is true then execute statement1(s) statement1(s) if condition is false then execute statement2(s) { ELSE statement2(s) } ENDIF FOR Counter = StartValue TO set variable Counter to the value StartValue initially, execute statements, and then EndValue {STEP StepValue} increment Counter by StepValue (1 if StepValue not used), repeat this loop again statement(s) and again until Counter exceeds EndValue NEXT Table II. Selected BS2 Instruction Set Command Reference. Page 9.96.5 Proceedings of the
studies were conducted to identify how teams learn and to guide thedevelopment of the MERIT kit. Hence, the kit has a strong theoretical and research foundation.The kit addresses an important need for instructional tools and methods that can support studentlearning when working in teams. Despite these strengths, further research is needed to determinethe impact of the MERIT kit in supporting individual student learning.ReferencesABET Engineering Accreditation Commission (2007, November 3). 2008-2009 Criteria for accrediting engineering programs. Retrieved December 15, 2008, from http://www.abet.org.Atman, C.J., Adams, R.S., Cardella, M.E., Turns, J., Mosborg, S., and Saleem, J. (2007). Engineering design processes: A comparison of students
Petroleum Design, iscelebrating a decade of existence. The idea for the course originally came from amultidisciplinary team research project undertaken by CSM faculty for the United StatesDepartment of Energy.2 This project realized an incremental benefit of $20 million discounted at10% and showed the power of a multidisciplinary approach. The results of this project alsoendorsed calls in the early 1990’s that suggested engineering curricula needed to be improved inthe area of engineering design and teamwork processes.6 When the requirements of ABET weremodified to include capstone design courses, CSM felt strongly that programs of this kind wouldbenefit its graduates and make them more valuable to future employers. In addition to
A Pr oposal for Unifying some of the Fundamental Concepts of Engineer ing Gr egor y S. Mowr y Engineer ing Depar tment, Univer sity of St. ThomasAbstractMathematics is the descriptive language of engineering while physics provides the foundation forengineering. At many engineering institutions, mathematics and physics are frequently taught bydepartments other than the engineering department. This tradition often has the result thatundergraduate students experience considerable difficulty in applying their mathematics skills inphysics and engineering. Additionally, students infrequently learn the relevance and significanceof several
of working on a problem has directed the attention to the 'managementof meaning' and thus the role of the consultant intervening in the act of deliberation."Furthermore, as well as the abilities to deal with these types of situations, students need to learnthe underlying issues so that they can make conscious choices about their style of practicing theprofession. As one example, Eden and Sims (1996) describe three paradigms that a consultantmay adhere to in order to affect the actions of the client: (s)he may attempt to coerce the clientinto using models and solutions devised by the consultant; (s)he may attempt to develop empathywith the client, discover the definition of the problem and help the client to devise a satisfactorycourse of
work with others in a more productive way.3. Developing detailed design specifications using the Quality Function Development(QFD) method Ullman [2003] popularized the QFD method in US engineering schools in his well adopted book The Mechanical Design Process. This method is important for turning vague, not measurable customer needs for a new design into a set of measurable engineering specifications. Although this method was proposed in Japan in the mid-70's, it is still not well known or popular in Asian engineering schools. Experienced design engineers can design well without explicitly using this method, however, it is very helpful to learn this concept in teaching and learning the design process. Figure 2 is a very good
. Mosst of the studdents go throough afounddation prograam before thhey are enrollled as a fresshmen student in PI. Thee foundationnprogrram is designned to help students s develop knowleedge, study sskills, techniical,analy ytical, and co ommunicatio on skills whiich are necesssary to meeet the PI’s enntrancerequiirements andd assist them m in their futu ure studies att the Petroleeum Institutee. Thefounddation prograam at the PI is called as the Advanceed Universitty Placementt program.Courrse framewo orkOncee the student reaches the freshmen leevel there aree core coursees that have to completeirresp
