from a focus on products (Dym, etal., 2005) to processes (Diefes-Dux, et al., 2004) and to the integration of entrepreneurship into thecurriculum (Kuratko, 2011; London, et al., 2018). However, while the importance of centering the designeffort of students around customer discovery and value creation is increasingly being recognized (e.g.,Bekki, et al., 2018), challenges exist in effectively integrating content that students learn in theengineering curriculum, and advances in technology, with ways of values to a customer in an educationsetting. A primary challenge is the development of new content which builds on, supplements andexpands students’ grasp of engineering, economic and social concepts. Furthermore, the integration ofnew content
benefits which relateto effective assessment. By making an effort to talk to faculty about the curriculum and ask themfor reflections on the impact of particular projects, the portfolio provides a natural way to engagecolleagues in discussion about the impact of specific courses. Discussions related to portfoliodevelopment can foster relations between faculty and offer areas for collaboration in theachievement of outcomes outside of the program’s normal assessment procedures.The portfolio is not intended to be a collection of all work, or to serve as the primary means ofassessment. In fact it is quite the opposite. At the Coast Guard Academy a regular process ofassessment and improvement already exists for curriculum review. In end of course
of research is manufacturing processes and materials with focus on vehic- ular applications. Dr. Paul Venhovens, Clemson University Dr. Paul Venhovens is the BMW Endowed Chair in Automotive Systems Integration and Professor in the Department of Automotive Engineering at CU-ICAR. He comes from BMW’s Research and Innovation Center in Munich, Germany, where he worked in the field of systems integration for 13 years. Dr. Venhovens is the founder of the Deep Orange program enabling the students to gain firsthand experience in his primary area of interest of new vehi- cle concepts, vehicle development processes and systems integration/engineering methods. Dr. Johnell Brooks, Clemson University Dr. Johnell Brooks is an
plan is presented forintegrating teamwork development into an engineering program to prepare graduates forsubsequent development of high performing teams in the professional workplace. A case isdiscussed to illustrate how team development is achieved in a project-based curriculum setting.IntroductionThe great engineering challenges of the twenty-first century are complex and multidisciplinary innature [1]. Engineers engaged in addressing problems of societal concern that have economicimpact will necessarily be members of multidisciplinary teams that bring diverse expertise andperspectives to the problem solving process. In general, a team is “a small number of people withcomplementary skills who are committed to a common purpose, set of
(ideation). Designprocess knowledge, in general, is taught in first year design courses, and then practiced duringcapstone design. During second and third year courses, the engineering curriculum focuses onanalytical concepts and techniques ultimately intended to support design analysis ability.However, students frequently have difficulty in integrating their design process knowledge andanalysis abilities during capstone design projects.Most four year engineering programs include a first year course focused on the engineeringdesign process where students are exposed to the wide range of issues that must be consideredwith regard to the ‘real life’ activity of designing a product or a process. These courses typicallyculminate in a team report
importance that all students receive high quality educationalexperiences in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) fields so that they becomedesigners and creators of our technology-rich future instead of being mere consumers oftechnological products.There are numerous on-going educational programs that seek to integrate and infuse varied mannerof technologies in STEM instruction and learning (e.g., computers, internet and mobileapplications, robotics, etc.). Recent research1,2 has shown that robotics can serve as an effectivepedagogical tool in STEM education. Educational robotics kits have been shown to enhancestudent engagement in STEM content.3 Moreover, robotics is known to stimulate excitement andencourage participation of students
sequence within an integrated curriculum in the 1999 academic year. Although thecourse has always undergone a gradual evolution from year to year (as a result of our ABET-related self evaluation and feedback loop), there was a marked shift three years ago as explainedin the next sub-sections.Original Format: Integrated Lectures and ProjectsWhen this capstone course was first introduced in 1999 it was conceived as an integrated lectureplus project course. The course spanned the Fall-Spring semesters worth 4 units each semester(8 units total). The mechanics involved traditional lectures twice a week (75 minutes each),although since projects were running concurrently, approximately every three weeks the lectureswould give way to student presentations
