How introduction of ClassTranscribe is changing engineeringeducation at the University of IllinoisProf. Lawrence Angrave, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Lawrence Angrave is an award winning Fellow and Teaching Professor at the department of computer sci- ence at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (UIUC). His interests include (but are not limited to) joyful teaching, empirically-sound educational research, campus and online courses, computer sci- ence, unlocking the potential of underrepresented minorities
2022 semester? - Which can be examined by comparing pre and post program global competence scores of students taking the Spring and Fall AY2022 courses.2. Does including ‘Science and Religion in Japan’ in an engineering education curriculum help students gain flexibility, an appreciation of equity, and a greater richness of ideas? - These aspects are required if students are to become ‘global engineers’.3. Are their expected learning outcomes being achieved, or are there any unexpected by- products gained from this course?Achieving expected learning outcomes1. The class contents Table 1 shows the course syllabus for the AY2022 ‘Science and Religion in Japan’.Students will explore the process of transformation that religious
other communication avenues to share announcements and opportunities.The event concluded with a discussion on topics that also constituted post-event assignments,including registering and preparing for both the career exploration symposium and themultidisciplinary introductory course (vide infra). Finally, trainees were given time to take ananonymous survey designed to evaluate the onboarding and orientation session.The fact that this session had to be held online due to COVID-19 made possible for the event tobe both broadcast and recorded. This enabled the remote synchronous attendance of internationaltrainees that had not yet traveled to the United States to begin their graduate studies due to thetravel restrictions related to the pandemic
most content-heavy courses in a traditional Mechanical Engineeringcurriculum by including many Active Learning teaching and learning techniques. In this practice-based research project, the authors attempted to answer the following questions: 1) Could thestudents learn the breadth and depth of the content via Active Learning, 2) How do the studentsvalue the Active Learning experience as compared to a traditional approach and 3) Is the facultyexperience such that it would motivate them to use Active Learning techniques in the future? Inorder to answer these questions, the course was redesigned to eliminate traditional lecturing andthe solving of example problems by the instructor. Instead example problems are placed online tobe reviewed by the
in 2007 and Ph.D. degree from the same department and same university in 2013. Her research interest includes Material behavior under Impact loading, Design and fabrication of high strain rate testing facility, Engineering Education and Engineering Design c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 NOT Reinventing the Wheel: Product Data Management (PDM) Software Utilized as a Feedback System for Students in an Introductory Engineering Graphics CourseAbstractThis work in progress describes the application of a PDM solution to an introductory engineeringgraphics (IEG) course. PDM is one of many tools that our students will most likely encounter intheir
students ina lecture format using the transparencies of the notes developed for the course. It is intended toalso offer this course to online distance students in the near future; currently, the on-campusversion of the course is web-based using the course management software, Prometheus. Thecourse web site has the follow sections: Syllabus, Grade Book, Files, Messages, Discussions, andUtilities. The use of the discussion forums in Prometheus fosters additional student-to-studentand student-to-instructor interactions outside of the classroom environment. The detailed courseoutline, and the percentage of time spent on each topic is shown below:1. Introduction to structural loading and load combinations (5 %)2. Dead loads; tributary width and
university studenthonor code stated on the course syllabus regarding cheating. We plan to account for this in future study by requiringstudents to sign a declaration of complete academic integrity prior to taking the examination with their study sheets. In conclusion, this study illuminates the intricate connection between students’ self-generated study materialsand their performance in examinations by exploring the impact of study sheets on students’ performance. While thisstudy could not establish the direct relationship between the quality of the study sheet with the students’performance, the study reveals that student's preparation and use of study sheets does not negatively affect theirperformance. The authors intend to conduct a future