years. Although some of the students focused on thecreative aspect of the project more than the civil engineering aspects, they nevertheless createdsomething new, understood the concept of concrete design better through hands-on activities,experimented with new materials, and found the experience interesting.References1. Crofton, F. S. “Educating for Sustainability: Opportunities in Undergraduate Engineering.” Journal of Cleaner Production, 2000: 397-405.2. Woodruff, P. H. “Educating Engineers to Create a Sustainable Future.” Journal of Environmental Engineering, April 2006: 434-444.3. Davidson, C. I., Matthews, H. S, Hendrickson, C. T, Bridges, M. W., Allenby, B. R., Crittenden, J. C., Chen, Y., Williams, E., Allen, D. T., Murphy, C
draw after about 28 minutes. Figure 3 shows hisdrawing. It is intended to be a carousel-type layout, but he had difficulty drawing a circle, so hedrew a rectangle instead, with blocks indicating the stations. The design is intended to includenine stations arranged in a circle, with the 1st station adjacent to the 9th station. He used the pinkstar to point to which part(s) would be assembled at each station as he talked. The designincludes five robot stations (3, 4, 5, 6, and 9) and four manual stations (1, 2, 7, 8).Figure 4 shows his typed cost estimates (the text overlap on the first line is due to a videosynching issue). He also listed items that would normally be included in a proposal, such as aschedule
Education, 55(1), 16-21. 3. Metioui, A., Brassard, C., LeVasseur, J., & Lavoie, M. (1996). The persistence of students' unfounded beliefs about electrical circuits: The case of ohm's law. International Journal of Science Education, 18(2), 193-212. 4. Bernhard, J., & Carstensen, A.-K. (2002). Learning and teaching electrical circuit theory. Paper presented at the Phyics Teaching in Engineering Education, Leuven. 5. Ainsworth, S. (2008). The educational value of multiple-representations when learning complex scientific concepts. In J. K. Gilbert, M. Reiner & M. Nakhleh (Eds.), Visualization: Theory and Practice in Science Education (pp. 191 - 208). Surrey, UK: Springer. 6. Holton, D., Verma, A., &
using LEGO® NXT Robotics, Chemical Engineering Education, Spring 2011, 45:2, pp. 86-92 12. Johnson, S. H., Luyben, W. L. and Talhelm, D.L., “Undergraduate Interdisciplinary Controls Laboratory”, Journal of Engineering Education, 84, (2), pp.133-136, (April 1995). 13. Hmelo, C. E.; Problem-based Learning: Development of knowledge and reasoning strategies, in Proceedings of the 17th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society; Pittsburgh, PA; 1995; pp. 404-408. Page 24.769.1014. Yu, Chung Y. and David T. Shaw; Fostering Creativity and Innovation in Engineering Students; 2006 International
spent anentire weekend learning about STEM fields and participating in prepared exercises whilebonding in the experience of post-secondary life as they stayed in the university dormitories. This program was funded by the Gaining Early Awareness and Readiness for UndergraduatePrograms (GEAR UP), a federal discretionary grant awarded by the U. S. Department ofEducation. It was designed to increase the enrollment of low-income students — simultaneouslypreparing them for success in post-secondary education — through a partnership grant betweenTexas A&M International University (TAMIU) and 19 school districts throughout the southernpart of Texas, covering approximately 14,972 square miles. To enhance skills, motivation, and preparation, the
-world client into the course. A computer-basedsimulator has been used to provide a learning environment for critical competencies aimed ataccelerating the student‟s learning in systems engineering concepts.5 The introduction of systemsengineering into pre-college education6 was shown to give students a broad perspective withwhich to interact with the world. Systems engineering was used with students as young as fiveyears old to emphasize the kind of interactive and interdependent group learning that fostersgrowth in social skills, giving children the opportunity to think and act critically in society.A systems engineering approach applied in a laboratory setting using an active learning strategycalled Activities, Project, and Problem-Based
thedepartment’s course lesson plans in the late 1980’s. Assessment of student learning aboutapplication of sustainable design principles became a specific criterion of the engineering impactstudent outcome in the department’s assessment plan in 2008.Results of student work assessment presented in the paper demonstrate that, although studentscould reflect thoughtfully on sustainability principles, they struggled to demonstrate rational,comprehensive application of these principles to the design process. The evidence suggested adifferent approach to learning sustainable design was needed. Dialogue with practitioners andindustry experts reminded the department that sustainable design is just “good engineering” thathas been present in the curriculum for
