effectiveness by traditional definitions. Second, the approachwill need to fit into the complex schedules and contexts of educators since simply spending timelearning about teaching may not be possible. For example, given that engineering educators (andfuture educators in the form of graduate students) are busy, approaches may need to help themsolve actual problems they are encountering or be aligned with other requirements that theeducators must meet (e.g., preparing materials for annual merit review or tenure review, getting ajob). Such a framing suggests two questions that can be asked for any approach to helpeducators become better educators: a) to what extent does the approach lead to learning ofknowledge and skills related to teaching and b) what
Page 11.447.2Examinations for the award of college-level credit.Excelsior made its first venture into instruction at-a-distance with the introduction of its Masterof Arts in Liberal Studies (1998) and piloted Business and Technology undergraduate onlinecourses in 2003. Using the experience gained in these, the college has recently made a successfultransition into the delivery of instruction in its undergraduate and graduate programs and nowoffers more than 125 courses.Online Nuclear Engineering Technology ProgramBS in Nuclear Engineering Technology program is one of the undergraduate programs offeredby the School of Business and Technology (B&T) at Excelsior College. Before September 2004,students enrolled in the Nuclear Engineering
of curriculum design and teaching that focuses on what studentscan actually do after they are taught. OBE focuses on these key questions as to:a) What should the students learn?b) What is the motivation for the students to learn it?c) How can the academic institution and its resources help students learn it?d) How will it be determined what the students have learned (assessment)?Thus, the OBE’s instructional planning process is a reverse of that associated withtraditional educational planning. The desired outcome is determined first and thecurriculum, instructional materials and assessments are designed around to support andfacilitate the intended outcome[3, 4]. All curriculum and teaching decisions are made basedon how best to facilitate
, D. Forsman, “A Rapid Prototyping Application in Wind Tunnel Testing – A Student Project,” Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, 2001.[8] A.E. Jackson, “An Industry-Centered Capstone Experience for Aeronautical Management Technology Students at Arizona State University East,” ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, 1998.[9] C.A. Bergman, “Senior Design Projects with Industry,” ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, 1998.[10] B. Darrow, “The Marriage of Industry and Academia,” Design News, vol. 44, no. 18, September 1988, pp. 22- 23. “Proceedings of the 2006 Midwest Section Conference of the American Society
projects.Overall the students did well on the project; however a closer look at the grading does reveal thatthe majority of points were lost for a weak analysis of the non-economic issues such as theglobal and societal impacts of the two decisions situations. Thus while students did an admirablejob on the economic analysis techniques (including gathering appropriate data, identifyingalternatives, developing potential outcomes and differences in cash flows, applying presentworth analysis, rate of return, or B/C ratios, and making a decision), they did not do a good jobwhen it came to considering the non-economic impacts of their decisions. Such issues as publicconcern over privacy (in the RFID case) and poor public relations for a company as a result ofjob
certainamount of asphalt after mechanical compaction. Figure 1 shows the aggregate for typicalasphalt mixture, different sizes of coarse aggregate in mixture after image processing, andasphalt mixture construction.a. Aggregate stockpile b. different aggregate size c. asphalt concrete construction Figure 1. Asphalt Mixture and ConstructionThe development of micromechanical models started about a hundred years ago,beginning by Voigt (1889), Einstein (1911), and Reuss (1929). During this time, anumber of research studies addressed micromechanical models with both non-interactingand interacting particles. In models with non-interacting particles, geometries were eitherspecified or not specified. Some simple micromechanical models
a modified version of the original Forms A and B thatincludes more items that involve analysis of diagrams and charts. For all versions, the totalnumber of correct answers is used as an index to measure overall critical thinking skill. Validityof the CCTST has been established through the face validity of the individual items,20 andthrough criterion reliability in comparison to other measures of academic performance.21 The Page 11.374.4test manual reports correlation coefficients of Form A with the more widely used Watson-Glaserinstrument of approximately 0.5. Comparable data is not available for Form 2000, but themanual does report
