study.It is important for us to hear students’ perceptions as well. A future study will seek to understandhow our students define “respect” as compared to how faculty define it. References[1] U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Employment in STEM occupations, September 4, 2019. Accessed on: January 16, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.bls.gov/emp/tables/stem- employment.htm.[2] National Science Board, Undergraduate Education, Enrollment, and Degrees in the United States, 19 12 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/2018/nsb20181/ report/sections/higher-education-in-science-and-engineering/undergraduate-education- enrollment-and-degrees-in-the-united-states.[3] M. W. Ohland, S. D. Sheppard, G
curricula effectively. Mentorship programs can rely on this basestructure to give students the options and resources to find a mentor that is best suited for theiracademic and research needs.References[1] D. Lopatto, “The Essential Features of Undergraduate Research Faculty Responses,” Counc. Undergrad. Res. Q., no. March, pp. 139–142, 2003.[2] “Mentoring Workshop Series - CEAT - Session 2 - Reading_1996.” .[3] L. Benson et al., “Assessing students’ researcher identity and epistemic cognition,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., vol. 2017-June, 2017.[4] J. K. Petrella and A. P. Jung, “2_Research 2008_Benefits,” vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 91–95.[5] T. D. Allen, L. T. Eby, and E. Lentz, “Mentorship behaviors and mentorship quality
average number of years of education of itspopulation is 9.8 years, while in Chiapas, the average is only 6.7 years. This difference meansthat Nuevo Leon is above the mandatory number of years of education that is required in Mexicofor each person to complete (nine years representing the completion of middle school). On theother hand, Chiapas is well below the number of years necessary. The average in both states isexpected to increase in the future. Beginning in May 2019, the number of mandatory years ofeducation in Mexico has risen to 12 years (completion of high school).That Chiapas students have better perceptions of physics than the Nuevo Leon students could berelated to the differences in wealth and education in these two states. According
. 6, no. 4, pp. 297–306, Dec. 2007, doi: 10.1187/cbe.07-06-0039.[3] S. Aggrawal and A. J. Magana, “Undergraduate Student Experience with Research Facilitated by Project Management and Self-regulated Learning Processes,” presented at the 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2023. Accessed: Nov. 05, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/undergraduate-student-experience-with-research- facilitated-by-project-management-and-self-regulated-learning-processes[4] J. K. PETRELLA and A. P. JUNG, “Undergraduate Research: Importance, Benefits, and Challenges,” Int. J. Exerc. Sci., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 91–95, Jul. 2008.[5] “Research Experiences for Undergraduates (REU) | NSF - National Science Foundation
Research Grants 24K06133 and the Shibaura Institute of Technology Grants for Educational Reform and Research Activity in the AY2024. Her current main research interests are: 1) how including humanities courses in an engineering education curriculum can help students to gain flexibility, and an appreciation of equity, and a greater richness of ideas; and 2) systematic issues impacting the effectiveness of engineering education, specifically in the context of project-based learnings for the engineering education. Below are her recent presentations at international conferences: ASEE 2023, WERA 2023, 2022, 2019, APAIE 2023, 2022, IIAI DSIR 2021, 2020. She obtained the Multidisciplinary Engineering Division’s Best Diversity
About Gen Z So Far." Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2020/05/14/on-the-cusp-of-adulthood-and- facing-an-uncertain-future-what-we-know-about-gen-z-so-far-2/ (accessed 1/8/24.[23] D. Riley, Engineering Thermodynamics and 21st Century Energy Problems: A Textbook Companion for Student Engagement (Synthesis Lectures on Engineering). Williston, VT: Morgan Claypool, 2011, p. 97 pages.[24] K. Johnson, J. A. Leydens, and B. M. Moskal, "Reflections on the integration of social justice concepts into an introductory control systems course (Work In Progress)," in 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, LA, 2016: ASEE.[25] C. A. Roberts and S. M. Lord, "Making Engineering
