realization process driven by its life cycle. In general,main problems in effective teaching of PRS are:1- many concepts are introduced late in the curriculum (during senior level courses or at the capstone projects)2- too many concepts are introduced in a short period of time (do not allow students to learn and progress based on their own mistakes)3- late introduction of PRS does not allow students to practice searching for unknown concepts and solutions (most senior level courses and projects are based on a concept of utilizing knowledge acquired in prerequisite courses)4- over-emphasis on ability of using mathematical analysis which usually requires having initial conditions and constraints (not often the case in real-word problems
and relay them over a medium-range(100 m) wireless network to a PDA8. Interactions between sensor networks and humans arealready judged controversial.Many Capstone and Senior projects by students are being done in this area. One recent exampleis ‘Outlet Power Monitoring Using Wireless Sensor Networks’9.The need for increased power monitoring in residential and commercial units is becomingincreasingly self-evident by the ongoing shortage of natural resources and rising costs ofelectricity. This need has been supported by recent government and private policies towardsreducing power consumption and better power monitoring. This system is one that implementsthese features by taking advantage of several new technologies, including energy
can be effectively andresponsibly integrated into different types of engineering courses.Regarding specific courses, we found that people teaching first-year courses reported GAI wasinfluencing thinking about assessment. This relatively high recognition might reflect thefoundational nature of these courses, where incorporating innovative technologies could play asignificant role in shaping early educational experiences. In contrast, Capstone Courses, oftenbeing the culmination of academic programs, showed a notable number of acknowledgments.This suggests that even in advanced stages of education, where comprehensive projects andpractical applications are prevalent, the potential of GAI to influence and enhance educationalpractices is widely
been pivotal in the development of structural programs to promote research inpredominantly undergraduate institutions [2]. This has led to an increase in undergraduateresearch programs at different universities over the last 35 years.Several models for undergraduate research programs exist, in addition to REUs. These modelsinclude capstone experiences, senior theses, internships and co-ops, course-based undergraduateresearch experiences (CURES), wrap-around experiences, bridge programs, consortium/project-based programs, community-based research programs [1], [3]. However, most of these programsare relatively short-term (i.e., limited to one to two semesters) and thus constrain how deeplystudents can delve into their research.Earlier studies
, “Exploring Agency in Capstone Design Problem Framing,” Studies in Engineering Education, vol. 2, no. 2, p. 96, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.21061/see.69.[4] X. Du, A. Lundberg, M. Ayari, K. K. Naji, and A. Hawari, “Examining engineering students’ perceptions of learner agency enactment in problem- and project-based learning using Q methodology,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 111, no. 1, pp. 111–136, 2022.[5] M. Wilson-fetrow, V. Svihla, S. Wettstein, J. Brown, and E. Chi, “Consequential Agency in Chemical Engineering Laboratory Courses,” in American Society of Engineering Education Conference Proceedings, Minneapolis, MN, 2022.[6] R. A. Engle and F. R. Conant, “Guiding Principles for Fostering Productive
Paper ID #36027SEWAGE PIPELINE INSPECTION TOOL & ROBOTMr. Jiaqiao Liang, Wentworth Inst. of Tech. Electromechanical undergraduate student of Wentworth Institute of Technology.James R McCusker PhD, Wentworth Institute of Technology James R. McCusker is an Associate Professor at Wentworth Institute of Technology in the Department of Electrical Engineering. Since joining Wentworth in 2010, he has been heavily involved with an array of interdisciplinary design courses that range from introductory to capstone courses.Dr. Gloria Guohua Ma, Wentworth Institute of Technology Gloria Ma is a Professor in School of Engineering. She
Technology Curriculum Paper presented at 2010 Annual Conference & Exposition, Louisville, Kentucky. 10.18260/1-2—16225 7. Kumar, A. S. K., & Rahman, Z. (2014). Is ELearning a Menace for T-Learning: An Analytical Report. Canadian Intl. Con. on Education, June 16th-19th, Proceedings Published by Infonomics Society, 454-459 8. Mohammed, J., & Dimmitt, N. J. (2012, June), A Coursework Plan for Improving Skills Necessary for Successful Capstone Projects Paper presented at 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, San Antonio, Texas. 10.18260/1-2—20796 9. Reynolds, H. L., & Kearns, K. D. (2017). A planning tool for incorporating backward design, active learning, and
and Aerospace Engineering and founding PI of the MERGE ((MEchanical engineeRing desiGn pEdagogy) Lab focusing his research and teaching efforts on Capstone Design, Design for Manufacturing, and developing hands-on manufacturing courses. Sean advises UF's Formula SAE team (Gator Motorsports) and co-advises the UF Rocket Team (Swamp Launch). Sean has worked in industrial maintenance and aerospace, with his graduate work studying soft matter engineering, 3D bio-printing, and biotribology. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Continuous Improvement of an Experiential Learning Manufacturing Lab
