Conference Session

Division for Experimentation & Lab-oriented Studies Technical Session 5

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sulakshana Lal, Curtin University; Anthony Denis Lucey, Curtin University; Euan Lindsay, Charles Sturt University; David Franklin Treagust, Curtin University; Mauro Mocerino, Curtin University; John Matthew Long, Deakin University; Marjan G. Zadnik, Curtin University of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Experimentation and Laboratory-Oriented Studies

students are ableto experience quality laboratory learning and also be prepared for modern industry demandsand a globally-connected workplace culture.AcknowledgmentThe work reported in this article contributes to a larger research project on laboratorylearning in Science and Engineering that is supported by the Australia Research Councilthrough grant DP140104189 for which Human Research Ethics approval has been obtainedfrom Curtin University (Approval Number: RDSE-61-15). The authors wish to express theirgratitude to both institutions.The authors also wish to acknowledge the contribution of the University of Technology,Sydney for allowing the use of their remote laboratory rigs for the purpose of this study.References[1] D. Lowe, S. Murray, D

Conference Session

Faculty Development Medley

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lindy Hamilton Mayled, Arizona State University; Lydia Ross, Arizona State University; James Collofello, Arizona State University; Stephen J. Krause, Arizona State University; Keith D. Hjelmstad, Arizona State University; Brent James Sebold, Arizona State University; Sarah Hoyt, Arizona State University

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Constituent Committee

institutionalizing the entrepreneurial mindset (EM),improving and expanding evidence-based pedagogical strategies in capstone courses, andcreating a faculty Community of Practice. To effectively institutionalize the entrepreneurialmindset and expand evidence-based pedagogical practices in capstone courses, professionaldevelopment was provided in conjunction with coaching sessions. This format aimed to provideaccountability for faculty participants, offer opportunities to strategize how the innovation(s)would be implemented in a contextualized setting, and shift the attitudes and practices of thecapstone faculty.Rogers’ Diffusion of Innovation (DOI) outlines an individual change model that describes thefive stages individuals follow towards adoption of an

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 6

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Yanjie Xie, Zhejiang University; Wei Zhang, Zhejiang University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

ecosystem.Reference[1] Acs, Z. J., Autio, E., & Szerb, L. (2014). National systems of entrepreneurship: Measurement issues and policy implications. Research Policy, 43(3), 476-494.[2] Zimmer, C. (1986). Entrepreneurship through social networks. The art and science of entrepreneurship. Ballinger, Cambridge, MA, 3-23.[3] Arruda, C., Nogueira, V. S., Cozzi, A., & Costa, V. (2015). The Brazilian entrepreneurial ecosystem of startups: an analysis of entrepreneurship determinants in Brazil and the perceptions around the Brazilian regulatory framework. In Entrepreneurship in BRICS (pp. 9-26). Springer, Cham.[4] Clark, B. K., & Bruno-Jofre, R. D. (2000). Creating entrepreneurial universities: organisational pathways of transformation

Conference Session

Construction Engineering Division Technical Session 6 - Technology & Simulation

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Fadi Castronovo, California State University, East Bay; Dragana Nikolic, University of Reading; Silvia Mastrolembo Ventura, Politecnico di Milano & University of Brescia; Vrinda Shroff, California State University, East Bay; Anh Nguyen; Nguyen H.P. Dinh, Mission College; Semih Yilmaz, California State University, East Bay; Reza Akhavian, California State University East Bay; Cristian Gaedicke, California State University East Bay

Tagged Divisions

Construction Engineering

-Rached H, Furness TA. Effects of field of view on presence, enjoyment, memory, and simulator sickness in a virtual environment. Virtual Reality, 2002. Proceedings. IEEE, IEEE; 2002, p. 164–71.[5] Cavazza M, Charles F, Mead SJ. Developing re-usable interactive storytelling technologies. Building the Information Society, Springer; 2004, p. 39–44.[6] Computer Integrated Construction Research Program. BIM Project Execution Planning Guide - Version 2.0. University Park, PA, USA: The Pennsylvania State University; 2010.[7] Kumar S. Procedures to incorporate interactivity in virtual prototypes using a game engine environment. International Conference on Construction Applications of Virtual Reality, 2011, Weimar, Germany: 2011.[8

