definition. This offering will provide acertificate for the experience and provide central administrative office assistance in developingmore of the opportunities. Most of the students utilizing this form of practicum have gottenbehind or out of sequence from the standard plan of study and need specific senior coursesunavailable every term. This program will allow them to effectively utilize their remainingacademic time and complete some form of professional work experience. The IntensiveInternship work experience provides a significant benefit to the student and the potential for anindustrial based capstone senior project. A certified Internship program has been approved by the faculty that will providestudents with an internship certificate
evaluating the student learning outcome,(4) collect the exam or assignment,(4) Using the rubric, score the artifact and review the results, Page 15.326.5(5) Use the results for program improvement. The advantages of course-embedded assessment are multiple and diverse: (1) it is a process ofusing student activities, rather than nationally normed tests or surveys to assess skills andknowledge, (2) it builds on the daily work (assignments, tests, projects) of students and faculty,(3) it gets students to participate more fully as this is not a voluntary activity but part of theircourse work, (4) it is not "added on" to faculty work but is a part of their
to develop beta-testing, inunder-developed countries like Cameroon, of culturally designed products/solutions, fromengineering senior capstone projects or with products launched thru “Engineers for the GreaterGood (EGG)” entrepreneurship competitions.Additionally, we are looking to recruit and expand this opportunity by inviting students from theNortheast LSAMP Alliance to participate. This will bring students from University ofConnecticut, University of Rhode Island, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, University ofMassachusetts Amherst and Northeastern University, all members of the NELSAMP, to providethis global experience to a larger number of underrepresented minorities across the three-statealliance.In conclusion, this culturally
on density and porosity in single-action compaction, 2) the spatialvariation of density and porosity within a part prepared using double-action compaction, and 3)the effect of sintering atmosphere on densification (using Fe and Cu metal powders).3. The ExperimentHigh-purity alumina (doped with 0.05% MgO) was chosen for the student project because it isthe best studied ceramic. The alumina powders specified as RC-HPF DBM were provided byReynolds Metals Company (Bauxite, AR). The average particle size (from sedimentationanalysis) was 380 nm, and the specific surface area (from the BET method) was 8.19 m2.g-1;these data were supplied by the manufacturer. The powder size analysis from sedimentation testshows that ∼60% powders are finer than
working. Kettering University is currently engaged in reforming itscurriculum to meet some of these demands. The objective of this paper is to discuss two new corecourses that were developed in the Department of Mechanical Engineering in the area of multi-disciplinary dynamic systems in order to reach this goal. The idea is to teach these courses using aunified approach to systems, with hands-on laboratory experience and system simulation usingsoftware tools like MATLAB®, and focusing on an inquiry-based problem-driven approach. Thisis a team effort and a number of faculty members from the ME Department will be involved inexecuting this project. Upon completion of these courses, the students should be able todemonstrate a good understanding of
; comparisons of results from thesurveys, the beginning of the 9th grade and at the end of each semester thereafter; and resultsfrom surveys of 12th grade students (survey, PSAT and/or ACT career interest). In addition,qualitative measurements will include the random sample work of student portfolio, and theirselection of a topic for their 11th grade capstone project as an indicator of increased interest inSTEM learning and careers.Baseline quantitative measurements data will be collected each year for the 9th grade class thathas no exposure to the ICE-HS framework. The quantitative data will be tested using two samplet test to indicate a statistically significant difference in the population.By the end of Phase 1 we will have the end of course grades
students’ meet the needs of the global workforce. One exampleof such experiences is the use of cross-national engineering student teams at the capstone level.Introduction “In the United States the oceans that bound our coasts no longer insulate us from other nations. In this dynamic global economy and political environment, engineering must adjust to the new world view.” (National Academy of Engineering, 2004)1 “Every day the men and women of this workforce will face the stress of competing in the fast-paced world of change we call the knowledge-based global economy of the twenty- first century. They will also face even larger challenges because the nation and world will need to call on them to seize
