analyzing alliance Embedded Tutor data.In addition, the authors are indebted to Dr. Jane Lehr, Director, Office of Student Research,Director, CSU-LSAMP at Cal Poly, and Professor, Ethnic Studies and Women’s, Gender &Queer Studies, California Polytechnic University San Luis Obispo.The project team also appreciates the assistance of Briante Meeks, Grants AdministrativeAssistant, Allan Hancock College, for general support of the project.This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under AwardNo. 2110112. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.7. References[1] Foundation
systems. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Academic Parallels from a Military Merit ListAbstract To explore the extent that military training can provide pedagogical insight, this research seeks todiscover relationships between classroom (on-campus formative assessment) and “real world”performance (summer training summative assessment) for Army Cadets. This analysis examinesdata from three years of one program’s Army Reserve Officer Training Corps participants. Weestablish what factors on-campus correlate to Cadet Summer Training success.The goal of this research is to spur a discussion about different assessments that could reflect real-world performance. Another goal of this
the ability to solve new problems. Interestingly it has been suggested thatdown shifting of this kind might the reason why students fail to apply higher levels of theBloom Taxonomy of Educational Objectives [21].We have to learn to be able recognize our biases and prejudices in order to adapt and that maybe achieved through reflection [22].The most pertinent example of dissonance at the present time are the press statements of thespokesman of the Israeli and Hamas in the Gaza War. The same differences in presentation areapparent in media reports of what members of the Israeli and Palestinian public think.Deception and controlIt is likely that we will readily concede that propaganda is a form of deception. It is less likelythat we will concede
experiments and activities that reflect authentic sci-entific practices and applications relevant to industry or research fields. For example, using thecommercial available software which students will use in their future career; integrating case stud-ies, simulations, or hands-on projects that mirror real-world problems and scenarios, alongsideincorporating modern technologies, equipment, and techniques used in industry settings. 22.1.3 Assessing student learning outcomesVarious indicators can be employed to assess and evaluate the learning outcomes, including stu-dents’ performance in laboratories, completion of homework assignments, and examination results.Designing homework assignments and quizzes
, and then share their thoughts withthe class [24], [25]. Additionally, the use of discussion boards provides students with a platformto engage in collaborative and reflective discussions on course topics, thereby promoting deeperunderstanding and critical thinking [8], [26]. Furthermore, the "muddiest point" techniqueencourages students to identify and articulate the most challenging or unclear aspects of thematerial, allowing instructors to address these areas of difficulty directly. By integrating theseactive learning strategies into the course, students are provided with opportunities for peerinteraction, self-reflection, and clarification of complex topics, ultimately contributing to a moredynamic and effective learning experience in the
required lecture nuggets. The hands-on part of the course is seen as the primaryfunction of the class, which is in contrast to cases where laboratory exercises are seen as a sideeffort of the class or something required for accreditation. Students are motivated by theavailability of time to work through technical issues as a community with their design systemphysically present.These project-based assignments tend to focus on higher-level learning, particularly synthesis /creation and reflection of the measured results. Each project is written in IEEE format with a hardpage limit (e.g. 4 or 9 pages) depending on the exercise particularly to require students tofine-tune their submission and encourage reflection on the hands-on experience
Figure 3). We haveadapted the language used in the literature, replacing the term ‘capability’ with ‘opportunity’ and‘functioning’ with ‘achievement’ since this makes the framework more approachable forengineering educators. The list below comprises our working definitions: • Opportunities (capabilities) are a person's real freedoms or affordance to achieve a life they desire, including their capacities—both innate and learned—and the beings and doings that contribute to their identity. • Outcomes are included since they represent the current paradigm. They are educational milestones that reflect goals of the program and processes students go through in engineering education. • Achievements (functionings
summers (2022, 2023) of dataenabled researchers to examine the impacts of the C-EEEM on smaller subgroups by aggregatingthe two cohorts, thereby increasing statistical power.In the first year of the C-EEEM replication (2022), researchers began with data collectionprotocols and instruments developed in the original pilot at the University of Notre Dame, whichwere then modified slightly [1, 4, 5, 18-21]. Instruments included weekly check-in surveys forteam feedback, prompts to encourage reflection on the experiences, and the main post-internshipsurvey instrument. The original instruments reflected researchers’ consistent interest of theimpact of the C-EEEM on STEM-learning experiences for students generally andunderrepresented groups in particular
