Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Adam Stark Masters, Virginia Tech; Lisa D. McNair, Virginia Tech; Donna M. Riley, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering)

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

Paper ID #23107MAKER: Identifying Practices of Inclusion in Maker and Hacker Spaceswith Diverse ParticipationAdam Stark Masters, Virginia Tech Adam S. Masters is a doctoral student and Graduate Research Assistant at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. They received a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from University of Delaware and are currently pursuing a Ph.D. in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. Adam’s research interests include access, equity and social justice in engineering with particular attention to the experiences of women & LGBTQ+ engineering students.Dr. Lisa D. McNair, Virginia Tech

Conference Session

Pre-college Engineering Education Division Poster Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tanner J. Huffman, The College of New Jersey; Manuel Alejandro Figueroa, The College of New Jersey

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division

Example Topic(s) Aligned Measurement Human-Centered Creative Self-Efficacy and Creative Role-Identity; Creativity Design Thinking Design in Engineering Design (Artifacts) Design Elements and Engineering Design Ideation Capacity; Creativity in Engineering Design Principles Process (Artifacts) Ideation Capacity; Creativity in Engineering Design Spatial Thinking (Artifacts) Design Skill Development Technical Capacity Creativity in Engineering Design (Artifacts) Tinkering

Conference Session

Engineering Physics and Physics Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Yumin Zhang, Southeast Missouri State University; David K. Probst P.E., Southeast Missouri State University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Physics and Physics

framework and become more confident in solvingproblems. Reference[1] Harris Cooper, Jorgianne C. Robinson, Erika A. Patall, “Does homework improve academicachievement? A synthesis of research, 1987–2003”, Review of Educational Research, 76(1), pp.1–62 (2006).[2] Autar Kaw, “Does Collecting Homework Improve Examination Performance?”, Proceedingsof 117th ASEE Annual Conference, Louisville, Kentucky, June 20 - 23, 2010.[3] Kathy S. Jackson, Mark D. Maughmer, “Promoting Student Success: Goodbye to GradedHomework and Hello to Homework Quizzes”, Proceedings of 124th ASEE Annual Conference,Columbus, Ohio, June 25 - 28, 2017.[4] Gilbert C. Brunnhoeffer III, “Homework Is So 20th Century!”, Proceedings of 124th

Conference Session

Curriculum and Instruction in Engineering Mechanics

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Julian Ly Davis, University of Southern Indiana; Tom McDonald, University of Southern Indiana

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics

the students if they value it, and if theyvalue it with respect to how it is being used. Certainly, there is literature backing both sides ofthe coin; for and against, online systems and traditional homework methods [3], [4], [7]–[9],[11]. Students however, are clearly asking for both, and indicate that both will probably behelpful. Similar hybrid approaches have proven to be successful in other disciplines [14]. Maybewe should ask them to eat their vegetables alongside their ice cream!References[1] M. F. Schar, A. M. Harris, R. J. Witt, R. Rice, and S. D. Sheppard, “Connecting for Success; The Impact of Student-to-Other Closeness on Performance in Large-Scale Engineering Classes,” p. 23, 2016.[2] J. L. Davis and T. McDonald, “Can

Conference Session

Innovative Course Structures and Learning Environments

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Elizabeth Kathleen Bucholz, Duke University; Robert A. Malkin, Duke University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical Engineering

,theycurrentlyseemaswellpreparedastheregularcohortofstudentswithnoobservabledifferences.Overallthecourseandtheprogramwereverywellreceivedbybothstudentsandfacultyanditisanticipatedtheprogramwillcontinuefortheforeseeablefuture.Conclusions:DukeUniversitycreatedasummerabroadprogramforbiomedicalengineerstaughtbyDukeUniversityfacultythatallowedstudentstogeta6-weekimmersivestudyabroadexperienceinCostaRicawhiletakingarequiredBMESignalsandSystemscourseaswellasaSocialScienceandHumanitiesElectivecourse.Theprogramwaswellreceivedbybothstudentsandfacultyandhasbeeninoperationfortwoyears.Thiscourseprovidesamodelforhowotheruniversitiesmightbeabletoimplementasimilarprogramtoallowtheirstudentsaccesstoawidervarietyofstudyabroadexperiencesthattheymightbeotherwiseunabletoexperienceduetotheirhighlyconstrainedschedules.References:1)O’Rear,I.,Sutton,R.L,Rubin,D.L.;“TheEffectofStudyAbroadonCollegeCompletioninaStateUniversitySystem”2)Gyimah,S.;“GoneInternational:ExpandingOpportunities,Reporton2015-2016graduatingcohort”3)DeWinter,U.J.;“ScienceandEngineeringEducationAbroad:AnOverview”,Frontiers:TheinterdisciplinaryJournalofStudyAbroad,vol3,issue17.

