Session 2632 VLSI Design Curriculum Richard B. Brown, Dennis Sylvester, David Blaauw, Michael Flynn, Gordon Carichner and Catharine June Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-2122Abstract—The Intel Foundation has funded a project at the University of Michigan to develop,document, and disseminate a world-class VLSI curriculum. This paper, which is the first presen-tation of the project, describes the overall curriculum at a high level
inactivestudents. SIMS identifies students as follows: 1 a. Entering from a high school. b. Changing majors, c. Texas Academy of Mathematics and Science (TAMS) student, d. Transferring from another University, e. Transferring from a Junior College, f. Transferring with military service courses, g. An international student,The order of the above list and the categorization of students into specific types below have nospecific meaning other than students have to be identified for discussion purposes. It is assumedthat other Universities have a student information management system that identifies students ina similar manner.Advisors use SIMS to study a student’s academic history to develop a degree
Point C (omissions) Point B Point A Time (lifetime) Figure 4. Graphical Representation of Understanding Differences Page 9.477.6 Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering Education things, often by omission, that are contrary to an effective diverse environment. Point B is anarbitrary location where an individual has a level of understanding
. Permeate flow rate: 32.7 ml/min Permeate solute concentration: 287.5 mg/l Assume no concentration polarization or fouling and that the feed concentration is kept constant with operating time. The following relationship exists for the osmotic pressure and solute concentration of the waste stream, πi/ci = 0.0134 psi/(mg/l). Determine the following: a) Solvent flux (kg/m2hr) b) Solvent permeability coefficient (kg/m2hr-psi) c) Solute flux (kg/m2hr) d) Solute permeability coefficient (m/hr) Page 9.1281.11 Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for
, the emphasis was on “distributed softwaredevelopment” with several provocative articles. Elizabeth Starrett, in the editorial column,wisely asked which distributed development concept the reader would prefer: distributeddevelopment of software, development of distributed software, or distributed development ofdistributed software1. Reading the entire article ignited a spark – what about the “distributeddevelopment of software professionals?” This is exactly the focus of this paper – the distributeddevelopment of software professionals around the world with the assistance of internationaluniversities recognized for their software engineering expertise, combined with the use of hybridlearning technologies, for providing high-quality credit and
. D. Eaton, Editors. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC.8. United States Environmental Protection Agency. 1996. The Volunteer Monitor's Guide to Quality Assurance Project Plans. EPA 841-B-96-003, September 1996. Office of Water, Washington, DC.Biographical InformationVIVIAN CHANG is a third-year student at the University of San Francisco majoring in Environmental Science andPolitics.ELIOT S. METZGER is a third-year student at the University of San Francisco majoring in Environmental Scienceand Business Administration with a minor in Politics.MICHAEL PAYNE is a third-year student at the University of San Francisco majoring in Environmental Scienceand Visual and Performing Arts.SONYA M. HAVENS is a recent graduate of the
-based homework assignments of the type described above can significantlyimprove their grades and stimulate learning. Students would not be able to invest thistime without any feedback provided by sophisticated computer program that stimulatesthem to improve their performance. The data shows that given an opportunity toimprove their performance, A-students have invested much more time in problemsolving than B-students.Arch 251 (4 lessons in a homework assignment) TAM 151 (10 lessons in a homework assignment) Number NumberCourse Time spent on computer Course Time spent on computer of
gratefully. Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering Education Session # 1478Bibliography[1] Scharge, D.P and Vachtsevanos, G., “ Software-Enabled Control for Intelligent UAV’s” Proceedings ofIEEE International Conference on Control Applications, Hawaii, August, 1999.[2] Pascoal, A., Oliveira, P., Silvestre, C., Sebastiao, L., et. Al., “Robotic Ocean Vehicles For MarineScience Applications : The European ASIMOV Project” Proceedings of Ocean, 2000[3] Brutzman, D., Healey, T., Marco, D., and McGhee, B., “The Phoenix
