-structure interaction during earthquakes. Due to the scope of the project, graduatestudents are serving as the primary mentors to the undergraduates as they complete their researchappointments.In this paper, we describe our strategies and experiences in recruiting, training, advising, andmentoring undergraduate student researchers for this laboratory-based research project. We alsodiscuss the methods used to prepare the graduate students for their roles as research mentors.As part of this project, the principal investigators worked with the graduate students to provideadvice and training on topics such as teamwork, project management, communication, feedback,and student learning, which has helped to foster effective mentor-mentee relationships.We
Paper ID #37628Engineering and the Fulbright U.S. Scholar Program AWorld of OpportunitiesJohn David Rice (Associate Professor) Dr. John Rice is an Associate Professor at Utah State University (USU) where he teaches senior and graduate-level courses in Embankment Dams and Slopes, Ground Improvement, Advanced Shear Strength of Soils, and Foundation Analysis and Risk Assessment for Dams. He received he Ph.D. from Virginia Tech with a dissertation titled The Long- Term Performance of Seepage Barriers in Dams. His research at USU focuses on seepage and internal erosion in dams and levees and he has published over 40
of belonging to their program of study. While this was a known problem for theEE program, a closed-loop educational assessment and improvement was conducted to close thegap and relate students to their field of study as early as the first semester of study. In this newapproach to the lower-division courses students will start system view courses and currentprototyping circuits and tools were used to set up the laboratory experiments. The goals of thisstudy were: a) Integration of courses and providing a system view in the lower-division courses. b) Improving retention and engagement in early years of study. c) Closing the gap between lower-division and upper-division courses by practicing system view projects using
arts organizations.Dr. Nassif E. Rayess, University of Detroit Mercy Nassif Rayess is Professor and Chair of Mechanical Engineering at University of Detroit Mercy. He was part of the efforts to introduce entrepreneurially minded learning to the University as part of the KEEN Network and Engineering Unleashed. He is also directly involved in the curricular elements of the co- op program at the University, and teaches the professional development courses that bookends the co-op semesters. He received his Ph.D. from Wayne State University and joined Detroit Mercy in 2001. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021Embedding Technical Writing into a
Paper ID #35028Undergraduate Area of Emphasis in Unmanned Aerial SystemsDr. Mario G Perhinschi, West Virginia University Mario G. Perhinschi is a Professor with the Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at West Virginia University. He is teaching courses in Feedback Control, Flight Simulation, Mechatron- ics, Aircraft Health Management, and Artificial Intelligence Techniques. He is actively involved in the improvement of the Aerospace Engineering Curriculum at his institution. His current research interests include primarily the design of intelligent fault tolerant control laws, trajectory planning and tracking
South Florida’s College ofEngineering (also in Tampa) to develop and implement laboratory exercises for classes inboth the electrical and industrial engineering departments. These departments have, inturn, offered technical expertise to support the equipment.Concluding RemarksThe HAS-200 can be used to teach most of the topics currently covered in existingManufacturing Science, Robotics, Automation, Controls, and Electrical Troubleshootingcourse offered at Community Colleges, Technical Schools, in-house corporate trainingcenters and Universities. Twelve community colleges and two universities are currentlyusing the system to teach various aspects of these topics in a number of different courses.Several systems have been used for operator and/or
Cutcliffe, Lehigh University Marie Dahleh, Harvard University Kurt DeGoede, Elizabethtown College Richard F. Devon, Penn State University Katy Disney, Mission College Elsa Garmire, Dartmouth Camille George, Univ. of St. Thomas Mary T. Huber, Carnegie Foundation for Adv. Teaching Mary Kasarda, Virginia Tech J. Doug Klein, Union College John Krupczak, Hope College Renee Lerche, University of Michigan Deborah Mechtel, United States Naval Academy Ron Miller, Colorado School of Mines Kay Neeley, University of Virginia Jean Nocito-Gobel, University of New Haven M. Grant Norton, Washington State University Barbara Oakley, Oakland
Collaboration, Currency Doubleday, 1995, p.31.Ralph O. BuchalDr. Buchal earned a degree in Mechanical Engineering from the University of British Columbia in 1980. Hesubsequently earned an M.A.Sc. in 1984 and a Ph.D. in 1987, both from U.B.C. He has been a faculty memberin the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Western Ontario since 1987. Prof. Buchal’sinterests include robotics, manufacturing, information technology, and computer-integrated manufacturing. Hehas been active in curriculum and undergraduate laboratory development in these areas. He teaches courses inRobotics and Manufacturing Automation, Production Management for Engineers, and Computer Systems andEngineering Applications. He is a content provider, site coordinator