students to showcase and reflect on their experiences. Amy has contributed to the development of an interdisciplinary grand challenges focused course and introduction to engineering course in both in-person and online (MOOC) formats at ASU. She is also actively involved in the ASU Kern project and Kern Entrepreneurial Engineering Network (KEEN), focused on students’ development of entrepreneurial mindset. Amy received the national 2019 KEEN Rising Star award from KEEN for her efforts in encouraging students in developing an entrepreneurial mindset. She is also a member of the current interim Executive Committee for the international GCSP Network, and mentors schools to develop GCSPs as part of the GCSP New Programs
Literature Review of Empirical Research on ChatGPT in Education.” Rochester, NY, Sep. 06, 2023. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.4562771.[18] C. K. Lo, “What Is the Impact of ChatGPT on Education? A Rapid Review of the Literature,” Educ. Sci., vol. 13, no. 4, Art. no. 4, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.3390/educsci13040410.[19] C. M. L. Phillips, J. S. London, W. C. Lee, A. S. Van Epps, and B. A. Watford, “Reflections on the messiness of initiating a systematic literature review on broadening participation in engineering and computer science,” in 2017 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), Oct. 2017, pp. 1–8. doi: 10.1109/FIE.2017.8190482.[20] L. Krupp et al., “Unreflected Acceptance -- Investigating the Negative Consequences of ChatGPT
replication (2022), researchers began with data collectionprotocols and instruments developed in the original pilot at the University of Notre Dame, whichwere then modified slightly [1, 4, 5, 18-21]. Instruments included weekly check-in surveys forteam feedback, prompts to encourage reflection on the experiences, and the main post-internshipsurvey instrument. The original instruments reflected researchers’ consistent interest of theimpact of the C-EEEM on STEM-learning experiences for students generally andunderrepresented groups in particular; these integrated considerations informed by research onhigh impact practices for STEM motivation and retention, as well as those for facilitatinginnovation ecosystems and place attachment [3-12, 22, 23
a reflection to a guided "3-2-1" prompt. After the tour of Brno, this prompt was: o What were the 3 most interesting pieces of Czech culture or history you learned from these sites? o What are 2 questions you have after these tours you would like to learn more about? o Share 1 picture of an artifact or piece of art that you found most compelling and give a brief paragraph of its history (or the artist’s biography). A similar prompt was provided after travel to Prague (and all other trips for the remainder of the summer). These reflections aimed to increase the active engagement of the students in the sites and history in which they were being
Sustainability (49senior students). This study analyses the outcome of students’ performance in terms of theknowledge highlighted in their mind maps and the application in their exams. Finally,instructors conducted a survey to inquire students about their perception about the rolemind mapping plays in their learning and course performance. The authors reflect on thedesign of the intervention and explore the avenues academia could take to form newpedagogical approaches to connect skills from both pedagogies in architecture education.Implications for research and practice are provided.IntroductionMind maps serve as a visual pedagogical tool, particularly suitable for students inclinedtowards this learning method. It is essential to underscore that visual
engineeringeducation. The significant improvements observed in students' scores on the EntrepreneurialMinset Learning Assessment (ESEMA) surveys indicate that these pedagogical approaches havethe potential to enhance both theoretical understanding and practical skills. Despite the challengespresented by the traditional emphasis on theoretical knowledge, the integration of PBL and EMLhas provided students with practical skills and an entrepreneurial mindset essential for success inthe field.In reflecting on the results of this study, it becomes evident that the integration of Problem-BasedLearning (PBL) and Entrepreneurial Mindset Learning (EML) holds promise for enhancingmechanical engineering education. The significant improvements observed in students
greatly when it is adopted in multiple courses or programs of construction education. [19] Multidisciplinary AECO Students reflected that they could better learn program communication practices and strategies when using the BIM software with actual project data in the industry. [41] Multidisciplinary AECO Interdisciplinary BIM-based joint capstone course in program highway engineering improved students’ collaborations and communication skills with other professionals. [42] Multidisciplinary AECO
