Conference Session

Social Media and In-class Technology: Creating Active Learning Environments

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gerald C. Gannod, Miami University; Kristen M. Bachman, Miami University

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education

during the creation of theartifacts in those genres 4. Genre in software engineering refers to categories or types ofcommunication that occur in recurrent situations. In this context, generic situations includeactivities such as definition of a software project/problem, elicitation and specification ofprogram requirements, creation of a design document, and so on. Table 2 lists the commongenres as defined by Carter et al. While we often think of creation of specific artifacts alongwith these genres, various reading, writing, speaking, and teaming/collaboration communicationmodes are employed. For instance, one might read program requirements to meet a number ofgoals such as determining what needs to be known to generate designs, to revise

Conference Session

Design Across Disciplines

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Keith G. Sheppard, Stevens Institute of Technology; John Nastasi, Stevens Institute of Technology; Eirik Hole, Stevens Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

13th 2012. 5. https://acc.dau.mil/CommunityBrowser.aspx?id=406165&lang=en-US, Retrieved January 19, 2011. 6. Beyerlein, S., Davis, D., Trevisan,M., Thompson, P. and Harrison, O., “Assessment Framework for Capstone Design Courses”, Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference, 2006, 2006-144. 7. Sheppard, K., Dominick, P. and Blicharz, E., “Peer and Self Assessment in Developing Team Skills in a Core Design Sequence”, ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, Austin, TX, June 2009 8. Allen, S. & Knight, J., “A Method for Collaboratively Developing and Validating a Rubric”, International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning ,http://www.georgiasouthern.edu/ijsotl, Vol. 3, No. 2 (July 2009

Conference Session

Research Projects, Course Development, and Industry Issues

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Wolter J. Fabrycky PE P.E., Virginia Tech and Academic Applications International

Tagged Divisions

Systems Engineering

.3. Demonstrate professionalism. Grow professionally through continued learning and involvement in professional activities. Contribute to the growth of the profession. Contribute to society through ethical and responsible behavior.4. Communicate (read, write, speak, listen, and illustrate) effectively in oral, written, and newly developing modes and media, especially with stakeholders and colleagues.Outcomes from GRCSE are statements about the competencies possessed by a graduate uponcompletion of the program. Ideally, outcomes are derived from objectives. Graduates of amaster’s program that aligns with the GRCSE recommendations will achieve a specified list of13 outcomes. These are reminiscent of the outcomes character of

Conference Session

Stakeholder Perspectives on Community Engagement in Engineering Education

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Christopher Bull, Brown University School of Engineering; Maureen Kay Sigler, Brown University; Michael Lye, Rhode Island School of Design

Tagged Divisions

Community Engagement Division

AC 2012-4493: ALIGNING THE AGENDAS OF THE ACADEMY ANDTHE COMMUNITYDr. Christopher Bull, Brown University School of Engineering Christopher Bull is a Senior Lecturer and Senior Research Engineer at the Brown University School of Engineering. He teaches, writes, and researches topics ranging from appropriate technology and neural implants to the university’s role in the larger community and how that might overlap with engineering education.Maureen Kay Sigler, Brown University Maureen Kay Sigler is a lecturer in education and Director of the History/Social Studies Education pro- gram at Brown University. Before coming to Brown, Kay Sigler worked for several years teaching in Washington, D.C., in both a public

Conference Session

CoED General Technical Session II

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jonathan M. Hill, University of Hartford; Ying Yu, University of Hartford

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education

Ying Yu received the B.Eng. degree from Fudan University in Shanghai, China, in 2000. She received the M.Eng. degree and Ph.D. in electrical engineering from Brown University, RI., USA, in 2003 and 2007, respectively. Since 2008, she has been teaching as an Assistant Professor of the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at University of Hartford. Her current research interests includes digital signal processing, speech processing, and teaching with new educational methods, which includes peer instruction, clickers, video games, and state-of-the-art CAD tools. Page 25.1281.1

Conference Session

Capstone and International Experiences

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Richard S. Stansbury, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Daytona Beach; William C. Barott, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Daytona Beach; Salamah Salamah, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Daytona Beach

Tagged Divisions

Multidisciplinary Engineering

paper also includes studentfeedback regarding the process derived from student surveys and their peer evaluations. Finally,suggestions are made regarding how these projects would be used for future academic years.BackgroundPrior to the development of a multidisciplinary capstone for the ECSSE Department, eachdiscipline has addressed the senior design experience differently. For the past 12 years,computer engineering and software engineering have had a common senior design. Theirprojects have primarily focused upon autonomous systems such as ground robots and unmannedaircraft. For this course, the students have followed an agile design process based upon theCrystal Clear and Crystal Yellow software design processes defined by Alistair