Conference Session

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jeong-Hee Kim, Texas Tech University; Ryan C. Campbell, Texas Tech University; Ngan T.T. Nguyen, Texas Tech University; Roman Taraban, Texas Tech University; Danny D. Reible P.E., Texas Tech University; Chongzheng Na, Texas Tech University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

become reflective engineers who usetheir phronesis to take conflicts and dilemmas more seriously in order to meet the ultimate goalof engineering: to find ways to make the world a better place.Reflection in Engineering Education Literature Various forms of reflection have surely been practiced and promoted by engineeringeducators around the world for centuries. However, considering that “engineering educationresearch (EER) generally lacked definition as a discipline until the late 1990s and early 2000s”(Johri & Olds, 2014) relevant literature on graduate-level engineering education prior to the1990’s can be difficult to find. This review will focus primarily on literature of the past decadebecause it is both more readily available

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session II

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sadegh Davari, University of Houston, Clear Lake; Nathanial David Wiggins, San Jacinto College; Krishani Abeysekera, University of Houston, Clear Lake; Sharon P Hall, University of Houston, Clear Lake

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

and Computing Students” (Washington, D.C., 2012)4. Davari, S., Abeysekera, K. and Yue, K., “Building STEM Awareness through Programming Competition”, the Fourth Annual Texas Engineering and Technology Consortium Best Practices Conference, Austin, February 11- 12, 20095. Abeysekera, K., Davari, S., Yue, K., Brown, E., Kent, M., Betts, P., & Meeks, J., Success through Academic Recognition (STAR): Sustaining and Expanding UHCL and SJC TWD Computer Science Scholar Program, the third annual Texas Engineering and Technology Consortium Best Practices Conference, Dallas, Feb. 28, 2008, pp 7-9. www.thecb.state.tx.us/index.cfm?objectid=8828378A-D358-8867-5E14BDC65C9860B96. Abeysekera, K., Zhang, T., Perkins-Hall, S

Conference Session

Works in Progress: Classroom Practice

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ada Hurst, University of Waterloo; Oscar G. Nespoli, University of Waterloo

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

Reformulate 3 Generating Documentation and Data Management Controlling Storing DistributingAs mentioned, the need analysis stage is regarded as the most important part of the designprocess. It is a process of problem finding and representing as opposed to problem solving. It isdivided into three (3) phases: identification, representation and communication. These divisionsare based on Karuppoor et al.27’s design philosophy, emphasizing the

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 3; The Best of All the FPD Papers

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Susan F. Freeman, Northeastern University; Courtney Pfluger, Northeastern University; Richard Whalen, Northeastern University; Kathryn Schulte Grahame, Northeastern University; Joshua L. Hertz, Northeastern University; Chirag Variawa, Northeastern University; Jennifer Ocif Love, Northeastern University; Mark L. Sivak, Northeastern University; Bala Maheswaran, Northeastern University

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session II

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Emad Habib, University of Louisiana, Lafayette; David G Tarboton, Utah State University; Matthew Wayne Deshotel, University of Louisiana at Lafayette; David J Farnham, Columbia University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

include:intermediate feedback to students to facilitate successful progress; use of screencasts to illustratecomplex operations; rubrics for students; instructor support in terms of key solutions andsupporting material; and templates for data analysis and advances statistical/modeling tasks.AcknowledgmentThe authors acknowledge the support provided to this study by the National ScienceFoundation's Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering andMathematics (TUES) program under Collaborative Award No. 1122898 (Type II).Bibliography1. Tarboton, D. G., J. S. Horsburgh, D. R. Maidment, T. Whiteaker, I. Zaslavsky, M. Piasecki, J. Goodall, D.Valentine and T. Whitenack, (2009), "Development of a Community Hydrologic Information

Conference Session

Engineering Economy Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Deborah Ann Pedraza, Texas Tech University; Mario G. Beruvides P.E., Texas Tech University

Tagged Topics

ASEE Diversity Committee

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Economy

605 .58 598 .48 Regents English IV Boys 429 .47 430 .43 406 .36 Girls 229 .58 229 .58 224 .42 Total 658 .47 659 .53 630 .43 Rank in H. S. Class* Boys 253 .47 264 .43 226 .34 Girls 157 .60 157 .62 145 .56

