. Page 7.862.5 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright Ó 2002, American Society for Engineering EducationBibliography1. J. L. Eaves and E. K. Reedy, Principles of Modern Radar, Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1987.2. B.R. Mahafza, Introduction to Radar Analysis, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1998.3. S. A. Hovanessian, Radar System design and Analysis, Artech House, 1984.4. M.I. Skolnik, Introduction to Radar System, McGraw-Hill, 1982.5. B. Edde, Radar- Principles, Technology, Applications, Prentice-Hall, 1993.6. E. Brookner, Radar Technology, Lexington Books, 1996.7. D. K. Barton, Modern Radar System Analysis, Artech House, 1988.8. M. H. Carpentier, Principles
final project report. Also required with the final report was a critical analysis of the members of the group b y the members of the group. This analysis was to be centered around the work actually performed, the technical ability of the work performed, the timeliness of the work performed and how the student could have helped the other group member become more successful. As the potential for either glowing student evaluations or outright physical conflict was great, these reviews were submitted confidentially and independently. The individual student reviews were distributed to each student at the conclusion of the class. Each group was required to have a weekly
Technology Management, Jul/Aug 1997.Machiavelli, Niccolo, The Prince (translated from the Italian by N.H.T.), Kegan Paul, Trench & Co., 1882.Miller, Robert B. and Stephen E. Heiman, Strategic Selling, Warner Books, 1985.Moore, Geoffrey A., Crossing the Chasm, Harper Business, 1999.Murray, William J., Relationship Sales Strategies, 1994.Porter, Michael E., Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance, Simon & Shuster, 1998.Rackham, Neil, SPIN Selling, McGraw-Hill, 1988.Rackham, Neil and John DeVincentis, Rethinking the Sales Force: Redefining Selling to Create and CaptureCustomer Value, McGraw-Hill, 1999.Rasmusson, Erika, “3M’s big strategy for big accounts”, Sales and Marketing Management, Sep 2000.The Rhetoric of
SYLLABUS magazine, Volume 15, No.5, December 2001, a 101 Communications Publication. 11. N. Shute, “Open University”, the PRISM magazine, ASEE, November 2001. 12. H. Pillay and B. Elliott, “Imperatives for Reforming Pedagogy and Curriculum”, Teaching Excellence – Towards the Best in the Academy, Vol. 13, No. 4, 2001-2002, a publication of the Professional and Organizational Development (POD) Network in Higher Education. 13. A. P. Sanoff, “Under the Magnifying Glass”, PRISM magazine, ASEE, October 2001. 14. C. C. Bonwell, "Risky Business: Making Active Learning a Reality", Teaching Excellence, a publication of the Professional and Organizational Development Network in Higher Education, Vol. 4
. Table 1 shows the survey distribution and ret urns.Multiparameter statistical linear regression models were successfully developed for eachcategory of alumni, and for the combined effects of the three categories of engineeringalumni.Before the data were collected, detailed preliminary studies were carried out includingthe determination of the best statistical sampling methodology to be adopted for thiswork. Some aspects of the preliminary studies included studies of previous datacollections of other organizations.It can also be shown that (Ross S. M., 1997, Soboyejo A. B. O., 2001) the function Y is astochastic model, with linear inputs of the variables X is such that the transfer function isgiven by F ( X i ) = Yi - Yi -1 = ai
Session 3142 Graduate Student Practice of Technology Management: The Cohort Approach to Structuring Graduate Programs Ken Vickers, Greg Salamo, Ronna Turner University of ArkansasBackgroundMany conferences have been held to discuss the skills needed by engineering and technologyprogram graduates to be successful in technology based careers. These conferences strive tounderstand the full spectrum of job requirements by typically including representatives ofacademe, government, and industry. A common result of these conferences 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 has beenlists of
scheme to serve as a model. Thus, the round robin time was the “Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright Ó 2002, American Society for Engineering Education”variable parameter in our case and all other parameters were fixed parameters. The dependent variables of themodule are the performance measures: average turnaround time, average waiting time, CPU utilization andthroughput. (a) Snapshot at time step 1 (b) Snapshot at time step 1 (c) Snapshot at time step 2 SCHEDULING STARTED Total Process Created = 3 Scheduling Started FifoQ Content : 5