A Matter of Priorities: Effects of Increased Opportunities for Extracurricular and Non-traditional Learning Experiences on Student Time Management and Attitudes David G. Spurlock, Ph.D., Daniel J. Bailey, Susan Murray, Ph.D., and Andrew S. Ricke Engineering Management and Systems Engineering Department University of Missouri-Rolla AbstractMany schools are emphasizing non-traditional and extracurricular learning experiences forundergraduate engineering students. These include activities such as incorporating service-learning projects into the classroom
Undergraduate Research Collaboration Between Penn State Main Campus and One of Its Remote Campuses Aiman S. Kuzmar, Ph. D., P. E. Penn State Fayette, The Eberly Campus One University Drive, Uniontown, PA 15401AbstractUndergraduate research has been heavily promoted recently by universities and through local,state and federal agencies. The importance and benefits of this type of research have been welldocumented in the literature. The general focus of universities without graduate programs is onteaching, and less emphasis is given to research. Consequently, such universities face variouschallenges to carry out undergraduate research. Some
• Build, test, troubleshoot, and verify a circuit that will implement systems a closed-loop system using op-amps. • Verify the behavior of a closed-loop system under the presence of disturbancesBibliography1. Fisher, S. & Nygren, T. I. (2000). Experiments in the Cost-Effective Uses of Technology in Teaching: Lessonsfrom the Mellon Program So Far. New York: The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation Cost-Effective Uses ofTechnology in Teaching (CEUTT) Initiative. Available: http://www.ceutt.org/ICLT%20CEUTT.pdf2. Shiratuddin, N., Hassan, S., & Landoni, M. (2003). A Usability Study for Promoting eContent in HigherEducation. Educational Technology &
,” Journal of Engineering Education, January 1998, pp. 23-27.7. Hoit, M. and M. Ohland, “The Impact of a Discipline-based Introduction to Engineering Course on Improving Retention,” Journal of Engineering Education, January 1998, pp. 79-85.8. Lau, A. S. and R. N. Pangborn, “Engaging Engineering Students in Learning – A College-wide First Year Seminar Program,” Proceedings, 2001 ASEE Annual Conference (Washington, DC: American Society for Engineering Education, 2001).9. Lau, A. S., et al., “Student Assessments of Engineering First-year Seminars,” Proceedings, 2001 ASEE Annual Conference (Washington, DC: American Society for Engineering Education, 2001).10. Litzinger, T., M. Trethewey and J. Gardner, “Integrated
‚ [s ? / l ] from Figure 4. Hence, the change [sin s ] = [cos l ] from (1) to (2) 2 kl rl rl 2 ‚ u ? cos s ? cos s ? sin l ; and | ? z (a dummy variable) 2 n n l l l 1 jk| sin l ‚ In equation (1) U(s) is replaced by U (l ) ? Ð I (| )e 2 d| 2 /1 jkje / jkr l 1 ‚ Substituting, we attain: E ? [cos l ] Ð I (| )e ju| d| where
free stream turbulence. o Hot air Ta( C)= 22.5 T ra n s ie n t te s t, S te e l S p h e re o o t(sec) Tcenter( C) Tsurface( C) 33 0 0 22.5 22.5 32 5 10 24.3 24.7 20 26.6 27.1 32 0 30 28.7 29.0 40 30.1 30.2 31 5 60 33.4 33.5 T e s t d ata T(K) 31 0
of the first stage of desorption (s)h = Depth of defect (m) Page 9.633.6D = Diffusion coefficient of gas penetrant in air (m2/s). Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering EducationThe mathematical model of the diffusion flux density (I) during this stage is complex and of littlepractical use.During the second stage of desorption, on the other hand, the diffussion flux density (I) can bedescribed more explicitly in terms of parameters that are known to be inherent to the phenomenaof absorption and
mass transfer fundamentalswithin specific fuel cell components to improve their performance. These projects willinvolve both graduate students and the AFE enterprise. In addition, assessment of theAFE enterprise is currently underway and will be reported at a future ASEE conference.AcknowledgmentsThe author would like to thank the United States Army Tank Automotive and ArmamentsCommand (TACOM) and the Michigan Economic Development Corporation for projectfunding.Bibliography 1. J. M. Keith, C. Dugar, J. Meyer, and N. Norman, “A Hands-On Multidisciplinary Design Course for Chemical Engineering Students,” ASEE Conference Proceedings (2001). 2. J. M. Keith, “Learning Outside the Toybox,” ASEE Conference Proceedings (2002). 3. S
. These circuit components are introduced early in thestudent s academic career, but usually only as ideal circuit elements. Concepts such as resistive1 Now with Lockheed Martin Corp., King of Prussia, PA. Page 9.811.12 Now with Raytheon Corp., Chelmsford, MA
