program, faculty at UD closely assessed the students’qualifications and outcomes, and either recommended changes in the curriculum to SHNU, ormodified the UD curriculum for SHNU students. The program morphed from the initial conceptto a “3 + 1” program where students study for three years at Shanghai Normal University,followed by one calendar year (three semesters) at the University of Dayton.Teaching in higher education is quite different between China and the United States. Tocontinue development of the program, SHNU annually sends faculty to UD for a semester tolearn about teaching and student learning in the United States. Additionally, UD annually sendsfaculty to teach at SHNU for a 4-5 week period to help prepare students for learning
homework. We incorporated these into take-home study guide assignments and backed them up with online quizzes. This small step toward the “flipped classroom” allowed us to skip some basic equipment introduction and focus within our laboratory on details of particular interest.ResultsAlthough not statistically significant given the small student class size from year-to-year (10students in 2011, 16 in 2012), the numeric results of student-returned course teaching evaluationsshowed significant improvement over the previous year. The following response categoriesshowed an improvement of at least one point on a five point scale: Table 1. Increase in Student Response between 2011 and 2012
teaching laboratory at WSU. We assume that this willProceedings of the 2013 Midwest Section Conference of the American Society for Engineering Educationconsiderably improve the enrollment rate in the engineering college. The specific objectives ofthis study were as follows: i) to educate high school students based on hands-on experience indifferent nanotechnology subjects, ii) to promote interest in this emerging technology, iii) tocreate an awareness of nanomaterials fabrication and characterization techniques, and iv) toprovide the students with a fundamental knowledge and understanding of nanoscience,nanotechnology, and associated technologies.1.2 Nanotechnology and EducationGenerally, nanotechnology is the development of materials, components
more attractive to implementing DSP component for CmpEcurriculum than digital signal processors traditionally used for the EE curriculum. Besides, theincreasingly important role played by FPGA in the DSP market also gives strong justification tothe adoption of FPGA for our DSP laboratories.This paper presents our new development on DSP laboratory materials for CmpE curriculumusing Altera’s DE2 FPGA kits. Many universities have developed DSP labs based on moresophisticated FPGAs such as Xilinx Vertex 4 and Altera’s Stratix II. However, low-end FPGAsuch as the Cyclone II on Altera’s DE2 board have mainly been used as simple input/output (I/O)and micro-controller. Teaching materials are found only for digital logic and computerarchitecture
. Students work on projects that address engineering measurement and reverseengineering. An exemplar task would be to perform systematic testing of existing products withthe goal of possibly illuminating areas for improvement [3]. During this year students are alsolectured on professionalism and engineering ethics [4]Sophomore Engineering Clinics (SEC I and SEC II)By the second year students have an understanding of the basic composition of an engineer; theirnext area of development is communication. The first semester focuses on written communication,while the second emphasizes oral communication. During both of these clinics the engineeringstudent takes a separate course that teaches the fundamentals of each communication type, awriting/literature
problemswhile facilitating communication with different specialists in a team. As one of the leading collegesof engineering, our mission is to link theory and practice via our learning-by-doing philosophy.To be in alignment with this mission, students in both areas of engineering technology can take atechnical elective course in robotics and applications during their senior year. In this course, theylearn the basic principles of the science of manipulation along with basic control of roboticmanipulators. In the laboratory portion of the course, they work in interdisciplinary teams andbuild a robotic manipulator with the interface to teleoperate it by using a haptic device. They applythe system for specific tasks of activities of daily living (such as
) – Indicates a Work in Progress Friday, April 1, 2011 (Morning)08:30 – 09:45 AM Concurrent Session Presentations Experiential Learning Jim Helbling, et al., Configuration Of Senior Capstone Course Using Team- 1 Teaching To Maximize Communication Skills And Minimize Team Conflict Mohammad Amin, et al., Investigation of a Masters Research Project for 13 Validation of Program's Goals and Student Learning Outcomes Jennifer Van Donk, et al., Developing a low cost prosthetic foot for the Vida Nueva 30 Clinic: A multidisciplinary senior design project Instrumentation & Lab Studies Ricardo Medina, et