, andthe richness of human experiences—and write it up based on the simplified, linear sequencedemanded in academia. It was not just about the aesthetic structure (introduction, literature,methods, results, discussions, etc.), it was how this dominant dissertation rhetoric silenced thetrue ambivalence and complexities of my findings. This traditional style and structure focused onknowledge production more than depth of holistic understanding (Kociatkiewicz & Kostera,2023). I relate to this reflection from another PhD student as she considered this same challenge: “How could I condense my research into a series of neatly defined chapters? I was attempting to follow the normative pattern of a conventional thesis [...] It seems
belonging at theuniversity level consists of five items that assess students’ sense of belonging within theiruniversity. Items were answered on a 7-point Likert-type scale (1= Not at all, 7= Very much so).An average score across items was calculated with higher scores reflecting higher sense ofbelonging at the university level. A sample item for sense of belonging- university level is “I feelthere is a sense of community at this school.” Sense of belonging- engineering major level. Sense of belonging at the engineeringmajor level consists of ten items that measure students’ perceptions of belonging within theirengineering major. Items were answered on a 7-point Likert-type scale (1= Not at all, 7= Verymuch so). An average score across items
, “Seeingthe faculty frequently and being able to talk to them about more than just school or assignmentshas given me a better relationship with them than other students. I feel as though I'm a welcomedpart of the engineering program.” The student who answered “Unsure/other” when asked if thelunches allow them to feel more connected to their engineering program remarked, “I feel likeI’d still have the same relationships with the same people, but I would see those people less so Iam unsure of the result.” However, most scholars reflected the sentiment of one scholar whostated, “Since all of us have split up into our major based classes, we rarely see all of each othernow. The lunches allow all of us to reconnect, even if it is just one day a week
vapors. None of thestudents were able to score at least 15 points out of 20 points (75%) for the problem. Only 25%of the students were able to score at least 12 out of 20 (60%). Some students were unable to findthe correct equation for the problem. Most students used an incorrect approach to the problem,including wrong assumptions or incorrect variables.In reflection, it appeared that students were unable to apply prior knowledge to differentsituations or to different models. As a result the instructor believed that more reinforcement maybe necessary in working with different models and in different situations. The next time heteaches the course, he plans to have group work in the classroom, where he has groups ofstudents working on problems
noted the importance of provided opportunities for “what if” thinking, given variationson the challenge and for new problems that also involved the lesson’s concepts. Attempts to helppeople reflect on their own processes as learners (to be metacognitive) were also emphasized.MethodologySince spring 2009 we implemented the use of Tablet PC in the courses IA-332 and IA-530.These courses are taught alternately during the year. In the spring semester IA-332 is offeredwhile IA-530 is taught in the fall. Therefore, this study was carried out during 2 periods per yearsince 2009. Data were collected from spring 2008 (before course redesign and Tablet PCimplementation) to fall 2010. The studied populations are presented in Table 1
) identify and apply specific scientific principles (i.e., equations derived exclusively from the engineering sciences) to the problems, 5) deploy mathematical strategies to solve these equations, 6) produce a single "correct" solution on which they are graded, 7) reflect back on the answer and ask whether it makes sense in the physical world.Students are rarely taught how to consider non-technical issues throughout this process: theymay even learn that such issues are irrelevant and unimportant. Engineering students are thustaught a reductionist approach to design that deliberately limits problem scope to technicalconcerns and both excludes and devalues broader considerations [4]. Similarly, Moriarty [6 , pp. 90]describes the
22.1077.2modularization efforts, along with experiential project-based learning and innovative deliverymethods, will be presented.Modularization and Sequencing of Mechatronics Curriculum The necessity for multi-disciplinary programs, reflecting the industry need for graduateswho can be multi-task-oriented and understand the whole system, is increasing as technologyimproves. Industrial multi-disciplinary skill training programs can be viewed as high-quality,technical teaching programs, particularly when they are supervised and/or taught by aninstitution of higher education3. To serve this need, Purdue University Calumet with thetremendous support of industry, in particular the packaging industry, developed the EngineeringTechnology baccalaureate program
to introduce their missions and activities. The final area included in the curriculumconcerns career opportunities. Here, activities are prepared to help students better understand thebroad range of career options available in the aerospace industry and how to prepare for anemployment search. To support each of these topics, students are given both individual and teamassignments to engage them in critical thinking about aerospace engineering problems.Furthermore, each of these components is supplemented by a mentoring program session with anassignment that reflects the content of the component. Page 22.1287.3These three parts of the
