. Multidisciplinary teaching helpsbridge the gap and illustrates the interrelation between courses. Many topics combine well inmultidisciplinary courses such as physics, mathematics, and engineering. Outside of thesciences, topics like writing, ethics, economics, and entrepreneurship relate well to engineeringas well. Page 14.772.4Rethinking Mathematics and the Sciences for EngineeringMost engineering schools in the nation require a minimum level of proficiency in Mathematics,Physics, and other sciences6-9. Four courses in mathematics consisting of a series of threecalculus courses and a differential equations course are considered a minimum in an
NUMBER REQUISITE PASS COMPUTERMETHODS IN CIVIL CGN 3421 - 4 C ENGINEERINGEXPERIMENTATION CGN 3710 PHY 2049 3 D TECHNICAL DRAWING AND CGN 2328 - 3 D VISUALIZATION CE MATERIALS CGN 3501 - 4 D PROFESSIONAL - EGN 4034 1 D ETHICS CONSTRUCTIONCE COST ANALYSIS CGN
) Department has established the following objectives for its BSREEprogram:≠ Graduates will excel as professionals in the various fields of energy engineering.≠ Graduates will be known for their commitment to lifelong learning, social responsibility, and professional and ethical responsibilities in implementing sustainable engineering solutions.≠ Graduates will excel in critical thinking, problem solving and effective communication.Program outcomes are based on the ABET EAC outcomes, the so-called "a through k" outcomes,plus three additional program-specific outcomes, 'l', 'm', and 'n.'(l) an ability to apply the fundamentals of energy conversion and application(m) an understanding of the obligations for implementing sustainable engineering
appropriate software. personal responsibility and (consistent with TAC/ABET Criterion accountability for one’s individual 2 Outcomes a, b, f); actions and performance. (i, k)5. demonstrate a broad education and 3.2.Students will have exposure to knowledge of contemporary issues in a situations that develop their philosophy global and societal context, as and appreciation for human differences. necessary to develop professional and (i, j) ethical responsibility, including 3.3.Students will be able to demonstrate the responsibility to employers and to ability to communicate in individual society at large. (consistent with and team
EET have taken different approaches in the planning, organizing and exectuion of theirrespective capstone projects. The primary areas of contrast are: 1) project sourcing, 2) type, 3)interim feedback and evaluation, 4) final assessment, and 5) supplemental resources. Theapproaches used in each area have advantages and disadvantages that necessitate trade-offs andcareful management.It is anticipated that capstones will continue to evolve with the most likely areas of improvementbeing: 1) better preparation embedded into the curriculum prior to the capstone, 2) increased useof external judging panels, 3) integration of additional project management techniques, 4) greaterfocus on societal and ethical responsibilities, 5) use of web-based
, relationship, etc) using UML and sequence diagrams then suitable tools can be developed (currently some are available) to implement the design in an object oriented language like C++. ≠ Year 4: In the graduation year a student is expected to complete the capstone project with results that can be demonstrated. Additionally the student is expected to take an addition of 4 more courses at level L4. Level4 courses provides the students with greater detailing with respect to the implementation and help fine tune the developed module and system.To get the proposed 200+ credits for a degree in CSE a student has to supplement with courseson soft-skills such as Communications, Leadership, and Ethics, and courses on
projects selected by students and started a longdiscussion about what constitutes an acceptable project for entrepreneurship students. They alsosuggested that an activity with a corporate attorney in the Silicon Valley program be included(and they provided one for the students to interview). Finally, and perhaps somewhatsurprisingly, Advisory Board members stressed the need for a discussion of ethics and pointedout how leadership can easily be compromised if company leaders do not treat their employeeswith respect or are less than forthcoming with data about company performance.An alumni group of Frank Fellows has been formed and a program has begun to solicitsuggestions from these people because they have been able to reexamine the Frank
emphasis on the role of opinion:“What’s true to you and what’s not true to you I think you think critically about those issues.” “I Page 14.1240.5guess you just think about what’s true to you, what’s ethical, what’s right to you.”making decisions: All students stated that their answers needed to be based on sound decisionsthat could be justified. Mike’s approach to the problems was to “just reason it, make sure thatwhat I’ve got down, my answer, makes sense to me.” Even when the problem did not involveany complicated knowledge, according to Alice justifying the final answer was important: “It’snot that hard of a problem, but I have to really think