need is listed as follows: a) Basic physical/chemical information: synonyms, chemical properties (melting point, boiling point, vapor pressure, water solubility, Kow, etc. b) Environmental Fate and transport: degradation potential, half-lives in environmental media, transport behavior, toxicity to organisms, bioaccumulation potential, etc. c) Toxicity information: basic toxicity data for human populations and animal/plant species d) OSHA and other regulatory standards and exposure limits for various relevant exposure
Session 3215 Bringing Constructibility Issues to Design Courses Douglas B. Cleary Civil and Environmental Engineering Rowan University 201 Mullica Hill Road Glassboro, NJ 08028AbstractThis paper describes a teaching tool being developed to fill gaps in the typical student’sknowledge of the construction process. A CD-ROM and/or web site is being created todocument construction practices in transportation, bridge, utility and building projects. It
/pubs.cfm 4 Lau, R. S. M. (1996). Strategic Flexibility: A New Reality for World-Class Manufacturing. SAM Advanced Management Journal. Spring 1996, pp. 11-15. 5 Facts in Brief: Most American Believe International Education and Issues Are Important U.S. Concern. American Council on Education, Higher Education and National Affairs. http://www.acenet.edu/hena/facts_in_brief/2001/04_02_00_fib.cfm 6 Landis, R. B. (1995). Studying Engineering: A Road Map to a Rewarding Career. Burbank, CA: Discovery Press. 7 Report Shows Record Increase In Enrollment of International Students. American Council on Education, Higher Education and National Affairs. http
Engineering Economy Steiner, H.M. Books Associates 1989 Contemporary Engineering Park, C.S. Prentice Hall 2002 Economics Economic Decision Analysis Fabrycky, W.J., G.J. Thuesen Prentice Hall 1998 & D. Verma Engineering Economic Neumann, D.G. & B. Johnson Engineering Press, 1995 Analysis Inc. Engineering Economic & Cost Collier, C.A. & C.R. Glagola Addison Wesley 1998 Analysis Engineering Economy Blank, L. & A. Tarquin McGraw
learntraditional engineering economy topics and also demonstrated some phenomena that are probablynot covered in most engineering economy courses.References1. Newnan, D. G., Lavelle, J. P. Engineering Economic Analysis. Engineering Press, Austin, TX, 1998.2. White, J. A., Case, K. E., Pratt, David B., and Agee, Marvin H., Principles of Engineering Economic Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY 1998.3. Sullivan, W. G., Bontadelli, J. A., Wicks, E. M., Engineering Economy, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1993.4. Young, D. Modern Engineering Economy, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY 1993. Page 7.722.6
the output lens to obtain a plane wave output. Does this work? Explain. Problem 4 A. Construct a cavity which consists only of two mirrors, each with a radius of curvature of –10 and a height of 30. The mirrors should be separated by 5 and should face each other. Now add a plane wave originating outside the cavity. What do you notice about the behavior of the rays inside the cavity? B. Repeat part A using a point source instead of a plane wave. C. Repeat part A using a Gaussian beam instead of a plane wave. For assistance you could also use the other applets located at http://www- ee.eng.buffalo.edu/~anc/photonics/rays.html
the valve satisfied the requirements and a negligible rise in pressure was The results of these tests are shown in noted over a span of 5 minute. The initia l leakFigure 5. They indicate that no leakage was checks using air unveiled that the “V”-Pack sealsobserved during the ten-minute interval. Normal could withstand pressures arising from differentfluctuations in the shop compressed air were valve stem positions.observed. Experiments using water were also(b) Valve Flow Check - Flow and Flush Positions: successful and the data yielded precise
Session 2630 A Conceptual Framework for Progressively Developing Students' Team and Problem Solving Skills Across the Curriculum Michael Prince, Michael Hanyak, Brian Hoyt, Daniel C. Hyde, E.J. Mastascusa, William Snyder, T. Michael Toole, Mathew Higgins, Steve Shooter, Marie Wagner, Margot Vigeant, Maurice Aburdene Bucknell UniversityAbstractProject Catalyst is an NSF-funded initiative to promote systemic change in engineeringeducation by utilizing proven instructional design techniques, transforming the classroom into anactive
master’sdegee programs, but waivers in certain cases are granted where a B average has been maintainedin upper-level engineering and science courses as well as a B average in calculus and allmathematics courses attempted beyond calculus. Minimum scores on the GRE of 500 (verbal)and 600 (quantitative) are required. Admission to a doctoral program requires a master’s degreewith a GPA of 3.5 and GRE scores of 550 (verbal) and 650 (quantitative). Additional admissionrequirements are given for each space-related program later in this paper, and more details onadmission requirements are given in AFIT publications. 4,5 While most of the students at AFITare full-time students, AFIT does allow part-time students to enroll for coursework and to worktowards a