’ potential fordeveloping a “business culture,” that is, developing optimization models, which reflect andencompass the student’s goals. These unique attributes of this game make it ideal for presentingthe students with a problem that evolves, aims to define the student’s decision making rational,develop key concepts regarding goals and formulation relevance, allows the student to addressconflicting and competing objectives within the mathematical abstract model, and presentscontinuous change that must be addressed in order to increase the relevance of the mathematicalmodel and its solution. Thus, this game has multiple characteristics that have high relevance inthe instruction of basic and advanced operations research such as linear, integer
required to function in work and homeenvironments characterized by increasing technological sophistication. A decade ago, the GlennCommission Report 1 voiced grave concern that declining performance and interest in STEMsubjects among U.S. students would significantly impact efforts to increase the size of atechnical workforce already too small to meet the hiring needs of the nation’s firms, that werepoised to face drastic reductions as Baby Boomers reach retirement age. Since the release of thatreport, STEM education reform has been a growing priority of both government and privatesector agencies, as reflected by a proliferation of STEM initiatives at national, state, and locallevels
that appropriately reflects the values and culture of society for which it is intended.9 Give examples of relationships among technologies and connections between technology and other fields of study.Responsibility10 Can identify and analyze professional, ethical, and social responsibilities as related to technology.11 Participates appropriately in decisions about the development and use of technology.12 Demonstrates an interest and ability in life-long learning and self-education about technological issues.Capabilities13 Formulate pertinent questions, of self and others, regarding the benefits and risks of technologies.14 Obtain and interpret information about new technologies.15 Discriminate the role of problem
superior in their ability to apply rudimentary laboratory skills and knowledge in theperformance of basic circuits analysis applications as reflected in their final lab practicum scores.The study was performed over five consecutive semesters with 160 students sub-divided intocontrol (traditional lab teams) and solo groups. Students in the control group performed theweekly laboratory exercises in lab teams of two or more while those in the solo group workedindependently. The solo group exhibited statistically significant higher scores on the final labpracticum as compared to the control group; whereas, the lab report, a traditional metric forevaluating student lab performance, lacked sufficient sensitivity to discriminate between thesegroup
their notes with the pictures to completely document their excursion.These debrief sessions lasted approximately forty-five minutes and were critical to the learningprocess. Many times the students were not able to capture everything that was going on whiletouring and these sessions allowed the students the opportunity to digest the information,document the experience and reflect on the experience. In addition to the students keeping formal documentation on each excursion, they kept adaily journal for the 35 day program and a group blog. Students were required to make journalentries on their free days and weekends, without exception. In addition, students wereresponsible to make blog entries for specific days. The purpose of the journal
scholarly reflection, professional practice,and activism is worthy of attention by engineering educators. Not only do such activities pointto areas of potential interest and relevance to prospective engineering students, but they connectin interesting and important ways with contemporary engineering educational reform initiatives,such as those revolving around liberal education in engineering; problem- and project-based andservice learning, as well as engineering ethics.Approaches to Social Justice in EngineeringFor the purposes of this paper, a range of contemporary approaches to social justice inengineering education are categorized not around the context of intervention but instead aroundthe underlying intervention strategy. Four such strategies
society is living in the 21st. Century. It is theapplication of Science to help society to reach the goal of achieving the same level ofdevelopment as the technological.Much of the objects we interact with during a typical day are the result of an engineered process- from the alarm clock to our car, the Internet, through television, the streets and buildings andeven the clothes we wear. All these objects so prosaic are the result of human ingenuity,personified in the professional engineer. All these objects came after weeks of reflection andnights, months or years of experiments, testing, developments and improvements, deep momentsof sublime technique and passion, until they were ready to serve the man.In according to the economic theory, this is