AC 2009-525: USING THE TEXAS INTERACTIVE POWER SIMULATOR FORDIRECT INSTRUCTIONMelissa Lott, University of Texas, Austin Melissa Lott is a graduate student in the Mechanical Engineering Department at the University of Texas at Austin. Her work includes a unique pairing of mechanical engineering and public policy in the field of energy systems research. She is a graduate of the University of California at Davis, receiving a Bachelor’s of Science degree in Biological Systems Engineering. Melissa is currently working as a member of the Webber Energy Group at the University of Texas at Austin. She was a 2008 recipient of the Rylander Excellence in Teaching Endowment for her achievements in the
.................................Engines of our Ingenuity [32-34] Oakley ....................................Everyday Engineering [41] Ollis........................................How Things Work [42-45]2 Technology Focus or Topics CoursesThese courses tend to address a single technological topic or issue. The subject matter isintentionally focused and selective rather than intentionally broad. These courses may have asubstantial quantitative component. The focus courses may include laboratories or projects. Insome cases, social and historical aspects of the topic are included.In developing and teaching these courses, instructors are often working from their area ofresearch expertise. The instructors can then rely on their extensive often life-long experience inthe
his research, he has devised a few teaching activities, including Lab-in-Class and Lab-in-a-Bag. He has received several teaching awards for his effort in developing the new activities. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Preparing Undergraduate Engineering Students for their Profession – A Novel Curricular Approach Joel R. Howell1, Christos S. Ferekides1, Wilfrido A. Moreno1, Thomas M. Weller2, Arash Takshi1 1 University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 2 Oregon State University, Corvallis, ORAbstractThis Work-In-Progress (WIP) paper describes a
Paper ID #19485WIP: Introducing MATLAB-based Instruction and Learning in the Creativ-ity Thread of a Novel Integrated Approach to ECE EducationProf. Branislav M. Notaros, Colorado State University Branislav M. Notaros is Professor and University Distinguished Teaching Scholar in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Colorado State University, where he also is Director of Electro- magnetics Laboratory. His research publications in computational and applied electromagnetics include more than 180 journal and conference papers. He is the author of textbooks Electromagnetics (2010) and MATLAB-Based
an Associate Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. She teaches courses in circuits, electromagnetics, and medical imaging. Before joining academia in 2006, she was at the Computed Tomography Laboratory at GE’s Global Research Center for 8 years. She worked on several technology development projects in the area of X-ray CT for medical and industrial imaging. She is a named inventor on 9 patents. She has been active in the recruitment and retention of women and minorities in engineering and currently PI for an NSF-STEM grant to improve diversity at Rose-Hulman.Dr. Kathleen Meehan, Virginia Tech Kathleen Meehan earned her B.S. in electrical engineering from Manhattan
Paper ID #22764WIP: Decoding a Discipline – Toward Identifying Threshold Concepts in Ge-omatics EngineeringDr. Ivan Detchev, University of Calgary Ivan Detchev holds a BScE (first division) from the department of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering at the University of New Brunswick. He also obtained a MSc and a PhD in Geomatics Engineering from the University of Calgary. Dr. Detchev is currently an instructor in surveying and mapping at the University of Calgary. He is interested in the scholarship of teaching and learning (SoTL) related to engineering education.Dr. Elena V. Rangelova, University of Calgary Dr. Elena
construction processvisualization with such tools as 3D animation.Different teaching strategies should be applied in each of courses above, including formallecture, laboratory, and comprehensive/intern projects. While the detailed technical description isbeing discussed in the following section, the knowledge points in the proposed courses can bedivided into three major steps/components: • Step I – Basic GIS/GPS concepts: This step allows students to learn the basic GIS/GPS concepts, spatial data management, and prepare to obtain the potential benefits for construction. Usually, students should be able to attend a pure GIS class from other programs such as Geography or a short training course offered by