Collection

2001 Annual Conference

Authors

Timothy Wheeler; Dr. Rose Marra; Dr. Jack Mitchell; Dr. Charles Croskey

the payload structure, the payload power systems and harness, thedata encoder and the S-band transmitter. One of the experiments was a deployed rigid sphere.This “bowling ball”, including the onboard transmitter, data encoder and the patch array antennawere entirely student designed and built.The four instruments included a pair of Langmuir probes, a miniature mass spectrometer(purchased from Faran Scientific, Inc.), an photodiode array (built by SUNY students), and therigid sphere. The mass spectrometer quadrapole apparently burned up due to the rocket’s lowerthan expected altitude. The other instruments were not as pressure-sensitive and performed well.Students at Penn State and SUNY continue data analysis efforts as of this writing. Except

Collection

2001 Annual Conference

Authors

Kathryn Jablokow

the details: (a) You are to keep a 8rhvrÃUuvxvtÃEhy throughout this course. (b) You are to write for at least 10 minutes in your journal every day, starting today and ending on the last day of class. (c) You may use any format for your journal, including the Thinking Expedition Journals that I will make available to you during our first class meeting. (d) For those of you who have never journalled before, we will discuss the process of journalling further in class. I will also put several books about journalling on reserve in the library. Content: • Your 8rhvrà Uuvxvtà Ehy is your personal “backpack” of ideas, thoughts, ques- tions, and comments related to this course

Collection

2001 Annual Conference

Authors

Karen Williams; James Hedrick

varying computer skills. A collegelevel research paper and presentation have been an important part of the workshop since itsinception and both require a high level of computer competence. Thus, we cover the computerskills that students need to write a clear, concise, easy to read research paper. The Netscapebrowser and search engines are used to locate data relating to AIDS on the WWW, and their use iscovered in class. The reliability of all data must be evaluated regardless of source and some Page 6.1101.3guidelines for evaluating information found on the WWW are presented. After discussing some ofthe tools for finding reliable data the

Collection

2001 Annual Conference

Authors

Edgar Conley; Linda Riley

mechanical or industrial engineering; 2) to provide students with elementary tools and methods useful in the design process and to encourage students to apply these tools by means of carefully crafted design exercises; 3) to develop teaming, interpersonal, time management and creative thinking skills; 4) to further refine communication, writing and presentation skills; and 5) to begin the process of relationship building among individual students, the instructor teaching the course, and the student’s home department.From a faculty perspective, achieving these objectives with a group of freshmen may seemdaunting. Nevertheless, such a course is often the student’s first exposure to discipline-specificmaterial, thus an improperly

Collection

2000 Annual Conference

Authors

Joseph Rencis, University of Arkansas

, including yourself? Include technical, analytical, organizational, documentation, creativity, research, leadership, construction, etc. 3. Rate your opinion of yourself and each of your groupmate understands of the concepts Page 5.622.5 involved in this project, on a scale of 1 (poor) to 5 (excellent). 4. Comment on your interaction with other group(s) that your group heavily relies on.This peer evaluation has been a very successful way for faculty advisors to identify anyteamwork problems within a particular group and with other groups.6. Team and Group StructureAt the beginning of the academic year the team was divided into the

Collection

2000 Annual Conference

Authors

Darrell D. Massie; Cheryl A. Massie

. Additionally,they found that in every ineffective team, without exception, the reason for failure was in someway related to the goal.13 Specific goals help a team assess their performance and track theirprogress. A team should write a clear statement of their goal and purpose14 and then continue arefinement of the goal and objectives through the life of the project.15However, having a clear goal in and of itself is not enough to ensure the success of the team.The goal must be specific, challenging, reasonable, and measurable so that one can tell when ithas been achieved. If for instance, you want to lose some weight, you are far more likely to besuccessful if you set a reasonable goal. Someone who says, “I want to lose ten pounds in thenext three

Collection

1997 Annual Conference

Authors

Rose M. Marra; Thomas Litzinger

. A t test between these two averages found this to be statistically significant atthe p < .01 level.Interviews with SI Leaders and ShadowsIn addition to the above results data, we also conducted brief, loosely structured interviews withthe SI leaders and SI shadows from Fall ‘96. The goal of these interviews was to determine bothhow the program had worked during the current semester, as well as to gather ideas forimprovement from these key participants.Both the shadows and the leaders were overwhelmingly positive about the program. The leadersadmitted that getting up in front of their peers was a “bit scary” at first, but this feeling quicklydissipated as they gained experience. One leader commented that he actually began to “enjoy”the

