sociocultural contexts, the impact of critical consciousness in engineering practice, and the development and imple- mentation of culturally responsive pedagogies in engineering education.Dr. Diana A. Chen, University of San Diego Diana A. Chen, PhD is an Associate Professor and one of the founding faculty members of Integrated En- gineering at the University of San Diego. She earned her BS in Engineering from Harvey Mudd College, and MS and PhD in Civil Engineering from Clemson University. In collaboration with colleagues, Dr. Chen is designing a new engineering curriculum to educate changemakers who understand that engineer- ing is an inherently socio-technical activity. Her passion is studying and encouraging culture
courses in which engineering design is included. These courses are: • ENGR 200-Engineering Graphics, • MANE 310-CAD/CAM, • MANE 315-Manufacturing Automation, • MANE 420-Simulation, • ENGR 430-Quality Control, and • MANE 450-Manufacturing Design Implementation. Page 15.352.3These six major courses and some other courses distributed throughout the curriculum include elementsof design that adequately defines an integrated design experience for students in the manufacturingengineering program. During the senior year, students also may gain additional design experience in theirchosen ENGR/MANE elective
technology, materials science, 3D printing, experiments, and product design. My interests include systems design, and systems engineering within the field of additive manufacturing.Dr. Marwa AbdelGawad, Texas A&M University at Qatar Dr. Marwa AbdelGawad is an Instructional Assistant Professor at Texas A&M University at Qatar. She earned her Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from Texas A&M University (USA), where her research focused on examining the impact of microstructure on the corrosion response and mechanical integrity of magnesium alloys used in biomedical applications, specifically orthopedic implants, which resulted in the publication of several papers in prestigious journals and presentations at conferences
Session 2140 Implementing the Required Ethics Component in Engineering Classrooms Dr. June Marshall, Dr. John Marshall St. Joseph’s College/ University of Southern MaineAbstractThis document focuses on how ethics education, more globally referred to as charactereducation, is being implemented into an undergraduate college program. Very successfultechniques are discussed that have been proven useful in providing instruction to futureprofessionals in national character education curriculums involving morals, values andethics. Suggestions for
skilled workforce as well as design and developnew technologies and products for the aerospace enterprise. BP-AE has leveraged the CoE’s goalsto expand recruitment, curriculum development, mentorship, and research collaborations tomaximize the overall impact of the program.The leading Institution (LI) has established track records in scholarly activities, recruitment, andeducation of African American and female engineering students. The addition of U-C will furtherenhance diversity with Hispanic workforce inclusion. The coalition members have alreadydeveloped long-term partnerships with stakeholders from AFRL, NASA centers, and otherrelevant institutions in terms of integration of research and education endeavors withdemonstrated success. The BP
curriculum because of time and spacelimitations6,7. The integration of design and manufacturing experience into the undergraduatecurriculum is not a new challenge8,9. Design and manufacturing integration in the curriculum hasbeen usually done by including hands on project experience using Engineering Design course injunior level and Senior Projects10. However there has been always a barrier between design andmanufacturing courses. An attempt to integrate design projects into the Manufacturing Processescourse (MET1161) has been studied in this paper.2. MET1161 Manufacturing Processes CourseAt the University of Pittsburgh at Johnstown, Mechanical Engineering Technology students arerequired to take MET1161, Manufacturing Processes. This is typically
used in both middle and highschool algebra classes; (2) provide a summer workshop for in-service mathematics teachers andundergraduate engineering Teaching Fellows; (3) develop an undergraduate engineeringTeaching Fellows program to provide hands on instructional classroom support for middle andhigh school algebra teachers to help them integrate the CD curricula into their courses; (4)maintain student interest in engineering at schools through the development andinstitutionalization of an after-school engineering program that culminates in a series ofcollaborative and competitive activities; and (5) increase the involvement of females and otherunderrepresented groups in engineering by providing female and minority engineering rolemodels in the
Paper ID #34551Conceptualizing Faculty Adaptability in Enacting Curricular ChangeHadi Ali, Arizona State University Hadi studies the influence of the future of work on curricular innovation, with a focus on exploring the relationships between and among adaptability, risk taking and value making. In an effort to characterize engineering education as an (eco)system for creating value, Hadi’s approach integrates analytical methods of data science to address changes in systems and society. More broadly, Hadi is interested in examining how engineering innovations mobilize social and economic change. Hadi has graduate degrees
