designs, and costconstraints.Students engaged in team work in a multidisciplinary team environment such that the Page 14.411.2reality of cooperation in a global economy became a lesson realized early in theirfreshman engineering year in college. With a dynamic market place, graduates need tobe able to interact effectively in diverse fields. One important goal of multidisciplinarydesign is to identify the many solutions needed to solve a single problem while keepingin mind the many differing objectives of the overall project [2] A multidisciplinaryapproach to engineering design is valuable in that it asks that students make certain that,“…advances in
user responses [17],[18], understand and adopt user language [18], [19], explore user experiences [20], and leveragethe full potential of prototypes to uncover user requirements [21]. On the other hand, directinteractions with users can help engineering students refine their understanding of their designproblem and keep user requirements in mind when generating solution concepts [7], [22], [23].In general, these previous studies have focused primarily on the outcomes of student designerinteractions with users. Few studies thus far have explored in depth how student designersperceive the role of user interactions in their design projects and how students’ perceptions mayin turn influence their approaches to these interactions. This study
Paper ID #27479The Card-Board DIY Microcontroller for Use with Paper Mechatronics (Re-source Exchange)Colin Dixon, Concord Consortium Colin Dixon holds a Ph.D. in Learning & Mind Sciences from the University of California, Davis. He researches the development of STEM practices and agency among young people creating things to use and share with the world. He writes about equity and identity in making and engineering, the role of community in science learning, and how youth leverage interests and experiences within STEM education.Dr. Corey T. Schimpf, The Concord Consoritum Corey Schimpf is a Learning Analytics
researcher at Aalto University Design Factory. Currently working on in- novation networks, creative ecosystems and community dynamics in relation to these. Holds a PhD in Industrial Design Engineering from TU Delft. Sine is also an architect.Dr. Tua A. Bj¨orklund, Aalto University Design Factory Tua Bj¨orklund is a professor of practice at Aalto University, and one of the co-founders of the Design Fac- tory, a multidisciplinary co-creation platform. She is particularly interested in how to support translating ideas into action in engineering design in organisations, whether it be in the context of teaching, product design or creating new strategy in technology companies.Prof. Niina Nurmi, Aalto University, School of Business
Paper ID #29814Designing for a Sustainable World: Integrating the United NationsSustainable Development Goals into a First-Year Engineering Course inScience, Technology and SocietyDr. Benjamin J. Laugelli, University of Virginia Dr. Laugelli is an Assistant Professor of Engineering and Society at the University of Virginia. He teaches courses that explore social and ethical aspects of engineering design and practice, including Sci- ence, Technology, and Contemporary Issues; Technology and the Frankenstein Myth; The LEGO Course: Engineering Design and Values; STS and Engineering Practice; and The Engineer, Ethics, and Profes
Engineering Education, vol. 96, issue 4, pp. 359-379, Oct 2007.[6] P. Steif, et al., “Improved Problem Solving Performance by Inducing Talk about SalientProblem Features,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 99, issue 2, pp. 135-142, April 2010.[7] B. Crandall, et al., Working Minds: A practitioner's guide to cognitive task analysis.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2006.[8] G. Polya, How to Solve It: A New Aspect of Mathematical Method, 2nd ed. Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press, 1957.[9] D. Jonassen, “Instructional Design as Design Problem Solving: An Iterative Process,”Educational Technology, vol. 48, issue 3, May-June 2008.[10] S. Salehi, “Improved Problem-Solving Through Reflection,” PhD dissertation, GraduateSchool of Education, Stanford
our uncertainty (tolerance for ambiguity). In this course, students experiencedmultiple levels of uncertainty and instructors offered permission as part of the course design tosafely take risks, fail, and move forward. As a result, final products were much more innovativeand creative in nature than ideas presented at the beginning of the class. Students recognized theimportance of the challenges they faced (group dynamics, work dynamics, distaste for the coursedesign and overwhelming amount of group work, etc.) in moving through the creative designprocess.With that in mind, we look to student reflections, specifically those of the engineering students,to identify strategies that contribute to creative practice and to help students