) ≠ Ability to find, analyze and solve a problem. Page 14.280.3 ≠ Understanding of the design process and how it fits into the overall business processes ≠ A basic understanding business processes and entrepreneurial ventures ≠ Strong Laboratory skills ≠ Ability to communicate (both written and verbal) ≠ Understanding of regulations and ethics for biomedical situations ≠ Leadership and teamwork skills ≠ Willingness to continue to learnFacultyWith regard to the recommendation by the Engineer of 2020 report regarding faculty andstudents being the primary actors in the learning process(2), it has always been an underlyingbelief of
Students will demonstrate their ability to evaluate a problem and bring general design strategies to bear on the problem with a commitment to quality, timeliness, and continuous improvement. 1.7 Students will demonstrate their ability to plan and coordinate a project and manage systems. 2.1 Students will demonstrate their ability to function effectively in teams. 2.2 Students will demonstrate understanding of professional ethical and social responsibilities, within a context of contemporary professional, societal and global issues. 2.3 Students will demonstrate the ability to engage in lifelong learning. 2.4 Students will demonstrate the ability to write clearly and concisely to a variety of audiences. 2.5 Students will demonstrate
Structures 4 Advanced Structural DesignTTE 4004 Transportation Engineering 3 II (Steel) 6SUR 4201 Route Geometrics 3 Elective II 4ENV 4514 Water and Wastewater 1 Treatment Major Project 8EGN 4034 Ethics 4 Geo Tech. Engineering II 6Semester 9 All track courses * 15TOTAL 131 239* All track courses are 3
successful and interesting projects, in its original format, the capstone course was tooshort and did not afford the students time to truly demonstrate their capabilities.Also, in order for the EET program to fullfill more strongly the ABET outcomes related todemonstrate that students are able to function on multi-disciplinary teams (outcome d), that theyshow a strong ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems (outcome e) andare able to understand professional and ethical responsibility (outcome f). Based on these goals,the EET faculty and its Industrial Advisory Board (IAB) agreed to modify and expand the EETSenior Project Course into two courses. TEET4610 is a 1-credit course offered in the fallsemester, and a TEET4620 is a 2
credits) Business (5 credits) Elective Modules Elective Modules (3 credits) (6 credits) Table 1. Enterprise minor and concentration curriculum. Project work credits can also be used as electives for students not pursuing the minor or concentration.CM/ENT3974 Fuel Cell Fundamentals (1)CM/ENT3977 Fundamentals of Hydrogen as an Energy Carrier (1)CM/ENT3978 Hydrogen Measurements Laboratory (1)CM4310 Chemical Process Safety / Environment (3)ENT3954 Enterprise Market Principles (1)ENT3958 Engineering Ethics in Design and Implementation (1)ENT3961 Enterprise Strategic Leadership (1)ENT3964 Project Management (1)ENT3971 Seven Habits of
the 2009 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright ©2009, American Society for Engineering Education The College’s overall graduate placement rate is outstanding. In the past 10 years, that rate has exceeded 95%, with a number of years with 100% placement. Our co-op students and graduates demonstrate leadership skills and quickly integrate into the culture and work ethic of their new companies. With their unique foundation, our graduates are ready and able to be immediate contributors to Electric Power and Energy sector and their communities. CAS co-op students and alumni are known for being exceptionally profession and well- prepared in tackling problems and applying what
development, withworkshops on leadership skill development (e.g., commitment, responsibility, ethics, peermentoring, etc.) and balancing one’s professional, academic, and personal life (including priority Page 14.203.4setting, multi-tasking, relaxation techniques, participation in extracurricular activities, etc.). Thethird year would focus on professional development and would include a workshop on oralcommunication skills (including mock interviews, etiquette, professionalism, and networking)and professional writing skills (e.g., resume writing, cover letters, other forms of writtencommunication in the workplace, etc.). The last year would focus