attached in Appendix A. Note the detailed level of gradingcriterion given to the students to help them write their lab reports. As the students progress toupper level courses, the grading sheets are less detailed. In Appendix B we have inc luded agrading sheet from a junior level heat transfer course. In the junior level courses the gradingsheets are not distributed before the students write up the lab but are instead used as a feedbackmechanism.Non-technical writing is done primarily in the humanities and social science courses taken aspart of the General Education Curriculum. Some is also done as part of the senior seminar inMechanical Engineering. One of the topics covered in this seminar is engineering ethics anddecision-making. The students
a request for proposals (RFP) from a range of possible Olympics researchtopics. Responses were then subject to negotiation to refine the topics and reduce redundancies.The next step required formal mission statements, objectives, goals, statements of deliverables anda timeline. The more vigorous teams attacked their assignments with enthusiasm, but, inevitablynotwithstanding the OPC process one or two teams had a tendency to drift down fuzzy paths.Table 2 shows the titles of the final project reports. Table 2Team Topic Team Topic A Advertising in the Olympic Games G Speed Climbing in the Olympics B
othersresponsible for their implementation. In November 2000, we asked five students from theDepartment of Industrial Engineering for their interpretations of five performance-basedoutcomes for graduates of the program. We wanted to document in their own words—not ours—what the students thought the outcomes meant and how to assess them. Four of the outcomeswere selected from a list of eleven outcomes developed by the Accreditation Board ofEngineering and Technology (ABET) for all engineering disciplines. The fifth outcome wasdeveloped by the department and was specific to industrial engineering. Four students mettogether in a series of three focus group discussions. The fifth student was interviewed alone onthree separate occasions because of scheduling
actual problems. The place that thesetwo aspects of the syllabus come together is in the engineering laboratory. It is here that thestudent is presented with a concrete problem to be solved, and they learn to apply the lessons ofthe classroom. The larger goal is to prepare the graduate to enter today’s engineering professionwith not only the proper problem-solving strategies and skills, but also to have gained experiencethat can be directly transferred to the needs of the contemporary career. This means exposure tothe latest technologies and an understanding of their concepts and applications. Perhaps the most significant aspect of engineering practice in the last decades has beenthe impact of computer technology in practically every
Slabbert, J.A,. (1997), A Quantum Leap to Excellence, University of Pretoria. Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2002, American Society for Engineering Education20 Collis, B., (1998) New Didactics for university instruction: why and how?, Computers & Education, Vol 31,Issue 4, pp. 373-393.21 Moller, J.J., (1997) Guidelines for designing and developing computer assisted instructional programmes, In:Successful teaching: guidelines for lecturers, teachers and trainers, Malan, S.P.T., Du Toit, P.H., and VanOostrum, L.J., Bureau for Academic Support Services: University of Pretoria.22 Ellis, R,K, (2001), “LCMS Roundup”, Learning
thinking abilities of undergraduate students. In this coursethere is no “right or wrong”, and no “unique solution”. Trying, inquiring, and questioning is whatcounts. It emphasizes “out-of-the-box” inventive thinking, imagination, intuition, common sense,and elements of teamwork. The course is based on: a) well established systematic and non-systematic approaches to inventive problem solving, b) results from NSF support to FAU on a Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2002, American Society for Engineering Education Page 7.440.2unified
. Ochs, J. B, Watkin, T.A., and Boothe, B.W. Creating a Truly MultidisciplinaryEntrepreneurial Educational Environment, Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 90, No. 4,p. 577-584, 2001.5. Sibiger, S. The Ten-Day MBA: A step-by-step guide to mastering the skills taught inAmerica’s top business schools, W. Morrow, NY, 1999.6. Sullivan, J. F, Carlson, L.E. and Carlson, D.W. Developing Aspiring Engineers intoBudding Entrepreneurs: An Invention and Innovation Course, Journal of EngineeringEducation, Vol 90, No. 4, p. 571-576, 2001.7. Vickers, K, Salamo, G, Loewer, O and Ahlen, J., Creation of an entrepreneurial universityculture, the University of Arkansas as a case study, Journal of Engineering Education, Vol 90,No. 4, p. 617-622, 2001.8. Wang, E