, and drawattention to the lack of local design epistemologies in humanitarian engineering scholarship andpractice.I argue that as students, teachers, and researchers, we equate the minds of those who occupyeconomic and social margins with the possession of marginal intellect when we set out to help oraid them without recognizing the validity of and valorizing their ways of knowing. I providethree exemplar grassroots practices of seeking feedback, perceiving needs and problems, andorganizing instrumental assistance and cooperation. Learning how members of socially andeconomically marginalized communities apply their minds, mouths, hands and feet to solvelocally occurring problems may help us interrogate our scholarly, pedagogical, and
AC 2007-1102: ESTABLISHING FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTS AND TARGETSPECIFICATIONS: A KEY COMPONENT OF PRODUCT DEVELOPMENTPROJECTSKarim Muci-Küchler, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology Karim Muci-Küchler is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at South Dakota School of Mines and Technology. Before joining SDSM&T, he was an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Detroit Mercy. He received his Ph.D. in Engineering Mechanics from Iowa State University in 1992. His main interest areas include Computational Mechanics, Solid Mechanics, and Product Design and Development. He has taught several different courses at the undergraduate and graduate level, has over 25
who teach this material,and that they will consider adopting Alloy or a similar tool. After all, if we are to place softwareengineering on a firm mathematical foundation, we must do so in a way that makes this useful to Page 11.616.6practicing engineers. To my mind, Alloy is a step in this direction.Bibliography1. Jeff Magee and Jeff Kramer. Concurrency: State Models & Java Programs. John Wiley & Sons, 1999.2. Michael Lutz and James Vallino. “Concurrent System Design: Applied Mathematics & Modeling in Software Engineering Education.” 2005 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June, 2005.3. Daniel Jackson. “Alloy: A
AC 2011-635: HIGHER TECHNOLOGICAL EDUCATION IN ENGLANDAND WALES 1955-1966. COMPULSORY LIBERAL STUDIESJohn Heywood, Trinity College Dublin Professorial Fellow Emeritus of Trinity College Dublin formerly Professor and Director of Teacher Ed- ucation. During the period of the paper was a lecturer in radio communication at Norwood Technical College, Senior Research Fellow in Higher Technological Education at Birmingham College of Advanced Technology, and Leverhulme Senior Research Fellow at the University of Lancaster respectively. he has an MSc in Engineering Education from the University of Dublin Page 22.776.1
Paper ID #44357Work in Progress: Building Conceptual Understanding in the Mass and EnergyBalances Course through Qualitative Analysis and Interactive DemonstrationsDr. Sakul Ratanalert, Columbia University Sakul Ratanalert is a Senior Lecturer in Discipline in the Department of Chemical Engineering at Columbia University. He received his BS in Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering from Cornell University, and his MS in Chemical Engineering Practice and his PhD in Chemical Engineering from MIT. His current research interests include developing engaging learning activities and building students’ intuition and conceptual
activities. In alignment with previous research(e.g., [19, 20]), our findings also show that educators being exposed to technical skills andactivities may have motivated youth to consider future technology-oriented careers. Finally,educators and administrators viewed the open-ended approach to self-directed learning andexploration of topics beyond classroom time, which is built into the curriculum as a motivator formany youths to independently search online for solutions, advanced technical topics, andresources beyond the ones included in the curriculum. These observations align with severalEngineering Habits of Mind, including persistence, collaboration, and creativity as identified inthe P12 Engineering Education Framework [5].In addition to
instructors and felt the instructors had their best interests in mind. These feelings contributed to overall student engagement in Part III, their MATLAB coding, and may contribute to persistence in the program. In their classic ethnographic study of 460 science, mathematics, and engineering (SME) students from fifteen four-year institutions from 1990-1993, Seymour and Hewitt found that the third most commonly-cited factor (36.1%) for switching out of SME was poor teaching by SME faculty. Poor teaching by SME faculty was also mentioned as a concern by 90.2% of all switchers and by 73.7% of non-switchers [24]. In their follow-up ethnographic study of 346 students from six four-year institutions, Seymour and Hunter observed that poor quality of STEM
Children's Self-Identity," in Proceedings of the 2017 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, 2017, pp. 109-120.[3] E. Vuopala, D. Guzmán Medrano, M. Aljabaly, D. Hietavirta, L. Malacara, and C. Pan, "Implementing a maker culture in elementary school–students’ perspectives," Technology, Pedagogy and Education, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 649-664, 2020.[4] L. Martin, "The promise of the maker movement for education," Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), vol. 5, no. 1, p. 4, 2015.[5] J. Lave and E. Wenger, Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press., 1991.[6] L. S. Vygotsky, "Mind in society," Mind in society the