Project Volunteer Team Team 2 255, 39% 215, 28% 47, 37% 15, 23% 189, 20% 9, 26% Engineer Help Work Work Event Design 3 192, 30% 100, 13% 37, 29% 10, 16% 180, 19% 8, 24% Project Food Datum Community Work Project 4 172, 27% 97, 13% 21, 16% 9, 14% 133, 14% 8, 24% Design Make Lab Assist Member System 5 113, 17% 95, 12% 20, 16% 8, 13% 130, 14
developing ‘creating value’skills have included exploring success via case studies, evaluating impact of biases, andencouraging students to define their own projects within capstone courses. However, validatedtools for such assessment appear to be less known within the community.While the 3Cs certainly have numerous educational techniques aimed at advancing each,additional assessments via validated tools would appear to be welcomed. Here we introduce theusage of an engineering design self-efficacy tool [7] as a means to assess across all 3Cs. Viamodifying the wording within this questionnaire, one can tailor to specific learning aspectswithin a course and establish a relation to at least one of the 3Cs. Here we use this tool to assessa course that
been active withinternational student projects for several years through the mechanical engineering seniordesign program. Working directly in Senegal, Peru, and Malawi, and indirectly in Rwanda,Dr. Kochersberger has initiated 21 international capstone projects and advised 15 of these ina six-year period, with work focused on agriculture, healthcare, water, and sanitation. Theseprojects have given technicians in Malawi a new latrine pit desludging technology(replicated in Niger), NGOs in Peru a portable exam table for cancer screening, and farmersin Senegal a simple grass chopping system for making silage for livestock.Over a six-year period, more than 130 Virginia Tech students have been exposed to theseinternational projects where design work
include COS, FMEA, and FMECA hazard analyses. This could include redundancy requirements and minimum safe control including risk analysis. Finally, a third elective could include more system engineering aspects of the design process including manufacturing, maintenance, project management, project organization, case studies, and ethics.The capstone project for the degree would be focused on the real-world application of theairworthiness standards. It would apply the knowledge stated above in a design problem thatwould focus on the airworthiness and regulatory aspects of the aerospace design process. Itwould include the suggestions of the NAS9945 series and ASTM F3457-20. The students wouldparticipate in a mock
practice.Intentionally, the application of critical thinking is systematically integrated within multipleopportunities for students to practice and broaden critical thinking skills, in general educationcourses, academic program courses, and experiential learning.As an example, design and problem solving projects are integral parts of all Mechanical,Manufacturing, and Electrical Mechanical Engineering Technology (MMET) program courses,with increasing complexity and integration of multiple domains as the students’ progress towardstheir capstone experiences. Approximately half of freshmen courses are in the engineeringtechnology core. This allows opportunities to help students immediately begin developing theircritical thinking and analytical skills and highlights
Technology course. Implementation varieddepending upon course learning outcomes and instructor preference, from a single lecture, to amulti-week simulation project culminating in a capstone session. Table 3 provides an overviewthat maps the standards modules and topics that were included to the specific courses in whichthey were utilized. Table 3: Correlation between Module Topics and CETEMS Courses 2018 ASEE Mid-Atlantic Spring Conference, April 6-7, 2018 – University of the District of ColumbiaFollowing lectures and class exercises such as a simulation game, small group work or acomprehensive case-based project, the students' work was analyzed to determine how well theygrasped concepts or were able to successfully apply the
young professionals – in herrole at Texas A&M University. She is the Director of the College of Engineering’s, Zachry LeadershipProgram and a Professor of Engineering Practice. At Texas A&M University, she has taught Capstone Se-nior Design and Foundations of Engineering courses, but now teaches Engineering Leadership Develop-ment courses. She has also taught Project Management and Risk Management courses for the Universityof Phoenix.Dr. Wickliff has been honored with University of Houston’s Distinguished Young Engineering AlumniAward, the Black Engineer of the Year Career Achievement Award for New Emerging Leaders and fea-tured in several publications. She has presented keynote addresses, facilitated workshops and given moti-vational