wereprepared on real-life subjects such as learning, teaching and learning styles, ethics in workplaceetc. The fundamental goal of this workshop was teach the mentors how to lead a discussionsession with their mentees and conflict resolution. It was held at the beginning of 2008 fallsemester with the participation of 4 mentors and the project team.Contributions within DisciplineThe mentoring session within the Computer Engineering Technology discipline highlights themany valuable contributions that mentors make in helping mentees understand the basic conceptsand the importance of using CMAPS tools in building and retaining their knowledge. Moreover,the mentoring session included a friendly discussion on how a group of students can worktogether to
Page 14.152.5improvement process, hard work and ethical conduct in a quality education system.The Future Mr. Viswanathan has and will continue to promote VIT University in the internationalarena as well as the national arena. He has observed4 that universities in the USA receivesubstantial funding from a variety of sources, such as philanthropists, industries, alumni, andbusinesses as well as from government. Universities in Europe and most developing countriesrely predominantly on government funding. He has also observed that in the Americaneducational system parents and students are prepared to pay for a quality higher educationprogram. Privatization is one solution for enhancing the quality of higher education in India.VIT University
purposeful courses foundation courses Quality/SPC Engrg Econ supporting courses Figure 2: A Minimalist Instruction Pattern for Manufacturing Engineering Instruction The ‘production engineering’ course would reprise the product and process engineeringfacets with multiple parts that make up a complete product. Then, quality engineeringconsiderations would be added. Finally, the entire production system would be designed. Issuessuch as ergonomics, energy efficiency, safety, environmental impact and ethical issues arereadily interwoven with this ‘systems design’ effort. The principal metrics used to evaluate theresultant production system designs are
give coherent meaning to seemingly divergent topics; ‚ To aid students in remembering content; ‚ Or, simply to break up a long lecture.The author is on the faculty in the Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Department atthe University of Michigan. He has used story-telling extensively in all of his classes, includingjunior-level Data Structures and Algorithms, and senior/grad-level Software Engineeringcourses. Story-telling also fits naturally into a Professionalism and Ethics course that hefrequently teaches.This paper describes story-telling as a teaching method. Several examples are used to illustratethe use of story-telling for different purposes. Dos and Don’ts are listed. Finally, the paper givesa summary.Story-telling
technical level appropriate for the students; • the lecture topics can be shown to have relevance to South Dakota and the surrounding region; • the topics are suited to the overall program theme; and • the speakers are qualified to speak informally on a large range of topics during the classroom component of the program.Interaction with the speakers prior to their arrival proved to be one of the most criticalcomponents of an individual speaker’s impact.Classroom ComponentA required course in the CEE curriculum is CEE 463: Civil Engineering Professions, offeredonly in the spring semester to graduating seniors. The course emphasis is on professional,personal, and ethical development of the student engineer. The class meets once
2006-26: LIFE IN MOVING FLUIDS: INTRODUCING CLASSICAL FLUIDMECHANICS INTO BIOENGINEERINGGeorge Catalano, State University of New York-Binghamton Dr. Catalano is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering. He researches and teaches in the areas of engineering design, the fluid dynamics of the natural world and applied mathematics and is included in the Philosophers’ Index for his work in environmental ethics Page 11.896.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006Life in Moving Fluids: Integrating Classical Fluid Mechanics into an Undergraduate Bioengineering ProgramAbstractA new course that seeks to
, design, analysis, procurement of equipment and materials, implementation, and performance verification. 2. Conduct necessary engineering experiments, make observations, collect and analyze data, and formulate conclusions. 3. Understand the ethical and societal impact of engineering solutions. 4. Communicate and function effectively and productively both as an individual and as part of an engineering team. 5. Recognize the need for and have the desire to engage in life-long learning. Outcome for all the Engineering Technology programs were exactly the same asthose listed in the TAC of ABET criteria. Nine assessment tools were identified to collectdata for the assessment of outcome achievement for the continuous