Conference Session

Diverse Pathways: Exploring Inclusive Practices and Outreach in Engineering Education

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lexy Chiwete Arinze, Purdue University at West Lafayette; Jacqueline E McDermott, Purdue University at West Lafayette; Janet M Beagle

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Minorities in Engineering Division(MIND)

success, such as navigating mentor-mentee relationships, sense of belonging, and findingsupport services, but additional opportunities exist to help prepare them for academicparticulars such as grant writing and publishing (RQ2)Navigating mentor-mentee relationshipsThe second highest average of the measures that were evaluated was the collection of questionssurrounding “Navigating future mentor-mentee relationships” (Fig 2). Alumni from theGradTrack program highlighted how their participation in GradTrack influenced how theyapproach mentoring during their time as a graduate student. Alumni said that GradTrackprovided them with a foundation to establish relationships with other mentees and mentors. Onealumnus who is now a mentor, mentioned the

Conference Session

ELOS Technical Session 4 - Design, Participation, and Projects

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Eliot Bethke, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Ali Ansari, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Joe Bradley, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Jennifer R. Amos, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Holly M. Golecki, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign

Tagged Divisions

Experimentation and Laboratory-Oriented Studies Division (DELOS)

undergraduates summarize thedetails of the team’s past progress and their future plans in a short write up which gets sent to theM.Eng. student(s). These informative reports help the M.Eng. students stay fully aware ofdetailed progress. The M.Eng. students then pass along the information along with theirconsiderations for timeline and resources to the project sponsors. Faculty are copied on theseregular communications, and students are given credit for completing and sending these reportson time. The undergraduate teams meet with a course instructor every two weeks for a 30-minutecheck-in meeting, which serves to monitor team progress and help students stay on track as thesemester progresses.M.Eng. Roles Throughout the course, M.Eng. students

Conference Session

Transfer issues between 2-year colleges and 4-year Engineering and Engineering Technology programs 2

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gregory L. Heileman, The University of Arizona; Chaouki T Abdallah, Georgia Institute of Technology; Andrew Karl Koch, John N. Gardner Institute for Excellence in Undergraduate Education

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Two-Year College Division (TYCD)

America. He has published 7 books, and more than 300 peer- reviewed papers. His PhD students hold academic positions in the USA and in Europe, and senior technical positions in various US National Laboratories. Professor Abdallah is a senior member of IEEE and a recipient of the IEEE Millennium medal. He is also active in the IEEE Control Systems Society most recently serving as the general chair of the 2008 Conference of Decision and Control CDC 2008.Dr. Andrew Karl Koch, John N. Gardner Institute for Excellence in Undergraduate Education Dr. Andrew K. Koch is the President and Chief Operating Officer of the non-profit John N. Gardner Institute for Excellence in Undergraduate Education. A leading advocate for making

Conference Session

Unique Pedagogies for Mechanics Education

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Marguerite Matherne, Northeastern University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics Division (MECHS)

checked and categorized individually by the instructor.Prompting ChatGPT in this manner – with clear, specific, and explicit instructions – was foundto produce a high rate of accurate classifications. It would miss many responses that should havebeen sorted into one of the groups, but leaving any space for ChatGPT to make its owninterpretation led to many incorrect classifications. Through much trial and error, it wasdetermined that writing the prompt in such a way that does not allow ChatGPT to interpret orassume anything is the best way to avoid false positive or negatives.Using Warm-ups in classFor most classes, the answers to all warm-up questions were summarized on slides and shared atthe beginning of class, starting with the muddiest point

Conference Session

Engineering Libraries Division (ELD) Technical Session 2

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Adam Lindsley, Oregon State University; Shalini Ramachandran, Loyola Marymount University; Clara Llebot, Oregon State University; Sheree Fu, California State University, Los Angeles

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Libraries Division (ELD)

"Desirable Characteristics of DataRepositories for Federally Funded Research" [1], outlining a set of recommended features andqualities that are considered desirable for data repositories handling research data resulting fromfederally funded research. The document establishes a set of standards and guidelines to ensurethat data resulting from federally funded projects is preserved in repositories that effectivelymanage and disseminate it.On August 25, 2022, Dr. Alondra Nelson, then Acting Director of OSTP, issued a Memorandum[2] recommending that all federal agencies formulate new plans or update existing ones,outlining their approach to ensuring public access to peer-reviewed publications and the researchdata associated with federally funded