-AlcornReport-072803.pdf 6. Elmore, B., Mariappan, J., and Hays, G., 2003, Improving Performance through Simulation - A Scenario- Based Learning Approach, White Paper - Experia Solutions, http://206.29.89.105/exp- learn/weblayout/doc/WhitePaper1.pdf 7. Elmore, B., Mariappan, J., and Hays, G., Scenario-based Learning vs. Role Plays and Case Studies, Experia Solutions White Paper, 2003, Available at, http://206.29.89.105/exp-learn/weblayout/doc/WhitePaper3.pdf Page 9.1083.6 8. Jonassen, D. H., and Hernandez-Serrano, J., 2002, Case-based reasoning and instructional design: Using stories to support
). A further introduction to finite element analysis of electromagnetic problems, IEEE Transactions on Education, v 34, n 4, p 322-329 10. Jensen, D. & Pramono, E., (1998). Method for teaching finite elements which combines the advantages of commercial pre- and postprocessing with student-written software, Computer Applications in Engineering Education, v 6, n 2, p 105-114. 11. Brinson, L.C., Belytschko, T., Moran, B. & Black, T., (1997). Design and computational methods in basic mechanics courses, Journal of Engineering Education, v 86, p 159-166. 12. Boronkay, T. G. and Dave, J. “Introduction of Finite Element Methods in the Lower Division Mechanical Engineering Technology
% 25% 5% 1. Generate and interpret schematics. X X ? 2. Sketch pictorials: a) Oblique X X ? b) Isometric X X ? 3. Sketch multiviews: a) Principal views X X ? b) Section views X X ? c) Detail views X X
fourteen courses over the course ofthree academic years and have tracked correlation between student self-assessment andinstructor assigned grades over this period. Because of the small class sizes at our institution,these results should not yet be considered to be statistically significant, but rather as preliminaryindicators. For each class, the instructor calculates the student grades prior to reading the studentself-assessment report. These grades are based on the usual averaging of points earned in thesemester’s assignments using a four point scale (i.e. A = 4.0, B=3.0, etc.). These instructor Page 9.585.2 Proceedings of the 2004
B=53, E=4, Modified Hardening B=53 E=16 Modified Hardening 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 Axial Strain (%) Figure 9. Comparative plots of laboratory test results and ABAQUS FEM results.Once the constitutive model parameters were judged to provide a reasonable prediction of thesoil’s behavior, more sophisticated finite element models were run in ABAQUS to predict thebehavior of the wheeled vehicles as
to address the requirementsof a new electronics curriculum: 1) ECET 154 Analog Electronics 2) ECET 356 Digital ElectronicsECET 154 educates the students on the system level input-output characteristics of electroniccomponents and subsystems. ECET 154 provides the background in electronics for higher-levelcourses in computer, communication, networking and process control. ECET 154 is a requiredcourse in all options of ECET. Objectives of ECET 154 are to learn (a) the operational amplifierdevice and applications, (b) the design of power supply circuits, (c) the design of power andtuned amplifiers, (d) the analog signal processing circuits and (d) the use of a simulation toolsuch as MULTISIM. Topics cover the operational
Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering EducationOur initial step has been to design the program and conduct a formal study of how twoindependent groups experienced the program. We are currently using the data to gain insight onthe impact of the program and learn how to improve it. In this paper, we will a) describe theprogram and concurrent research study, b) present case studies for a sample of the participants,with a focus on characterizing their experiences, and c) identify implications for continuousimprovement.Background and Motivation for Focusing on Engineering Graduate StudentsThere are strong reasons to focus on helping graduate students become more effective educators.Here we
Page 9.262.91. Shirley, D. (1999). Women in Engineering: Focus on Success. The Bridge, vol 60, no.2, pp. 7-14.2. Silverman, S. and Pritchard, A. M. (1996). Building Their Future: Girls and Technology Education inConnecticut, Journal of Technology Education. Volume 7, number 2. Digital Library and Archives,http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournlas/JTE/v7n2/silverman.jte-v7n2.html, accessed December 19, 2003.3. Widnall, S.E. (2000). Digits of Pi: barriers and enablers for women in engineering. The Bridge, vol 30, no. 3&4,pp.14-18.4. Whitehead, J.M. (1996). Sex stereotypes, gender identity and subject choice at A-level. Educational Research, 38,147-160.5. Welty, K., and Puck, B. (2001). Modeling Athena: Preparing young women for citizenship and