opportunities for current students, and toopen up the pool of possible students interested in this field. Expanding educational opportunitiesby developing online delivery of wind energy graduate courses is one strategy to address muchneeded diversity in the field. Building upon the literature of previous successful consortiumdevelopment, a new replicable model for setting up a consortium was created, called the Rapidmodel, with the name reflecting the goal to implement a new consortium within one year.Researchers conducted a study to determine the effectiveness of the model, through observingprogram meetings, interviewing faculty, staff and administrators engaged in the consortiumdevelopment work, and examining course sharing outcomes. Researchers
at UMES which provides specialization options to the students in thetraditional areas of electrical, mechanical, aerospace, and computer engineering. The course isoffered to engineering juniors and draws upon pre-requisite knowledge of computer programming,electrical, and mechanical engineering fundamentals of a spirally bound curriculum [7] with abroad emphasis. Interested readers can visit the URL Instrumentation Course Syllabus Fall 2021to peruse the course outline. The course provides an overview of sensors and instrumentation andthe critical role it plays in characterizing physical phenomena and process monitoring as well asfeedback control. Fundamentals of electricity (DC and AC) and electronics as well as engineeringmechanics and
return bonus.After the first year, at least one instructor returned each year, mentoring new instructors.Planning ProcessInstructors are coached to use a backward design process in the course design process. First,instructors identify learning outcomes for the class as a team and then break these down intoindividual learning outcomes for each subdiscipline/instructor. Next, instructors research andselect assessment methods, including formative and summative assessment strategies for theoverall course and individual instructors. Then, instructors develop methods for grading andproviding feedback before developing learning activities and associated grading aids.Along the way, instructors develop the syllabus, rubrics, lesson plans, and online
undergraduate seniors, the students were primarily familiar with traditional pedagogies –receiving new material in class and working on a homework out of class. To set conditions forimplementing the three pedagogies examined in this study, students were made aware of thecourse design via a two-page description in the syllabus, a question on the first homeworkassignment asking the students to describe the course in their own words, and through repeatedverbal reminders by the instructor throughout the semester.Problem-Based LearningTwo versions of problem-based learning were implemented in the course – daily homeworkproblems, and large real-world problems.Homework ProblemsHomework problems are not typically thought of as problem-based learning; however
Paper ID #44618Incorporating Sustainability Concepts into the Course Design of FluidMechanics: An Approach to Improving Students’ Problem-Solving Skillswith Environment ScienceYingxiao Song, Muskingum University Assistant Professor in Physics and Engineering Department of Muskingum University ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Incorporating Sustainability Concepts into the Course Design of FluidMechanics: An Approach to Improving Students’ Problem-Solving Skills with Environment Science Yingxiao Song
presentationsimpacts student’s engagement within an online class context, to gain insight for developingan efficient methodology which may enhance learning outcomes within our digital flexibleeducation model.MethodologyDuring this research, a quasi – experimental study was performed within 51 first – yearengineering students sampled by convenience. The students where enrolled in aMathematics course at Fall 2021, which included differential and integral calculus. Theywere segmented in two groups: an experimental group and a control group. Due to ourUniversity’s enrollment process, researchers had no control on the selection of students forthe experimental and control groups, however, the characteristics of all students weresimilar, in terms of academic
systematic application of inclusive teaching standards(called I-Standards) in our curriculum. The I- Standards were inspired by the approach andformat of Quality Matters, the certification system for online courses, which is adopted at theuniversity for all online classes and is supported by the university teaching center [6]. Theywere developed by a team of faculty by integrating principles of Universal Design forLearning [7], evidenced-based inclusive teaching practices and a comprehensive suite ofstudent support structures anchored by the strength-based approach. The I-standards are usedas a guide to organize the activities of the I-team, a team of instructors who attend a series ofworkshops and work together to redesign their courses.Research
course project (40%). Course projectsrequired student teams to propose a solution to an engineering problem. Specific engineeringproblems were initially identified by student teams and project work typically occurred duringlab periods or outside of class.3.2 Input from Project-Based-Learning Faculty CohortFive faculty from Civil and Environmental Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, ComputerScience, Mathematics, and Statistics attended the Worcester Polytechnical Institute workshop onProject Based Learning in June 2019 [9]. In this institute, faculty learned the benefits of project-based approaches and strategies for developing and scaffolding interdisciplinary projects. Thisfaculty cohort drafted the first syllabus and outcomes for the course