,” Ithaka S+R, Jan. 2019. doi: 10.18665/sr.310885.[11] S. Parker, “Research Data Sharing in Engineering: A Report on Faculty Practices and Preferences Prior to the Tri-Agency Policy,” in 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Baltimore, Maryland: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2023, p. 44112. doi: 10.18260/1-2--44112.[12] C. Tenopir et al., “Changes in Data Sharing and Data Reuse Practices and Perceptions among Scientists Worldwide,” PLOS ONE, vol. 10, no. 8, p. e0134826, Aug. 2015, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134826.[13] B. Suhr, J. Dungl, and A. Stocker, “Search, reuse and sharing of research data in materials science and engineering—A qualitative interview study,” PLOS ONE, vol. 15, no. 9, p
graduates.References[1] M. C. Paretti, J. D. Ford, S. Howe, D. A. Kotys-Schwartz, and R. Ott, “It’s a Context Gap, Not a Competency Gap: Understanding the Transition from Capstone Design to Industry,” 2021.[2] Z. S. Arsha, “An Undergraduate Internship/Project on Industry Academia Linkage and the Identification of Skills Gaps of the Graduating Engineering Students at Tertiary Level Education,” Independent University, Bangladesh, 2023.[3] M. Mora, Undergraduate Engineering Students’ Agency in Professional Socialization: Evidence From a Capstone Design Lab. State University of New York at Albany, 2019.[4] W. M. Butler, “The Impact of Simulation-Based Learning in Aircraft Design on Aerospace Student Preparedness for Engineering Practice: A Mixed
leading to an empathic formation compass for co-design,” Internation Journal of Design, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 53–68, 2019.[17] N. D. Fila, C. T. Schimpf, and J. L. Hess, “Critical incidents in biomedical engineering students’ experiences of empathy in engineering design,” in preparation.[18] E. B.-N. Sanders and P. J. Stappers, “Co-creation and the new landscapes of design,” Co- Design, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 5–18, 2008, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880701875068[19] J. L. Hess, N. D. Fila, C. T. Schimpf, A. Godwin, A., and E. A. Sanders, “Board 203: A research study on assessing empathic formation in engineering design,” Paper presented at 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Baltimore , Maryland
years on the faculty at the US Military Academy at West Point teaching civil engineering. He also served as the Director, Graduate Professional Development at Northeastern University’s College of Engineering. He is the recipient of the 2021 NSPE Engineering Education Excellence Award and the 2019 ASCE Thomas A Lenox ExCEEd Leadership Award.Dr. Camilla M. Saviz P.E., University of the Pacific Camilla Saviz is Professor and Chair of Civil Engineering at the University of the Pacific. She received B.S. and M.S. degrees in Mechanical Engineering from Clarkson University, an M.B.A. from the New York Institute of Technology, and a Ph.D. in Civil and Environmental Engineering from the University of California
, no. 1, pp. 22–26, 2011.[6] J. B. Halkiyo, “Enhancing the Equity and Inclusivity of Engineering Education for Diverse Learners through an Innovative Instructional Design, Delivery, and Evaluation: International Students in Focus,” In 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2022, [Online]. Available: https://strategy.asee.org/41209[7] N. Dasgupta, M. M. Scircle, and M. Hunsinger, “Female peers in small work groups enhance women’s motivation, verbal participation, and career aspirations in engineering,” PNAS Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. Am., vol. 112, no. 16, pp. 4988–4993, 2015, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1422822112.[8] S. J. Ceci, D. K. Ginther, S. Kahn, and W. M. Williams, “Women in Academic Science: A Changing
Learn., vol. 7, no. 2, Sep. 2013, doi: 10.7771/1541-5015.1339.[6] T. J. Moore, S. S. Guzey, and A. W. Glancy, “The EngrTEAMS Project: STEM Integration Curricula for Grades 4-8 (Curriculum Exchange),” presented at the 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2014, p. 24.1212.1-24.1212.2. Accessed: Feb. 11, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/the-engrteams-project-stem-integration-curricula- for-grades-4-8-curriculum-exchange[7] A. Hira and M. M. Hynes, “Design-based research to broaden participation in pre-college engineering: research and practice of an interest-based engineering challenges framework,” Eur. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 44, no. 1–2, pp. 103–122, Mar. 2019, doi: 10.1080