-designed experiment as contributing to their learning, althoughfor this particular lab, students responded on the full range of the scale, with somestudents rating the lab at a 1 and others at a 7. The average rating was 5.6. In the focusgroups, students also disagreed on the value of this lab with one student commenting“[The Student designed labs] took a little bit of extra effort. I think you got more backfrom it, as well, having put so much of ourselves into it. It combined all those skills wegathered throughout the semester.” Other students remarked that the nature of this labmimicked potential future experiences, both in required senior capstone projects and inreal-world work situations. They believed their experiences would be beneficial
and Innovation Certificate must complete asequence of 5 courses (15 credits). These include two required core courses, two optioncourses in areas of their choice, and one capstone or project-based course. TheBiotechnology Laboratory I (IT226) course within the Biotechnology program is offeredas an option course for the Entrepreneurial program. Biotechnology Lab forEntrepreneurs (IT226E) provides hands-on experience with the latest biotechnologyequipment via the collaboration discussed above with Bindley Bioscience Center. Thecourse also incorporates guest speakers from biotechnology industries and academia thatshare their experience with the students. For students interested in entrepreneurship, thebiotechnology course provides the
2008 to fix the problem.2. These experiments expose you to a way how data acquisition is done in real industrial applications. If not, please elaborate. The average rating for this question is 4.3.3. These experiments are reasonable in content and length. If not, how can we improve it? The average rating for this question is 4.6From the assessment result, we can conclude that the students are very satisfied with theseexperiments. In addition one of the students who took this course in the fall of 2005 used asimilar PCI DAQ board manufactured by Measurement Computing in his capstone project todesign and build a Software Controlled Radio. The experiments in this course provided him withimportant knowledge for his senior design
Design and Fabrication of Spline(DFS module) using the rotary axis of a CNC machining center, and a laboratory experiment inrobotics along with results obtained from student team projects are presented, analyzed, anddiscussed.IntroductionThe advancement in technology, computers, and automation demands continuous improvementin the quality of education, both in theory in the classroom, as well as hands-on practice indesign, computer simulation, and manufacturing laboratories. There is a growing need forpreparing the students both in theory and practice so that they are well prepared to meet thechallenges in the job market, especially in the manufacturing industries of the 21st century. Astrong multi-disciplinary background is required from
is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Technology in Mechanical Engineering Technology Program. She holds a Ph.D. from Purdue University in Mechanical Engineering Technol- ogy, focus on Digital Manufacturing. Her research is focused on mechatronics, digital manufacturing, digital thread, cyber physical systems, broadening participation, and engineering education. She is a Co-Director of Mechatronics and Digital Manufacturing Lab at ODU and a lead of Area of Specializa- tion Mechatronics Systems Design. She worked as a Visiting Researcher at Commonwealth Center for Advanced Manufacturing in Disputanta, VA on projects focusing on digital thread and cyber security of manufacturing systems. She has funded research
multiple teams at the university to track metricsthat may offer insights into our effectiveness in changing the curriculum, and ultimately,the ecosystem. We intend to assess the following statistics: the number of companiesengaged in the program through guest lectures, co-ops and internships; the number ofnew and current students who apply to the program; funding requests for researchingteaching methods to improve the engineering technology program not only for theuniversity but the community college and career-technical centers; number ofsponsored manufacturing internships and capstone projects with an applicationcomponent.The industry relationship-building that the steering committee and faculty haveintegrated into the first two years include
Paper ID #29303Developing a Framework for Experiential LearningDr. John H Callewaert, University of Michigan John Callewaert is Director of Strategic Projects in the Office of the Associate Dean for Undergraduate Education, College of Engineering, University of Michigan. He previously served as a program director with the University of Michigan’s Graham Sustainability Institute, Director of the University of Michigan- Flint’s Office of Research, and the Director of the Institute for Community and Environment at Colby- Sawyer College. He completed doctoral study in Resource, Policy and Behavior at the University of
, no. 4, pp. 325-328, October 2003.[21] Northern Kentucky University, "Catalog," [Online]. Available: https://inside.nku.edu/registrar/catalog.html. [Accessed 1 Febraury 2018].[22] ETAC, 2013-2014 Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Technology Programs, ABET (Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology), 2012.[23] M. Sadat-Hossieny and M. Torres, "Vertical Integration of Capstone Projects in Multiple Courses in the Engineering Technology Programs," in 122nd Annual ASEE Conference, Seattle, WA, 2015.[24] "Advantage Kentucky Alliance," [Online]. Available: http://orgs.wku.edu/advantageky/. [Accessed 21 July 2015].
