Education Endowed Professorship in Engineering #1 at The University of Texas at Austin as well as Adjunct Pro- fessor of Imaging Physics at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. Dr. Markey is a 1994 graduate of the Illinois Mathematics and Science Academy. She has a B.S. in computational biology (Carnegie Mellon, 1998). Dr. Markey earned her Ph.D. in biomedical engineering (2002), along with a certificate in bioinformatics, from Duke University. Dr. Markey has been recognized for excellence in research and teaching with awards from organizations such as the American Medical Informatics Asso- ciation, the American Society for Engineering Education, the American Cancer Society, and the Society for Women’s
UDP UAV Dynamics Control Commands Figure 1. X-Plane – Mission Planner SIL Architecture (Bittar, Figuereido, Guimaraes, & Mendez, 2014)Figure 1 illustrates the architecture of the SIL generated between X-Plane and Mission Planner.Data packages between X-Plane and Mission Planner are sent via User Datagram Protocol (UDP).Mission Planner evaluates and assigns control commands for the guidance of the aircraft. X-Planereceives commands from Mission Planner and performs the requested control surfaces deflections.Then, X-Plane runs the model physics and sends the generated navigation data to Mission Planner.The data is then
Paper ID #35083Using MUTISIM software to reinforce use and application of Norton’stheory in electrical circuitsDr. Cyrus K Hagigat, The University of Toledo Dr. Hagigat is an associate professor in the Engineering Technology department of the College of Engi- neering of the University of Toledo. Dr. Hagigat has an extensive industrial background, and his teaching technique is based on practical aspects of engineering. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 1
Journal. He has generated $8.9M in external research funding, over 70 technical publications that has been cited over 1000+ times. He received ”Best Paper Award” in the ASME conference, 1st Place Award in 2012/13 ASHRAE project, 14 research awards from Purdue Northwest, and 4 US Patents. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Virtual Engineering Summer Camp in the age of COVID-19 Pandemic 1 Virtual Engineering Summer Camp in the age of COVID-19 Pandemic Anveeksh Koneru, George Nnanna Department of Mechanical Engineering
Education, 2021ABSTRACTBiomedical engineering seniors at Texas &M University enroll in Mass & Energy Transport inBiosystems that traditionally is taught face-to-face using a blended approach of lectures and collaborativeproblem-based learning sessions. The three learning objectives are to (1) mathematically define anddescribe general biotransport problems, including deriving governing equations and defining appropriateboundary and initial conditions (2) solve and analyze a variety of basic biotransport problems, and (3)develop transport models and approaches to biomedical problems and critically evaluate the solutions.Class activities span lower to higher order levels of Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy and require application ofmultivariable
analysisis grounded in the views of the universities on taking on the pandemic, as expressed throughtheir content in the COVID-19 related web pages.Grounded Theory MethodologyGrounded theory is a systematic qualitative research methodology initially developed as a way tomerge qualitative and quantitative approaches in social science research [1], [2] and isconsidered as an emerging methodology in engineering education research [3]. Thismethodology enables researchers to build theory from data through constant comparison,identifying analytical codes and categories from data, and then using these categories to generatetheories and theoretical models [4]. Our approach thus takes advantage of features of theconstructivist approach of Charmaz [4], as
in collaborative research between engineering education scholars and social scientists that focuses on the processes through which inequalities are enacted, reproduced, and/or challenged in various educational contexts. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021An Analysis of Gendered Outreach Messages on the Engineer Girl Website:How Female Engineers Promote Engineering to Young WomenIntroductionWomen’s underrepresentation in engineering in the United States has been an ongoing area ofconcern to engineering educators and administrators [1], [2]. Despite the fact that women nowearn more undergraduate degrees than men, and girls now perform as well as boys in
forengineering and pre-engineering students was 10% lower than for students in other disciplines atthe same university. This trend appears to be, unfortunately, present at a majority of U.S.institutions of higher education [1]. In order to address this critical issue, engineering facultymembers at this university developed a program for a subset of incoming first-year engineeringstudents, called the Engineering Learning Community (ELC). The ELC was first implemented inthe Fall 2016 semester, and since then has been iterated each academic year based on studentfeedback, best practices, and, beginning in the Fall 2019 semester, support from the NationalScience Foundation (NSF) in the form of S-STEM scholarships for financially qualified students.The