were, instead, placed on 2 CDs. The CDs are bundled with the textbook.Students are required to view the lecture segments prior to coming to laboratory. As thelectures are segmented into small time segments, students need not commit more than 10-15 minutes to view a lecture segment. Students also may load the problems discussed inclass in their solid modeling system: SolidWorks. Thus, as shown in Figure 1 below,students can view the lecture and examine the actual solid model together.Figure 1: Video Lecture and Accompanying SolidWorks Part from Course CD Students can access their course syllabus within the EG&CAD web pages. As there are avariety of potential solid models available for each laboratory session, students fromdifferent sections
Management – Project, Budget & Personnel Management; ReportingMar. 25 Written Communication – Peer reviewMar. 30 Research Proposal Workday: Peer ReviewApr. 1 Oral Communication – Oral presentationsApr. 6 Oral Communication – Poster presentationsApr. 15 Research Proposal Workday: Class PresentationsApr. 20 Research Proposal Workday: Class PresentationsApr. 22 ResearchApr. 27 EthicsApr. 29 MentoringMay 4 Final exam2.2. Interdisciplinary research proposal and projectAs is mentioned in the syllabus included in the preceding section, students taking the transferableskills course form several multi-departmental and interdisciplinary teams. These teams arecharged with preparing
focuses on model-based reasoning and conservation principles (mass, energy, etc.). An NSF grant funded courserelease time for instructors and support from learning scientists in order to integrate inclusiveengineering skills into the course design.The course redesign team chose to focus on the awareness of bias and its effects on technicalmodeling. An additional goal was building interpersonal skills at the dyad and team (2-4 people)level, although this second goal is not the focus of this paper. Both goals were incorporated intothe formal syllabus and course objectives. The new learning objectives are addressed not inseparate lectures about inclusivity, etc. but via changes to the context of the analytical problemsbeing solved. For instance, a
. Assistant, “Stress and Anxiety Among First Year and Final Year Engineering Students,” International Journal of Advanced Research in Education & Technology (IJARET), vol. 17, no. 4, 2016, [Online]. Available: www.ijaret.com[22] R. A. Streveler, K. A. Smith, and M. Pilotte, “Aligning Course Content, Assessment, and Delivery,” in Outcome-Based Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education, Hershey, PA: IGI Global, 2012, pp. 1–26. doi: 10.4018/978-1-4666-1809-1.ch001.[23] S. P. Brophy, “Developing Flexibly Adaptive Skills through Progressive Design Challenges,” in ASEE 123rd Annual Conference and Exposition, 2016.[24] NASA, “NASA Engineering Design Challenges,” 2008. Accessed: Feb. 09, 2023. [Online
“Tailored Instruction and EngineeringDelivery Using PROTOCOLs” (TIED UP). In ‘tailored instruction’, the course syllabus will bere-organized into an integrated modular concept format where complex engineering conceptswill be presented as networked sub concepts in a web interface, creating a virtual neural space.Each of these networked concepts and sub-concepts will be further linked to several learningtools such as animations, short concept lecture videos (4-6 minute duration) and mandatedstudent activities that are designed leveraging latest insights from established theories of neuroand cognitive science with the help of a number of PROTOCOLs. PROTOCOLs are systematicbrain based learning principles to be followed while delivering a new concept
materials and students’homework. This allowed modification to the PD content and instruction targeted to fit the needsof current students and changes in course objectives.The list of task underwent by the PR was follows:1. Understand content of prior MEA TA-PD PowerPoint slides. This required reading the course syllabus, the MEA problem statement, sample student work on this MEA, experts’ assessment of this sample student work, and past semester TAs’ feedback on this sample student work.2. Modify PowerPoint slides to accommodate new content that could address TA confusion over poorly defined terms associated with MEAs and provide samples of actual TA feedback from past semester.3. Understand MEA assessment dimensions. There are two
that exceeds the University of Arkansas EnvironmentalHealth and Safety requirements.• Achieve professional development: With the knowledge gained in this course, students canwork in industry, government, or academic research environments with an understanding ofpertinent safety issues and relevant application. Necessary ancillary skills, such ascommunicating professionally about safety matters will also be developed.Table 1: Course syllabus Class Topic Description Assignments and In-class discussions 1 Introduction: What is safety? Assigned to watch the CSB video “Experimenting with Danger