thecertification framework.AcknowledgementWe acknowledge support from the U.S. Department of Defense [Contract No. W52P1J-22-9-3009]. References[1] J. S. Linvill et al., "Development of a Certification Framework for a MicroelectronicsWorkforce Development Program," Accepted for presentation as part of a competitively selectedpanel at the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Baltimore, MD, June 2023.[2] J. S. Linvill, I. Adams, E. Haluschak, B. Quezada, and T. J. Moore, "‘Good communicationskills are super, super important’: Developing students’ professional communication skills forcareer-ready engineers," Accepted for presentation as part of a competitively selected panel at theASEE Annual Conference &
Innovation Fellow, Andre Schleife, for guidance and support.References[1] L. D. Feisel and A. J. Rosa, “The Role of the Laboratory in Undergraduate Engineering Education,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 121–130, 2005, doi: j.2168-9830.2005.tb00833.x.[2] P. H. Borgstrom et al., “Science and engineering active learning (SEAL) system: A novel approach to controls laboratories,” presented at the 119th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, San Antonio, Texas, Jun. 2012. doi: 10.18260/1-2--21900.[3] W. E. Dixon, D. M. Dawson, B. T. Costic, and M. S. de Queiroz, “A MATLAB-based control systems laboratory experience for undergraduate students: toward standardization and shared resources,” IEEE Transactions on
simulation,” Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 280–285, Jun. 2004. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2004.04.001[3] D. Laurillard and A. Masulis, Rethinking University Teaching: A Conversational Framework for the Effective Use of Learning Technologies. Routledge, 2013.[4] L. W. Barsalou, “Grounded cognition,” Annual Review of Psychology, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 617–645, Jan. 2008. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639[5] K. Koenig, K. E. Wood, L. J. Bortner, and L. Bao, “Modifying traditional labs to target scientific reasoning,” Journal of College Science Teaching, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 28–35, May 2019. doi:10.1080/0047231x.2019.12290473[6] B. A. Danielak, A. Gupta, and A. Elby, “Marginalized identities of sense
ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, New Orleans, Louisiana: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2016, p. 25999. doi: 10.18260/p.25999.[7] A. B. Diekman, E. S. Weisgram, and A. L. Belanger, “New Routes to Recruiting and Retaining Women in STEM: Policy Implications of a Communal Goal Congruity Perspective,” Soc. Issues Policy Rev., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 52–88, 2015, doi: 10.1111/sipr.12010.[8] K. L. Boucher, M. A. Fuesting, A. B. Diekman, and M. C. Murphy, “Can I Work with and Help Others in This Field? How Communal Goals Influence Interest and Participation in STEM Fields,” Front. Psychol., vol. 8, 2017, Accessed: Feb. 07, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles
, “Software Carpentry: Getting scientists to write better code by making them more productive,” Computing in Science & Engineering (CiSE), vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 66–69, Nov. 2006. [8] A. Simperler and G. Wilson, “Software Carpentry – get more done in less time,” arXiv:1506.02575, Jun. 2015. [9] B. K. Weaver, “The efficacy and usefulness of Software Carpentry training: A follow-up cohort study,” Master’s thesis, The University of Queensland, 2019.[10] A. Berg, S. Osnes, and R. Glassey, “If in doubt, try three: Developing better version control commit behavior with first year students,” in ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE), Feb. 2022, pp. 362–368.[11] V. Garousi, G. Giray, and E. T¨uz¨un, “Survey of the
. McCarthey, and A. Magnifico, "Recursive Feedback: Evaluative Dimensions of e-Learning," in E-Learning Ecologies: Principles for New Learning and Assessment, Taylor & Francis. 2017, pp. 118-142.[3] M. D. Gurer, I. Cetin, and E. Top, “Factors affecting students’ attitudes toward computer programming,” in Informatics in Education, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 281–296, 2019[4] L. B. Nilson, “Where STEM education falls short” in Teaching at Its Best: A Research-Based Resource for College Instructors, 4th Ed. San Francisco, CA, USA: Wiley, 2016, pp 273.[5] R. E. Mayer and R. Clark,“Applying the segmenting and pretraining principles” in e-Learning and the Science of Instruction: Proven Guidelines for Consumers and