engineering.IntroductionThis paper presents a performance process model for implementing an engineering curriculumfor the Uganda Christian University. Engineering education is non existent at the UgandaChristian University. This is a university that serves the educational needs of the Church ofUganda and admits any qualified student in Uganda or students of other countries. The Churchof Uganda has about 5 million members which is approximately 20 per cent of the 24.7 millionpopulation of Uganda1 . The results of a survey conducted over a four year period show thatthere is both a need to train scientists and engineers as well as a need to train teachers at thesecondary level to teach the basics of science and engineering. The findings were similar to thefindings from
environment where engineering students and faculty andeducation students and faculty can collaborate to design and build laboratory equipment andinstructional materials to enhance teaching and learning of mathematics and science in K-12.Three one-credit hour courses, ENGR 202, 303, and 404 are being created so students canreceive academic credits while engaging in multi-year, multi-disciplinary service-learningprojects. Community service provides the context for students to develop and grow skills inengineering design, teamwork, and communication.Another function of the Engineering Design Center for Service Learning is to support WMUstudent volunteers, which numbers approximately 400 students about half of whom are educationstudents, to lead after
formthe foundation of engineering. Focusing on applications in biological systems to teach theseconservation laws provides a new and unifying approach to the introductory, interdisciplinaryfundamentals course in Biomedical Engineering departments.Chapters 1 and 2 provide exposure to bioengineering problems and motivation for a quantitativeengineering approach. The manuscript begins with a basic review of engineering calculationswith an emphasis on elaborating the physical variables, which are introduced in the context ofdifferent biomedical technologies. The fundamental framework of the conservation laws isdescribed in Chapter 2.Chapters 3-6 cover conservation of mass, energy, charge, and momentum in biomedical systems.Each chapter begins with a
Paper ID #9874Curriculum Revision to Better Integrate Mechanical Engineering Science andPractice in the 2nd and 3rd Undergraduate YearsDr. Michele Miller, Michigan Technological University Dr. Michele Miller is an associate professor of Mechanical Engineering at Michigan Technological Uni- versity. She teaches classes on manufacturing and does research in engineering education with particular interest in hands-on ability, lifelong learning, and project-based learning.Dr. Jeffrey Allen, Michigan Technological UniversityDr. Jason Blough, Michigan Technological UniversityDr. James P. De Clerck, Michigan Technological University
past International Director of SME and a Fellow of SME. His areas of interest are manufacturingprocesses, manufacturing management, and laboratory teaching that replicates industry conditions.ALVIN POSTAlvin Post is an assistant professor in the Mechanical & Manufacturing Engineering Technology Department atArizona State University East. Before joining ASU East, Dr. Post taught at McGill University in Canada and hada 19-year career at IBM as a designer. His areas of interest are machine design, applied engineering mathematics, Page 8.835.7and education. Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education
of the subjects being taught.The choice for a high-end simulation package is based on the principle of teaching a tool that canbe used during the students’ senior design courses and in their professional careers as well.Carrying out the integration of the software into the course can pose some challenging issues. Forexample, integrating software teaching and assignments into an already full course schedule. Herethe author suggests a Web-based approach. Student feedback on the integration is included andan example assignment is also given in the paper.Introduction Page 8.742.1Many universities currently teach kinematics and dynamics of
Delivery The traditional lecture mode of teaching has changed little for centuries. In light of changing needs anda shift of emphasis from teaching to learning, new modes of delivery need to be developed and exploited. Thetable below illustrates how different modes of educational delivery can be classified according to the temporaland spatial relationship between the student and the instructor. Synchronous (Same Time) Asynchronous (Different Time ) Collocated Classroom lecture CBT/multimedia (Same Discussion groups, tutorials Internet Location) Laboratories File sharing
AC 2011-1464: PUTTING BELLS & WHISTLES ON DSP TOOLKIT OFLABVIEWMurat Tanyel, Geneva College Murat Tanyel is a professor of engineering at Geneva College. He teaches upper level electrical engineer- ing courses. Prior to teaching at Geneva College, Dr. Tanyel taught at Dordt College in Sioux Center, IA. He started his career at Drexel University where he worked for the Enhanced Educational Experience for Engineering Students (E4) project, setting up and teaching laboratory and hands-on computer exper- iments for engineering freshmen and sophomores. For one semester, he was also a visiting professor at the United Arab Emirates University in Al-Ain, UAE where he helped set up an innovative introductory