Doe Run in La Oroya, PeruEthics of how to integrate cultural considerations into science and engineering: the case of well-building in KenyaAnalysis of China’s industrialization and widening economic inequality: the role of technology in education andhealth care disparitiesAssessmentBecause learning and assessment are highly linked63, the self-directed learning reflections ofstudents provide a primary vehicle for assessment. This is inherently a qualitative approach toassessment, and one that involves subjective judgment and interpretation of student narratives.Such an assessment follows logically from the content and pedagogy employed here; when oneintentionally teaches content that challenges positivist assumptions, with pedagogies that do
large-scale integrated circuits (VLSI) and ultra-large scale integration devices (ULSI) [2,3].Now, almost everything in our everyday life supported by semiconductor-based devices andappliances. As a science/engineering major student, learning the semiconductor device course isessential to understand the fundamentals of semiconductor devices and the semiconductortechnology as well as for the future development of the semiconductor field.Semiconductor device course is one of a professional courses for the electrical and computerengineering curriculum. This course introduces basic concepts and principles, operation of basicsemiconductor devices, and device characterization. It provides the foundation required to pursuea career in an electrical
limited.Open-ended design and analysis project. In a third-year course, students learn the design processand apply it to a design problem that is carefully chosen to require the application of all coreengineering science courses required for graduation. This course was recently removed as arequirement from the undergraduate curriculum. This was a design on paper only.As part of a major curriculum revision, RIT has developed a freshman course that exposesstudents to the full design cycle, from problem definition through to prototype testing. Thecourse integrates topics from the introductory courses in CAD, machine shop lab, and designprocess, using a hands-on, open-ended design project as the context for the material covered inthe class. The project
Paper ID #15569User Testing with Assessors to Develop Universal Rubric Rows for AssessingEngineering DesignNikita Dawe, University of Toronto Nikita is a M.A.Sc. candidate in the Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering at the Univer- sity of Toronto. She is completing the Collaborative Program in Engineering Education.Ms. Lisa Romkey, University of Toronto Lisa Romkey serves as an Associate Professor, Teaching Stream with the Division of Engineering Science at the University of Toronto. In this position, Lisa plays a central role in the evaluation, design and delivery of a dynamic and complex curriculum
back at an experience; it is a process that helps us to makemeaning of experiences that can be applied to and used for the future. Reflection as a processmust be taught to students so that they are guided to better understand and utilize this skillattributed to successful engineers and professionals in general. An initial framework offered bythe CPREE team includes specific elements of reflection – experience, features, lens, meaning,action, intentional, and dialectical – and provides examples of how these elements might framestudents use of reflection in a homework assignment. Context and examples of these elements ofreflection are found in Integrating Reflection into Engineering Education.4Reflection and DesignThe use of reflection in
Lifetrainings; how RA experiences align with ways the hidden curriculum plays out in traditionalclassrooms, and the broader set of educational outcomes associated with students’ residentialexperience within universities.The most comprehensive definition of emotional safety is by Wang and Degol, who defineemotionally safe schools as having: school-based mental health services, caring and supportivestaff, an absence of verbal bullying or harassment, and students/staff who are able to effectivelyinteract and “express feelings without fear or antagonization” [8]. The first dimension is school-based mental health services, which includes access to mental health professionals, such asschool psychologists or counselors, who can provide support and guidance to
of diversity and global awareness are often separateobjectives on university campuses, ASU has integrated these two concepts into a singular focus.The demographics of ASU and the surrounding community may contribute to this unique visionof diversity awareness. The global emphasis is exemplified by the creation of the Office forGlobal Engagement within the Fulton Schools of Engineering. The mission of this office [28, 29] isto “structure an integrated and comprehensive portfolio of opportunities, programs, andpartnerships that provide students and faculty the resources needed to become leaders in theglobal and professional arena”. Faculty members are also finding ways to integrate students‟hands-on global design experiences in the curriculum
senior year, recenttrends emerged to weave PBL in the first year and throughout the curriculum in semester-long projects.Students are being introduced to design methods, team dynamics and ethics in parallel with the analysis-focused courses (Dym et al., 2005). However, the systematic integration of design and analysis in coursesis still lacking (Carberry & McKenna, 2014). Some of the outstanding research questions about PBL asproposed by Dym et al. (2005) include: “What are the best proportions of problems, projects, teamwork,technology, and reality for a given state of student development,” and “how do the proportions changewith regard to the context of different engineering disciplines and institutional missions?” (p. 112).There are some