the activity (from “0” for boring to “4” for very interesting). Figures 1and 2 display the results graphically. Activities are ordered according to their sequence aspresented in the course. 4 3 Average Rating Learning 2 Engaging 1 0 a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p Classroom Activities Figure 1: End-of
. Page 11.926.1313. Kahn, J.M., Katz, R.H., Pister, K.S.J. (1999) Next century Challenges: Mobile Networking for “Smart Dust”Proceedings of the 5th Annual ACM International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (MobiCom)14. Nikoletseas, S., Chatzigiannakis, I., Euthimiou, H., Kinalis, A., Antoniou, A., Mylonas, G. (2004).Energy efficient protocols for sensing multiple events in Smart Dust Networks. 37th Annual Simulation Symposium,2004, 15-24.15. Pister K. S. J., Kahn J. M., and Boser B. E. (1999) Smart dust: Wireless networks of millimeter-scale sensornodes. In 1999 UCB Electronics Research Laboratory Research Summary16. TinyOS (2006), What is TinyOS? Mission Statement. Accessed at http://www.tinyos.net/special/mission Jan200617
., “Modernization of a Mechanical Engineering Laboratory using Data Acquisition with LABVIEW”, ASEE 2003 Session 22663 McConnaughay,K., Welsford,I., Stabenau,E., “Inquiry, Investigation, and Integration in Undergraduate Science Curricula”, Council on Undergraduate Research Quartley, pp14-18, September 19994 Mantei,E.J., “Using Internet Class Notes and Power Point in the Physical Geology Lecture – Comparing the Success of Computer Technology with Traditional Teaching Techniques”, Journal of College Science teaching, pp301-305, April 20005 Regan,M., Sheppard,S., “Interactive Multimedia Courseware and Hands-On Learning Experience: An Assessment Study”, Journal of Engineering Education, pp123-131, Apr 19966 Riggs,B., Poli,C., Woolf,B
School and Gender z o ón a ma ao üe an ic b a m o lin ya ac a g ce Ju e y r a m ay n n A r Ba Ca Gu Hu M Po Sa F M HS_TYPE PRIVA DA 1000
the “banking education” format. Thus, it is valuable togather information regarding students’ preference with regard to the new coursestructure.3. New Structure:In Spring of 2005, CE4506 was team taught by two new instructors. Instructor Awas a professional engineer at a local firm. Instructor B was a Ph. D. candidate inEnvironmental Engineering at Michigan Tech. The two instructors rotated on aweekly basis. Thus, each taught every other week. The class was taught onMonday, Wednesday, and Friday, in one hour sessions. Course format changesincluded alterations to the components of the student grade and the classroomteaching methods as described in the following sections.3.1 Student Grade ComponentsStudent grades for the class were based on the
Learning, Projects that Matter: Concepts and Models for Service Learning in Engineering, AAHE, E. Tsang, ed., Washington D.C., (2000).6 Design Criteria for Sustainable Development in Appropriate Technology: Technology as if People Matter Robert C. Wicklein, Ed. D. University of Georgia, USA7 Hazelton, B, Bull, C. Appropriate Technology: Tools, Choices and Implications, November 1988.8 Wilk, et. al., Preparing Engineering Students to Work in a Global Environmen: The Union College Model,, Proceedings of the 2001 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition9 Mayes, et. al., ABET Best Practices: Results form Interviews with 27 Peer Institutions, Proceedings of the 2005 ASEE Annual Conference and
on an equal footing in Page 11.1449.4 the content of the programs. 4. The management aspects of engineering need to be a portion of every engineering management course – “once we get the number, what does it mean and what do we do with it” should be central to every course. No course in engineering management can stop once the number is found. 5. Faculties in engineering management programs need to include a solid leavening of people who either (a) have an EM degree (and thus meet the expectations for admittance to typical EM graduate programs of practical engineering experience) or (b) have had
S = 100MVAFigure 2b. Data for Simulation ExerciseThe high level problem, offered to a second group of EE students taking the same course, isshown in Figure 2. The same problem was given to all EET students (it should be noticed that all10 EET from Buffalo State and were assigned both programming and simulation projects, while13 EET students from UPJ were assigned simulation project). This is a segment of the publicelectric utility grid in Western New York. The students were asked to complete the following:a) Simulate the given power system using a high level program (PowerWorld® 3 wasdemonstrated for them)b) Make changes that should improve the systemc) Assess those changesd) Propose further improvements to the problem at hand.We assess
Engineering Education. 94:2, 207-213.14. Light, Richard J., Judith D. Singer, and John B. Willett (1990) By Design, Planning Research on Higher Education. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 296p.15. Van de Ven (2000) “Professional Science for a Professional School: Action Science and Normal Science” Breaking the Code of Change, chapter 19, edited by Michael Beer and Nitin Nohria. Harvard Business School Press. Boston, 512p.16. van Someren, Maarten W., Yvonne F. Barnard, and Jacobijn A.C. Sandberg (1994) The Think Aloud Method: A Practical Guide to Modelling Cognitive Processes. Academic Press, London, 218p.17. Camacho, M., and Good, R. (1989) “Problem Solving and Chemical Equilibrium: Successful versus
). Page 11.787.4Protocols and Standards2.1 Identify a MAC (Media Access Control) address and its parts.2.2 Identify the seven layers of the OSI (Open Systems Interconnect) model and their functions.2.3 Identify the OSI (OSI) layers at which the following network components operate:2.4 Differentiate between network protocols in terms of routing, addressing schemes, interoperability and naming conventions2.5 Identify the components and structure of IP (Internet Protocol) addresses (IPv4, IPv6) and the required setting for connections across the Internet.2.6 Identify classful IP (Internet Protocol) ranges and their subnet masks (example: Class A, B and C).2.7 Identify the purpose of subnetting2.8 Identify the differences between private
managed to meet the state mandated passingrates for the math and language arts portions. This data is quite encouraging.a) b) Page 11.1264.5 c) Failing rate rises Percent failingFigure 2: GHSGT Results in (a) English/Language Arts, (b) Mathematics, (c) Science; source: GADepartment of Education Report Cards 3 Upon closer examination of the GHSGT math scores, it is apparent that this school hasexhibited a gradual decrease in
2006-1623: AN INTER-UNIVERSITY COLLABORATIVE UNDERGRADUATERESEARCH/LEARNING EXPERIENCE FOR PRODUCT PLATFORMPLANNING: YEAR 2Hansen Lukman, Bucknell University Hansen Lukman is a senior Mechanical Engineering student at Bucknell University. He was involved with the REU program of summer 2005 and served as the Bucknell University Host for visiting REU students. He is currently doing research with Steven B. Shooter and Fabrice Alizon on Examination of a Potential Ontology Representation for Product Platform Planning.Steven Shooter, Bucknell University Steve Shooter is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Bucknell University where he teaches design and mechatronics. As a registered
week.) There are a few other excellent references for thetransmission lines first approach4, 5, 6. Reference 6 has suggested topics usingtransmission lines first approach and also uses MATLAB examples.It is true for students as well as for some ECE faculty that the subject of electromagneticsis possibly the toughest mathematically oriented subject in the undergraduate curriculumfor electrical engineering and some computer engineering majors. Basically there arefour (4) major equations, MAXWELL’S EQUATIONS, which govern the behavior oftime-varying (dynamic) electromagnetic fields and wave propagation. In most commonform these equations are stated as:ı · E = - • B/ • t ; ı · H = J + • D/ • t ; ı· D = t ; ı ·B=0where t is volume
(Assessment and LEarning inKnowledge Spaces)1 in an effort to provide a more effective mathematics tutoring program forour students. The goals were to 1) increase student retention and success in freshman andsophomore-level mathematics courses (such as calculus, which all engineering majors take), and2) increase the willingness of students to utilize the available tutorial services. Note that “studentsuccess” is defined as “making an “A”, “B” or “C” in the course” (since all engineering andscience majors are required to earn a grade of “C” or higher in all math courses which areprerequisites for other courses).ALEKS is a web-based system (versus software-based) that can be accessed from any computerwith web access and a java-enabled web browser. The
industryprofessionals, that is, members of Industrial Advisory Boards. The responses from round one andround two were combined together resulting in overall 108 completed surveys, 52 completedsurveys from education part across 39 States and 32 completed surveys from industry part across18 States. Figure 1 shows the faculty professional rank percentages of 52 academic respondents Page 11.532.5(a), and industry sector percentages of 32 respondents from industry (b). PhD Student Professor 13% Others
semester of 2005. This classconsisted of 64 students. While this laboratory class consists of six experiments, analysis wasperformed only on 4 experiments as only four virtual labs (Measurement of Hardness, Coldrolling, Metallography and tensile testing) are available at this time. At the beginning ofsemester, the students were asked to fill out an evaluation sheet in which they indicated theircurrent GPA. They were also asked to complete the Index of Learning Styles Questionnairedeveloped by Soloman and Felder of North Carolina State University(http://www.engr.ncsu.edu/learningstyles/ilsweb.html). This survey asks a series of questionsbased on which a student can be identified as a) Active or reflective learner b
B Student Assessment of Learning Gains SurveysAppendix C Beginning and End-of-Semester SurveyAppendix D Assessment of Activities Page 11.1347.12 11 APPENDIX A: EVALUATION AND ASSESSMENT PLAN CollegeClassroomTeam – Evaluation/Assessment PlanObjectivesof theCIRTLProfessional Development Formsof EvidenceProgram- takenfromStrategicPlan AuthenticAssessmentI. Developandapplyskillsof -developadiscipline
Influence Primary Influence Figure 1: Factors Affecting Participation as Reported by Teacher PartnersLong-Term Benefits. The second section contained a total of 15 items, broken into threesubcategories of 5 items each. The subcategories were (a) content and knowledge, (b) teachingstrategies, and (c) attitudes and resourcefulness. The responses within the subcategories wereadded to first identify the subset with the most identified lasting benefits. As shown in Figure 2,the subcategory teaching strategies had the most teachers responding that the program“significantly improved” their ability to incorporate engineering based activities into theirinstruction. However, content and knowledge has the largest combined response of “improved”and
on the International Collaborative Project. Major suggestions from RHITstudents were as follows:(a) Information on Japanese bus transportation system was insufficient to tackle properly the project theme, Improving Japanese Bus Stop.(b) It was not easy for US students to judge if the developed design solutions could serve effectively as safe, comfortable and convenient bus stops.(c) It would be better if Japanese students joined US design teams.4. Students’ Achievements(1) Achievements of KIT StudentsAs a typical example of design activities at KIT, the achievements of one design teamare presented below.Students of the design team selected a project theme, “Designing a system wherepassengers don’t have to wait for a bus”. The project
. Introduction to Nuclear and Radiation Engineering Concepts (1 hr) b. Introduction to Nuclear Power Systems (3 hr) c. Radiation and Radiation Protection (3 hr) and one of the following d. Reactor Engineering (3 hr) e. Radiation and Radiation Protection Laboratory (3 hr) f. Radioactive Waste Management (3 hr) 3. Establishment of a Radiation Physics option with the Physics Department which included all the following courses. a. Introduction to Nuclear and Radiation Engineering Concepts (1 hr) Page 11.1318.2 b. Introduction to Nuclear Power Systems (3 hr) c
Part B Program Description, December, 2004.7. Dwellis, A., “EE 212: Digital Design,” Colorado Technical University, Colorado Springs, CO8. Barrett, S., “EE 281: Digital Design,” The United States Air Force Academy, ColoradoSprings, CO9. Barrett, S., “EE/COSC 2390: Digital Design,” University of Wyoming. Page 11.1128.14Page 11.1128.15
studies originated at the UW under her guidance and were conducted atUW for a number of years before she and Susan Metz got the undergraduate climate surveyfunded through WEPAN for a national survey. The graduate climate survey was also the productof Dr. Brainard’s work; she began it because there was so little research on the topic.This research was funded in part, by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. SBE-0123442. Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.[1] R. M. Hall and B. R. Sandler, "The classroom climate: A chilly one for women?," Project on the status and education of women
engineering measurements laboratory,” Proceedings of the 2005 ASEE Conference, 2005. http://www.asee.org/about/events/conferences/search.cfm3. Nasr, K J. and B. Ramadan, “Implementation of problem-based learning into engineering thermodynamics,” Page 11.1025.10 Proceedings of the 2005 ASEE Conference, 2005. http://www.asee.org/about/events/conferences/search.cfm4. Prince, M., “Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research,” Journal of Engineering Education, July, 2004, pp. 223-231.5. Woods, D.R., Problem-based Learning: how to gain the most from PBL, D.R. Woods, 1994. http://chemeng.mcmaster.ca