with design experience that supports thegoals of ABET Engineering Criteria 2000, (iii) to prepare students for further work in DSP,particularly in their “Major Qualifying Project (MQP),” a one-year capstone design experienceproviding credit equivalent to three courses. EE 3703 has two features that distinguish it fromprevious real-time DSP courses: its use of the interactive “studio” format, and its use of softwareengineering principles.Assessment data for the course was derived from student grades, lab reports, identical pre/post-course assessment exams, and MQP reports. The pre/post -course exams focused on topicscovered in both the present and prerequisite courses, and were used to gauge the preparation andprogress of each student. The data
diverse needs of society globally.DEI Statements in Senior Design Projects:The requirement for DEI statements in senior design projects at UIC's Chemical EngineeringDepartment is a significant educational innovation. These statements require students to considerand articulate the societal, cultural, and ethical implications of their engineering solutions. Byintegrating DEI considerations into the capstone projects, students are encouraged to thinkcritically about the broader impact of their work, fostering a mindset that values diversity andinclusivity. This integration ensures that students are not only capable engineers but alsoconscientious contributors to society who understand the importance of their work in variouscultural and societal
of the Center for Educational Networks and Impacts at the Institute for Creativity, Arts, and Technology (ICAT). Her research interests include interdisciplinary collaboration, design education, communication studies, identity theory and reflective practice. Projects supported by the National Science Foundation include exploring disciplines as cultures, liberatory maker spaces, and a RED grant to increase pathways in ECE for the professional formation of engineers.Dr. David Gray, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Dr. Gray receieved his B.S. in Electrical and Computer Engineering from Virginia Tech in 2000. He then earned a M.S. and a Ph.D. in Materials Science and Engineering from Virginia Tech in
State University. He teaches in the areas of introductory materials engineering, polymers and composites, and capstone design. His research interests include evaluating conceptual knowledge, mis- conceptions and technologies to promote conceptual change. He has co-developed a Materials Concept Inventory and a Chemistry Concept Inventory for assessing conceptual knowledge and change for intro- ductory materials science and chemistry classes. He is currently conducting research on NSF projects in two areas. One is studying how strategies of engagement and feedback with support from internet tools and resources affect conceptual change and associated impact on students’ attitude, achievement, and per- sistence. The
requirements of specialproblems or capstone design courses (provided the problems are suitably complex).The description of each laboratory project and the authors’ experiences with these projects aregiven below. Additional details are given for most of the projects in the appendices.Equilibrium of Concurrent Force Systems. A plywood box mounted on a laboratory cart,shown in Figure 1, and a few inexpensive battery operated fish scales are the key elements of theapparatus for this experiment. The sides of thebox have U-shaped, fencing nails driven partway into the walls on two inch centers. Theseare attachment points for tension cords whichsupport a weight pan and exercise weights.Although Figure 1 shows the set up of a two-dimensional problem, three
2006-831: CONTENT ASSESSMENT AT THE COURSE LEVELRichard Bannerot, University of Houston Richard Bannerot is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Houston. His research interests are in the thermal sciences and in engineering design education. For the past fifteen years he has taught the required "Introduction to Design" course at the sophomore level and has been involved in the teaching of the department's capstone design course. He is a registered professional engineer in the State of Texas. Page 11.356.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 20062006-831: CONTENT
Paper ID #11437Measuring the Complexity of Simulated Engineering Design ProblemsMs. Golnaz Arastoopour, University of Wisconsin, Madison Before becoming interested in education, Golnaz studied Mechanical Engineering at the University of Illi- nois at Urbana-Champaign with a minor in Spanish. While earning her Bachelor’s degree in engineering, she worked as a computer science instructor at Campus Middle School for Girls in Urbana, IL. Along with a team of undergraduates, she headlined a project to develop a unique computer science curriculum for middle school students. She then earned her M.A. in mathematics education at
Engineering.The objective of this paper is to describe the Neural Engineering curriculum and its core coursesat the University of Illinois at Chicago. Largely defined during the last four years, an importantaspect of the curriculum is the adaptation of research-level approaches to cutting edge,interdisciplinary problems in bioengineering to the undergraduate teaching environment. Keyfeatures of the curriculum are pointed out, and course evaluations from pilot offerings aredescribed. One particular course, Bioengineering / Biological Sciences 474 (BioE/BioS 474),Neural Engineering I, which serves as the capstone for the undergraduate track and the startingpoint for the graduate track, is described in detail. Development of BioE/BioS 474 is
