[11], and Purdue’s EPICand Multidisciplinary Engineering programs [12], [13].RESEARCH QUESTIONSIncluded among those universities implementing engineering curricula change is University of Virginia,where an interdisciplinary engineering program exists in the form of the Technology Leadership Program(TLP). This program’s curriculum focuses on developing a student’s knowledge and skills that addressboth component level design and systems integration. This interdisciplinary program is a crosscollaboration between the Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE), Systems Engineering (SIE) andMechanical Engineering (MAE) departments. Its three year curriculum fosters a learning environment inwhich electrical, computer, systems and mechanical
characterization techniques of polymer and com- posite structures and the incorporation of multifunctionality by inducing desired responses to mechanical loading. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Teaching Systems Thinking in a Capstone Mechatronic Design CourseIntroductionEngineers involved in product design and development have been facing a clear trend towardsthe integration of multiple subsystems into existing and new devices. Sensors, actuators, andprocessors are now ubiquitous components in design, which has led to the rise of mechatronicsengineering and subsequent curriculum changes in conventional disciplines such as mechanicalengineering. Moreover
Paper ID #25365Examining Beginning Designers’ Design Self-regulation through Linkogra-phyDr. Andrew Jackson, Yale University Andrew Jackson is currently a postdoctoral associate at Yale University, developing and assessing sec- ondary engineering curriculum with the aim to broaden participation in engineering. He received a PhD in Technology through Purdue’s Polytechnic Institute, with an emphasis on Engineering and Technology Teacher Education. His teaching and research interests are to support students’ development as designers and the day-to-day practices of technology and engineering educators. His contributions toward
make curricular connections between the liberal arts and engineeringeducation. In many cases, multiple faculty members from different disciplines create and co-teach courses, which may take substantial time and effort for faculty to sit together to design thecurriculum. On the other hand, faculty members might be fiercely proud of their disciplines.They may resist an integrated curriculum that devalues their own discipline while elevatinganother [2]. No matter what the course is, faculty members should be devoted to creating aneffective learning environment and then ensure students achieve designed learning outcomes.Thus, understanding students’ motivation for learning is one of the prime factors that contributeto achieving the goal which is
incorporate exciting research advances in importantphotonics technology into the undergraduate and early graduate curriculum. The PRIDE program willprovide integrative curricular modules to bring photonics from the world of research to undergraduatecore courses, to elective course laboratories, and to our capstone design course. Our focus is on advancedundergraduate experiences, but early graduate curricula overlap through the specialized electives, andwould also be served. Integrating photonics modules into existing curricula, rather than building specializedcourses, will demonstrate a different model of curriculum development. F’acult y researchers and researchprofessors, too busy to build an entire course, will be stimulated to offer their
AC 2009-190: STUDENT EVALUATIONS OF SPONSOR INTERACTION IN ACAPSTONE INTERDISCIPLINARY SENIOR DESIGN PROGRAMPeter Schmidt, University of North Carolina, Charlotte Peter L. Schmidt received his bachelor’s degree in mechanical engineering from the University of Louisville, a master’s degree in mechanical engineering from the Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology and his doctorate degree in mechanical engineering from Vanderbilt University. He is currently an assistant professor at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte. He has served as a research associate and as an instructor at Vanderbilt University. He has also worked at the Naval Surface Warfare Center in Crane, Indiana; at Precision
. The firstimplementation focused on logic layout at the mask level to produce an ApplicationSpecific Integrated Circuit (ASIC). The second implementation involved Verilog codebeing mapped to a Field-Programmable Gate Array (FPGA). Both methods providedstudents with different insights into the design process while exposing them to a varietyof CAD tools used in manufacturing today.This project grew out of Project G (short for Godzilla), an earlier endeavor in which agroup of undergraduates constructed a Lego® robot using the Lego MindstormsTM toolkit. This work looked for alternative ways to control the robot and was performed as amixture of class projects and faculty directed undergraduate research. The project hasresulted in successfully
through the curriculum culminating in a major design experience basedon the knowledge and skills acquired in earlier coursework and incorporating engineeringstandards and realistic constraints that include most of the following considerations: economic;environmental; sustainability; manufacturability; ethical; health and safety; social; andpolitical.”1 In the new ABET criteria for accrediting engineering programs during the 2008-2009accreditation cycle, it is under criterion 5, explicitly titled “Curriculum”, that the requirement forusing engineering standards is placed - in these terms: “Students must be prepared forengineering practice through a curriculum culminating in a major design experience based on theknowledge and skills acquired in