credit, or even college credits under their belt, how to teach and train. What is it about, so teachers aren't scared off. [So] increasing their depth of knowledge [beyond just what the standard says] I think will only help us more.Finally, the participants also emphasized the thoroughness they would like to see in terms of mathand physics knowledge from students and teachers in engineering classrooms. All participantsemphasized the importance of math and science numerous times during the conversation as evidentfrom this quote, “...to be ready for the college, they have to keep in mind, they need physics. Theyneed math, as much math as possible and we tell the CTE teachers, the same thing.” Mathspecifically was considered a non
AC 2007-1672: UNIVERSAL INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN APPLIED IN A DESIGNCLASSROOMSusan McCahan, University of Toronto Page 12.1517.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Universal Instructional Design Applied in a Design ClassroomAbstractOne of the major challenges in teaching large courses is the diversity of the student population.Characteristics now common in undergraduate engineering student populations include diversityin learning style, cultural background, and factors that may disadvantage students, such as alearning disability. One approach to addressing these challenges is Universal InstructionalDesign (UID) and it is now gaining acceptance in higher
Paper ID #17857Development and Use of a Client Interaction Rubric for Formative Assess-mentDr. John K. Estell, Ohio Northern University Dr. John K Estell is Professor of Computer Engineering and Computer Science at Ohio Northern Uni- versity, providing instruction primarily in the areas of introductory computer programming and first-year engineering. He has been on the faculty of the Electrical & Computer Engineering and Computer Science Department since 2001, and served as department chair from 2001-2010. He received a B.S.C.S.E. degree from The University of Toledo and the M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Computer Science
participating on an integrative team or educationalexperience required the faculty involved to grow, learn, and get out of their comfort zones.Session I was primarily concerned with integration within engineering curricula, while thesecond session was primary concerned with integration that occurred in particular courses orother educational experiences.Although the papers in all of the sessions reflected significant progress and accomplishment inintegration, “Measuring Change Over Time in Sociotechnical Thinking: A Survey/ValidationModel for Sociotechnical Habits of Mind” by Leydens, Johnson, Claussen, Blacklock, Moskal,and Cordova provides the most fully realized account of sociotechnical integration, which theauthors implicitly define as highlighting
is minding the gap?” AAC&U Peer Review,vol. 16, no. 2, Spring 2014. [Online]. Available: https://www.aacu.org/publications-research/periodicals/who-minding-gap[3] J. Gill, R. Sharp, J. Mills and S. Franzway, “I ‘still’ wanna be an engineer! Women,education and the engineering profession,” European Journal of Engineering Education, vol.33, no. 4, pp. 391–402, 2008.[4] J. Blackmore, “Bureaucratic, corporate/market and network Governance: Shifting spacesfor gender equity in education,” Gender, Work and Organization, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 443-466,2011.[5] E. Castilla, “Gender, race, and meritocracy in organizational careers,” American Journalof Sociology, vol. 113, no. 6, pp.1479-1526, 2008.[6] C. Fletcher, R. Boden, J. Kent and
perceived divisions between STEM andthe liberal arts by linking those perspectives and assignments to broader habits of mind that arenecessary for engineers and designers. We then describe our strategies for integrating a richdesign experience into the course and consider how that integration alters typical approaches todesign projects. Finally, we discuss our plan to implement assessments that account for bothstudents’ technical abilities and their application of course theories and concepts.Course development was supported at the Institution by a summer course development grant thatencouraged faculty to partner across disciplines to create unique course offerings. Thepartnership between the Humanities & Social Sciences (HSS) and the
: And for me I learned a lot about just if you set your mind to something, you can do it. I mean, I didn’t really know too much about cars in general before I started this project. I feel like I learned a whole bunch about cars just through the other team members. And then, beyond that, like I just knew that going into the engineering field now that I feel totally comfortable that I can do the job that they expect me to do. And so, I think it’s helped out a lot that way. [Focus Group, LP1] You know, I think at the beginning of the semester I was definitely like, I don't know if I'm ready to graduate, I don't know if I'm ready for this, but I think just going through, you know, senior design, just