have assessed the viability of usingconventional course evaluation instruments (originally designed for traditional in-personclassroom environments), to evaluate virtual lab classes. This article presents a preliminary set ofresults from a study that examines and compares engineering undergraduate students’evaluations of a capstone mechanical and aerospace engineering laboratory course taught in twodifferent environments: in-person and remotely (virtual/online environment). The instrumentused in both cases was the conventional course evaluation instrument that was quantitative anddesigned using a Likert scale. The aim of this study is to understand how this instrument capturesor does not capture the students’ perceptions of their learning of
capstone designcourses starting in 2016. No other concern, weakness or deficiency was raised about thedepartment ABET assessment in the 2015 ABET review. When the 2021 ABET reviewoccurred, a weakness was assigned for our program in Criterion 4: continuous improvement.The weakness was attributable to (a) faculty not assessing all elements of certain studentoutcomes (SOs), (b) inconsistency in which aspect of SOs were assessed by different instructorsteaching two different sections of the same course, and (c) faculty averaging their assessmentscores in an ad-hoc manner. ABET determined that the department assessment results did notrepresent a systematic assessment process that was applied in a consistent manner throughout theprogram.The new
format typically use specially equipped rooms with cameras,microphones, and large projection screens. When executed well, multi-campus courses providestudents with a variety of study options, extend the reach of exceptional instructors, and offerinstitutions opportunities for cost savings. In some contexts, courses taught using ICT helpbridge cultural boundaries, improve cross-pollination of ideas between institutions, and bringcomprehensive, sophisticated programs to rural areas [1]–[4].Despite dramatic innovations in teaching and communications technology, there remainsignificant challenges to implementing multi-campus programs effectively. Educators, includinginstructors, course designers, teaching assistants (TA), and program directors must
(Fundamentals of Physics, TEC216 (Constraint-Based SolidModeling & Production Drawings), TEC233 (CNC and Machining), TEC234 (Robotics SystemsIntegration), and TEC392 (Capstone: Manufacturing Organization & Management). Since alldata in this study was compiled during the Fall 2021 semester, some students may not havecompleted all their coursework (no grade reported). Figure 1. Grade in TEC116 by Posttest Outcomes.Figure 2. Grade in MAT120 (Finite Mathematics) by Posttest Outcomes. Figure 3. Grade in PHY105 (Physics) by Posttest Outcomes.Figure 4. Grade in TEC216 (Constraint-Based CAD & Prod Dwgs) by Posttest Outcomes.Figure 5. Grade in TEC233 (CNC & Machining) by Posttest Outcomes. Figure 6. Grade in TEC234
with a range ofaudiences), 5 (an ability to function effectively on a team . . .) and 6 (an ability to develop andconduct appropriate experimentation, analyze and interpret data, and use engineering judgmentto draw conclusions) are most easily satisfied through laboratory and capstone design activities.In teaching undergraduate laboratory, the development of a “stable” of good quality labexperiments is essential. The experiments can be either virtual or physical (hands-on with theequipment), although there have been many discussions on the pros and cons of using each ofthese types of undergraduate labs. Korestky et al. [2] offered an opinion that virtual labs arebetter for experimental design, critical thinking and dealing with ambiguity
capstone designcourses in chemical engineering; we thus sought to transform a core chemical engineering course to betterteach these authentic problem-solving skills. In this WIP paper we provide a detailed description of thecourse design and implementation. We also provide preliminary measurements of students’ authenticproblem-solving skills before and after the course to determine how effective this particular design is forteaching these types of problems. These preliminary findings can provide guidance to other chemicalengineering instructors as to best practices for instructional design toward the goal of teaching authenticengineering problem-solving.Introduction:Previous research on problem-solving in engineering suggest that students may not
Chemical Engineering. She coordinated STEM outreach for the Leonard C. Nelson College of Engineering and Sciences.Dr. Marcia Pool, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Dr. Marcia Pool is a Teaching Associate Professor and Director of Undergraduate Programs in the Depart- ment of Bioengineering at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (UIUC). She has been active in improving undergraduate education including developing laboratories to enhance experimental design skills and mentoring and guiding student teams through the capstone design and a translational course following capstone design. In her Director role, she works closely with the departmental leadership to manage the undergraduate program including
unregistered persons whomay have violated the statutes governing the profession. The power of theseboards, in the United States, is vested in them through the police power of theirrespective states’ constitutions. Addressing ethical issues impacting the professionis a central theme which runs throughout the required capstone courseProfessional Aspects of Land Surveying offered at Penn State University. Inaddressing these issues students, for first three weeks of the semester are engagedin reading, interpreting statutes, and researching case law with respect toregistration laws, code of ethics, and the disciplinary actions taken by thelicensing boards of a number of jurisdictions. It is the intent of this article topresent a compilation of the