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session I

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kristen Billiar, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; Jeanne Hubelbank PhD, Independent Program Evaluator; Jared Quinn, Overlook Middle School; Thomas Andrew Oliva, Worcester Public Schools; Marsha W Rolle, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; Terri A. Camesano, Worcester Polytechnic Institute

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Step 3 Communicate the Develop Solution(s) Design Solution(s) Process Step 6 Step 4 Evaluate Select Best Solution(s) Solution(s) Step 5 Construct Prototype Figure 2. The steps of the engineering design process. Note that each step can also cycle back to

Conference Session

Developing Systems Engineering Curriculum and Programs

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Bruce Harmon, Colorado Technical University; John M Santiago Jr, Colorado Technical University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Systems Engineering

. Infact, other disciplines such as large-scale systems theory may need to be applied to addressthe management of large data when it comes to real-time control of complex systems.References 1. Guide to the Systems Engineering Body of Knowledge (SEBoK). Retrieved December 31, 2015, from http://sebokwiki.org/wiki/Guide_to_the_Systems_Engineering_Body_of_Knowledge_(SEBoK) 2. Blanchard, B. S., & Fabrycky, W. J. (2010). Systems Engineering and Analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. 3. Banks, J., Carson, J. S. II, Nelson, B. L., & Nicol, D. M. (2009). Discrete-Event System Simulation (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. 4. Buede, D. M., &

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division: Faculty and Gender Issues

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kacey D. Beddoes, Oregon State University; Corey T. Schimpf, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Alice L. Pawley, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

to write this off as an historical relic, statements such as these have gone un-critiqued in the last 20 years. It should also be noted that another kind of study exists: thosethat compare and contrast male and female department heads or examine women in academicleadership positions12,64,68-71. While presenting another important approach to studyingrelationships between gender and department heads, such studies are not central to theanalysis at hand.Fourth, a discourse of fairness permeates the literature. As the following quotationsdemonstrate, many publications emphasize that the head has an obligation to act ‘fairly’ andthat (s)he will be most successful if (s)he makes ‘fair’ decisions. Several of the numerousexamples include

Conference Session

Explorations in Mechanics Pedagogy

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Derek James Lura Ph.D., Florida Gulf Coast University; Robert James O'Neill, Florida Gulf Coast University; Ashraf Badir P.E., Florida Gulf Coast University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics

bothcompletion and accuracy, and partial credit was awarded for both. For the homework, since alarger number of problems were submitted, only a selection of problems that were submittedwere assessed for each assignment. Table 1: Description of courses included in the study ID Assessment Term Class Period Instructor(s) N* H1 Homework Fall 2013 TR 8:00-10:45am A&B 37 H2 Homework Spring 2014 TR 8:00-10:45am A&C 32 Q1 Quizzes Fall 2014 WMF 8:00-9:50am A&C 35 Q2 Quizzes Fall 2014 MWF 11:00-12:50pm B 33*N is the number

Conference Session

NEW THIS YEAR! - ASEE Main Plenary II: Best Paper Recognition & Industry Day Session: Corporate Member Council Speaker

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Stephen R. Turns, Pennsylvania State University, University Park

Tagged Topics

ASEE Board of Directors, Corporate Members Council

2 Q A process occurs toState Change S    S irrev change the system’s state. 1  1 Q2 , out  1W2 , out 1 T

Conference Session

Computer Science, Computer Engineering, and Digital Systems Education 2

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Cho Sehyeong, Myongji University

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer

can be used for actual programming, as well as forexecuting, debugging, and visualizing. Thus, our specific aim was two-fold: first, help learnprogramming/problem solving and, second, facilitate the learning of a textual programminglanguage – the C language. The actual hypothesis tested in the present study was X. The resultsof the experiment that was designed to test our expectation fully support our hypothesis. In whatfollows, we will briefly introduce the tool used and proceed with the discussion of theexperiment and the results.Related WorkThere are many different approaches to facilitating the acquisition of programming language(s).For instance, in order to avoid the complexity of full-fledged programming languages, one canuse simplified

Conference Session

Non-Canonical Canons of Engineering Ethics

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Xiaofeng Tang, Penn State University; Dean Nieusma, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics, Liberal Education/Engineering & Society, Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

Conference Session

Curriculum Exchange

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mary McCormick, Tufts University; Elissa C Milto, Tufts Center for Engineering Education and Outreach

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

other 21 Century Skills. • It meets common core and next generation science standards.More information and resources for implementation can be found at novelengineering.org. Page 26.1097.2 This project is funded by the National Science Foundation DRK-12 program, grant # DRL-1020243. Any opinion, findings,conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

Conference Session

Make It!