. The students were encouraged to stretch their capabilitiesand those of the software being used to create an innovative and aesthetic design. In addition,the students were challenged to incorporate the ideas of parametrics and modularity into thevehicle design. The organization of the project was similar to that of GM, with BYU acting asthe vehicle integrator, Virginia Tech acting as the power train integrator, and all others schoolsworking on specific parts of the vehicle. Each group of engineering students was responsible fora particular component of the vehicle such as the brakes, suspension, or steering assembly. Fourindustrial design schools were assigned to create individual exterior designs for the vehicle, andBYU industrial design
Innovation Center for En- trepreneurship and Director of the Global Leadership program. Her responsibilities include interdisci- plinary program evaluation and assessment, course/workshop instruction in the areas of leadership and human centered design. She received her BS in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Michigan and an MBA from Wayne State University and is currently working on her PhD at Michigan Technologi- cal University. Before joining MTU she held various engineering and management positions during a 15 year career in the automotive industry.Dr. Gretchen L. Hein, Michigan Technological University Gretchen Hein is a senior lecturer in Engineering Fundamentals at Michigan Tech. She have been teaching
college of engineering.Roberta Harvey, Rowan University Roberta Harvey is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Writing Arts at Rowan University. She has been part of the faculty team that teaches Sophomore Clinic I since 1998 and played a key role in the development of the integrated design and communication pedagogy of the course. In addition to engineering communication, her areas of interest and expertise include interdisciplinary learning, collaborative learning and teamwork, meta-cognitive learning, information literacy, and student learning outcomes assessment.Paris von Lockette, Rowan University Paris von Locketter is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Rowan
properly fostered, could help develop students, andparticularly, engineers, into 21st century innovators [26].However, even though many instructors and research mentors have good intentions towardsincluding creativity in their instruction/training process [4, 27], studies demonstrate thatengineering students’ level of creativity actually decreases over the course of their training [6, 8,28]. Creativity or creative thinking has been largely absent or unsupported in the standardengineering curriculum, let alone research training programs, due to a number of factors,including faculty’s lack of knowledge of how to properly teach creativity and creative thinkingand how to integrate such teaching into the existing curriculum [5, 28-31]. Thus, the field
examined forconstruction and testing feasibility.First offering of the ME Capstone Detail Design CourseSince the ME propulsion-track students had previously taken a basic course in airbreathing androcket propulsion which covered jet engine cycle design point analysis and off-design pointengine operation, and an advanced propulsion course that covered component design, they werewell prepared for the first capstone preliminary design course to do cycle analysis, componentmatching and airframe integration for a turbojet-powered area-defense fighter. Since theemphasis on the follow-on detail design course involved component manufacturing and testing, afirst stage compressor blade was chosen to be examined from a production and testing viewpoint.The
ofeach 28-person group.As part of this project, community members will be surveyed to consider their needs for potentialfuture affordable housing developments. The surveys will be used to identify specific concernsthe community has about affordable housing projects and how these homes/buildings can bebetter designed to minimize those concerns. Including a community voice in the affordablehousing project may help to reduce NIMBYism (Not In My Backyard).This design project hopes to educate engineering students about the local issue of homelessness.At the same time, it will give students the opportunity to apply their skills and knowledgetowards a solution to an open-ended, real-world problem. This paper will describe the projectdetails and will
work; team processes and decision-making; ethical reasoning, constitution, and processes; engineering design; technology and its impacts on organizational and personal life; network analysis; as well as organizational identity, identification, and culture.Dr. Carla B. Zoltowski, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Carla B. Zoltowski is an assistant professor of engineering practice in the Schools of Electrical and Com- puter Engineering and (by courtesy) Engineering Education at Purdue University. She holds a B.S.E.E., M.S.E.E., and Ph.D. in Engineering Education, all from Purdue. Prior to this she was Co-Director of the EPICS Program at Purdue where she was responsible for developing curriculum