regarding active experimentation[7]. Open-ended laboratory courses or even traditional classes with experimentation exposure have shownto provide greater learning value as compared to the traditional lecture only focus [2,8]. Such coursesemploy an approach to learning science that are backed by a significant body of work on research-basedand active pedagogies in various engineering disciplines as well as have demonstrated superior levels ofstudent engagement and learning. Introduction of real-world problems not only allows students to masterappropriate techniques and technologies, but also allows the students to design strategies for solvingproblems and practice an overall process of inquiry [9-10]. Since experimentation is so critical to
California Institute of Technology, where he was an AT&T Bell Laboratories Ph.D. Scholar. Dr. Wood was formerly a Professor of Mechanical engineering at the University of Texas (1989-2011), where he established a computational and experimental laboratory for research in engineering design and manufac- Page 23.758.1 turing. He was a National Science Foundation Young Investigator, the Cullen Trust for Higher Education Endowed Professor in Engineering and University Distinguished Teaching Professor at The University of Texas at Austin. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013
has outstanding capabilities of fault insertion ofsoftware and hardware levels and features 35+ electrical faults. The fault insertion capability Proceedings of the 2020 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference University of New Mexico, Albuquerque Copyright 2020, American Society for Engineering Education 15provides students with unique, real world like opportunity to troubleshoot the industrial equipmentin academic settings.Availability of the state-of-the-art industrial equipment is important to enable the teaching ofcritical skills that are very relevant to current industry needs. Currently, laboratory
(Unigraphics NX) into the curriculum ofstrategically selected academic partners worldwide. Michigan Tech was one of only twoU.S. universities selected for the initial four academic program partner sites. Proceedings of the 2007 ASEE North Midwest Sectional Conference 1Today NX is the key CAD/CAM/CAE software used in our mechanical engineeringcurriculum and utilized in our laboratories [1]. It is integrated throughout our curriculumbeginning with the first year, to learn solid modeling using NX. Sophomore students useNX in the lab portion of the course “Integrated Design and Manufacturing” to create thetool paths to produce a designed part. Junior students use NX in the Product Realization Iand II courses. Senior students use NX in
Russell is a senior in Mechanical Engineering at Tennessee Tech University. He is currently working as an undergraduate research assistant in the additive manufacturing laboratory under Dr. Fidan. Nick is the student trustee on the Tennessee Tech Board of Trustees and is formally the Tennessee Board of Regents Student Regent. He is also the recipient of the 2017 Rising Renaissance Engineer Spectrum Award. Nick enjoys spending time with his family and trading stocks in his free time.Mr. James Reed Rust, Tennessee Technological University Mr. Reed Rust is a senior in Manufacturing Engineering Technology at Tennessee Tech University. He is currently working as an undergraduate research assistant in the additive manufacturing
RTOS and introduce basic theoretic topics intheir microcontroller courses. As a result, students who have a good understanding of theory andconcepts of RTOS do not have the opportunity to map their knowledge onto real-worldimplementations. To bridge the gap between conceptual understanding and concreteimplementations, an embedded RTOS educational platform has been established for EETstudents in the Department of Engineering Technology & Industrial Distribution at Texas A&MUniversity as well as in the Engineering Technology program at Northern Kentucky University.This paper only focuses on hardware design and development of the embedded RTOS platform.The laboratory curriculum development and student learning outcomes/feedback will
AC 2007-1565: SOFTWARE FOR STUDENT TEAM FORMATION AND PEEREVALUATION: CATME INCORPORATES TEAM-MAKERRichard Layton, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Richard A. Layton is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Rose-Hulman Instsitute of Technology. He holds a PhD in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Washington. His professional interests include modeling and simulation of dynamic systems as well as curriculum and laboratory development in mechanical engineering. He has given workshops on building student teams for the ERM’s Regional Effective Teaching Institute as well as workshops in laboratory development.Matthew Ohland, Purdue Engineering Education Matthew W
for two-thirds of a public institution’s funding to come from the state.Today things are dramatically different. A recent survey found that state funding can varyfrom eight percent to up to 57 percent of a state four-year institution of highereducation’s budget. On the low end were national research institutions and on the highend were predominantly teaching intuitions. [1] The rational from the respective statelegislatures appeared to be that research institutions could get by for less due to the grantmoney they took in. Their student tuition also tends to be higher. However, funding fromthe state and student tuition is not enough. Almost all public institutions now mustengage in fundraising to be able to balance their budgets. The question