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Robyn Paul, University of Calgary; Kim Gould, Pivotal Projects

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

Engineering Teacher, pp. 30-35, May 2014.[2] International Technology Education Association, “Standards for Technological Literacy: Content for the Study of Technology,” 3rd ed., 2007. [Online]. Available: http://www.iteea.org/TAA/PDFs/xstnd.pdf. [Accessed: 01- Apr-2015].[3] D. Sianez, M. Fugere, and C. Lennon, “Technology and Engineering Education Students’ Perceptions of Hands-On and Hands-Off Activities,” Research in Science & Technological Education, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 291- 299, Nov. 2010.[4] M. Milojkovic, M. Milovanovic, D. Mitic, S. Peric, M. Spasic, and S. Nikolic, “Laboratory CNC Machine for Education of Students on Control Systems Engineering,” Facta Universitatis, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 117-125, 2014.[5] D. Rijmenants

Conference Session

Engineering Physics & Physics Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Andrew Elby, University of Maryland, College Park; Eric Kuo, Stanford University; Ayush Gupta, University of Maryland, College Park; Michael M. Hull, Wayne State College

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Physics & Physics

a refinement of strategiesthat experienced physics teachers have been teaching for decades and because it is optimized forthe types of problems traditionally found in physics textbooks. The prescriptions aim to steerstudents away from common novice approaches such as identifying the unknown and searchingfor an equation that contains it, or pattern matching based on superficial aspects of the physicalscenario.12, 15 Although details differ, the prescriptions generally consist of steps like these: 1. Using diagrams as needed, visualize and make sense of the physical situation conceptually/qualitatively. 2. Explicitly identity the relevant physics principles. 3. Using the insights from (1) and (2), write equation(s) that can be

Conference Session

NSF Grantees’ Poster Session

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Matthew W. Ohland, Purdue University; Misty L. Loughry, Georgia Southern University; Richard . Layton, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; David Jonathan Woehr, University of North Carolina Charlotte; Daniel Michael Ferguson, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

was supported in part by NSF award 1431694, Optimizing Student Team SkillDevelopment using Evidence-Based Strategies.References1 Brutus, S., & Donia, M. B. (2010). Improving the effectiveness of students in groups with a centralized peer evaluation system. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 9, 652-662.2 Mayo, M., Kakarika, M. Pastor, J.C., & Brutus, S. (2012). Aligning or inflating your Leadership self-image? A longitudinal study of responses to peer feedback in MBA teams. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11, 631-652.3 Brutus, S., & Donia, M. B., & Ronen, S. (2013). Can business students learn to evaluate better? Evidence from repeated exposure to a peer

Conference Session

NSF Grantees’ Poster Session

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Matthew W. Ohland, Purdue University; Misty L. Loughry, Georgia Southern University; David Jonathan Woehr; Richard . Layton, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Daniel Michael Ferguson, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Evidence-Based Strategies.References1 Brutus, S., & Donia, M. B. (2010). Improving the effectiveness of students in groups with a centralized peer evaluation system. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 9, 652-662.2 Mayo, M., Kakarika, M. Pastor, J.C., & Brutus, S. (2012). Aligning or inflating your Leadership self-image? A longitudinal study of responses to peer feedback in MBA teams. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11, 631-652.3 Brutus, S., & Donia, M. B., & Ronen, S. (2013). Can business students learn to evaluate better? Evidence from repeated exposure to a peer evaluation system. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 12, 18-31.4 Ohland, M. W

Conference Session

Industrial Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Eric Specking, University of Arkansas; Patricia E Kirkwood, University of Arkansas; Lihua Yang, University of Arkansas

Tagged Divisions

Industrial Engineering

of the longitudinal study. Once validated, the appropriate survey willbe administrated to students at least 4 times throughout their undergraduate career toanalyze engineering perception and how it changes over time.Reference1. Besterfield-Sacre, M. E., Atman, C. J., & Shuman, L. J. ([1996]). Pittsburgh freshman engineering attitudes survey University of Pittsburg.2. Davis, D. C., Trevisan, M., Brown, S., French, B., Davis, H., LeBeau, J. & Brooks, S. Pittsburgh freshman engineering attitudes survey (PFEAS). Retrieved from http://assess.tidee.org/instruments/details/953. Abou-Jaoude, G., & Najjar, M. (2011). Perception of Lebanese middle school students about engineering. Paper presented at the 2011 IEEE Global