Page 24.51.16engineering education, more fundamental knowledge about this design approach will bedeveloped and subsequently find entrance into the design paradigm.Currently, there are little to no formal methods available to help sensitize engineers to designcontexts that require a more in-depth assessment of the deeper needs of the end-user. The need forcare and empathy has been acknowledged as a valuable contribution to engineering education,8yet there is a need for an integral approach to transfer this insight to engineering students andinstill this desirable skill set in future engineers. This skill set is especially valuable in medicaldesign contexts. We believe that including compassionate design in the teaching curriculum at astage when
AC 2012-3920: SCAFFOLDING PROVIDED TO ENGINEERING STUDENTSIN CORNERSTONE DESIGN PROJECT SCENARIOS RELATED TO PRAC-TICES OF EXPERT DESIGNERSDr. Yosef S. Allam, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Daytona Beach Yosef Allam is an Assistant Professor in the Freshman Engineering Department at Embry-Riddle Aero- nautical University. He graduated from the Ohio State University with B.S. and M.S. degrees in industrial and systems engineering and a Ph.D. in engineering education. Allam’s interests are in spatial visualiza- tion, the use of learning management systems for large-sample educational research studies, curriculum development, and fulfilling the needs of an integrated, multi-disciplinary first-year engineering educa
understand how they and their teammates view learning and tasks.The second module addresses communication, feedback and team dynamics with the thirdmodule on project management. This threaded approach is also seen in a recent paper8 whichdescribes how team skills are developed through two lecture courses and then implemented inteam projects throughout the curriculum. In our work we also integrate the development of teamskills through the curriculum as a means to reinforce the process of developing the requisitecognitive and behavioral skills and attributes.Development of a Teaming ThreadThis paper describes an approach to developing team skills through a series of engineeringdesign courses. The curriculum at Stevens Institute of Technology has a
Engineering Clinic: teaching engineering design and technicalcommunication. New assessment results quantifying student success on the entrepreneurialprojects, both in terms of developing student interest at the beginning of the semester and inconvincing faculty at the end of the semester that a project merits additional effort in the junioryear, will also be presented.I. Background and IntroductionProject-based learning has been gaining popularity in engineering curricula to address theprofessional skills component (or A-K criteria) introduced by ABET in the 2000 criteria2. TheCollege of Engineering at Rowan University has adopted an eight-semester sequence of courses,known as Engineering Clinics, which are integrated through the curriculum for all
methodology.Because of the time needed to complete articulation, students currently in the support programwho are ME students did not receive the necessary design component in certain classes taken atjunior colleges. In order to make up for this deficiency, a summer-long design clinic was heldfor those students, and provided the necessary information required for complete integration intothe ME design stem.This paper discusses the design experience. More specifically: Under the supervision of thesupport program advisor, a group of students was given the task of designing and manufacturingan intake manifold for an internal combustion engine. The students followed the standard designprotocol of conceptual, preliminary, and critical design and presented their
.”6 These Academies’ reports5-6 and others7-9 convey an urgency toreform K-12 public education systems. But, changing the US K-12 public school systems(which number over 14,000) presents a great deal of time-consuming inertia to overcome for Page 25.992.2any change agent. Further, extensive nation-wide curriculum changes ought to be madecarefully, with sufficient planning and financial support. In the meantime, as we await neededsystemic changes, a broad outreach program such as High School Enterprise can have a muchmore timely impact. High School Enterprise (HSE) is an initiative that has established teams of secondarystudents that
Design (PtD) National Initiative. He continues to work on PtD through a project that brings PtD principles into engineering textbooks as they are being updated.Donna Heidel, NIOSH Donna Heidel is a certified industrial hygienist with over 25 years' experience in the health care industry. Ms. Heidel received a B.A. from DeSales University and an M.S. from Temple University. She has spent the last 15 years of her career building a world-class, global, integrated occupational toxicology and industrial hygiene program at Johnson & Johnson, a decentralized company consisting of 230 operating companies in 57 countries. At J&J, she developed and implemented their global health hazard and control
STEM. Craftingmitigation plans aimed at student success should be research based and implemented to welcomeand benefit all students. Researchers have worked to identify predictors of STEM persistence,both before matriculation and after. A student’s level of academic success before matriculation isa strong predictor of STEM persistence. These predictors include standardized test scores andtaking calculus in high school [9], [10].Research has found that, after matriculation, a student’s likelihood to complete an undergraduatedegree was linked to a student’s level of academic and social integration. Tinto [11] definesacademic integration by a student's academic performance and their perception of their ownacademic experience. Therefore, it