Practical Courses for Synthetic Ability Practical Courses for Specialized Skills Practical Courses for Basic Skills EXPERIMENTAL AND ENGINEERING EDUCATION PLATFORM The National Experimental Education Center of Transportation Engineering The National Engineering Education Center for Practice Teaching The Joint Center of National and Provincial Engineering Education The Provincial Key Laboratory of Comprehensive Transportation The Railways Schedule Formation Center of Ministry of Transportation (P.R.China) 21 Large Enterprises for
, understandingand application of selected laboratory exercises. It includes classroom/laboratory instruction,follow-up activities at the schools, and evaluation, both during and after the institute.While the Year 1 (2006) Summer Institute focused on providing engineering hands-on activitiesthat teachers could subsequently use in their classrooms,5, 6 the Year 2 (2007) Institute taught theparticipants how to design their own experiments using a reverse design teaching method calledthe “design loop” method which emphasizes results-driven outcomes.7 The design loopapproach focuses on three components: 1) a clear set of desired results by identifying goals forstudents, the specific information the students will understand , and what students will achieve asa
Engineering Education, 5 (2), 93-99. 3. Quere, R., Lalande, M., Boutin, J. N., and Valente, C. (1995). An Automatic Characterization of Gaussian Noise Source for Undergraduate Electronics Laboratory, IEEE Transaction on Education, vol.38, No2, 126-130. 4. Kim A. S., Park C., and Park, S. H. (2003). Development of web-based Engineering Numerical Software (WENS) Using MATLAB: Applications to Linear Algebra, Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 11 (2), 67-75. 5. Orsak G. C., Etter D. M. (1995). Collaborative Signal Processing Education Using the Internet and MATLAB. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 12 (6), 23-32. 6. Pires V. F. and Silva J. F. A. (2002). Teaching Nonlinear Modeling, Simulation and Control of Electronic Power
training programs), Ross Kastor was hired as a lecturer to teach the class.While he has added and subtracted lecture topics, the project aspect of the course hadremained relatively unchanged since 1981. Fours years ago the Department of Electricaland Computer Engineering (ECE) added the course as a degree requirement for all Proceedings of the 2003 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference The University of Texas at Arlington Copyright 2003, American Society for Engineering Educationstudents entering in the fall, 1998 and thereafter. Since then some ECE students havetaken the course as an elective. That number has grown over the past three years to about30 in the fall, 2002. Fifty-five
Motivating cadets’ learning in engineering education is always critical, however thisbecomes even more important when teaching engineering courses to non-engineering majors. Inorder to influence these students we develop an active learning environment. Class sizes areconstrained to no more than 18 students. This allows for more instructor-student interaction.Each class of students is organized into three or four person groups. This helps the cadets learnby helping each other, and also forces them to work as a member of a team, an ability required ofArmy officers. The active learning environment involves many hands-on applications ofengineering. Many physical models, training aids and laboratories are used to enhance the activelearning atmosphere. 4
work place andthe rigor of an academic challenge. Projects should use all the skills of the student and requireconcrete, measurable outcomes.C. The Learning Factory (Laboratory Facilities for Projects)As much as we like to espouse the virtual organization, it is healthy to have a dedicated space tofocus the activities of the work. The Learning Factory is more than a lab. It is the intersection ofindustry and the classroom. Here is where technology is applied to the design of real worldproblems that will be translated into industry solutions for the marketplace. As with any robustdesign, the Learning Factory has the potential to provide value well beyond the students’ project.By the Teach, Learn, Teach Principle, the developments that emerge
. Ultimately, the solution to the lack of dedicated engineering space was simple (butnot easy): construct a new building. However, building a new space on campus requiresinstitutional support and a funding source. The College President and College Advancementoffice began raising funds to design and build an addition to the existing science center. Theseefforts culminated in the construction in 2017 of a joint Engineering and Biomedical SciencesHall, which included a dedicated engineering laboratory, an engineering computation lab, amodern teaching classroom, three faculty offices, and two “project labs” intended to provideworkspace for Engineering and Integrated Science design, research, and capstone projects.However, shortly after construction was