technology. Xc) An ability to conduct, analyze and interpret experiments andapply experimental results to improve processes. Xd) An ability to apply creativity in the design of systems,components or processes. Xe) An ability to function effectively on teams. Xf) An ability to identify, analyze & solve technical problems. Xg) An ability to communicate effectively. Xh) A recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage inlifelong learning. Xi) An ability to understand professional, ethical and socialresponsibilities
/about/aboutlibraries.html 3. Turner, K. (2005, October 11). New Students’ Library Guide. Retrieved January 4, 2006 from http://www.library.drexel.edu/about/studentguide.html 4. Bhatt, J. and Baldwin, J. (2003). A collaborative approach toward fostering information literacy in freshman engineering students at Drexel University. Poster presented at the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition : Session 1541. 5. Bhatt, J., Fromm, E., and Manion, M. (2004). Engineering ethics, the Drexel Engineering Curriculum and the library - a collaborative teaching partnership. Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition
effectiveinstruction, with the ultimate goal of improved learning. In an attempt to gain a methodicalunderstanding of these factors, Kahn 8 developed a framework for Web-based learning,consisting of eight dimensions: (1) pedagogical, (2) technological, (3) interface design, (4)evaluation, (5) management, (6) resource support, (7) ethical, and (8) institutional. Kahn 14 lateroffered a framework for placing Web-based instruction along a band ranging from “micro” to“macro” uses. The “micro” end of the band involves the use of the Web as a way to supplementor enhance conventional classroom instruction (e.g., providing students in a electronic coursewith an interactive map of the electronic circuit to help them learn device functions). Furtheralong the continuum
course and program outcomes. For example, the RMU benchmark states that at least 80% of the class obtains 80% or better marks in ABET outcomes assessment tasks.Parents would like to see the following: • The university offers a safe and supportive environment for learning. Page 11.193.4 • Student motivation is increased so that students complete the degree requirements. • There is value for their money in terms of student success.The greater community expects modern engineers have the following skill set: • Awareness of ethical responsibilities • Attention to energy conservation, environmental protection, and sustainable
), Construction Engineering (Engr439), Finite Element Methods (Engr 432) and Mechanical and Structural Vibrations (Engr 461).Most of these courses focus on basic design-oriented content to prepare students for practicalexperience. In their last semester, students enroll in a required two-course sequence, SeniorDesign Project (Engr 696/697), in which they: (1) engage in laboratory and field exercises anddemonstrations; (2) discuss the selection of design projects, methods of research, engineeringprofessional practice, ethics, and time management; (3) select, develop, schedule and completean original design project; and (4) present the project orally and in writing. This advanced workis done with maximum independence under the supervision of a faculty
Entrepreneurship (1) (1) ENG3971 Seven Habits (1) ENG4951 Budgeting (1) ENG 4951 Global Competition ENG2963 Electric Circuit (1) Design & Fab (1) ENG3955 Conceptual Design / ENG3956 Industrial Health and Problem Solving (1) Safety (1) ENG3957 / 3967 Product and Process ENG3958 Engineering Ethics Development (1) in Design (1) ENG3966 Design for ENG3968 Manufacturing Manufacturing (1
were informed that their engineering technology degree was not recognized andthat they were ineligible for the positions. Ethically, it became necessary to inform students atthe outset of the program that they may not be eligible for such jobs, which effectively broughtenrollment in the program to a halt. Page 11.114.8Conclusions and RecommendationsThe experiences in the development and delivery of the SET program at ASU have led to theseveral conclusions. • Such a program is best delivered as a Security Systems Engineering program. • The Sandia methodology forms a foundation for such a Security Systems Engineering program and is
character of thespecific technical knowledge required for full participation in a technological society. By Hirsch’s definition, even most engineers would not qualify as technically literate inengineering fields not related to their own. And, as Young, Cole, and Denton recognize in“Improving Technological Literacy” (2002), “Even engineers, who have traditionally beenconsidered experts in technology, may not have the training or experience necessary to thinkabout the social, political, and ethical implications of their work and so may not be Page 11.652.8technologically literate”.9 In sum, the terminology “literacy” is condescending