feeling a sense ofbelonging. Finally, survey findings provide evidence that cognitive diversity, opportunity towork with people who have different styles of problem-solving, is among trainees’ favoriteaspects of the program. In addition, we discuss the structure of our NRT and recruitmentstrategies we have used to advance more diverse participation.1. IntroductionWomen have been underrepresented in STEM at four-year institutions and the workforce. Thenumber of advanced degrees earned by women have increased, with women earning larger shareof graduate degrees [1] [2] yet national data show a large STEM gender gap: in 2018, 29% ofmaster’s degrees in engineering and computer information science were awarded to women and24% of doctoral degrees were
increasing the creativity and effectiveness of engineeringteams [1], yet can have an adverse effect when these viewpoints result in negatively imposedbiases. Unconscious bias (or implicit bias) can be defined as “a prejudice in favor of or againstone thing, person, or group compared with another usually in a way that’s considered to beunfair. Biases may be held by an individual, group, or institution and can have negative orpositive consequences” [2]. Unconscious bias is pervasive and affects our decisions, even whenwe think we are operating objectively. Yet because of identity-protective cognition, engineerswho are immersed in a culture of objectivity often pride themselves on only looking at facts, andcan have strong emotional reactions and
, Alexandra received a bachelor’s degree in aerospace engineering from MIT and a master’s degree in systems engineering from the University of Virginia. Alexandra comes to FIU af- ter completing a postdoctoral fellowship at Georgia Tech’s Center for the Enhancement of Teaching and Learning (CETL) and three years as a faculty member at Olin College of Engineering in Massachusetts. Alexandra’s research aims to amplify the voices and work of students, educators, and Minority-Serving Institutions (MSIs) overall and support continued educational innovation within engineering at these in- stitutions. Specifically, she focuses on (1) educational and professional development of graduate students and faculty, (2) critical
Professor, School of Engineering Technology Purdue University mshehadi@purdue.eduAbstractFormula-1 (F1) racing cars aerodynamic effects are mainly controlled by the body contours andother aerodynamic elements such as over-body wings. Over-body wings tend to force the cardownwards but would increase the drag force on the car. This capstone project investigated theground effects on a scaled F1 car by testing the down force and drag force with and withoutground effects. To meet the objectives, an 8.8 feet-long (2.93 m) wind tunnel was built by theteam having a 6 × 6 sq.in (3.34 m2) cross-section testing chamber running air at an approximatespeed of 34 miles per hour (mph
increasing nationally [1] - [2]. A recent effort by theHealthy Minds Network and ACHA-NCHA collected data during the COVID-19 pandemic(between March and May 2020) from 14 U.S. colleges and universities (the specific breakdownof sites and participants can be seen in [3]. Findings showed decreases in psychologicalwellbeing and an increased difficulty in accessing mental health care [3]. Accessibility of mentalhealth resources is a critical concern as college and university campus counseling centers areunable to keep pace with students’ counseling needs with students’ academic progress being tiedto their mental health state [4]. Undiagnosed and untreated mental health problems can affectstudents’ satisfaction, academic performance, research
persistence among diverse students.Placing STEM history and cultures directly in the critical frameworks of WGS may help providethese populations with epistemological and personal insights that boost a sense of belonging inengineering and support their persistence.Numerous studies have addressed aspects of the complex question of student under-representation. The National Academies’ Beyond Bias investigated the factors contributing tounderrepresentation, and determined that biases and structural disadvantages overwhelm talentedwomen and other would-be engineering students. “Women who are interested in science andengineering careers are lost at every education transition,” and “the problem is not simply thepipeline” [1].Concern over the proper
,environmental pollution, food, education, and so on. These obstacles require the attention ofprofessionals who know what technology can do, can work as or with engineers, and who havethe necessary socio-political inclinations and capabilities.” This program was both a naturaloutgrowth of Lafayette College’s founding principles of liberal education and consistent with thetrends in engineering education in the 1960s, which also impacted other institutions [1].Our campus newspaper greeted the new program with enthusiasm: “It will explore the nature androles of engineering, the problem solving skills employed by engineers, and the socio-politicalissues involved in the direction and control of technology,” student journalists wrote in 1970 [2].Since its