Conference Session

Best Practices in Research & Assessment Tools for Pre-College Engineering Education

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Susheela Shanta, Governor's STEM Academy @ the Burton Center for Arts and Technology - Center for Engineering

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education

integration andcollaboration.Further research needs to be conducted to follow up with developing better classroom-readyinstruments for classroom assessments in authentic problem solving challenges. In addition, alarger study that includes follow up of students’ performance post-graduation (from high school)to seek an understanding of the impact on their pursuit of STEM education (speciallyengineering) and careers would be recommended.References[1] Partnership for 21st Century Learning (2015). P21 Framework Definitions. P21: Washington, DC.[2] S. Haag, N. Hubele, A. Garcia, & K. McBeath, “Engineering undergraduate attrition and contributing factors,” International Journal of Engineering Education, vol 23, no. 5, pp. 929- 940, 2007.[3] T

Conference Session

Mechanical Engineering Division Technical Session 11

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

James A. Mynderse, Lawrence Technological University; Liping Liu, Lawrence Technological University; Andrew L. Gerhart, Lawrence Technological University; Robert W. Fletcher, Lawrence Technological University; Hamid Vejdani, Lawrence Technological University; Wuming Jing, Lawrence Technological University; Kingman E. Yee, Lawrence Technological University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

with CDS alumni and current students may reinforce these observations of the advisors.Nonetheless, continual improvement is being sought with regards to the entrepreneurial mindsetof the students, and improvement to assessment techniques will be sought to ultimately producebetter graduating engineers.AcknowledgmentsThe authors thank Dr. Arslan and Dr. Xie for their contributions as project advisors during thecourse of the work described. The authors also acknowledge support of this work at all levels ofadministration by Dr. Jawad, Dr. Grace, and Dr. Vaz.References [1] J. Mynderse, S. Arslan and L. Liu, "Using A Funded Capstone Project To Teach Fluid Power," ASME 2014 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, 2014.[2] J

Conference Session

Technical Session 12: Teaching and Learning

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nina Schiffeler, IMA - RWTH Aachen University; Valerie Stehling, RWTH Aachen University; Frank Hees, Cybernetics Lab IMA & IfU; Ingrid Isenhardt

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education

effect of AR on these aspects. The focus of this paper, however, isthe examination of the effect(s) of the collaborative AR app developed on the process of theteamwork in terms of communication and interaction. It aims at understanding to whichextent AR changes the way people communicate in collaborative settings, i.e. when theypursue a common goal. Moreover, the results of the study aim at identifyingrecommendations for action (e.g. for university teachers) in terms of the design ofcollaborative (learning) processes that will be enriched by AR.Tags: collaboration, Augmented Reality, communication, interaction, team1. Augmented Reality in collaborative learning1.1. Augmented RealityIn higher education, modern technological trends often find

Conference Session

ERM Technical Session 3: Working in Teams

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Saira Anwar, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Muhsin Menekse, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Asefeh Kardgar, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are thoseof the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of IES.References[1] X. Fan, W. Luo, M. Menekse, D. Litman, and J. Wang, “CourseMIRROR: Enhancing large classroom instructor-student interactions via mobile interfaces and natural language processing.” in Proceedings of ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2015), Seoul, Korea, 2015. pp. 1473–1478.[2] W. Luo and D. J. Litman, “Summarizing student responses to reflection prompts.,” in Proceedings of Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), Lisbon, Portugal, 2015. pp. 1955–1960.[3] W. Luo, X. Fan, M. Menekse, J. Wang, and D. J. Litman

Conference Session

ERM Technical Session 16: Faculty Development and Teaching Contexts

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Cassandra Sue Ellen Woodcock, University of Michigan; Nicole Erin Friend, University of Michigan; Aileen Huang-Saad, University of Michigan

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

traditional disciplines, including engineering and physical sciences,to perform research focused on the micro to macro-level fabrication and regeneration of tissues.While this field has continued to grow since the 1970’s [6], it faces challenges shared by otherinterdisciplinary fields when trying to develop and implement curriculum for interdisciplinaryprograms.Rapid growth in interdisciplinary fields and subsequently interdisciplinary academic programshas created programs with ill-defined disciplinary skills for students graduating from thoseprograms [7]. As a result, interdisciplinary engineering program graduates regularly pursuecareers outside of traditional engineering jobs [8], often making career trajectories unclear aftergraduation [9]. In an