Conference Session

BME Courses and Learning Activities

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jorge E. Bohorquez, University of Miami; Ozcan Ozdamar, University of Miami; Jonathon Anthony Toft-Nielsen, University of Miami

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical

give immediate feedback to the students. Allobservations are collected and logged in a lab report after each session. In later labs, focus shifts to the microcontroller, specifically the 8051 modelmicrocontroller. Lab work shifts from building physical circuits to writing segments of code.Many students find programming portions of the course to be less immediately rewarding if theyare only manipulating digital values internal to the chip. In order to help ease the shift, as welland give students immediate physical feedback, the instructors for the class built a speciallydesigned test board. Each board was fitted with a port where the AT89C8051 microcontrollercould be plugged into after programming. Included on the board were a number of

Conference Session

Ethics in different disciplines

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Diana Bairaktarova, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Demetra Evangelou, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

chosen representing both individualachievement (summative)18 and assessments to assist student learning (formative).18 Two kindsof summative individual assessments will occur in this course. On the first day of the course eachstudent will be presented with a short case to identify ethical dilemma, to name possible courseof action, and to evaluate the consequences of actions taken. Then again on the last day of classthe same case will be discussed with each student and the same questions will be asked. This willprovide students with a measure of progress in the areas of the content. The reflection journalsthat students will write throughout the semester will also act as a kind of informal summativeassessment. Grading will measure a student’s

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship Faculty Development

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Douglas E. Allen, Bucknell University; Steven B. Shooter, Bucknell University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

AC 2011-1863: BIG: UNITING THE UNIVERSITY INNOVATION ECOSYS-TEMDouglas E. Allen, Bucknell UniversitySteven B. Shooter, Bucknell University Steve Shooter, Ph.D., P.E. is Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Bucknell University where he has taught for design, innovation and robotics for 16 years. He has published over 90 peer-reviewed papers and been PI or Co-PI on grants from NSF, ONR, NIST, ARDEC in addition to industry. As a registered professional engineer he also consults extensively with industry on design projects and formulation of innovation strategies. Page 22.287.1 c

Conference Session

Assessing Student Learning

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

James E. Bluman, U.S. Military Academy; Kathryn Purchase, U.S. Military Academy; Christopher Thomas Duling, U.S. Military Academy, West Point, Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

topic. Students in Connor-Green’sclasses reported that they studied more consistently and came to class better-prepared, “Studentsappear to articulate their ideas more readily and clearly after writing their quiz responses, whichraises the level of class discussion.”8 However, Connor-Green did not realize any increase in thegrades of students who took scheduled quizzes.Literature Review: Other considerations On the other hand, Lowman 9 argues against frequent in-class quizzes because they canincrease anxiety about coming to class and can decrease the amount of learning that occurs inclass following the quiz. “…too frequent testing is costly in class time and in teacher time spenton grading; it also leads to an overemphasis on external

Conference Session

Certifying Teachers in Engineering or Integrated STEM

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

AnnMarie Thomas, University of Saint Thomas; Jan B Hansen, University of Saint Thomas; Sarah H. Cohn, Science Museum of Minnesota; Brian Phillip Jensen, University of St. Thomas

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

remotely operated vehicle). (SeeFigure 9) Figure 8: (a) buoyancy lab, (b) Stokes’ law lab Figure 9: Styrofoam cup that has been submerged in approximately 3,000 meters of water, next to a comparison cupEngineering and Society (3 hour unit)The goals for this unit are for the students to:  Understand the societal and environmental impacts that engineering and its products can have  Be able to identify both positive and negative impacts of engineered systems  Discuss the ethical obligations of engineersIn preparation for this unit, students were asked to choose an invention and write a briefhistory of it. They were then asked to list 3-5 positive aspects of this

Collection

1999 Annual Conference

Authors

Kurt C. Gramoll

course orhomework. With only 20-50 students in the three courses described in the paper, there werenever enough students at any given time to make the chat rooms work effectively.The web board concept, while not new, is an extremely important component to the onlinecourses. With the web board, questions and discussions can be done similar to the interactionthat takes place in a normal classroom. In some respects, the web board discussions allowed Page 4.491.8more students to participate in asking questions since there was no time limit or peer pressure notto ask questions. It also allowed students to ask questions when the questions arose, i.e