23. Revised Methodology For Teaching Manufacturing & Technology The revised curriculum is based on developing direct ties to theory and usingpractice-based design as a methodology for moving students toward an understandingof manufacturing technology. In addition, students solve a series of small designproblems activities to build skills that they will need later in the course. This is all donein the context of team-based activities. the class is divided into small teams of two orthree students that undertake these projects and activities together for the entire semester.The team works together to analyze, solve, and write-up all the reports required tocomplete the project activities. this requires oral team reports for about half
dynamic failures and crack propagation of cylindrical composite storage tank with particular interests in the development of hydrogen storage tanks, failure behaviors of hydrogen-diffused porous composite materials, and the containment of the associated hydrogen embrittlement. Wosu established an integrative dynamic impact and high speed imaging system at the University of Pittsburgh Department of Mechan- ical Engineering that is capable of simulating low and high strain rate penetration loading and capturing the dynamic event at two million frames per second. Special sample fixtures he developed are used to study perforation impact and single and multi-mode fracture tests and general characterization of materi- als
Chair at The Citadel. He previously taught mechanical engineering at the United States Military Academy at West Point. He received his B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from the United Military Academy and his M.S. and PhD in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Texas at Austin. His research and teaching interests are in mechatronics, regenerative power, and multidisciplinary engineering.Dr. Alyson G. Eggleston, Penn State University Alyson Eggleston is an Associate Professor in the Penn State Hershey College of Medicine and Director of Evaluation for the Penn State Clinical and Translational Science Institute. Her research and teaching background focuses on program assessment, STEM technical communication
-stepengineering design process to create and test an orange juice concentration process. KateZiemer, Assistant Professor of Chemical Engineering, developed this unit where students arechallenged to provide good-tasting orange juice to Boston Schools for $0.15 a glass. This unit isdesigned to be flexible enough to fit into any teacher’s current curriculum and is divided intoactivities that can be run independently of the entire unit. The entire unit takes approximatelyfour weeks to run from start to finish and each kit costs approximately $100.The goals of The Great Orange Squeeze unit are to: - Involve student interest in an enjoyable and equitable way - Build a connection between engineering careers and helping society - Illustrate as
design of machine elements, as well as necessaryindustrial and manufacturing engineering tools (such as CAM, CAE, DFM, DFA and qualityanalysis) for improving machine design education. As quoted by Liu and Brown4 “ABET ismaking increasing demands to integrate projects into engineering curriculum”. The authors believethat the initiative will also strengthen the impact on the following ABET student outcomes of thecourses in focus5: Page 26.52.8(c) an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realisticconstraints - manufacturability(e) an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems(k) an ability
often express that belonging to a supportive community positivelyinfluences their mental well-being [8,9]. Recognizing and addressing the unique needs ofstudents with ASD is integral to creating an environment conducive to their academic successand overall well-being [8,10]. In particular, improving self-advocacy skills are linked to positiveretention rates in college for students with disabilities [11]. Implementing targeted supportmechanisms, such as assistance with executive functioning skills and promoting community-building initiatives not only facilitates academic success but also enhances the overall collegeexperience for individuals with ASD.EASE ProgramASU has developed a free program, Employment Assistance and Social Engagement (EASE
world. Technology design involves theapplication of knowledge to new situations or goals, resulting in the development of newknowledge 5. However, recent research has demonstrated that difficulties of effectively bringingsubstantive math and science content to bear in middle and high school pre-engineering curricula6 . These challenges for relevant math and science integration are even greater at the elementarylevel 7. With little room for new curriculum, there is a need to develop innovative instructionalstrategies that leverage existing inquiry-based science curriculum to support engineeringeducation goals. We suggest graphic-based modeling as a mediating process between inquiryscience and engineering design, providing students with a robust