participants focused upon junior-levelundergraduates in engineering and computer science. Students in this group have reasonableopportunity to complete their degree requirements during their two years of participation in theproject. The idea was that students would engage in two years of full-time academic studies anda summer internship, while participating in STEP.NSF required that project participants be United States citizens, nationals, or aliens admitted asrefugees; that they be eligible for U.S. Department of Education Pell Grants (this definition offinancial need later was relaxed by NSF); and that they be enrolled as full-time students. Ourrequirements were that candidates for STEP have a minimum overall GPA of 3.0/4.0 and a gradeof B or
Session 3192 Developing an Integrated Freshman Seminar for Women in Technology: An Innovative University-Corporate Partnership Model Mara H. Wasburn, Susan G. Miller Purdue UniversityAbstractAccording to a recent report by the National Council for Research on Women, at least half of theavailable science, engineering and technology talent pool will be women. Therefore, it becomesimperative to retain more women in these disciplines. Increasingly, companies and corporationsare seeking to diversify those areas of their workforce that are predominantly male. In 2002
. At the end of the course the participants also responded toopen-ended questions. The project team met regularly during the semester and used the analyzeddata for continuous course improvement. Assessment techniques that were utilized in the course include technological competenceand use, performance tasks, portfolios, reflective journals, teacher observation, and student self-assessment. Rubrics were developed and used for some exams. Rubrics or criteria for judgmentpromote learning by offering clear performance targets to students for agreed-upon standards.Table 2 provides the rubric that was used for Task B on one of the examinations. Note that byspecifically indicating the elements used in evaluating a student’s work and stating
members from any academic programs, and is particularly interested inincluding members from IT programs across the nation and eventually the world. Participationon any of the committees is open to all SIGITE members.REFERENCES1. Dalkey, N. & O. Helmer, “The Use of Experts for the Estimation of Bombing Requirements: A Project Delphi Experiment”, Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corp., 1951.2. Brown, B., “Delphi Process: A Methodology Used for the Elicitation of Opinions of Experts”, Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corp., 1968.3. Dalkey, N., “Delphi:, Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corp., 1967.4. Dalkey, N., “The Delphi Method: An Experimental Study of Group Opinion”, Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corp., 1969.5. Dalkey, N., et al., “The Delphi Method III: Use of Self
, applications, and information. The four distinct forms of integration and examplesreported in [1] include a) Portals integration - the shallowest form of integration, which brings potentially dissimilar applications together in a single Web-based portal entry point. b) Business-process integration - a form of integration that coordinates business processes across applications and around enterprise boundaries. One good example is a supply chain management system. It is observed that Web services [3] using XML-based protocols such SOAP (Simple Object Access Protocol) [4], WSDL (Web Service Definition Language) [5], and UDDI (Universal Description, Discovery, and Integration) [6] and their derivatives are becoming
LabVIEW data acquisition not only made the job of recording data easier,but a much higher precision was obtained.IV- MATHEMATICAL MODELINGTo better appreciate the complexity of the potential behavior of the system (to be designed),mathematical models were generated, examined and used as a visual platform to decide on thedegree of modularity of the apparatus. Further, they serve as indicators by which a laboratorycoordinator/instructor may make more informed decisions about the time for conducting theexperiment/demonstration. These models are presented in Appendix “B” both in the time (t)and (S) domains.V- DESIGN OF THE COMPONENTS AND SUBSYSTEMS OF THE APPARATUSThe proposed Modular Lumped Mass System is composed of the following major
Pgm Obj 3 Pgm Obj 4 Pgm Obj 5 ABET Criteria: A) Apply knowledge of Mathematics, Science, and Engineering X X B) Ability to design and conduct experiments; Analyze and interpret data X C) Design system, component, or process to meet needs X X D) Function on multi-disciplinary teams