Collection

1999 Annual Conference

Authors

Russell D. Meier

often appreciate experiential reports from colleagues,however. This motivated me to write this paper. I will focus my remaining comments on how Iimplemented active learning in the large lectures of CprE 301 and CprE 310.III. How I Implemented Active Learning in Large LecturesStudents began actively learning during the first lecture of the semester. This was the initialexposure for many students to an active lecture environment. Naturally, some of them resistedan environment in which their opinions mattered. Imagine that! Active learning played a largerole in at least two of the three CprE 301 lectures each week, and in every CprE 310 lecture. Idid my best to carefully plan each active learning exercise by analyzing: • my purpose for

Collection

1998 Annual Conference

Authors

Lia F. Arthur; Irem Y. Tumer

the supervision of a mentor,who provides guidance and critique to the doctoral students1,9. These programs, while rare, arestarting to attract a lot of attention among academia-track students and concerned faculty.The idea of team-teaching is slightly different than faculty mentoring. Specifically, in team-teaching a course, the doctoral students get an opportunity to work along with the facultymember in addressing all aspects of the course, hence being treated as a peer, instead of having amentor-student relationship. The main advantage of team-teaching is that both the student andthe faculty get to lecture as equals, thereby achieving two goals: (1) providing the undergraduatestudents with two different views on the lecture topics; and, (2

Conference Session

Implementing the CE BOK into Courses and Curricula

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Angela Bielefeldt, University of Colorado, Boulder

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

teams, communication, and public speaking. First year femaleengineering students were found to be less confident then their male peers on math and scienceabilities, but equally confident in professional and interpersonal skills8. Therefore, if femalestudents see the value of professional and interpersonal skills in the careers of engineers theymay feel more confident of their overall ability in engineering.Many students also want their college experience to provide a broad experience that preparesthem for a rich life. For these students, the rigid curriculum requirements in engineering can bediscouraging and may lead them to select other majors.13,14 At the University of Colorado atBoulder (CU) our civil engineering (CVEN) B.S. degree of 128

Conference Session

Mentoring First Year Students

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Daina Briedis, Michigan State Univesity; Nathaniel Ehrlich, Michigan State University; Colleen McDonough, Michigan State University; Jon Sticklen, Michigan State University; Thomas Wolff, Michigan State University

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

15.1221.3  peer assisted learning (PAL) for undergraduate COE students who study in targeted gateway core courses  course cross linkages, wherein concepts in problem sets and assignments are linked among target pre-engineering coursesThe fourth arm of the retention program is directed at increased faculty connections withentering students, primarily through designated Connector Faculty.Of the four retention efforts, the Connector Faculty (CF) program is the only one targeting theentire freshman intenders (FI), but is specifically aimed at the student who chooses to go toanother discipline even though academic achievement is not an issue. These “leavers” werestudied extensively by Seymour and Hewitt1, with a major conclusion

Conference Session

Innovative Instructional Strategies and Curricula in ECE I

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alejandra J. Magana, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Bedrich Benes, Purdue University

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer

peer evaluated by students in the classroom. Students are asked todiscuss the disadvantages of the presented method, such as weaknesses and possible extensions.The presentation allows showing the theoretical knowledge gained in the class in the context ofits practical applications to the contemporary CG scientific problems. An example of a studentproject is an implementation of Floyd-Steinberg dithering algorithm, or an implementation of a3-D static field defining an implicit iso-surface.Here we report students’ perceptions of their learning in the course and their perceived transferof such concepts and skills into practical situations. Focusing on student gained skills, theyreported a moderate perception of having learned the latest CG

Conference Session

Civil Engineering Education and Workforce Development Challenges

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Steven D. Hart, U.S. Military Academy; Ledlie Klosky, U.S. Military Academy, West Point; Joseph P. Hanus, U.S. Military Academy; Karl F. Meyer, U.S. Military Academy; Jason Allen Toth; Morgan Reese, U.S. Military Academy

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

West Point and recipient of ASEE’s 2010 National Outstanding Teaching Medal. Dr. Klosky writes regularly about engineering education, covering topics ranging from classroom tech- niques to curricular reform. Much of this work is focused on the use of internet communications and social networks for educational purposes.Joseph P Hanus, U.S. Military Academy Lieutenant Colonel Joseph Hanus is the acting Chair of the Civil Engineering Department at the United States Military Academy, West Point, NY. He received his BS from the University of Wisconsin - Plat- teville; MS from the University of Minnesota - Twin Cities; and PhD from the University of Wisconsin - Madison. He is an active member of ASEE and is a registered