summer of2022, several major airlines in the United States canceled a record number of scheduled flights orran delayed due to the same reason [1]. A unique approach adopted by the airlines to address thischallenge is to look for non-traditional sources such as retired military and veteran rotary wingpilots. This led to a growing shortage of helicopter pilots in the medical transport and offshore oilsupport industries [2]. This challenge also opens new opportunities and career pathways forveterans. Additionally, special training and experience requirements for certificated flightinstructors (CFIs) to be able to provide flight instruction in the Robinson R22 and R44 variantsmake it cost-prohibitive for most military helicopter instructors to
valuable learning in the classroom for students. The course content canbecome integrated with more real-world examples so students can directly apply concepts andtheories learned in the classroom to industry, which gives them a better understanding of thematerial while simultaneously preparing them for the workforce [5].IABs are sometimes used to provide opportunities for students to benefit through offeringinternships and employment opportunities. The Structural Design, Construction, and EngineeringTechnology Advisory Board at Penn State Harrisburg [6] emphasizes networking betweenexternal professionals and students at specific career job fairs, through guest speaking in-classlectures, and assistance on field trips. The result is consistent
6 3 0 Figure 5: Literature Representation of Facility Engineering DisciplinesThe built environment is supported by organizations in the delivery of facility engineering. Theseorganizations can be a crucial resource for engineering educators to fuse career pathways forstudents. Industry affiliations and organizations supporting the facility engineering profession arepresented in Table 2.Table 2: Organizations Representation of Facility Engineering Disciplines Facility Engineering Discipline Organization A C E M S T EM AIA (American Institute of
engineering education. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Analyzing the Needs of Engineering Teaching Assistants: Examining Hidden Deficit IdeasIntroductionThe lack of preparation of graduate students for the professoriate has been documented bydifferent scholars [1, 2]. It is well known that graduate education prepares students to pursuedifferent career paths [1], but a large majority of engineering graduate students will followprimarily corporate and industry positions while a small percentage will chase faculty careers[3]. According to Choe and Borrego [3], doctoral international engineering students are morelikely to pursue an academic career. Nonetheless, it
academic, social, and economic support.The expected outcome of the SD-FIRST program is to achieve a sustainable increased retentionand graduation rate, and an increase in emotional intelligence for students participating in theprogram. The initial cohort of SD-FIRST scholars began in the fall 2021 semester, and thedetails of the program as well as initial implementation are included in this paper.Introduction and MotivationThe higher education system can be nebulous – from entrance to graduation, processes involvedwith financial aid, work study, faculty office hours, forming student connections, career fairs,and more can be intimidating for many students. For first-generation students, whose familymembers have no or limited experience with the
solutions.The entry courses along with the collaborative courses build a learning sequence that leads to a minordegree in design and innovation. While minor degrees are not novel, it was found that the programminghad to be linked to something of recognizable/tangible value to students. Through student and advisorinterviews, it was found that advising programs are automated to direct students toward “checking boxes”for a plan of study without consideration of the nuances of different types of learning opportunities. Themain goal of pursuing higher education for students is to essentially receive credentials that have value forfuture careers. So, it is important to understand the degree planning systems and use them to enablestudents to get more out of
Artificial Intelligence (AI). Her career in higher education began at Howard University as the first Black female fac- ulty member in the Department of Computer Science. Her professional experience also includes Winthrop University, The Aerospace Corporation, and IBM. She is a graduate of Johnson C. Smith University (B.S., ’00) and North Carolina State University (M.S., ’02; Ph.D., ’05), becoming the first Black woman to earn a Ph.D. in computer science at the university and 2019 Computer Science Hall of Fame Inductee.Shaundra Bryant Daily, Duke University Shaundra B. Daily is a professor of practice in Electrical and Computer Engineering & Computer Sci- ence at Duke University and Levitan Faculty Fellow, Special
University (PSU) in 2010 and 2012, respectively. Dr. Ashour was the inaugural re- cipient of William and Wendy Korb Early Career Professorship in Industrial Engineering in 2016. Dr. Ashour’s research areas include data-driven decision-making, modeling and simulation, data analytics, immersive technologies, and process improvement. He contributed to research directed to improve design and engineering education.Dr. Daniel Knight, University of Colorado, Boulder Daniel W. Knight is the Program Assessment and Research Associate at Design Center (DC) Colorado in CUˆa C™s Department of Mechanical Engineering at the College of Engineering and Applied Science. He holds a B.A. in psychology from Louisiana State Universit