, techniques andobjectives. This paper will present experiences in developing such toolboxes and their efficientuse in teaching and learning the fundamental mechanics courses.Development of MATLAB toolbox A MATLAB toolbox is a collection of individual analysis modules supported by asoftware architecture that can allow an integrated analysis of multiple fundamental mechanicsproblems. Development of MATLAB toolbox is a meritorious choice for many reasons. Itsversatile computational power, easy graphical user interface, convenient GUI development tools(GUIDE function), easy deployment (MATLAB compiler) and availability of numerous existingtoolboxes for seamless integration have lead to its wide-use amongst universities and industry.2,3The MATLAB
formanufacturability. Through working on this project, students will be able to study a complexengineering and technology system that: (1) exposes them to applied and cutting-edgetechnologies; (2) encourages them to participate in an integrated, interdisciplinary curriculum;and (3) involves them in methods of applied technology and skills necessary to transition fromacademic to professional environments.1. Introduction Rapid advancement in technology has laid a path for the design and manufacture of manyinterdisciplinary integrated technologies. These advancements have provided new avenues forthe engineering educators to better prepare tomorrows global citizens through methods capableof responding to the challenges of tomorrow1. On the other hand, the
important subjects in the engineering curriculum. This paper will describe several ways ofimplementing issues in profesional practice either through the ABET-required major designexperience or as separate elective courses.Background of the InstituteThe Institute for Professional Practice was originated in 1989 by ASFE - Professional FirmsPracticing in the Geosciences (originally the Association of Soil and Foundation Engineers) withfunds derived from an international conference held in San Francisco a few years previously.While this geotechnical engineering group provided the impetus for establishing the Institute, itwas set up as a separate, non-profit 501(c)(3) corporation to serve the entire spectrum ofengineering practice in the United
establishment been expanded to cover the most part of thestudents’ final year and also constitutes the main competitive mean of attracting new students tothe area of engineering design.This paper presents results from an attempt to introduce a similar concept into the students’ firstyear of studies, in the form of cornerstone projects. The intention was to build on the extensiveexperience from the many capstone courses and projects, and to bridge the gap between the firstyear and the final year, with the purpose of giving a perspective and a broad overview of theentire curriculum and the following courses.In conclusion, a number of mechanisms are presented for the exchange of experiences andknowledge between the students of the first and final years of
partner institutions. Web-based course/module supportmaterials are also being developed.The next phase would be related to the integration of the comprehensive design curriculum intothe existing academic program, development of workforce training and development of anoutreach program via existing pre-college outreach programs at partner institutions.3. Product Design and Realization and Global Working EnvironmentProduct design and realization includes the whole spectrum of conceptualization, detailed design,analysis, simulation, and prototyping. In collaborative design, multidisciplinary teams participatein design decision-making. Product information is shared across enterprise boundaries in anInternet-enabled distributed environment. Product and
Incorporating Software Usage in Teaching Structural Analysis Courses in Civil Engineering Chiara Silvestri, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester Adriana Hera, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester Malcolm H. Ray, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester Siamak Najafi, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester Session 2: Tools, techniques, and best practices of engineering education for the digital generation.Abstract This paper illustrates an approach of software integration in teaching structural analysiscourses in civil engineering. The authors describe key facets of their methodology to
to active learning” activities [1], whichhave been demonstrated to increase student performance [5-8] and enhance student motivation[9].BackgroundThe curriculum includes problem-based learning (PBL), “an instructional method whererelevant problems are introduced at the beginning of the instruction cycle and used to providethe context and motivation for the leaning that follows” [10]. Compared to other active learningpedagogies, PBL results in increased gains in self-regulated learning [11]. It also leads toimproved performance and long-term knowledge retention [12-15].In a recent American Society of Mechanical Engineering (ASME) survey, 55.5% of 1,404industry engineering supervisors rated practical experience (how devices are made/work) as
goals became to apply and develop engineering designacross the curriculum. Starting by an introduction to engineering course in the first semester, ourcurriculum consists of design embedded courses each semester. However, that brings a challengeto us, engineering educators, to prevent this emphasis from shadowing the subject material ofeach course. Design work should not be a separate entity, but a contributory tool which can beused to support the teaching of the courses’ fundamentals1. Upper division courses are easier toincorporate design projects due to the knowledge levels and skills of the students. On the otherside, creating good design projects for lower division courses are more difficult because thestudents don’t have the analytical