interestedin developing a workstation that integrated as many of the necessary equipment in anelectricity/electronics laboratory as possible and that was economically viable, even forinstitutions with limited resources. To achieve this, the UTESA-OPEX consortium embarked onthe development of several technologies and resources that enabled the functioning of all theinvolved parts in a unified way as an educational ecosystem. Therefore, at the end of the projectdevelopment time, the research team had managed to develop a workstation, a practice board, anLMS platform with educational content, and an application for the interface with the workstation.Workstation:The workstation is the hardware that has been developed to incorporate the electronic boards
Paper ID #37309The ”besTech” Technology Practice Framework for Early Childhood Educa-tionDr. Safia Malallah, Kansas State University Safia Malallah is a postdoc in the computer science department at Kansas State University working with Vision and Data science projects. She has ten years of experience as a computer analyst and graphic de- signer. Besides, she’s passionate about developing curriculums for teaching coding, data science, AI, and engineering to young children by modeling playground environments. She tries to expand her experience by facilitating and volunteering for many STEM workshopsJoshua Levi Weese, Kansas
InitiativesInitiatives to address technical interview preparation for CS majors are expanding. Companiesand organizations alike are making resources available for students to prepare for technicalinterviews [1, 13, 26, 32]. In academic settings, institutions have also begun to expand theirresources and/or adjust their CS curriculums in an effort to foster student exposure to thetechnical interview process [8, 12, 35]. Moreover, academic scholars are now conducting casestudies and related interventions to tackle potential challenges that are associated with thetechnical interview process [7, 20, 23, 25].2.3.1. Persistent Finding – Performance AnxietyWhen observing prior efforts that highlight student performance during mock technicalinterviews, anxiety has been
objectives can be accomplished by developing a curriculum for engineering and science atthe university. The proposed draft for the curriculum is found below. An important part of theprogram will give the students the opportunity to do field work. While important in anycurriculum, the field work is particularly encouraged by national leaders and technical leaders inUganda10, 11. First Year Fundamentals of Engineering/Scientific Mathematics First Semester Technical Writing for Engineering and Science Introduction to Chemistry First Year Second Geometry I Semester Organic Chemistry I Historical
applications have been explored. In each application area mentioned above,curriculum was created and the classroom dynamics were suitably modified to takeadvantage of the Palm PDA capabilities in the lecture and laboratory. The objectives of this paper are to introduce Palm handheld technology to theeducator and highlight examples of successful integration of this technology into theclassroom environment. It is hoped that the reader will gain an appreciation of thepotential improvements offered by PDA technology in both learning effectiveness and inthe efficient delivery of instruction.2. Palm Handheld BasicsThe following sections describe the basic features of the Palm handheld and highlightselect software applications that are of interest to
beginning. In each course, students have opportunity to redesign/modify thesubsystem relevant to the particular course they are in. After completing these three courses in asequence, students will have design and testing experience with component, subsystems, andfinally an integrated system. Details of the platform project as well as individual course projectswill be described in this paper. The assessment method for course evaluation will be presented atthe end of the paper along with students’ feedbacks and course-exit survey results.I IntroductionTraditionally major courses in ECE four-year undergraduate curriculum are taught in relativeisolation with each course focusing on its own teaching materials and structure. It was found thateven the
the role of the communications instructor to capitalize on this manyfaceted skill set that, if properly integrated, can greatly enhance the quality, scope andrelevance to the engineering educational coursework.IntroductionCommunication is increasingly an element of engineering education. A brief survey ofthe curriculum of ten Canadian and American engineering programs1 reveals that at leastone course in communication is mandatory across the board. In the past this course was Page 15.292.2almost exclusively a university-dictated compulsory communications course, designedfor students in many disciplines. While certainly better than no communications
AC 2012-4986: BROADENING PARTICIPATION ACTIVITIES AT UPRMTHROUGH THE NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION BRIGE PROGRAMDr. Aidsa I. Santiago-Romn, University of Puerto Rico, Mayagez Aidsa I. Santiago-Romn is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Science and Materi- als and the Director of the Strategic Engineering Education Development (SEED) Office at the University of Puerto Rico, Mayagez (UPRM). Santiago earned a B.A. (1996) and a M.S. (2000) in industrial engi- neering from UPRM, and a Ph.D. (2009) in engineering education from Purdue University. Her primary research interest is investigating students’ understanding of difficult concepts in engineering science with underrepresented populations. She also