AC 2009-1704: OPERATING A CENTER FOR APPLIED RESEARCH ANDTECHNOLOGY (CART)Bruce Mutter, Bluefield State College Page 14.935.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009Operating the Center for Applied Research & Technology (CART, Inc.)AbstractThe paper describes the continuing development of the Center for Applied Research andTechnology (CART, Inc.) at a small college as a vehicle for entrepreneurial success. It discussesour Unmanned Systems Laboratory (USL) to provide teams of engineering technology studentsfor our School of Engineering Technology and Computer Science (SET) with in-house internshipexperience and the School with a source of increased funding through CART
Laboratory Experiments Simulator”, CACHE News, 37, 6-12.4. Felder, R, M. and L. K. Silverman, “Learning and Teaching Styles in Engineering Education”, Journal of Engineering Education, 78(7), 674-681, April, 1988.5. Fogler, H. S., S.M. Montgomery, and R.P. Zipp, “Interactive Computer Modules for Chemical Engineering Instruction”, Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 1(1), 11-24, 1992.6. Kolb, D. A., “Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development”, Prentice- Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N. J., 1984.7. Montgomery, Susan and H. Scott Fogler, “Selecting Computer-Aided Instructional Software”, Journal of Engineering Education, 85(l), January, 1996.8. Pimentel, Ken and Teixeira, Kevin, “Virtual Reality
, and formal presentation. Given that this required course already provides thefoundation for a significant research experience, the question arises whether a substitute to thiscourse could be created that complemented the course’s library research component withexperimental, computational, or theoretical research in actual laboratories. The benefits wouldnot only be that the students would gain valuable research experiences, but that the students’appreciation for the communication would deepen, because the students would be more likely toassume ownership of the content. This document presents the results of a proof-of-concept test [10] for whether anundergraduate technical communication course could effectively be linked to larger
: Implementation and Outcomes Student Performance in Dissemination - Homework Success - Quizzes & Exams Measures for - Laboratory Reports Course - Presentations Objectives Quality Teaching & Student Evaluations of
Dr. McCullough was afforded the opportunity to work with Dr. Brian Adams, a well-known hand surgeon. In the summer of 2006, he began a post-doctoral fellowship at Mayo Clinic, working on orthopaedic biomechanics and physiology cellular imaging laboratories. This provided the opportunity to work with outstanding clinical and research mentors like Drs. Kai-Nan An, Kenton Kauf- man, Gary Sieck, Ann Reed, Harold Kitaoka, as well as others. His research at that time focused on non-invasive imaging of muscle tissue as well as cadaveric studies of the foot and ankle. Dr. McCullough is a faculty member of the first bioengineering program independently housed at a Historically Black College or University and is a part of
Paper ID #11587Design for Impact: Reimagining Inquiry-Based Activities in Heat Transferfor Effectiveness and Ease of Faculty AdoptionDr. Margot A Vigeant, Bucknell University Margot Vigeant is a professor of chemical engineering and an associate dean of engineering at Bucknell University. She earned her B.S. in chemical engineering from Cornell University, and her M.S. and Ph.D., also in chemical engineering, from the University of Virginia. Her primary research focus is on engineering pedagogy at the undergraduate level. She is particularly interested in the teaching and learning of concepts related to thermodynamics
instructing courses in industrial management, financial management, computer technology, and environmental technology, as well as leading seminars in the uni- versity’s general education program. Prior to academia, Mr. Hilgarth was employed as as engineer in the aerospace industry in laboratory and flight test development, facilities management, and as a manager in quality assurance. He has contributed papers on management, ground-test laboratory and flight test facilities, and ethics to several technical and professional organizations. In education, he has served as a consultant and curriculum developer to the Ohio Board of Higher Education and the Ohio Department of Education. He holds an M.S. in engineering management
AC 2008-173: ANALYSIS OF THE RESULTS OF A PILOT ENGINEERING ANDENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY STUDENT INVENTORY SURVEYAndrew Vavreck, Pennsylvania State University-Altoona Andrew N. Vavreck is Associate Professor of Engineering and Head of the Division of Business and Engineering at Penn State Altoona. He has earned degrees in Engineering Science (BS), Engineering Mechanics (MS) and Engineering Science and Mechanics (PhD), all from Penn State. His work experience includes engineering research and management at Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory and the Applied Research Laboratory, Penn State. His research is in smart material (particularly magnetorheological fluid) design, application and
competition – receive a governmental grant in the amount from two to five annual budgets for the period of two years. The programs, being realized by these universities, envisage a whole complex of pedagogical innovations, including such as:- introduction of a two-level system “bachelor-master”;- introduction of a credit-modular construction of academic programs;- wide usage of information technologies and active (involved) methods of teaching;- combination of academic, scientific and practical (production) activities;- evaluation of the quality of education on the basis of actual competencies. Priority support is given to training of engineers in the spheres of
engineering, biotechnology, nanotechnology, electronics and informationdevelopment or delivery. We need to take an active role in redefining the education pipeline,especially an enhanced awareness of science and math in K through 12, as well as a broadeningof the chemical engineering undergraduate curriculum. We must look to redefining the goals ofindustry and their responsibilities to society, that is, sustainable development, while we continueto support the core industries and knowledge base of chemical engineering.If we define “Industry” as where we work, “Technology” as how we work, “Education” as howwe teach/learn, and “Society” as how we behave/develop, we can readily present AIChE’shistoric role as a professional society in Figure 1. Chemical
conclusion.MissionThe virtual center promotes the opportunity to gain the knowledge and innovation skills to copewith the formidable technological, economic, social, and financial changes associated withcreating value from technological knowledge in an age of global competition. The focus of thecenter is on the rapid transfer of research, knowledge, and technology from the laboratory tothe marketplace.CPIC is ideal for professionals who: • Work in multi-functional, and perhaps global and virtual, product development teams. • Work in supply chain management or supplier partnering. • Are interested in general management of technology commercialization processes. • Work in technology transfer at a university, R&D laboratory, incubator
the manipulation and analysis of the data collected.The manufacture of a product will necessitate the use of interdisciplinary teams of ComputerScience, Engineering Technology and other students in their capstone projects classes.The conclusion is that computer integrated manufacturing can be the focal point of study formany disciplines at many different levels.PhilosophyThe traditional way of teaching a technical subject is to strip away all superfluous distractionsand concentrate on a single issue. This is seen in the design of laboratory equipment that canperform one or a small number of very focused exercises. While this is very beneficial inintroducing a concept, it leaves the student with islands of knowledge and limited understandingof
this is written, has not taken anyofficial action on the questions that arise.In this paper, the opinion will be expressed that outcomes assessment, as being implemented inthe new criteria known as EC2000, will make it possible for institutions to show that theirdistance education programs are achieving the desired outcomes, provided of course that theyare. The reasons for this opinion, which is solely that of the author, will be given.IntroductionIn engineering education, distance education programs have existed for many years. After WorldWar II, engineering faculty rode trains to teach graduate classes to engineers in industry. Later,they drove, flew in university planes—whatever was necessary to meet the demand forpostgraduate education
traditional lecture. For manystudents, the combination of difficulties with the level of mathematics and passivitywithin the traditional lecture style has an overwhelmingly negative impact on their abilityto learn and understand the subject matter. In recent years, scientific visualization hasemerged as an important tool in helping us understand many complex physicalphenomena. However, the problem of translating standard mathematical notation into thetraditional high-level computer languages has made it difficult to use programming andcomputers in the undergraduate classroom.To overcome these problems, state-of-the-art software for mathematical computing isbeing integrated into the teaching process to facilitate and foster an active
clustersystems across a collection of virtual machines. This paper will explore the pedagogical andtechnological issues involved in the use of virtualization and cloud computing technologies forHPC education, focusing on: mixed use of physical and virtual computing environments; highperformance networking fabrics; pedagogical limitations of virtual and cloud computing; thedevelopment of an effective teaching laboratory for virtual clustering; and the performance andreliability constraints of a mixed virtual cluster environment. The paper will describe the use ofvirtualization software, specifically Xen, OpenVZ, and VMware, and an assessment of theviability of the Eucalyptus, NIMBUS, and OpenNebula cloud computing systems for use forvirtual clusters for