AC 2012-4526: A WORKSHOP TO IMPROVE COMMUNICATION SKILLSFOR TEACHING ASSISTANTSDr. Elizabeth A. DeBartolo, Rochester Institute of Technology Elizabeth A. DeBartolo is an Associate Professor in the Mechanical Engineering Department at the Rochester Institute of Technology. She earned her B.S.E. at Duke University in 1994 and her Ph.D. at Purdue University in 2000. She works with students on assistive device design and determining mechani- cal properties of materials. DeBartolo serves on her college’s leadership teams for both multi-disciplinary capstone design and outreach program development.Prof. Margaret B. Bailey, Rochester Institute of Technology Margaret B. Bailey, P.E., is a professor of mechanical engineering
Identifying and Leveraging a DfXIdentifying and leveraging a DfX has three possible benefits. First, identifying a DfX that bestserves a given sector and corporation can be invaluable to an engineering designer or designfirm. The appropriate application of said DfX can provide a competitive edge to the firm whileproviding benefits to both the consumer and society[2]. Kimberly-Clark (K-C) is one firm that hasbenefitted from implementing DfE. In the mind of Ken Strassner, Vice President for GlobalEnvironmental, Safety, Regulatory, and Scientific Affairs[4]:“Design for the Environment will continue to be an important area of activity for Kimberly-Clarkbecause it can be a point of differentiation for us and can help deliver value for our business ...We
that are notmultiple-choice but require a calculated answer. Mehrabian et al. [3, 4] discussed how shouldfaculty design online exams for students studying in engineering and technology related fieldswithout sacrificing the educational quality and exam security and also provided facultyexperiences on the topic. They presented following important recommendations to prepareonline-open book-open mind approach exams: the students should be tested more on theconcepts rather than the material that can be plagiarized easily and selecting random sets ofquestions from a pool of questions for each student. For the second part, more questions shouldbe setup in the learning management system so that the system can randomized the exam foreach student. Pohl
' scores onthe Entrepreneurial Minded Learning Assessment (ESEMA) surveys underscore the potential ofthese pedagogical approaches to augment both theoretical understanding and practical skills.However, the challenges encountered, such as the need for iterative prototyping and adjustmentsto project requirements, highlight the complexities inherent in implementing innovative teachingmethods.The implementation of Problem-Based Learning (PBL) and Entrepreneurial Mindset Learning(EML) in foundational mechanical engineering courses, specifically Statics and Dynamics, hasyielded promising results. Despite the challenges presented by the traditional emphasis ontheoretical knowledge, the integration of PBL and EML has provided students with practical
Paper ID #43267A Comparative Study on the Role of Bloom’s Taxonomy-based Assignmentsand Project-based Learning on Student Performance in an UndergraduateFluid Mechanics CourseDr. Arkasama Bandyopadhyay, Texas A&M University Dr. Arkasama Bandyopadhyay is an Instructional Assistant Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Texas A&M University (TAMU). She previously earned a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering with a minor in Mathematics from Oklahoma State University and a Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Texas at Austin. Her research interests span the areas of distributed energy
Paper ID #31155Valued Defiance - Teachers’ View on STEM and Students (fundamental,diversity)Dr. Johannes Strobel, University of Missouri Dr. Johannes Strobel is Full Professor, Information Science & Learning Technologies at the University of Missouri where he leads a maker initiative and conducts research in engineering education. His research focuses on engineering learning through hands-on activities; defiance, empathy, care and worldviews in engineering. Dr. Strobel has been PI, Co-PI and key personnel of grants totaling $30MM in the USA and Canada. He co-authored 160 papers and co-edited four books. Dr. Strobel is
Paper ID #41120Fostering Student Ownership and Active Learning through Student-Led GroupLectures in a Civil Engineering Materials CourseDr. Shenghua Wu, University of South Alabama Dr. Shenghua Wu is currently an Associate Professor in the Department of Civil, Coastal, and Environmental Engineering at the University of South Alabama. His research areas include civil engineering materials characterization, pavement performance evaluation and modeling, design, and maintenance, multidisciplinary approach to address complex engineering issues, as well as STEM education. He is the Director for the Solid Waste Sustainability Hub
effective mentorship and social support tracks directly onto gender, ethnic, race,and class differences. With this contingency in mind, the measurement of self-efficacy can betied to a much larger social project. Most suggestively, Jaffee and Riley draw our attention tothe fact that it is in leaving engineering that some women express agency. We certainly need notaccept as final or desirable the departure of these young women from STEM fields, but if we areto understand the complex relationship between identity, self-efficacy, and equitableopportunities in STEM disciplines, such broadened definitions of what counts as self-confidenceand self-determination will be vital. McLoughlin's work on so-called non-traditional students (aproblematic word in