educator and an engineering professor workedtogether to design and teach an undergraduate honors course to students from multipledisciplines at the University of Cincinnati. We discuss our planning process, share our courseassignments, discuss challenges encountered, and reflect upon outcomes for our students. Weexplain how the course enhanced interdisciplinary collaboration, fostered deep discussion, andinvestigated the links that connect artistic and scientific disciplines. We believe that throughintentional integration of engineering and art, students gained experience in a variety of modesof inquiry. They developed creative research approaches, problem solving skills, and innovativehabits of the mind that will serve them in their respective
introduced practical and technical subjects. Thiscohort had the lowest originality levels overall but achieved the second greatest difference(308%) between phase one (6.7%) and phase two (20.5%). The greatest difference (371%) inoriginality between phase one (7.2%) and phase two (26.7%) was evident for the communityschool, which were set up to give recognition to a compromise between secondary andvocational Schools, offering a broad curriculum embracing both practical and academicsubjects.Figure 5: Originality of design ideas between school typesThe following section explores the level of students intrinsic motivation between phase oneand phase two. The hypothesis under analysis; increase in design ideas (due to thebrainsketching strategy) due to an
for Engineering Education, 2012Prof. Junichi Kanai, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute After seven years with the Information Science Research Institute, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, where he was an Associate Research Professor, Junichi Kanai joined Panasonic Information and Net- working Technologies Lab in 1998. He was a Senior Scientist developing and transferring new technolo- gies to product divisions. From 2002 to 2004, he was a manager at Matsushita Electric Corporation of America (Panasonic), providing system integration and software development for clients. Kanai joined Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI) in 2004. He is currently Associate Director of the O.T. Swanson Multidisciplinary Design
school to create the first high school EPICS program. The commitment of these alums to continue theirservice to the community demonstrates the long-term impact that EPICS has on the lives of our students. The high school students have developed a system consisting of several devices that enable a fellow studentwith cerebral palsy to sense when she needs to swallow in order to avoid drooling. One device, which measuresthe time between swallows, is integrated into an inconspicuous necklace that she wears. If the time betweenswallows does become too long, then another device worn on the wrist or the waist can either vibrate or makenoise to remind her to swallow.This is an innovative device – the students found nothing like it despite diligent
increased to 4.97 and Evaluation methods increased to 4.61.At the end of Winter 2009, C&E scored 5.28 and EM scored 5.15. While the Fall 2009scores have not been released, we anticipate holding these scores. Perhaps moreimportantly, grade appeals to instructors dropped 50% in the 2008/2009 academic year(from 150 to 74), and in the Fall 2009 semester, only 68 appeals were reported. Alongwith the increased consistency shown by the coaches, these numbers would seem toindicate that the process, while labour-intensive, ensures that the student learningexperience is far more consistent, focusing student attention on the content, not on gradecomplaints.Bibliography1. Patton, M D. "Beyond WI: building an integrated communication curriculum in one
pretest and posttestresults show there is a significant improvement in students’ spatial cognition when the proposedtool is used to assist the course.Introduction The development of technology has led to the high demand in engineering design careersthat undergo required training involved with innovative technology. Computer-Aided Design(CAD) have become an essential tool for engineers and other STEM-related fields, which requiresan adequate spatial cognition skill (Sorby et al. 2013). Strong spatial skills are necessary to notonly complete the engineering course but also to succeed in professional practice after finishingthe curriculum (Hsi et al., 1997). Improving students’ interpretation, analysis, and visualization ofmodels, as well as
. Page 26.1038.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Investigating Pattern in Design Performance of Interdisciplinary Undergraduate Engineering Student TeamsINTRODUCTIONOver the last 5 decades, the average engineering curriculum has largely been based on an “engineeringscience” model in which the analytical and mathematical elements of engineering are strictly of focus [1].This implies that all challenges faced in engineering can be condensed and modeled as solvable mathequations. This model, however, poses a threat to the current methods of engineering practice by givingthe notion that all serious engineering is done in the language of mathematics [2]. While the