comments in submissions in a LMS system. Overall,the main format of feedback is still in the written format. This format generally providesmechanism provides for an ineffective, static monologue between the instructor and the student 7.In past studies, it has been shown that for many problems, alternative forms of feedback outsideof the written comment can be more effective, the best effectiveness often comes from providingfeedback in a variety of modes8. Verbal feedback is often employed in a mentorship manner.Most software engineering programs have some form of a capstone project where an advisor ormentor routinely meets with project teams and discusses their project. This mentorship helpsstudents tremendously. Oral presenters are often “coached
core component of any engineering education. Most students take someform of engineering design in their capstone experience, as is recommended by ABET [1].Recently, however, more opportunities for this work have been created for underclassmen.Studies have shown that placing team-based engineering design earlier in an engineeringcurriculum can provide students with valuable teamwork skills and connections to real-worldengineering work, as well as increase retention of material learned in class [2]. Teaching designfreshman year increases retention of women and underrepresented minorities[3]. It also providesrelevance and context to young engineers’ careers.While there is an increased interest in teaching engineering design, understanding how to
Engineering Technology. In 2001, she joined the Spacecraft Technology Center as an Assistant Director where she was responsible for the structural and thermal analysis of payloads. She served as Director of the Space Engi- neering Institute and in 2010 she accepted a position with the Academic Affairs office of the Dwight Look College of Engineering where she oversaw outreach, recruiting, retention and enrichment programs for the college. Since 2013, she serves as the Executive Director for Industry and Nonprofit Partnerships with responsibilities to increase opportunities for undergraduates engineering students to engage in experiential learning multidisciplinary team projects. These include promoting capstone design
Paper ID #11121The Paul Peck Program: A Multi-Year Leadership Development ProgramMs. Alistar Erickson-Ludwig, Drexel University (Eng. & Eng. Tech.) Ms. Alistar Erickson-Ludwig serves as the STEM Program Coordinator in the College of Engineering at Drexel University. She focuses on outreach and education programs for current undergraduates, k- 12 students, and the community. She concentrates on the Greater Philadelphia Seaperch Underwater Robotics Competition, Summer Diversity Program, Introduce a Girl to Engineering Day, and Engineering Projects in Community Service (EPICS) at Drexel, among others. In collaboration with
capstone (culminating project). A review of over fifty associate level mechatronicsprograms in the United States revealed that over 90% of those programs had at least one coursein each subject mentioned above as the “second year” courses. Local program “flavor” dependson regional industry needs and is expressed in other related courses that might be required orelective.The future of mechatronics education is exciting and coming very fast. Many industries,including manufacturers, are rapidly adopting the technologies and communication platforms ofIndustry 4.0 for their production systems. The new term “Industry 4.0” was coined to capture thegrowing integration of cyberphysical systems, cloud computing, big data with sophisticatedautomated and
Instruction Using Slack for Project Support and Team-work Engineering design instruction using Slack for project support and teamwork,” in Design in Engineering Education Division: Capstone Design Practices, 2019.[9] Perkel J, “HOW SCIENTISTS USE SLACK,” Nature, p. 124, 2017.[10] B. Lin, A. Zagalsky, M.-A. Storey, and A. Serebrenik, “Why Developers Are Slacking Off: Understanding How Software Teams Use Slack,” in Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing Companion, 2016, pp. 333–336, doi: 10.1145/2818052.2869117.[11] A. Tuhkala and T. Kärkkäinen, “Using Slack for computer-mediated communication to support higher education students’ peer
, Wentworth Institute of Technology Gloria Ma is a Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering and Technology. She has been teaching robotics with Lego Mindstorm to ME freshmen for several years. She is actively involved in community services of offering robotics workshops to middle- and high-school girls. Her research in- terests are dynamics and system modeling, geometry modeling, project based engineering design, and robotics in manufacturing.James R McCusker PhD, Wentworth Institute of Technology James R. McCusker is an Associate Professor at Wentworth Institute of Technology in the Department of Electrical Engineering. Since joining Wentworth in 2010, he has been heavily involved with an array of