their third year of undergraduatestudy. During these introductory courses, students report the study of fluid mechanics as abstract,relying on difficult mathematical concepts, and presenting only uninteresting problems that lackconnection to real-world engineering challenges and applications [1]. Notably, researchers havereported that students’ experiences in introductory fluid mechanics courses relate to a negativeperspective shift in their perceptions toward the field [2]. Taken together, these observationssuggest that there is a need to involve students in fluid mechanics activities earlier, and withauthentic and interesting curricula for the purpose of garnering interest and intuition in the topicof fluid mechanics. Flow
greatsource of information, a critical realization to support positive engineering design experiences inK-12 and higher education.1.0 IntroductionConceptual modeling has been described as the most important step in engineering design [1],[2]. Developing and using conceptual models involves creating representations of how a systemworks, which help people know, understand, or simulate a subject the model represents [3]–[6].These representations include underlying structures, relationships, and processes which aid inunderstanding underlying systems of the engineering design problem [3], [4], [7]. Research onprofessional engineering design practices indicates the importance of conceptual modeling as aninteroperable representation to generate and
deeply in graduate education,interdisciplinary learning has not been highly reflected or cultivated in engineering educationcurricula [1]. This lack of acknowledgment may be attributed to the historical exclusion ofinterdisciplinary ways of being and thinking across the disciplines, which also limits how studentssee themselves as engineers. Historical perspectives within engineering education include thosethat “institutionalize cultural and epistemic injustice” by excluding views that deviate from thedominant ways of thinking in engineering [2, p. 4]. Riley and Lambrinidou [2] expressed how thisapproach to educating engineers may result in engineers who do not feel they fit into the mold ofa stereotypical engineer, which emphasizes technical
by the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET),which, in its most recent manifestation, cunningly integrates societal context and professionalskills throughout its technical objectives. The new ABET Student Outcomes 1-7 renderengineering programs unable to decouple technical skills from what are commonly (and oftendisdainfully) referred to as “soft skills.” Our program, and specifically the course discussed inthis study, embrace the integration of the liberal arts into engineering and purposefully frametechnical engineering content by its broader social context, as well as take a humanisticapproach to engineering by orienting the core of our program around social justice [1, 2].Much of the literature tying engineering
improve its sustainability as a lab course modality.Introduction and Purpose In many universities, graduate students have been recruited as economical and valuableadditions to the teaching staff. They serve as a cost-effective solution to increasing face-to-faceinteraction with students while reducing the teaching and/or grading burden on senior staff andinstructors through service as a graduate teaching assistant (GTAs). There are both benefits anddrawbacks to the graduate assistant position [1], but one prevalent theme in existing literature isthe murky and ill-defined nature of a GTA’s practical role in academia, as it sits firmly in thegrey area between teacher and student that often comes with unclear expectations [2], [3
doctoral programs, the numbers are staggering,especially for engineering disciplines. According to the Council of Graduate Schools, attritionfrom engineering doctoral programs ranges from 35% for men to 44% for women, with higherrates reported for students in minority groups [1], [2]. Despite such staggering statistics,researchers have just begun to focus on education at the graduate level in response to a call fromthe National Academies for educational change, particularly in science, technology, engineering,and mathematics [3]. Ameliorating attrition at the graduate level is vital because each Ph.D.student who leaves their program represents an investment of both time and money by thestudents themselves and universities, departments, and
ethics and ethical frameworks. With the knowledge gainedfrom this research, first-year engineering programs can better explore how incoming students viewdecision-making and design more effective instructional practices. BackgroundIntroductionEthics is the “standards of conduct that apply to everyone” [1]. It is the difference between rightand wrong. People use ethics to determine how to act when confronted with any situation; askingquestions such as “who will this benefit?”, “who will this harm?”, and “what are theconsequences?”. However, engineering ethics is different from everyday ethics. Engineeringethics are a set of professional ethics, or “those special morally permissible standards of conductthat