practice. Leaders in industry and government began to recognize this in the 1980sand 1990s [1] [2], and major employers, spearheaded by Boeing, made concerted efforts duringthis time to pressure universities into better equipping engineering students with skills codifiedas most valuable for career-readiness [3].Tensions between industry needs and higher education came to a head in the mid-1990s when“American industry successfully lobbied the National Science Foundation to fund reform ofeducation” and influenced the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) tooverhaul the basis for accreditation in 1996 with Engineering Criteria 2000 (EC2000) [4].Although EC2000 has been mostly successful in improving engineering education, the
, persistence, and career trajectories; engineering writing and communication; and methodological development. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Capturing attrition decisions in engineering graduate students using longitudinal SMS dataKeywords: Attrition, longitudinal study, SMS (Short Message Service), time series dataAbstractThis research paper reports results from a longitudinal Short Message Service (SMS) text messagesurvey study that captured attrition decisions from engineering graduate students who decided toleave their Ph.D. program or change degree objectives from Ph.D. to M.S. (Master’s-leveldeparture). While past research has investigated doctoral attrition across disciplines to
of 2020 report [5, p. 125], noting “The questionsof… how much specialization there should be at the undergraduate level, how to preparestudents for careers that include both technical and managerial tracks, and how to meet the needsand expectations of society all seem timeless.” This tension is echoed in a more recent 2018NAE report [6]. Bear and Skorton [7] state, “the notion that disciplinary specialization andtechnical depth are the only important prerequisites for employment turns out to be false.” Kingand Pister [8] also advocate for broadening engineering Bachelor’s degrees, and present a varietyof ideas to achieve this aim.According to data from the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) [9] only asmall number of students
%) strongly agreed or somewhat agreed that pairprogramming helped to prepare them for their future career. Most students (69%) always workedremotely, compared to 30% who worked partially or completely in-person. Finally, 74% ofstudents strongly agreed or agreed that they would prefer to self-select their programmingpartner, although there were a few who wanted to be assigned a partner.Fig. 1. Pair Programming Survey ResultsPairs were similar with respect to whether they 1) found pair programming helpful, 2) enjoyedpair programming, 3) believed pair programming prepared them for exams, 4) believed pairprogramming prepared them for their future careers, and 5) would prefer to self-select their pairprogramming partner. However, there were significant
veterans. We highlighted the critical role of facultymentors in serving as a protective buffer for student veterans of color. The results from this studyprovide pragmatic implications for university stakeholders committed to developing a genuinelyveteran-friendly community in STEM graduate programs. IntroductionOver the past few decades, the science and technology sector has drawn great public attention aspeople witness its visible impact on society and everyday lives. The rapid development of globalscientific and technological developments also fueled the proliferation of STEM (science,technology, engineering, and mathematics) careers and STEM education. The nation expects asignificant increase in the
communities,we agree to endure the obvious lack of racial and gendered representation [6], the “not so micro”microaggressions [7], and the turmoil of systemic racism [8] because we aim for a higherpurpose. However, what happens when systemic racism and socialized practices [8] startchipping away out our confidence [9], our sense of belonging [10], [11], or emotional and mentalwell-being [12], and our scholarly development? What happens when the very thing that bringsyou such pain and distress is the fabric of what engineering doctoral education is made of? Whathappens when you are spirit-murdered and it causes you to become a fraction of your formerself, all in pursuit of an academic degree and professional career. The concept of spirit
student populations (especially first-generation students) whohave not historically entered careers in nuclear-related industries. Therefore, the project-basedlearning program presents an opportunity for education and training for students as part of thenuclear workforce development efforts.Several years ago, WCU joined with Consortium of Universities for Sustainable Power (CUSP)as part of a country-wide partnership lead by University of Minnesota to attract and trainstudents into careers in sustainable power. An engineering major with electrical powerconcentration was developed under the engineering program through which students could takevarious courses at WCU and to address the regional needs. To encourage interest in careers innuclear power
student retention. They found that academicsupport and career counseling can have a big impact on self-efficacy and retention. Xu [10]found that academic integration (participation in organized academic activities with peers,working with students outside class, interacting with faculty outside class concerningcoursework) was one of the strongest indicators of student retention in STEM majors.Zimmerman [11] found that students with high levels of self-efficacy work harder, participate inclass, persist longer, and have fewer negative reactions when they encounter difficulties in theirmajor. Lent and Hackett [12] found that self-efficacy has a positive impact on the educational aswell as career choices among these students.Disciplinary IdentityGee
and Education from American University in 2016 and his BA in International Affairs from the University of Colorado, Boulder in 2006.Ms. Rebecca Z. Kenemuth, University of Maryland, College Park Rebecca Kenemuth is the Assistant Director of Recruitment and Outreach for the Women in Engineering Program at the University of Maryland. She holds an M.A. in Counseling and Personnel Services from the University of Maryland and is passionate about empowering girls and women to pursue careers in STEM-related fields.Dr. Elizabeth Kurban, University of Maryland, College Park Elizabeth Kurban serves as the Assistant Director of Retention for the Women in Engineering Program at the University of Maryland Clark School of
useful, compared to what they see and think when it's a male and a white male technology.”It should be noted that one of the participants did not report encountering exclusionary orharmful day to day practices in academia and entrepreneurial spaces. Dr. S explained how shebenefitted intellectually and career-wise from being situated in environments that recognized theimportance of diversity. She commented, “There are things that were different from when I came from my PhD, like I said, is that it was a much more diverse and highly interdisciplinary environment. So, I had to just develop new skills, especially in terms of how to work with people and people with different personalities, much larger groups.”This
c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Paper ID #33313retention and career readiness, as well as (c) students’ ethical reasoning and technology use, with a par-ticular focus on STEM students. Most of Dr. Long’s research has focused on the academic and socialexperiences of Black and Latinx groups as well as student-athletes in STEM fields. He helped to leadresearch, funded by the NCAA Innovations in Research and Practice Grant, to improve the well-being ofthe student-athlete through support of their career readiness. He also helped to secure funding from NSF(award # 2024973) to examine the potential benefit of using critical narratives
rather than using them toward an associate’s degree. [16]Additionally, the NSB reported that “In 2013, recent female S&E bachelor’s and master’s degreerecipients were more likely than their male counterparts to have attended a community college.”[16]The focus of PVWIS on local community college women in STEM directly supports broadeningparticipation efforts. According to Costello, “Scientists and policymakers point to thecommunity college as a critical link in the educational pathway to STEM careers for women andstudents who are low-income, minority, or the first in their families to enter college. This linkmust be bolstered if community colleges are to provide opportunities in STEM fields for largenumbers of these students.” [5] Snyder and
education research, teacher professional development, and secondary STEM education. In 2021, Erica received the ASEE Pacific Southwest Early Career Teaching Award and two awards at UNLV for mentoring undergraduate and graduate students. She also received the Peter J. Bosscher Outstanding Faculty Advisor Award in 2019 from Engineers Without Borders and was recognized as a Nevada Woman in STEM by Senator Jackie Rosen.Prof. Eakalak Khan, University of Nevada, Las Vegas Eakalak Khan is a Professor in Civil and Environmental Engineering and Construction Department and the Director of Water Resources Research Program, University of Nevada, Las Vegas. From 2002 to 2017, he was a Professor in Civil and Environmental
. - Completing ODSA-funded project on Ohio Advanced Manufacturing Technical Resource Network roadmaps organized by manufacturing processes to determine manufactur- ing needs and technical solutions for machining, molding, joining/forming, additive manufacturing. - Collaborating with state and national partners on advanced manufacturing education pathways and engi- neering technologist manufacturing career programs - Served as lead coordinator of a Bachelor of Science in Engineering Technology degree program at The Ohio State University focused on curriculum devel- opment and approval, securing industry support and promoting program to internal/external audiences. - Published a US Economic Development Agency-funded engineering
, engineering stu- dent career pathways, and engagement of engineering faculty in engineering education research. She was awarded a CAREER award from the National Science Foundation for her research on undergraduate mental health in engineering programs. Before joining UIUC she completed a post-doctoral fellowship at Sanofi Oncology in Cambridge, MA. She earned a bachelor’s degree in biological engineering from Cornell University and a Ph.D. in biomedical engineering from the University of Virginia.Dr. Gary Lichtenstein, Arizona State University Gary Lichtenstein, Ed.D., Director of Program Effectiveness for the Entrepreneurial Mindset initiative at the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State University. He is
survey, were developed using variouslearning models, such as Bloom’s Taxonomy cognitive and affect domain, and Dee Fink’sTaxonomy of Creating Significant Learning Experiences, to ensure we captured multiplelearning opportunities. Students give answers by choosing their level of agreement on a likertscale for each of the items. Our items ask about expected learning outcomes such as “I betterunderstood what had been confusing about a topic” and “I understood how the topics in thiscourse can be applied to the real world,” which relate to course content knowledge andknowledge relevant to their careers. Additionally, our items ask about novel potential learningoutcomes such as “I realized the skills I gained [in this context] will help me in my
Paper ID #32451Entering Research Online: Developing a Virtual Course to SupportExperiential Education for Undergraduate Research AssistantsMs. Candyce Hill, Michigan State University Candyce is an academic advisor in the College of Engineering at Michigan State University (MSU). She holds a Master of Arts in Student Affairs Administration from MSU and a Bachelor’s degree in History and Judaic Studies from the University of Michigan (U of M). Before coming to MSU, Candyce worked as a teacher in Tulsa, Oklahoma and then as a career adviser at U of M.Dr. Katy Luchini-Colbry, Michigan State University Katy Luchini-Colbry is the
. in Engineering Mechanics from Iowa State University in 1992. His main interest areas include Computational Mechanics, Solid Mechanics, and Product Design and Development. He has taught several different courses at the undergraduate and graduate level, has over 50 publications, is co-author of one book, and has done consulting for industry in Mexico and the US. He can be reached at Karim.Muci@sdsmt.edu.Dr. Mark David Bedillion, Carnegie Mellon University Dr. Bedillion received the BS degree in 1998, the MS degree in 2001, and the PhD degree in 2005, all from the mechanical engineering department of Carnegie Mellon University. After a seven year career in the hard disk drive industry, Dr. Bedillion was on the
career goals. These assignments were typicallycompleted at the end of the semester, and perhaps as a result of that, the quality of theassignments was often quite varied; it was clear that many students did not put much thought oreffort into these activities, or did not even bother to attempt them.A few years later, Clemson’s Center for Workforce Development produced a series of onlinemodules with a similar goal of helping students learn about the various engineering disciplines.The General Engineering department required the first-year engineering students to complete themodules as a part of the first-semester course requirement. The modules allowed the work to bespread across several weeks and provided students with flexibility due to its self
analyzeswhich career readiness competencies employers value most in their new college hires [3].Employers rank each competency as more than essential, essential, or somewhat essential in thesurvey. In the Job Outlook 2019 Survey, employers ranked critical thinking, oral and writtencommunication, teamwork and collaboration skills, and professionalism/work ethic as more thanessential competencies in new hires [3]. While the training in this project did not address thecritical thinking competency, it addressed the other top three skills cited in the NACE survey:oral and written communication, teamwork and collaboration skills, and professionalism/workethic.Recognizing that we had two groups from distinctly different disciplines that shared a
Society for Engineering Education, 2021ABSTRACTThe session will report on the success of the last four years of implementing a collaborative DOEproject between two state colleges and a Hispanic Serving Institution (HSI) university with acombined 140,000+ undergraduate students. The session will also report the revision of aSystemic, Evidenced-Based, and Student-Centered (SE-SC) framework as initially designed in theDOE project. The original SE-SC framework aims to maximize the number of academically-talented, Hispanic students who complete their AS degrees at State Colleges and transfer to a 4-year institution to complete their B.S. degree and are career-ready to enter engineering andcomputer science (ECS). The revised SE-SC framework addresses
a greater percentage than working engineers.As to persistence in engineering, a number of studies [1], [2], [4], [5], [14] found that students’abilities, perception of abilities, especially in mathematics play a big part. Another largecontributing factor to persistence is student aspirations and how well the discipline – or moreaccurately, their perception of the discipline – lines up with their career aspirations and personalinterest. To improve retention, engineering programs need to ensure that students recognize howtheir career aspirations and personal interests align with their chosen field early in their studies.Toward this end, an accurate picture of student interest is needed.Study PopulationThe authors teach an introductory course