the concepts learnt in theclass and thoughtfully consider project requirements and constraints while seeking possiblesolutions. PBL also allows the instructor to integrate oral and written communicationcomponents into the course through required presentations, project reports and team meetings.The application and hands-on components of PBL are especially crucial in an applied scienceprogram such as engineering. Also, it is argued in this paper that integrating a PBL course in thejunior year curriculum can serve as a very good preparation for the Capstone project.While it is extremely important to design engineering curriculum so as to meet specific programoutcomes and deliver specific content, it is being increasingly recognized that a focus
) Professional Tools (teaching and implementing design tools) Professional Ethics (evaluating and practicing appropriate professional behavior)Each component has defined attributes and goals, a structure for implementation across thefour years of the curriculum, and coordinated assessment activities monitoring studentoutcomes. This structure helps to coordinate the efforts of the WKU ME faculty members,and assure student success in developing these skills, recognizing that desired studentprofessional outcomes are only completed through multiple courses and faculty members.The result is that professional experiences can be integrated throughout the curriculum,rather than delivered in an isolated or inconsistent way.The overall structure of the
students through the lens of identity theory (NSF BRIGE grant), advancing problem-based learning methodologies (NSF CCLI grant), assessing student learning, and un- derstanding and integrating complex problem solving in undergraduate engineering education (NSF CA- REER grant). Her other research interests lie in cardiovascular fluid mechanics, sustainability, and K-12 engineering outreach.Dr. Eric C. Pappas, James Madison University Eric Pappas is an Associate Professor in the School of Engineering and Department of Integrated Science and Technology at James Madison University. Email: PappasEC@jmu.edu.Dr. Robert L. Nagel, James Madison University Robert Nagel is an Assistant Professor in the School of Engineering at
revolutionize the engineering curriculum, instead, we are usingthis study to introduce an conceptual flowchart design procedure to integrate AI algorithms intodesign class.Research Method – A case study of a bookshelf designThis research was performed through the use of a case study, as it is suitable for understandingoccurrences in real-life situations and focuses on answering the fundamental exploratory questionsof ‘how’ and ‘why’ [29]. Since this research considers design practices, a case study is appropriatehere as it is often used to study design practices in companies or corporate settings [26], [30]–[34].Since this is exploratory research that poses questions on generative design and its role in theconceptual design process, it fits for case
liberal-arts education provides unique opportunities [1] to integrateinterventions within the curriculum. Cognitive approaches such as design and innovative thinkingcan be integrated into the curriculum and can be implemented through active learning and humancentered design methodologies. We incorporated these methodologies into our curricula to preparestudents to address the ever changing and complex environmental challenges that affect society[2]. Traditional lecture-based learning does not provide adequate preparations for students toutilize their learning and apply their knowledge in various real-life scenarios outside of theclassroom. Problem based learning provides a novel teaching and learning model where studentsinteract with concepts and
Page 25.88.3developed in the SE domain. They are used for workforce development and education. The SECapstone project goals listed below have the numbers of relevant competencies from AppendixA noted: Identify the needs and objectives of key stakeholders including the operational and life-cycle context, and how these shape and set the scope for the development program (2, 4, 5). Demonstrate recognition that the value of a system is largely embodied in the interaction among its components, and not in the components themselves when addressing stakeholder requirements (6, 8). Demonstrate an ability to produce a well thought out system design and well managed interface specifications as critical to successful system integration (6
university) the average undergraduatestudent’s life consists of answering tests, participating in extracurricular activities,and performing undergraduate research at different levels. On campus, thedefining moment of an undergraduate engineering student comes by way of his orher Capstone Engineering Design in which students come together to work on aproject that deals with their particular field of study. For purpose ofdemonstration, the ECE Department’s Computer Engineering Capstone Coursehas as its course description: “[Capstone] course in which student teams design aproject to solve a complete Computer Engineering Problem consideringengineering standards and realistic constraints. The project should integrate bothhardware and software.” This is