engineering education does not encourage or cultivate socially relevant thoughtsgiven the evidence of a lack of meaningful interpersonal relationships within the field (Seymourand Hewitt, 1977). Furthermore, the concerns of a culture of disengagement from social andpolitical issues is prevalent in engineering trajectories (Cech, 2014). Public-inspired science can include elements of 1) science as a “public good,” 2) citizenscience to empower people, 3) service learning, and 4) social justice and investigative science(Edwards, 2016). Allowing engineers to pursue public-inspired work can potentially be anopportunity for engineering to remain socially relevant. Public-inspired science has a premisethat scientists and engineers can enter into a
culture, equity in engineering education and increasing diversity in STEM through transformation of traditional teaching methods.Dr. Randy Yerrick, Fresno State University Randy Yerrick is Dean of the Kremen School for Education and Human Development at Fresno State University. He has also served as Professor of Science Education at SUNY Buffalo where he Associate Dean and Science Education Professor for the Graduate School of Education. Dr. Yerrick maintains an active research agenda focusing on two central questions: 1) How do scientific norms of discourse get enacted in classrooms and 2) To what extend can historical barriers to STEM learning be traversed for underrepresented students through expert teaching
with properly selected NGOs they might be ready todeliver. Moving beyond the dangers and perils of trips to "save the poor," the HumanitarianEngineering (HE) program at Colorado School of Mines (Mines) is developing newinteractions with socially responsible and accountable NGOs to ensure that communities areempowered through engineering projects for sustainable community development. To ensurethat these projects can better serve and empower communities, this paper shows 1) howengineers can map their partnerships with NGOs; 2) how to develop engineering designcourses where students learn human-centred problem definition and explore designchallenges with NGO partners; and 3) how to develop relationships with NGOs so studentscan have community
to obtain a job. Many faced personal/discriminatory interviewquestions, biases, and assumptions about what they could or could not do, in addition to beingsubjected to explicit discouragement and gender discrimination. The paper offersrecommendations for addressing these issues as well as further areas of research to pursue. Bybringing to light the issues surrounding females entering engineering professions in Qatar, thisstudy offers a contribution to women’s role and empowerment in the region.IntroductionWhile attracting women to STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) fieldshas been a steady concern in Western countries, female students across the Arab world aredominating most STEM educational programs [1-2]. Engineering
identified collaboration and communication as core aspects ofengineering work. Discussions of other social aspects of engineering, such as engaging withstakeholders, collaborating with users, or considering the societal implications of engineeringwork, were relatively limited. Understanding engineering students’ beliefs about the socialaspects of engineering work based on their previous experiences can help us better alignengineering curricula to promote more holistic and inclusive views of engineering.1. IntroductionEngineering is an inherently social discipline. The social aspects of engineering work include thevarious ways that engineers, within the context of their professional roles, impact, interact with,and relate to both broader society and
Paper ID #32392#LaHoraSTEAM (The STEAM Hour) – An Initiative to Promote STEM-STEAMLearning in Quarantine Times (Work in Progress)Mr. Marcelo Caplan, Columbia College Marcelo Caplan - Associate Professor, Department of Science and Mathematics, Columbia College Chicago. In addition to my teaching responsibilities, I am involved in the outreach programs and activities of the department. I am the coordinator of three outreach programs 1) the NSF-ISE project ”Scientists for To- morrow” which goal is to promote Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) learning in community centers in the Chicago area, 2) the Junior
-12 teachers. Teachers took pre-and post- concept inventories to assess their learning of content throughout the workshop and theresults indicated improvement of 58%. These assessments focused on vulnerabilities and specifictypes of attacks, system security, data transmission and encryption, permutations andcombinatorics, and binary numbers.1. IntroductionThere is an exponential growth in the number of cyber-attack incidents in the recent yearsresulting in significant financial loss and national security concerns. Secure cyberspace has beendesignated as one of the National Academy of Engineering (NAE) Grand Challenges inengineering. Broadly, the security threats are targeted on software programs, operating systemand network with the intention