-module score of 3.7 to apost module score of 4.3 on a 5-point Likert scale. Another approach has been to combine studyof contemporary issues and ethics through case studies.14,15 Authors discussed the challenges ofteaching a truly contemporary ethical case study, where new information became available everyday. Needy introduces students to the impact of contemporary issues on project management byincluding articles from the Wall Street Journal, Business Week, and the local paper as discussiontopics in her engineering management course.16ImplementationPrior to starting the actual meetings each semester, it is necessary to identify a time and locationfor the meetings and to publicize these events. Setting the time for the meeting is
-ended questionspossibly pushing them further along in their cognitive development. The junior year is also keyin the transition from novice to expert when students receive the last of their technicalpreparations before their senior capstone design courses. The use of common industry simulationsoftware also increases course diversity and helps to push students into higher levels ofdevelopment such as early or higher multiplicity. In Perry’s theory of development, this refers towhen students admit that multiple answers are possible and instructors might not know theanswer (a common experience in capstone design courses).25Previous work done in the Fall of 2015 on the orbital mechanics class found that students whoperform better on questions
University. Her research interests include design education research at K-16 levels.Dr. Michael L. Philpott, University of Illinois, Urbana-ChampaignJulia Laystrom-Woodard, University of Illinois, Urbana-ChampaignDr. Marcia Pool, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Dr. Marcia Pool is a Teaching Associate Professor and Director of Undergraduate Programs in the Depart- ment of Bioengineering at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (UIUC). She has been active in improving undergraduate education including developing laboratories to enhance experimental design skills and mentoring and guiding student teams through the capstone design and a translational course following capstone design. In her Director role, she
, University of Tulsa LAURA P. FORD is an Associate Professor of Chemical Engineering at the University of Tulsa. She teaches engineering science thermodynamics and fluid mechanics, mass transfer, and chemical engineer- ing senior labs. She is a co-advisor for TU’s student chapter of Engineers Without Borders USA. Her email address is laura-ford@utulsa.edu.Dr. Jennifer Cole, Northwestern University Jennifer Cole is the Assistant Chair in Chemical and Biological Engineering in the Robert R. McCormick School of Engineering and Applied Science at Northwestern University. Dr. Cole’s primary teaching is in capstone and freshman design, and her research interest are in engineering design education.Dr. Lucas James Landherr
working in a marketing research firm. Practicumexperiences also allow students to design and develop a project in which they applyknowledge and develop skills such as a doctoral student preparing the components of anonline course. Service Learning Experiences are distinguished by being mutually beneficial for bothstudent and community. Service learning is growing rapidly and is considered a part ofexperiential education by its very nature of learning, performing a job within the community,and serious reflection by the student. Service learning involves solving some of society'sissues; such as, homelessness, poverty, lack of quality education, pollution, etc. One of thegoals of service learning is to help students become aware of these issues
betweenintention, participation, and skills (e.g., leadership, creative thinking)11–16 or investigate theimpact of entrepreneurship education on student outcomes (e.g., retention)17–19. However, withnotable exceptions20,21, these studies do not consider students’ socio-demographic characteristicsto evaluate or assess programs. Much can be gained by considering socio-demographic characteristics, as numerousempirical studies in higher education show that these characteristics, such as gender, race, andpre-college academic preparation affect students’ college experience22. A notable exception isDuval-Couetil et al’s. (2012)20 multi-institutional study of engineering capstone courses. Duval-Couetil et al. (2012)20 found that while engineering major
during the spring quarter.Year 4:By the end of Year 4, students should be able to: • Analyze a no-win ethical dilemma • Analyze a dispute involving multiple conflicting ethical principles • Discuss how ethics played a role in their senior design projectDuring the year-long senior capstone design course, students assessed two different ethicaldilemmas. One dilemma involved an engineer being asked to donate engineering services tomaintain future work for his firm (a no-win ethical dilemma). The students also analyzed theDeepwater Horizon Oil Spill case, in which there were conflicting ethical principles. For bothcase studies, students utilized the ethical decision-making process worked in teams to discuss thedilemma, reflect on relevant