of Gains for Female Faculty?" Teachers College Record, 93, 697-709.5. P. Bronstein, E. Rothblum & S. Solomon. (1993). "Ivy Halls and Glass Walls: Barriers to Academic Careers for Women and Ethnic Minorities" in J. Gainen and R. Boice (eds.) New Directions for Teaching and Research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.6. J. Buck. (2001). “The President’s Report” Academe, September-October, 18-20.7. D.E. Chubin & E. Hackett. (1990). Peerless Science: Peer Review and US Science Policy. Albany: State University of New York at Albany Press.8. R.T.D. De George. (1997). Academic Freedom and Tenure: Ethical Issues. New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.9. J. Dewey. (1902). “Academic Freedom
in the area of undergraduate softwareengineering education over the past five years. In the late 1990’s, the ABET, the accreditationbody for applied science, engineering, computing and technology degree programs in the UnitedStates, approved criteria for accrediting software engineering under the EngineeringAccreditation Commission (EAC). Four programs were accredited in 2003, and another two in20048. Page 10.653.1 Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Education Category
Calculation of Electrical Quantities in Three Phase Circuits using MATLAB Khalid S. Al-Olimat, Pete Jankovsky, Matt Valerio and Jack Skinner Ohio Northern UniversityAbstractThis paper presents a MATLAB program that utilizes a Graphical User Interface (GUI) tocalculate the electrical quantities of three phase circuits. The GUI is designed in a way to allowthe user to enter the resistances and reactances of the source, the transmission line and that of theload respectively. It also requires a voltage value of one of the phases at the generator end. Thisprogram performs the calculations with respect to the specified connection type. There are fourtypes: wye-wye, wye-delta, delta-wye and delta
Big Picture Guy – Interview with Broadcom, Inc., Co-founder Henry Samueli”, Prism, American Society for Engineering Education, April 2001, pp. 16-21Carryer, J. E. (2000) “March Madness: a Mechatronics Project Theme”, Mechatronics 2000 – 7th Mechatronics Forum International Conference, September 6-8, 2000, Atlanta, GA, CD-ROMCraig, K. (2000) “Inverted Pendulum Systems: Rotary and Arm-Driven – a Mechatronics System Design Case Study”, Mechatronics 2000 – 7th Mechatronics Forum International Conference, September 6-8, 2000, Atlanta, GA, CD-ROMField, S.; Meek, S.; Devasia, S. (2000) “Mechatronics Education in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Utah”, Mechatronics 2000 – 7th Mechatronics Forum
made and parameters are established. In our situation, this happened at thedepartment level with department chairs establishing boundaries, and at the college level wherethe steering committee and associate dean made decisions and sorted through requests. Further,connecting the faculty developing the metrics with the college technical support with regularmeetings, allowed ideas to be floated, technical possibilities explored, and realities of cost,availability, institute data supply issues, and technical capability to be addressed.All this is easier ‘said than done.’ There is an inherent, traditional culture at work in academia.The 1990’s saw many attempts to implement Total Quality Management (TQM) in highereducation with many failures. TQM
? - È y% Ù È sin cos ÙÚ ÈÉ v ÙÚ ÈÉ Vc sin c ÙÚ (1) É Ú É %?rwhere x, y, and s""are the planar position and rotation variables in the world or inertialframe of reference and u, v, and r are the surge velocity, sway velocity and yaw rate withrespect to a reference frame attached to the USAV.In Equation (1) Vc and sc represent the ocean current magnitude and direction. The oceancurrent directly modifies the velocities in the inertial frame as evidenced from Equation(1).Exact dynamics of marine vessels becomes extremely complicated if all the added inertiaand first and higher order
during an interval of time is a = -2v m/s2. When t = 0,its position is s = 0 and its velocity is v = 2 m/s. Determine the router’s velocity as afunction of time.2. Engineers analyzing the motion of a linkage determine that the velocity of anattachment point is given by v = A + 4s2 ft/s, where A is constant. When s = 2 ft, itsacceleration is measured and determined to be a = 320 ft/s2. What is its velocity whens = 2 ft?Because of the nature of the class, the post-test was a typical end-of-chapter textbookproblem. Unlike the pretest, students were required not only to use relevant equations,but also to apply them correctly in solving the problem. Thus success on the post-testindicates a higher degree of skill and understanding than did success on