opportunities and challenges for both the students and their facultyadvisors.Course ContentDuring CS407A, each project team must: (a) evaluate their project to determine what needs to bedone in order to reach a successful completion prior to graduation the following spring, (b)solicit and record specific project requirements from their client, (c) organize their project teamto effectively and efficiently complete the project prior to graduation, (d) schedule all projectrequirements, (e) identify technological skills that are required to complete their project, (f)identify which technological skills they need to learn, (g) complete a technology prototypedemonstration, (h) complete a requirements design document, (i) complete a detailed softwaredesign
biomaterials.The bioinformatics module is composed of four sub-modules, each of equal length: 1) Anexperimental investigation of the properties (optimal temperature and pH, effect of substrateconcentration on activity) of a hydrolytic enzyme; 2) computation-based multi-sequencealignment of the amino acid sequences of the different forms of the enzyme produced bydifferent organisms; 3) construction of a phylogenetic tree of the different enzyme forms bycomputation; and 4) computational automated docking of different substrates in the enzymeactive site. The student teams in the course studied either b-glucosidase or glucoamylase.Results: Learning JournalsEach of the three modules shared common problem-solving course learning outcomes. Throughthese courses
Certification standard7. Hence, this certification is approved and honored by the NSAand the DoD. This makes JMU students more marketable because the NSA hires employeeswith this certificate at a grade higher than the ones who do not have the certificate.Certificate requirements: 1) CS major 2) The Introductory Information Security course 3) Internetworking course 4) One of the following courses a. Network Applications Development b. Network Analysis and Design Page 9.273.6 c. Selected Topics in Information SecurityProceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference &
Research Experiences program for Undergraduates in an Historically Black college and University. Gbekeloluwa B. Oguntimein1 , Pamela Leigh-Mack2 , Bert Davy1 .and John Wheatland 3 1 Department of Civil Engineering and 2 Department of Electrical and ComputerEngineering, 3 Dean’s Office, School of Engineering, Morgan State University, Baltimore Maryland.AbstractInvolving undergraduate students in research has been recognized as a method ofdeveloping the intellectual capacity of undergraduate student. This paper reportsoperation, achievements and challenges of a Science Engineering and Mathematics(SEM) Summer Research Training program, which has been in operation for
file2 are introduced, theability to represent file2 in terms of strings from file1 is reduced, leading to a larger file size forfile12.gz.One can judge the similarity of file1 and file2 by looking at the sizes of file1.gz, file2.gz, andfile12.gz. The smaller file12.gz is relative to file1.gz and file2.gz , the more similar the files are.However, some method is needed to normalize the file size comparison so that we can rank allpairings of students in terms of the similarity of their submitted source code. Metrics A and B(metricA and metricB) were created for this purpose. Both metrics are designed to give a valueof 0 if file1 and file2 have nothing in common, and a value of 1 if file and file2 are identical.The first metric we considered
engineering program involves identification of the constituents of theprogram, followed by formulation of a set of basic program objectives by all of the majorconstituents. The complete list of constituents may be fairly long but the principal ones can beidentified fairly easily. These include the student body; the faculty; alumni and industrialpartners, particularly at the local and regional levels. These various constituencies should, inconcert, formulate a relatively short set of basic objectives consistent with: a. the mission of the institution; b. the stated long-term goals of any larger academic unit to which the program belongs (in our case the College of Engineering); c. the eleven learning objectives of ABET’s EC2000
directly into any AC outlet and supplies 12 VAC at 1 Amp to the Pandora box. The internal circuitry of the Pandora box converts this power into the +/- 5V DC at a 500 mA maximum (more than sufficient for sophomore and junior circuit experiments) to be used by the student and also the power supplies (+12V DC, -12V DC, and 3.3V DC) necessary to operate the other circuits internal to the box. b. The function generator. The function generator provides signals as inputs to the student’s circuit board. The signal types include sine or cosine, square, and triangular signals. Note that a DC signal is already available via the power supply. The signal frequencies are selectable from 10 Hz to 1 MHz. The signal