(n = 22). As described above, academic goals usually focus on math skills. Affective goalsoften focus on confidence, social integration, motivation, and similar constructs. Figure 7: Summer bridge program goals. Study ResultsThe most commonly reported result was an improvement in student retention. Studies also foundpositive effective results, including high levels of satisfaction with the program, intent to persist inSTEM studies, improved self-efficacy, sense of belonging, confidence, motivation, sense ofpreparedness for future studies, and understanding of the engineering profession. There were alsoreports of improved academic skills, including spatial reasoning, metacognition, and math. Nullor negative
is one dominated by systems. In order to better prepare graduates with asystems perspective and the competencies to be effective in system design, we discuss initiatives topromote the development of systems thinking, both in undergraduate and K-12 communities. This paperdescribes vertically-integrated curriculum innovation, in which graduate-level coursework spawned apilot program to embed systems in a core engineering design course for undergraduates with its resultingadoption and extension to a core design thread, and a resulting high school curriculum development anddissemination effort which has followed. These efforts have also prompted educational research todevelop the academic underpinnings of the relatively under-developed scholarly
AC 2005-185: REAL ENGINEERING PRACTICE IN THE CLASSROOM: CANASCE’S BOK BE DONE IN 4 YEARS?Doug Schmucker, Trine UniversityShane Palmquist, Western Kentucky University Page 10.1057.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2005 Real Engineering Practice in the Classroom: Can ASCE’s BOK be done in 4-years? Douglas G. Schmucker and Shane M. Palmquist Western Kentucky UniversitySummaryThe baccalaureate civil engineering program at Western Kentucky University (WKU) is uniquein how it integrates practice into the curriculum while also being a joint program with theUniversity of
moved from theory toreal-world applications, and the need for skilled engineers has grown. Therefore, many collegesand universities are strategizing ways to provide students with hands-on experiences to developthe needed practical skills in industry. One of the pillars of I4.0 is human-machine interactionwhich includes robotics and automation. Undergraduate degrees need to provide appliedknowledge of robots that use modern controllers and other integrated hardware rather than theclassic robotic design. The curriculum should provide the students with real-world experienceswith real hardware. This paper presents the steps of designing and constructing a reconfigurableand affordable industrial robotic arm platform that can be used to teach
Carolina State University in 1992. From 1992-1998, he was a senior researcher at MANTECH, NC. He joined Zayed University in August 1998. Currently he is an assistant professor of Information systems. His research interests include systems modeling, educational technology and curriculum design in Information Systems. His teaching interests include instructional technology and statistical modeling.Akram Al-Rawi, Zayed University Akram is a Professor of CIS at Zayed University, UAE. He has worked at several academic institutions of which the last two were the University of Missouri-Columbia and Columbia College, MO. His teaching interests in-clude programming languages, logic design, and
with these challenges, several European researchinitiatives are trying to update the content of curricula responding to industrial needs. Thispaper first presents the findings of the EU-IST research project BRIDGES by discussing andcomparing e--business trends and challenges in the EU and the USA. Then, challenges foreducation in E-Business are elaborated. Those challenges are picked up by the EU-IST/ IMSproject GEM in order to create a new curriculum for a master degree in ManufacturingStrategy. It will cover technology and business topics and especially consider digital business.Finally, an initial concept of a short course covering essential aspects of production based ondigital business is discussed.IntroductionE-business has brought up
topics incorporated in their engineering curricula [4]. Integration of sustainabilityinto undergraduate engineering curriculum can generally be classified into four categories (1)dedicated sustainability courses, (2) integrating concepts into existing courses, (3) linking with anon-engineering department for an interdisciplinary course and (4) courses linked tosustainability, although not explicitly taught (ex: energy and life cycle analysis) [4]. The 2016-2017 Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) Criteria for AccreditingEngineering Programs (2018-2019), Criterion 3- Student Outcomes describes sustainabilityprinciples in two outcomes, (c) and (h). • (c) an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired