study of the internal combustion engine. Whatwere the key elements in presenting this subject that caused a reasonably deep understanding to take root inthe mind of a 13 year old boy. Was it the verbal description of the characteristics of piston rings? Or the playby play description of the four cycles; intake, compression, power and exhaust? I am sure that these elementscontributed to my understanding but when I recall that lesson, the picture in my mind is not of the teachertalking or the overhead slides but rather of seeing an actual engine block with the crank rotating, the pistonmoving, etc. This is what defined the elements of the system in my mind. And yet memorizing the motion ofeach element was worth little without understanding the
Option 4: Engineering Survey Courses: Introduction to Electrical and Computer Engineering, etc. 26Option 2:An Introduction to Engineering Engineering habits of mind, and basic elements of Engineering Design Process and Systems Thinking • Grand Challenges are used to connect students to societal problems. Engineering analysis, visualization tools, and a Survey of various engineering disciplines • All engineering disciplines… 27College Board would like to conduct another surveyof Engineering DeansNeed at least 100 Deans to attest to placement and credit What would universities be most favorable to in terms of placement and credit? • Option 2: Introduction to
Science in Energy and Environmental Design (SEED) Renewable Energy Storage (RESTOR) FY 2011 Engineering Multicellular and Interkingdom Signaling (MIKS); Mind, Machines, and Motor Control (M3C) FY ‘12,’13 Flexible Bioelectronics Systems (BioFlex), Origami Design for the Integration Of Self-assembling Systems For Engineering Innovation (ODISSEI); Photosynthetic Biorefineries (PSBR)• TOPIC LEADERS - Program Directors from ENG Divisions in collaboration with PDs from other NSF Directorates and other Federal agencies when appropriate http://nsf.gov/staff/staff_list.jsp?org=EFRI&from_org=EFRI]• CONTACT - Rosemarie D
building. However, while theorganizational cultures may be different, there are common elements that characterize effectiveleadership, according to Covey1. For example, he has identified seven habits of highly effectivepeople. These include: 1. Be Proactive: Principles of Personal Vision; 2. Begin with the End in Mind: Principles of Personal Leadership; 3. Put First Things First: Principles of Personal Management; Page 9.844.2 4. Think Win/Win: Principles of Interpersonal Leadership; “Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004
accommodates sophisticated knowledgebeliefs. Furthermore, epistemologies also vary across national and cultural contexts,33 suggestingthat global competency requires understanding that others have different epistemologies. Theconstruct of global competency is clearly epistemological, but exact relationships between thetwo have not yet been investigated.Empirical Inspiration for Theoretical ExplorationSince 2011, we have been conducting interviews with twenty-seven current and former civilengineering students at a public university in the United States. Participants were students fromtheir sophomore year of university through their first year as practicing engineers. The study wasnot originally designed with global competency in mind: its salience for
trained in theory and classical solutions will be a much wiser user ofengineering software and a better engineer. We conclude with a quote from a survey completedby a practicing engineer: “Having been away from academia for 20 years now, I’ve lost theoryand classical solutions ability. The refresher was valuable. With those in mind, the computersolutions fall together and speak for themselves.”Bibliography1. Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET). (2003). “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs,” (http://www.abet.org/criteria.html).2. National Society of Professional Engineers (NSPE). (1997). Engineering Licensure Laws: A state-by-state summary and analysis, NSPE, Alexandria, Va.3. Lawson, W. D. (2002). “In
Tennessee in Knoxville, Tennessee Jul 30GIFTS: Metacognition reflection notecard - A 5-minute daily class activity to driveself-efficacy, classroom engagement, and communityIn the last five minutes of my first-year engineering class sessions, I hand out notecards and askeach student to write their responses to three simple but powerful questions:Question 1: What's the most important concept you learned today that you want to remember?Question 2: Is anything unclear to you after today's class? Are there any outstanding questionsstill on your mind?Question 3: What is one song you'd like to be added to our class playlist? Include your name ifyou want credit for your song choice.I review student responses at the
integrating cutting-edge technologies into industrial automation. Inaddition, this project is designed to assist engineering technology students learn the integration ofmechatronic system components, robot programming fundamentals, articulated robotconfigurations and movements, and the evolution of human–robot collaboration in modernindustry.IntroductionThe integration of the electrical activities of the human brain with electromechanical devices todevelop mind-controlled systems has become one of the most cutting-edge research topics in thefields of neuroscience, biomechatronics, human-computer interaction, robotics, and fourthindustrial revolution known as Industry 4.0. This interdisciplinary effort brings together expertsfrom different domains to
Engineering Connection. Identify and describe how you will explicitly address theways in which your lesson or activity is representative of the processes, habits of mind andpractices used by engineers, or is demonstrative of work in specific engineering fields.i At leastone of those must be within the first four listed, below; i.e., do not only check “other”. Check allthat apply: x Use of an engineering design process that has at least one iteration/improvement x Attention to specific engineering habits of mind x Attention to engineering practices (as described in the NGSS/Framework and as practiced by engineers) Attention to specific engineering careers or fields related to the lesson/activity
team player?The attributes that will make a team successful encompass the following:• Creativity• Willingness to listen, speak, and question• Follow through• Responsibility• Aptitude to work• Leadership qualities but ability to followWith these thoughts in mind the College of Engineering at Michigan State University decidedthat a program would be instituted to bring select freshmen together and prepare them for theirentrance into the university and the College of Engineering. The thought was to develop in thema sense of comaraderie that reflected the team approach to all things. As a team they wouldattend classes, study together, live together, and approach problems together as a team.The Residential Option for Science and Engineering Students
is required but also no knowledge of engineering is acquired either.Characteristics of a Framework for Explaining How Things WorkDevelopment of an easily-used framework or approach for understanding technology would helpto promote technological literacy. Since engineering is the profession whose primary purpose isthe creation of new technology, this framework should reflect a characteristically engineeringway of thinking. Engineers must use some ways of thinking or habits of mind that are unique to Page 15.1324.6the discipline. The framework for understanding technology might be found in the question“What does it mean to think like an
broad education necessary tounderstand the impact of engineering solutions in a global and societal context.”2 In response, thecivil engineering program at UE has as one of its published program outcomes the following:“Students will understand the importance of involving the public in civil engineering projects.”A survey of the literature reveals that other civil engineering programs have recognized the needfor public-minded students. McCuen3 has implemented a one-credit course open to students inthe Engineering Honors Program at the University of Maryland focusing primarily on the issue ofleadership. The course has one lecture on public policy-making and uses papers by Tribe4 andSchott5 as foundational readings. Cleary and Sun6 at Rowan
. Learn table/dining etiquette Financial Security 1. Can meet living expenses. 2. Can meet academic expenses Engineering Self- 1. Believe they belong in an engineering/engineering technology Efficacy program. 2. Believe they will be successful engineers in the futureFigure 1: Targeted and Self-Directed Learning Based on Research Variables and Knowles et al.'s (2015) Andragogical Concepts (Bullington et al., 2021)The next six sections break down findings by each of the project variables.CamaraderieParticipants responded that having opportunities to meet people like themselves, other SVMS,was extremely important. They explained that meeting like-minded peers helped
engineering area. The Foundation Coalition has stated,“Curriculum integration implies restructuring learning activities to help students buildconnections between topics. A seminal study by Seymour and Hewitt concludes that one of thereasons students leave science and engineering is that they lose interest. Building connectionsand establishing greater relevance is important.”Since it appears that little is being done to acquaint students with the actual importance of theseearly courses with their future work, one would feel that any effort to provide connections wouldimprove the current status of career development services. Many students enter Michigan StateUniversity with engineering in general or a specific engineering program in mind. They come
application of individual research methods [5; 17].With these characteristics of the field of engineering education research in mind, the goal at theoutset of this project was to build on an initial theoretical understanding of research quality withthe view to developing a quality framework that reflects the practices of engineering educationresearchers. This goal was to be achieved through two streams (see below) of integrated datagathering and educational workshops and the qualitative analysis of the data using iterativecoding methods of constant comparison [19; 20; 21; 22; 23]. Page 26.303.2 Stream A: In-depth longitudinal workshops
Saturday, June 13, 2015 8:00 A.M. – 5:00 P.M. Sheraton Seattle | Seattle | WAAuthentic Engineering Connection. Identify and describe how you will explicitly address theways in which your lesson or activity is representative of the processes, habits of mind andpractices used by engineers, or is demonstrative of work in specific engineering fields.i At leastone of those must be within the first four listed, below; i.e., do not only check “other”. Check allthat apply: Use of an engineering design process that has at least one iteration/improvement Attention to specific engineering habits of mind Attention to engineering practices (as described in the NGSS
solutions in the developing world. Mark has experiences as a teacher, researcher, engineer, social entrepreneur, and in higher education program management. He earned his PhD in Engineering Education at ASU and also has a BS/MS in Biomedical Engineering. Mark’s research interests revolve around developing engineers capable of leading and enacting positive change on their communities. His research explores the topics of entrepreneurial mindset, innovation, well-being, leadership, interpersonal skills, and other 21st century competencies. Mark has experiences in teaching and mentoring engineering students in human-centered design, social entrepreneurship, hu- manitarian engineering, leadership, and mindfulness
more diligent attention to engineering education and what is expected in the profession.Why Change?The old axiom, “Don’t fix it if it isn’t broke” is often on the minds of those considering howmuch education/learning is the minimum for engineering practice at the professional level.Those of us who are educators constantly look at what is best for our students over their entirecareers. Professional societies must look at what is needed to determine how its future memberswill be best served. That is what ASCE is doing in its Policy Statement 465 AcademicPrerequisites for Licensure and Professional Practice initiative. The policy states the following:“The ASCE supports the concept of the master’s degree or equivalent (MOE) as a prerequisitefor
might be building with absurdity, like a fire-breathing octopus,communing with like-minded quirky people via the internet, using “alternative energy” to comeup with out-of-the-box ideas, or hacking your GE appliances to make breakfast when your alarmgoes off. In an engineering space, it could be creating surprise and delight for a user group,applying aesthetic flourishes, brainstorming wild and crazy ideas, with non-yellow Post-Its, orapplying a design challenge prompt in form of “design for the future of X.” A key considerationis that play can be seen as frivolous and undermining rigor, rather than an opportunity to convertinterest and passion into invention.Risk TakingMakers can treat failure as a badge of honor and admission into their
Wayne State University, • History of technology at the University of South Florida, • Business law at Milwaukee School of Engineering, • Team leadership and facilitation at North Carolina ATSU and Milwaukee School of Engineering, • Reliability at Cal State Hayward, • Cognitive engineering at Ohio State University, • Fuzzy logic at SUNY-Binghamton, and • Entrepreneurship at South Dakota School of Mines and Technology.ConclusionsAs a faculty member, I sometimes feel that the field is dominated by large research baseddepartments. I believe we should keep in mind that only 66% of the IE programs are indepartments that grant the Ph.D., and over half of IE faculty members are in departments thathave 14 or fewer faculty
Wayne State University, • History of technology at the University of South Florida, • Business law at Milwaukee School of Engineering, • Team leadership and facilitation at North Carolina ATSU and Milwaukee School of Engineering, • Reliability at Cal State Hayward, • Cognitive engineering at Ohio State University, • Fuzzy logic at SUNY-Binghamton, and • Entrepreneurship at South Dakota School of Mines and Technology.ConclusionsAs a faculty member, I sometimes feel that the field is dominated by large research baseddepartments. I believe we should keep in mind that only 66% of the IE programs are indepartments that grant the Ph.D., and over half of IE faculty members are in departments thathave 14 or fewer faculty
, college cumulative GPA, and motivation tobe positively correlated with enrollment in engineering. Tyson18 examined student grades inPhysics and Calculus courses and found indications that low grades in these courses couldpredict a student leaving engineering. However, he also correlated earning an A in Calculus IIwith switching from engineering to computer science18. With these college and engineeringretention and dropout factors in mind, we present an initial method for identifying potential riskfactors for overpersistence.MethodSample. The sample for this initial study comes from a single land grant institution in thesoutheast over the period 1987-2004. Once a procedure is established, it will be applied to morerecent data. We use six-year
instructors to assess that students have enoughknowledge to pass onto the next stage, avoiding the risk of having external factors thatmight help students excessively [1]. A problem of traditional exams is that they cangenerate an excess of stress and anxiety on students, reducing their academicperformance [2]–[5]. It is common to have students complain after exams, explainingthat their performance was bad because their minds went blank [1]. However, forengineering students, most of the exams are traditional (individual, time-limited, closed-book). This is even the case in post-graduation exams such as the fundamentals ofengineering and the professional engineering exam [6].From early courses (e.g., math, chemistry, physics) in engineering programs
, College of Engineering and Computer Science, Florida Atlantic University, St. Lucie Campus, Port St. Lucie, FL Contact Information: Ravi Shankar, shankar@fau.edu, (561) 297-3470 589AbstractWe offer a compelling vision for bringing together like-minded faculty members across our severaluniversity campuses and colleges, to develop smart phone/ mobile applications in domains that areunderrepresented but have substantial potential to succeed, with social, economic, or technologicalimpact. A university is uniquely qualified to address such Apps given the close proximity of experts innon-overlapping and distinct fields. However, the close proximity is offset by silos built
AC 2012-3119: SUPPORTING SELF-AUTHORSHIP DEVELOPMENT: THECONTRIBUTION OF PREPAREDNESS PORTFOLIOSMs. Brook Sattler, University of Washington Brook Sattler is a Ph.D. candidate in the Department of Human Centered Design & Engineering at the University of Washington. Her dissertation focuses on mechanisms for supporting engineering student development, specifically self-authorship.Dr. Jennifer A. Turns, University of WashingtonMs. Kathryn Ann Mobrand, University of Washington Kathryn Mobrand is a doctoral candidate in the Human Centered Design & Engineering Department at UW. She investigates engineering undergraduates’ conceptions of the communication they will engage in as practicing engineers
approach to inquiry.Five (5) male junior and senior electrical engineering students who had taken at least two electriccircuit courses participated in this study. The participants were asked open-ended questions viathink-aloud protocol to explain real-world electrical incidents. They were expected to verbalizetheir thought process and learning of circuit concepts. The analysis was guided by the skills aspectof the engineering habits of mind framework, where students use mental models and toolsnecessary to make educated choices and use approaches to thinking when solving problems insimilar or new contexts. All participants generally used mental tools associated with electric circuittheory, which indicated that students use mathematical models and
classroom, it is important for STOMP students to understand thecurriculum standards outlined for the appropriate grade level, and subsequently highlight thoseconcepts in the classroom projects. As the standards for each age vary, the one concept that isconsistent for all ages is the engineering design process. The classroom projects are executed inthis structured process, so that the students develop the habit of (1) identifying the problem/task;(2) outlining/designing the solution on paper; (3) constructing and testing the solution; (4)analyzing the results of the tests, and then discussing how to make improvements for futuredesigns. With these four steps in mind, the teacher and STOMP student can require the kids tokeep an engineering log, where
venue proved to be very successful. As thesaying goes, “the proof of the pudding is in the eating”. Informal course evaluations werecompleted by participating students, the positive results of which are provided at the end of thispaper. Keep in mind that the facilities used for this experimental lab were limited in size and thuslimited to the number of students that were allowed to participate.DESIGNING A SECOND INDUSTRIAL CONTROL SYSTEMS COURSEFollowing the administration of the first course described above, additional equipment donationsto the School of Engineering Technology required that a second more advanced ICS course bedeveloped. The following is a brief description of this second course and the participation andinfluence that
) • Lists (Word Processing – bullets and lists, Mind map, Web publishing – personal web page, blog journal, wall wisher, post it notes) Bookmarking internet browsers using favorites and bookmarks, web 2.0 tools del.icio.us & diigo • Basic Searches - search engines, (Google, excite, ask, yahoo, metacrawler etc.) library catalogue, ClearinghousesKeywords: Recognizing, Listing, Describing, Identifying, Retrieving, Naming, Locating, Finding, Bullet pointing,Highlighting, Bookmarking, Social networking, Social bookmarking, Favorite/local bookmarking, Searching,GooglingFurther details for the cognitive processes entitled Understand, Apply, Analyze, Evaluate, andCreate can be found in Curches9. Activities performed by
participants were university graphics instructors with a variety of academic andindustrial backgrounds.I. IntroductionMuch research has been done to assess how the human mind operates, how it perceives and Page 10.153.1processes information. These individual learning differences are referred to as “learning styles” “Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Education”(Butler, 1987). As a result, many learning models have been developed by which an individual’sstyle of learning can be assessed. Educators can begin