Conference Session

Technical Session 3: The Best of Computers in Education

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alexander James Tuttle, University of Georgia; Siddharth Savadatti, University of Georgia; Kyle Johnsen, University of Georgia

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education

bematched. As a result, this added another dimension to the study (collaborative vs. alone).Two similar (and typical) engineering staticsproblems were chosen for this study. Termedthe ‘hinge’ and ‘anvil’ problems (Figure 8),they each involved determining the momentproduced by a force about a specified axis ona 3D structure. Each of the 11 sessions (8collaborative, 3 individual) involved solvingboth problems. For each session, one of thetwo problems had its measurements visible,while the other had them hidden to force theparticipant(s) to make use of the virtualmeasurement tool. Between the order ofsolving the problems (first and second) andthe availability of measurements (visible andhidden), there were four possiblepermutations for any given

Conference Session

Manufacturing Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Dave Kim, Washington State University, Vancouver; Jong-Hoon Kim, Washington State University

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

] university. University of This section (conclusion/summary) is a summary of In an online lab Minnesota the results and discussion from the report. It is still report writing Department of discussion, where you insert your opinion of the resource of a R1 Mechanical results. Report the key findings of the report here. It is university’s Engineering much like the results and discussion sections of the mechanical Student Writing abstract. Directly answer the report question here. Do engineering Guide [14] not be vague. program. Ringleb, S. I., Conclusions are logically tied to inquiry findings and In an engineering

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Robert C. Martin, Texas A&M University; Cynthia Lang, Texas A&M University; Sin-Ning Cindy Liu, Texas A&M University; Carolyn L Sandoval, University of California, San Diego; Mindy Bergman, Texas A&M University; Jeffrey E. Froyd, Ohio State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

, “Development of a Classification System for Engineering Student Characteristics Affecting College Enrollment and Retention,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 98, no. 4, pp. 361–376, October 2009.[7] M. Meyer, and S. Marx, “Engineering dropouts: A qualitative examination of why undergraduates leave engineering,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 103, no. 4, pp. 525-548, October 2014.[8] S. Haag, N. Hubele, A. Garcia and K. McBeath, “Engineering undergraduate attrition and contributing factors,” International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 929-940, October 2007.[9] K. L. Sutton, and C. Sankar, C, “Student satisfaction with information provided by academic advisors,” Journal of STEM Education

Conference Session

FOCUS ON EXHIBITS: Welcome Reception & NEW THIS YEAR! 2018 Best Division Paper Nominee Poster Session Sponsored by Engineering Unleashed

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Robert B Austin P.E., Bowling Green State University

Tagged Topics

ASEE Headquarters

development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55, 469-480.3. Austin, R. B. (2017) Reengineering BGSU’s Construction Management Capstone, 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Columbus, OH4. Berg, D., Manib, H.S., Marinakis, Y., Tierneyc, R. and Walsh, S. (2015) An introduction to Management of Technology pedagogy (andragogy). Technological Forecasting & Social Change 100 1–45. Berg, T., Erichsen, M. and Hokstad, L.F. (2016) Stuck at the Threshold, Which strategies do students choose when facing liminality with certain disciples at a business school?6. Chan, S. (2010) Applications of Andragogy in Multi-Disciplined Teaching and Learning, Journal of Adult Education Volume 39, Number 2

Conference Session

Communication Across the Divisions I

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kathryn A. Neeley, University of Virginia; Judith Shaul Norback, Georgia Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods, Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

differences in the trends emerging from the twogroups. Our analysis thus far suggests that trends tend to be common to both groups.Specifically, most of the trends emerging from Table 2 are replicated in Table 3 and vice versa.Table 2. Papers Presented in Divisions Other Than LEES Table&2.&PAPERS&PRESENTED&IN&DIVISIONS&OUTSIDE(OF(LEES& Division Number and Title of Session No. & Paper Title(s) & ID Numbers Non-LEES Sessions Position of Papers 1. Chemical Engineering W105 Communication in the 4 (entire • “Improving Student Technical

Conference Session

Capstone Design in ECE

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jeffrey Scott McGuirk Ph.D., United States Air Force Academy; John G. Ciezki, United States Air Force Academy

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer

Paper ID #14624An Electromagnetic Railgun Design and Realization for an Electrical Engi-neering Capstone ProjectLt. Col. Jeffrey Scott McGuirk Ph.D., United States Air Force Academy Jeffrey S. McGuirk received his BSEE degree in 1995 from the United States Air Force Academy (US- AFA) in Colorado Springs, CO, and an MSEE degree from Iowa State University in 1996. From 1997- 2000, he was with the Air Force Research Laboratory at Eglin Air Force Base where he designed fuzes for weapons. From 2000-2003, he was with the Air Force Operational Test and Evaluation Center where he directed tests on satellite communication systems

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 9: Evaluating and Measuring Recruiting and Major Selection Strategies

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jaqi C. McNeil, University of Louisville; Angela Thompson P.E., University of Louisville

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

interested in. This was done over two class periods. Almost all the ofcomments about time were negative, ranging from the presentations being too short (, or therewasn’t enough time to answer questions or students felt rushed. One student seemed to enjoy thepresentations but thought they should be longer, “It would have been helpful if the presentationswere a little longer because some of the speakers had a lot of great info in their presentations butcouldn't get through all of it because of the time constraints” (DP196). Some students wantedone-on-one time with the department presenters, “I have considered switching majors but theydon't give you enough time to talk one on one to the presenters about what it mean(s) to switchor compare the 2 fields

Conference Session

Student and Other Views on Engineering Leadership

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sara Jansen Perry, Baylor University; Emily M Hunter, Baylor University; Ed Frauenheim, Great Place to Work Institute; Steven C. Currall, Southern Methodist University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development Division

, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.2. Washington Post (2014, January 28). Full transcript: Obama’s 2014 State of the Union address, accessed January 31, 2014. http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/full-text-of-obamas-2014-state-of-the-union- address/2014/01/28/e0c93358-887f-11e3-a5bd-844629433ba3_story.html3. Engineering Research Centers. “Summary of ERC Study Findings 2001-2008,” accessed April 24, 2013. http://www.erc-assoc.org/studies_and_reports.4. Roessner, D., Manrique, L., & Park, J. (2010). The economic impact of Engineering Research Centers: Preliminary results of a pilot study. Journal of Technology Transfer, 35, 475-493.5. Currall, S. C., Hammer, T. H., Baggett, L. S., & Doniger, G. M. (1999). Combining qualitative and

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session II

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Milo Koretsky, Oregon State University; Michelle Kay Bothwell, Oregon State University; Susan Bobbitt Nolen, University of Washington; Devlin Montfort, Oregon State University; James D. Sweeney, Oregon State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

developments. In Design research on learning and thinking in educational settings: Enhancing intellectual growth and functioning. London: Taylor & Francis, 2012.8. Barrows, H. S., & Tamblyn, R. M. (1980). Problem-based learning: An approach to medical education. New York: Springer.9. Barrows, H. S. (1985). How to design a problem-based learning curriculum for the preclinical years. New York: Springler-Verlag.10. Smith, K. A., Sheppard, S. D., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2005). Pedagogies of engagement: Classroom‐based practices. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 87-101.11. Woods, D. R. 1994. Problem-based learning: How to gain the most from PBL. Waterdown, Ontario: Donald R. Woods.12. Woods

Conference Session

Solid and Structural Mechanics in Aerospace Engineering

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David C. Fleming, Florida Institute of Technology

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Aerospace

machine. The testing machine is pre-programmed to execute constant amplitude loadingunder load control conditions. Figure 3: Installation of fatigue test specimen in servohydraulic testing machineResults for fatigue life in general strongly depend on the load levels experienced. Given the timelimitations, a single load range is used for all test samples. (In a materials rather than astructures lab, variations in fatigue life due to different stress amplitudes can be explored in thecontext of a rotating beam test to generate a S-N curve.) The peak amplitude of stress was set toprovide an estimated run time of about 30 minutes for the specimens with a circular hole. Thisresulted in a maximum load of 1788 lb (7.95 kN), corresponding to a

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session I

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mary E. Besterfield-Sacre, University of Pittsburgh; Larry J. Shuman, University of Pittsburgh; Cheryl Matherly; Gisele Ragusa, University of Southern California; Lisa Benson, Clemson University

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

Education, 8(1).9. Machotka, M. and S. Spodek (2002). “Study Abroad: Preparing Engineering Students for Success in the Global Economy,” (CD) Proceedings, 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Conference.10. Besterfield-Sacre, M., Matherly, C., G. Ragusa, L. Howard, and L.J. Shuman. “Assessing the Spectrum of International Undergraduate Engineering Education Experiences,” 2013 ASEE International Forum, Atlanta, GA, June 22, 2013.11. S. Huang, S. Levonisova, Streiner, S., S. Cunningham, G. Ragusa, M. Besterfield-Sacre, L. Shuman, C. Matherly, and D. Kotys-Schwartz, “Exploring Engineering Education in Broader Context: A Framework of Engineering Global Preparedness,” 2014 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Indianapolis

Conference Session

NSF Grantees’ Poster Session

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Seda McKIlligan, Iowa State University; Shanna R. Daly, University of Michigan; Colleen M. Seifert, University of Michigan; Richard Gonzalez, University of Michigan; Colin M. Gray, Iowa State University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

. International Studies of Management and Organization, 1976. 6: p. 45-63.12. Perkins, D., Creativity’s camel: The role of analogy in invention, in Creative Thought, T. Ward, S. Smith, and J. Vaid, Editors. 1997, American Psychological Association: Washington, DC. p. 523-528.13. Zwicky, F., Discovery, invention, reserach through the morphological approach. 1969, New York, NY: Macmillan.14. Gordon, W.J.J., Synectics. 1961, New York: Harper & Row.15. de Bono, E., Six thinking hats. 1999: Back Bay Books.16. Finke, R.A., T.B. Ward, and S.M. Smith, Creative cognition: Theory, research, and applications. 1992, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.17. Eberle, B., Scamper. 1995, Waco, Texas: Prufrock.18. Altshuller, G

Conference Session

Discussions on Research Methodology: ERM Roundtable

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brent K Jesiek, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Sang Eun Woo, Purdue University; Qin Zhu, Purdue University; Kavitha D Ramane, Purdue University ; Neha Choudhary, Purdue University Programs

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

questions.While we are just launching our validation effort, it is worth commenting on some criticalmethodological issues related to the two main approaches we are now pursuing. The firstapproach is among the most widely used for scoring SJT items. It involves utilizing a smallgroup of SMEs (i.e., job incumbents with extensive global experience) who identify best andworst options, or rate each response option on a continuum using a Likert-type scale (e.g., from1=least desirable behavior/action to 5=most desirable behavior/action). A test-taker’s answerswill then be compared to the SME ratings; the more similarities between SME ratings and thetest-taker’s answers, the higher scores s/he would receive. This presumes that responses collectedfrom SMEs

Conference Session

Reimagining Engineering Information Literacy: Novel Perspectives on Integration, Assessment, Competencies & Information Use

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Laura Robinson Hanlan, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; Evelyn M Riley, Worcester Polytechnic Institute

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Libraries

(s) of studyand completed in the final year of the undergraduate degree. The three projects may becompleted off-campus at global projects centers, which accounts for WPI being recognized in theU.S.A. for sending more engineering undergraduates abroad than any other school. Moststudents who choose to go away do so for the IQP project, and complete projects sponsoredmainly by governmental and non-governmental organizations, and advised by WPI faculty on-site at the project centers.WPI has a population of 4100 undergraduates, 32% of whom are female. Students come from 47states and 71 countries. Seventy-one percent of students major in a choice of more than tenengineering majors, including the U.S.A.’s first undergraduate major in robotics

Conference Session

Engineering Economics Teaching Tools

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ted Eschenbach P.E., University of Alaska Anchorage; Neal A Lewis, University of Bridgeport

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Economy

beyond thesimple price indices. Note that both price and total return versions of the Dow Jones and the S&P500 indices are available. Only total return versions should be used. We note that the S&P 500and the Russell 1000 are generally regarded as better measures than the Dow Jones, as theyinclude more firms and they weight them by their capitalization or float, rather than simplyaveraging the stock market prices of 30 firms as does the Dow Jones with a divisor calculated tomaintain historical continuity.A Realistic and Valuable Bond and Stock PortfolioWe want to build a portfolio that is a combination of assets in order to manage the risk and returnof the entire portfolio. In general, we want to maximize the return while minimizing the

Conference Session

Assessment of Engineering Leadership Skills

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Doug Reeve P.Eng., University of Toronto; Cindy Rottmann, University of Toronto, ILead; Robin Sacks, University of Toronto

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development Division

strongleaders and strong engineers.T ABLE  1 :  S AMPLE  S URVEY  Q UESTIONS  Survey Sample Question Focus CodesectionPart 1: Age: 20-29; 30-39; 40-49; 50-59; 60+ Self Demographics (AgeDemographics Category)Part 2: As a student, when dreaming about my future, I Self Time (student)Student imagined doing technically complex work. Situationexperiences (1 never, 2 rarely, 3 occasionally, 4 frequently, 5 (aspiration/satisfaction

Conference Session

Teaching and Learning Strategies I

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alison B. Hoxie, University of Minnesota Duluth; Thomas Shepard, University of St. Thomas; Robert Feyen, University of Minnesota Duluth

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

  0.86   0.00   0.80   0.71   0.00   helping me to understand the material.   3. The course format/delivery -1.13   0.73   0.00   -0.57   1.01   0.01   method encouraged cheating.   4. I enjoyed the course. 0.37   0.89     0.03   0.50   0.78   0.00   5. I was interested in the material 0.80   0.81   0.00   1.07   0.78   0.00   presented.   6. It would bother me if other 0.57   1.04   0.01   0.63   1.13   0.01   student(s) cheated during this course

Conference Session

Survey and Assessment Development

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jessica Menold Menold, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Kathryn W. Jablokow, Pennsylvania State University, Great Valley; Senay Purzer, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Daniel Michael Ferguson, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Matthew W. Ohland, Purdue University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

methods include the use of content experts, reviews of existinginstruments, and lists of behaviors and descriptors commonly associated with the construct(s) wewish to assess. Unfortunately, however, item creation sometimes becomes overly dependentupon a researcher’s personal attitudes about the construct(s) being tested, or on “borrowing”items from other instruments that may or may not be sound measures of the construct(s) ofinterest. These risks are particularly likely for new researchers in engineering education, whomay have little experience with best practices in social science research.One way to support best practices in the development of new surveys and assessments is to usean instrument blueprint to guide the creation of items, as well

Conference Session

New Engineering Educators Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ralph Ocon, Purdue University, Calumet

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

humor by an instructor is 1.60 1.58 1.68 typically a waste of classroom time. 5. I feel more comfortable asking an 3.83 4.25 4.43 instructor a question if s/he uses humor in the classroom. 6. An instructor’s job is to teach, not 2.83 2.33 2.75 entertain. 7. I would rather have an instructor try to be 4.14 4.17 4.00 humorous and fail rather than not try to be humorous at all. 8. I am sometimes offended by the uses of 1.43 1.79 1.72 humor by an instructor. 9. I am likely to go to class where the 4.13 4.30 4.50 instructor uses some humor. 10. An instructor doesn’t have to use humor 3.96 3.42 3.50 to be an

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 1: It's All About Teams and Teamwork

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nick Tatar, Olin College of Engineering; Kevin A. Nguyen, Texas Tech University; Chris Gewirtz, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

.”Perspective Respect does not just “When you talk they will listen. They respect your happen ideas, so be willing to admit your flaws because other[s] might not.”ConclusionEngineering Student Reflection Based on our findings we believe engineering students learn a great deal aboutthemselves and their teams when they have time to reflect on those experiences. A larger samplesize may be required to satisfactorily tell whether or not there actually is a difference betweenprompts that are used to promote learning and the possible differences in gender ratings suggeststhe need for further research and confirmation in that area. Though the assignment

Conference Session

Two-year College Division: Authors Address Transfer Matters-Part I

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sarah Cooley Jones, Louisiana State University; Warren N. Waggenspack Jr., Louisiana State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Two Year College Division

Paper ID #12213BRCC to LSU Engineering Pathway to SuccessMrs. Sarah Cooley Jones, Louisiana State UniversityDr. Warren N. Waggenspack Jr., Louisiana State University Page 26.288.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 BRCC to LSU Engineering Pathways to SuccessABSTRACTThe National Science Foundation (NSF) S-STEM funded scholarship program, EngineeringPathway to Success, is a joint effort of the College of Engineering at Louisiana State University(LSU) and Baton Rouge Community College (BRCC), and it