implementing evidence-based pedagogy canhave in order to further drive participant motivation to adopt those practices.The TEN programInstitutional ContextThe TEN was envisioned in Fall 2019 when few pedagogy development programs were offeredat Rutgers University and there was no central coordination for teaching support. In 2020, facultyneeded pedagogical support as they moved to remote teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic,and various units on campus began creating programs to meet those needs as we first offered theTEN programs in AY 2020-21. One program focused on community building and resourcesharing; another on asynchronous online course design, and another combined workshops andseminars on inclusive teaching into a series of digital badges [17
mechanical engineering: A guidebook for teaching and learning. Springer Nature Switzerland AG, 2022. DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-85390-7[5] J. Murray, L.C. Paxson, S. Seo and M. Beattie, “STEM-Oriented Alliance for Research (SOAR): An educational model for interdisciplinary project-based learning”. 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access. DOI:10.18260/1-2—35206[6] A. Carvalho Alvesa, F. Moreiraa, M.A. Carvalhoa, S. Oliveiraa, M.T. Malheiroa, I. Britoa, C. Pinto Leãoa and S. Teixeiraa, S. “Integrating STEM contents through PBL in an Industrial Engineering and Management first year program”. Scientific Electronic Library Online, Brazil. Production (29). 2019. Article e20180111
field, the report’s guidance helpsguard against well-intentioned changes that may ultimately fall short. By engaging with the GrinterReport’s ideas, educators can align around shared objectives and foster meaningful collaboration—ifwe're open to hearing what it has to offer.References[1] A. R. Cheville, K. Madhavan, J. Heywood, and M. C. Richey, “The wisdom of winter is madness in May,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 108, no. 2, 2019.[2] S. Sorby, N. L. Fortenberry, and G. Bertoline, “Stuck in 1955, engineering education needs a revolution,” Issues Sci Technol, 2021.[3] J. G. Harris, E. M. DeLoatch, W. R. Grogan, I. C. Peden, and J. R. Whinnery, “Journal of Engineering Education Round Table: Reflections on the
2025 ASEE Northeast Section Conference, March 22, 2025, University of Bridgeport, Bridgeport, CT, USA. Teaching Students Essential Survival Skills in the Age of Generative Artificial Intelligence: Critical Thinking, Digital Literacy, and Cybersecurity AwarenessTeresa Piliouras, Steffi Crasto, Chinmay Dharap, and Navarun Gupta Pui Lam Yu Department of Electrical EngineeringCenter for Advanced Research on Emerging Technologies University of Bridgeport TCR, Inc. Bridgeport, CT, United States Weston
introduction to four core change strategies,” Journal of College Science Teaching,vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 18–25, 2010.[15] R. Brent and R. M. Felder, “A model for engineering faculty development,” InternationalJournal of Engineering Education, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 234–240, 2003.[16] C. J. Finelli and J. E. Froyd, “Improving student learning in undergraduate engineeringeducation by improving teaching and assessment.,” Advances in Engineering Education, pp. 1–30, 2019.[17] Gao, R, Hipwell, M.C, Seets, D. C., Polycarpou, A, Watson, K., & Srinivasa, A. R. WIP:Incremental innovation training as a means for percolating faculty teaching culture change: Afirst look. ASEE annual conference, (). Retrieved from https://par.nsf.gov/biblio/10350226.[18] Srinivasa
Journal of Psychological Assessment. 2019.[18] M. Pett, N. Lackey, and J. Sullivan, Making Sense of Factor Analysis. Thousand Oaks,California: SAGE Publications, Inc., 2003. doi: 10.4135/9781412984898.[19] S. Wilson, I. Blaber, J. Hancock, G. Pitcher, and J. Hammer, “Delivery Of Mental HealthTraining Across A College Of Engineering”.[20] K. Beddoes and A. Danowitz, “Engineering Students Coping With COVID-19: Yoga,Meditation, and Mental Health,” in 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access,Virtual Conference: ASEE Conferences, 2021.[21] N. Ban, L. O. Mensah, M. Whitwer, L. E. Hargis, C. J. Wright, J. H. Hammer, and S. A.Wilson, “‘It’s very important to my professors… at least most of them’: How messages fromengineering faculty and staff
; Imperatives for Upskilling—A Review,” Architecture,vol. 4, no. 4, Art. no. 4, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.3390/architecture4040046.[6] S. Strain, A. B. Watson, and M. Hale, “Generative AI as an educational resource,”presented at the 2024 South East Section Meeting, Mar. 2024. Accessed: Jan. 14, 2025. [Online].Available: https://peer.asee.org/generative-ai-as-an-educational-resource[7] J. L. Alberd, M. K. Pallikonda, and R. C. Manimaran, “The Future of Learning:Harnessing Generative AI for Enhanced Engineering Technology Education,” presented at the2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2024. Accessed: Jan. 14, 2025. [Online].Available: https://peer.asee.org/the-future-of-learning-harnessing-generative-ai-for-enhanced-engineering-technology
County, Florida. The researchers would like to thank their co-authors,program management, and research teams for their assistance and support throughout the summerprograms and research study. The researchers would also like to thank the teacher programfacilitators for making the summer programs and this work possible.7. References[1] D. Stokes, P. Evans, and C. Craig, Developing STEM Teachers through both Informal and Formal Learning Experiences. Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca, 2017. Accessed: Feb. 19, 2025. [Online]. Available: http://repositorio.grial.eu/handle/grial/919[2] K. Cheng, “Informal Learning Opportunities and STEM Teacher Identity Development,” University of Tennessee, Dec. 01, 2019. [Online]. Available: https
EnvE Majors EnvE Majors 2019 24 6 25% 2020 48 14 29% 2021 64 22 34% 2022 60 15 25% 2023 59 10 17%2. Engage, engage, engage: message the motivation for change to all stakeholders. We began the RED and KEEN initiatives with the project leaders meeting with the full range of the school’s stakeholders to present both initiatives, explain why we were pursuing them and their significance, and gather input on how best we could move forward to attain
. J. Kiernan, and F. Frost, Understanding by design. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development Alexandria, VA, 1998. [4] D. F. Walker, Fundamentals of curriculum: Passion and professionalism. Routledge, 2002. [5] J. Impagliazzo, S. Conry, J. Hughes, L. Weidong, L. Junlin, A. McGettrick, V. Nelson, E. Durant, H. Lam, and R. Reese, “Curriculum guidelines for undergraduate degree programs in computer engineering,” CE2016). December, vol. 15, 2016. [Online]. Available: https://www.acm.org/binaries/content/assets/education/ce2016-final-report.pdf [6] T. Dion and K. C. Bower, “Integrating learning outcomes throughout the civil engineering curriculum to meet site engineering prerequisite needs,” in ASEE
Fellowshipfrom the college, which provided me the time and space to explore this work. Faculty member inthe department were invited to join me on this journey, but were not required to participate. Inthis paper, I present an overview of the scaffolded approach I used, including examples of eachelement, and share the goals, implementation strategies, and my personal experiences, insights,and reflections as the faculty lead.Development of the Scaffolded ApproachAfter several conversations with the dean about my interests and observations, we identified twokey goals for my Dean’s Fellowship: first, to participate in the ASEE Engineering CultureRoundtable at the annual conference and bring those insights back to our college; and second, toorganize a
Reform of an Introductory Mechanics Course Sequence Driven by a Community of Practice,” in International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, vol. 15. ASME, p. 11. [Online]. Available: https://dx.doi.org/10.1115/IMECE2015-51493[12] M. West, N. Walters, M. Silva, T. Bretl, and C. Zilles, “Integrating Diverse Learning Tools using the PrairieLearn Platform,” in The 52nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. ACM, Jul. 2009, pp. 161–165.[13] M. West, G. Herman, and C. Zilles, “PrairieLearn: Mastery-based Online Problem Solving with Adaptive Scoring and Recommendations Driven by Machine Learning,” in 2015 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition Proceedings. Seattle, Washington: ASEE Conferences, Jun