Conference Session

Teaching Problem Solving in a Multidisciplinary Context

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Luciana C. El Debs, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Rich Dionne, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Marisa Exter, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Mark Shaurette, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Multidisciplinary Engineering

Paper ID #12043Problem solving in a multidisciplinary environment: observations from anewly developed programLuciana C. El Debs, Purdue University Luciana Debs, is a Technology doctoral student and Graduate Research Assistant in the Department of Building Construction Management at Purdue Universitys College of Technology. She received her MS from the Technical Research Institute of Sao Paulo (IPT-SP), and her BSArc from the University of S˜ao Paulo (USP), both in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Prior to her current position she worked in design coordination in construction and real estate development companies in Brazil. Her research

Conference Session

Concepts and Conceptual Knowledge

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lauren Suzanne Wallace; Floraliza Bornilla Bornasal, Oregon State University; Shane A. Brown P.E., Oregon State University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

Conference Session

Curriculum Exchange

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nancy Ruzycki, University of Florida

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

culminated in an engineering design activity tied to curriculumcontent.During curriculum exchange copies of the tools will be available to teachers, and examples of teachercreated units using the templates will be shown. Teachers will be able to start to work through anduse the design templates to get a better feel for how they can be incorporated into lesson design.These tools are ideal for use in Lesson Study or Professional Learning Communities, or as part ofco/team teaching.Below is an example of a filled Frame: Page 26.434.2Page 26.434.31. University of Kansas Center for Teaching and Learning, http://www.ku-crl.org.2. Ellis, E. S., (1994

Conference Session

Chemical Engineering Division Poster Session

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mahdi Malmali, University of Minnesota; Kevin Wagner, University of Minnesota; Michael H. Reese, University of Minnesota - West Central Research and Outreach Center; Edward L. Cussler, University of Minnesota - Twin Cities; Alon V. McCormick, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

ammonia production? When needed? Expertise available to operate?) - What is your production target? What is the target scale/size/weight? (Hand- pulled or animal-pulled cart, car trunk, tractor, etc.) - Who is going to be the end-user? What expertise you expect they have? Consider different degrees of complexity! A farmer? An explorer? A trained research technician? - What balance do you envision about uses of ammonia: e.g., as fuel, as fertilizer, as a hydrogen source for H2 fuel cells, etc? - What mode(s) of production should you consider? (batch, continuous, other?) - What might affect the optimum pressure and temperature for the production facility, considering the limitations by the

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session - Retaining and Developing Women Faculty

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Theresa M. Vitolo, Gannon University; Karinna M Vernaza, Gannon University; Lori D. Lindley, Gannon University; Elisa M. Konieczko, Gannon University; Weslene Tallmadge, Gannon University

Tagged Topics

ASEE Diversity Committee, Diversity, Engineering Deans Council

Tagged Divisions

Engineering and Public Policy, Women in Engineering

information science; her industry experience includes systems analysis and cognitive science applications. She is one of the Principal Investigators on two NSF S-STEM and one NSF ADVANCE-PAID grants. With a life-long interest in technology and its potential for enhancing human capabilities, her research includes advances in analytics, motivated system energetics, and other topics relative to knowledge-intensive systems.Dr. Karinna M Vernaza, Gannon University Dr. Karinna Vernaza joined Gannon University in 2003, and she is currently a Professor in the Mechanical Engineering Department and Associate Dean of the College of Engineering and Business. She earned her Ph.D. and M.S. in mechanical engineering from the University

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division: Design Mental Frameworks

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Eunhye Kim, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

stopping short of claimingthat the resultant output is a systematic review” (p.102). As for the differentiated characteristicsof systematized reviews, they described that a systematized review typically omits the step ofquality appraisal with a smaller set of eligible articles but still involves a systematic search,review, and synthesis process. Also, they mentioned that a systematized review can be conductedby one researcher rather than a research team. As a systematized review, this study followedBorrego, Foster, and Froyd (2014)’s steps in conducting a systematic review: identifying a scopeand research questions, defining inclusion criteria, finding and cataloging sources, critique andappraisal, and synthesis. However, this study did not