: Instructions Provided to Students Self-Assessment. (10%; pass/fail) • The five learning objectives listed in the table below are drawn from the course syllabus. Assess the degree of development you achieved in each area through both informal and formal learning you did in this course. (The table simply repeats the outcomes outlined above. The most significant feature of its design is that it requires students to provide evidence to support their assessments.) Provide evidence to support each of your assessments. Your self-assessment will notaffect your course grade. The goals here are self-awareness and differentiating degrees ofdevelopment. Specifically, • Convey your assessment by filling out the
for possible activities were provided with the assignment description. Thesesuggestions were chosen to closely follow interests and learning objectives of students at thisearly point in their career: technical-related student clubs, career events, professionalorganization tours, and technical readings of interest.The assignment was printed in the syllabus and discussed at the beginning of the semester. Afteran overview of the assignment expectations, students were encouraged to discuss with theinstructor if they had questions about what sort of activities they could pursue. The electronicassignment form was posted on the main page of the course web files, and periodic reminderswere given over the course of the semester.Electronic submission
teaching in the Republic of Korea (South Korea). Isubmitted my curriculum vitae and proposed course syllabus to Kyungpook NationalUniversity’s Office of International Affairs, doubtful that a technical-writing course would bewelcomed by KNU’s engineering program. Instead, the course was well received by KNU’sDepartment of English Language and Literature. By June 2006, I was teaching and livingabroad—only my second time ever to travel overseas and my first time to travel internationallyalone.Teaching and living abroad, even if only for one summer, was one of my most professionallychallenging and personally rewarding experiences. Not only has the experience expanded myteaching repertoire, but it has also informed and improved my interactions with
housesmany modern classrooms. The classrooms contain flexible furniture, white-board-lined walls,and ample technology to encourage instructors to use active learning pedagogies. Thispurposeful design of the classrooms motivated the authors to add more active learning activitiesto the curriculum of a mechanics of materials course that was taught in one of the newclassrooms.The incorporation of active learning techniques was not new for the instructor of record.Previously, he co-developed a learning environment called Freeform founded upon the research-based pedagogies of active, blended, and collaborative learning [1-3]. The mechanics ofmaterials course utilized the Freeform framework, which included online video solutions forevery example problem in
by two digits, the first digit represents the course unit while the second digit representsthe training number for the course unit. For example, 1.1 connotes the first training for theconservation of mass unit, while 4.2 connotes the second training for thermal preservation unit.Table 1. Trainings assigned to each course unit Weeks Unit Training 1-3 Conservation of Mass 1.1 - 1.3 4-7 Fluid Flow & Pumps 2.1 - 2.4 8-10 Fans Selection 3.1 - 3.3 11-12 Thermal Preservation 4.1 - 4.2At the beginning of the semester, the syllabus, course outcomes, and a comprehensive list of LOswere presented
facilitate their participation in summer internships in industry and governmentallabs.Proposed ActivitiesIt is evident from various studies that active learning experiences through the use of appropriateinstructional technology can serve as a stimulus to attract students to any specific field includingengineering. Therefore, the program will be structured to meet the following objectives:1) To teach how scientists and environmental engineers use molecular biology based methods asresearch tools. This will be accomplished by three mechanisms:a. Fundamental discussion of molecular biology skills. Introductory materials will be expandedto include thirty percent of the total course (5 of 15 lectures, see course syllabus) in order to helpclarify the
differs from thetraditional multidisciplinary approach of parallel perspectives that can often be found incourses with sequential independent modules taught by professors from various disciplines.The course’s redesign was also a response to the need to embed the territory-based approachin disaster risks management, especially given the fast pace of the climate change process at aglobal scale.The course was redesigned in terms of methodology and evaluation method, in order toencourage self-learning and the integration of knowledge and skills acquired in previouscourses. The course’s new syllabus included conceptual and methodological interdisciplinarycontents related and articulated to the development of DRM plans e.g. Mitigation,preparedness and