potentials to make win-win situation forstudents, faculty, department, and taxpayers. Reference1. Reliable, Affordable, and Environmentally Sound Energy for America’s Future, Report of the National EnergyPolicy Development Group, U.S Government Printing Office, ISBN 0-16-050814-22. Capehart, B. L., Turner, W. C., & Kennedy, W. J. (2000) Guide to Energy Management, 3 ed., The FairmontPress, ISBN0-88173-336-93. Thumann. A., & Marie, R. (Editors). The Market Survey of the Energy Industry 2001, The Association of EnergyEngineers. URL: http://www.aecenter.org/news4. Turner, W. C. (1997), Energy Management Handbook, 3 ed., The Fairmont Press, ISBN 0-88173-228-15. http://www.eren.doe.gov/buildings
PreCalc PreCalc Calc Not Calc Not Clustered Clustered Clustered ClusteredFigure 1. Average number of required fundamental cours hours completed with an A, B, orC grade during the first year.Since FC cohorting programs were institutionalized in 1998, clustered students have progressedthrough these required fundamental courses more quickly than their non-clustered peers.Students starting in 1998 and 1999 who were clustered during both semesters of their freshmanyear completed the required courses in 3.6 semesters. By contrast, students starting in 1998 and1999 who were in non-clustered courses for both freshmen semesters required 4.1 and 3.7semesters, respectively
reviewers of reviews, dynamically. However, in special situations they fail toproduce valid mappings. If a student drops a class after an assignment has started, it may beimpossible to produce a valid mapping. Assume that there are four students and our algorithmwould have produced the mapping (A reviews B, B reviews A, C reviews D, and D reviews C).If the first two mapping assignments (Aà B and B à A) have already been made, and D dropsthe course, we have no alternative but to assign C to review himself. Therefore, further work isnecessary to see how to minimize the probability that an invalid mapping will result.Also, sometimes we desire individuals to review project teams. Even if some project teams havemore members than others, we would still
where a moredetailed evaluation is needed to support informed programmatic decision-making with respect tothe Business Analysis Laboratory. Page 7.348.7 Proceeding of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2002, American Society for Engineering EducationReferences1. ISU Pappajohn Center. (2000). ISU Business Lab. [On-line]. Available: http://www.isupjcenter.org/BusinessLab.html2. Hull, D. (1995). Who are you calling stupid? Waco, TX: Center for Occupational Research and Development, Inc.3. Keif, M. G., & Stewart, B. R. (1996). A Study of Instruction in
Chicago, Gary, Hammond, and the Lake Station target area. The goal ofthe introductory aviation course was to interest young people in the aviation industry, which istraditionally underrepresented by minorities. The students were exposed to all three componentsof the Aviation Program: Flight training, maintenance technology and business management.They were introduced to aerodynamics, propulsion, airframe structures and aircraft syst ems. Aqualified pilot taught them the basics of flying a B-727 full motion flight simulator, and theymade a flight in a light aircraft. As a final hands-on project the students built an aluminumwinglet section. Last summer the faculty organized field trips to a major air carrier maintenancefacility and an Air Force
, American Society for Engineering Education”15. Hart, H., and Kinnas, S.A., "Developing Web-Based Tools for Environmental Courses," American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference Proceedings, Seattle, WA, June 28 - July 1, 1998.16. Robinson, R. B., "Multimedia Tour of a Wastewater Treatment Plant," American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference Proceedings, Seattle, WA, June 28 - July 1, 1998.17. Katz, L.E., Weather, L.J., Kozlowski, R., Scott, M. and Manion, W., "A Multimedia Based Laboratory Course for Environmental Engineering," American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference Proceedings, Seattle, WA, June 28 - July 1, 1998.18. Chevalier, L.R. and Craddock, J.N., “Interactive Multimedia
LCD. This labrequired the cadets to completely understand the programming and operation of HC12 ports,create precise delay loops by calculating delay times for various instructions, satisfy timingrequirements for external devices (e.g., LCD), and utilize D-Bug12 routines.This lab required four modifications. First, a different means of pulsing the enable (E) line onthe LCD was required. The LCD requires data be placed on its data lines followed by a positivepulse on its E line with a pulse width of at least 450 ns. The 68HC11-implementation used theSTRB line (1000 ns pulse width) to pulse E. The 68HC11 automatically generated this pulseafter writing a byte to port B (attached to LCD data lines). Since the 68HC12 doesn’t havestrobe lines, the