restructured to meet the growingglobal competition and to keep pace with the changes in the field.”5As PS465 suggests, ASCE believes that the engineer of two decades hence will need anew skill set and a new mind set. The fundamentals of science and mathematics willcontinue to be the foundation for engineering. But engineering will have additionaldimensions. It will be information and molecular based using new and differentmaterials. Moreover, it will be an interactive global enterprise. The future engineer mustunderstand project/activity management, how businesses function, and the social contextof engineering practice. The design space has expanded, and now includes social,economic, and policy-related consequences.In short, ASCE believes the
Session 3575 Transitioning from Industry to Education: The First Year William R. Loendorf Eastern Washington University School of Computing and Engineering Sciences Department of Engineering Technology and Multimedia DesignAbstractAfter years as an engineering professional in industry, a career transition into a related field wason the horizon. The events at the beginning of the 21st century lead to the downsizing ofnumerous companies and the eventual elimination of countless jobs. As the economy weakened,it became increasingly difficult to
replaced thejoker’s cap with the mortar board of the analytical engineer, then he can begin the convergent Page 2.121.1thinking process. The analytical mind of the engineer will immediately see that some of the newconcepts will never fly in today’s environmentally conscious society. Without employing therigor of the evaluation matrix and firm criteria, the engineer can rule out certain new ideas. CULLING is the process of separating the rotten apples from the good edible apples inthe basket. Just as the image of a bad apple smacks us in the face, so too the visual image of abad product concept will jump off the page at us. In the process
Session 2125 Teaching Innovation and Entrepreneurship Through Design in Inventor’s Studio Burt L. Swersey Mechanical, Aerospace, Nuclear Engineering William Foley Decision Sciences & Engineering Systems Rensselaer Polytechnic InstituteInnovation and entrepreneurship are two words that are often put forward as goals forengineering education. Although most of our students will not start new companies upongraduation we can prepare them to act in an entrepreneurial manner within
used in designing the topical map is to teach broad system level concepts and analyses first followed by in depth treatments of the pertinent subtopics. This ensures that the engineer always has the “forest” in mind while he or she tackles the “trees”. Furthermore, the applications “close the loop” by reemphasizing system level concepts and exploiting the deep analytic tools developed earlier. Since the program culminates in a thesis that addresses an immediate aerospace communication problem, research goals are a major consideration in the topical design. This ensures students will be adequately prepared to make a significant research contribution (see figure 3). Since there is a wide variety of research areas in communication engineering
Conference Proceedings.[3] ASME, 1995, “Integrating the product Realization Process (PRP) into the Undergraduate Curriculum,” (a curriculum development project of the ASME Council on Education, ASME, December 1995.[4] Brancaccio-Taras, L., Mawn, M. V., Premo, J., & Ramachandran, R. (2021). Teaching in a Time of Crisis: Editorial Perspectives on Adjusting STEM Education to the “New Normal” during the COVID-19 Pandemic.[5] Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., and Cocking, R. R. (eds.). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1999.[6] C. Chaplin, ‘Creativity in Engineering Design – The Educational Function,” The Education and Training of Charted Engineers for the 21st
social good of engineering and demonstrating how it is relevant to the real world 2. Interdisciplinary approach: Add a technological component to all subjects and lessons, and implement writing guidelines in math and science courses 3. Standards: Involve engineering in K-12 lessons that map to state standards for math and science. Further, states should follow Massachusetts and enact state standards for engineering 4. Use/Improve K-12 Teachers: Engage more K-12 teachers in outreach efforts and curriculum writing, and increase teacher salaries to attract the best technological Page 10.219.1 minds to teaching
professionally oriented graduate educationto be more relevant to the needs of the practicing profession in industry to ensure a strong U.S. engineeringworkforce. This paper suggests a framework of guidelines for curricular design of innovative master,doctoral, and fellow level professional graduate programs crafted to meet the career-long needs ofengineering professionals in industry and guided by the incorporation of five major attributes of high-quality graduate programs that positively affect the growth and development of working professionals. Theguidelines are based on the functional requirements, tasks, and responsibilities that engineering leadersencounter throughout their professional careers. The paper presents a new vision for shaping
Provost. She is Professor of Mechanical Engineering and enjoys teaching thermo/fluids/energy and design related courses. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 The ICE Faculty Development Program (Integrating Curriculum with Entrepreneurial Mindset) – Then and NowAbstractThis evidence-based practice paper describes the creation and evolution of a faculty developmentprogram known as “Integrating Curriculum with Entrepreneurial Mindset” (ICE) that has beenoffered for more than ten years. The program began when entrepreneurially minded learning(EML) was in its infancy and has undergone continual improvement as a deeper understandingof what is required for effective EML has continued to
expand U.S. capability through increasing the number of successful African American, American Indian, and Latino women and men in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education and careers.Our Vision An engineering workforce that looks like America.Our Goal Working with our partners to produce an engineering graduating class that looks like America.Our Purpose Our aim is to increase the proportion of African American, American Indian, and Latino graduates in STEM education and careers, our metric is parity in the workforce, and our methodology is connecting the network of like-minded individuals and organizations that share a commitment to these aims.Our Beliefs We believe in the concept of the
transportation an engineering mind setcentered on flight safety and professional responsibility and accountability is needed. This mindset is required of personnel in air traffic control, aircraft air and ground crews, airplane designmanagement, and especially aircraft design engineers and therefore aircraft design students. Thispaper proposes that the major responsibility and accountability for flight safety rest with theaircraft design engineers since these individuals wield the most leverage for incorporating safetyduring the preliminary design process. Transferring this concept to the classroom is an expedientfor achieving improved levels of flight safety. ACKNOWLEDGMENTSMany people in industry and academia have
requires experiencing first hand environmentswhere individual innovation and independent thought are sought out, reinforced and rewarded.Agility of the mind, the ability to adopt professional skills to rapidly changing conditions,flexibility and risk-taking need to be prominent in the destinations chosen by UAE engineeringstudents when they go abroad.In this respect, North America is a good place for UAE engineering students to spend some time.Foreign students are frequently struck by the seeming endless flow of new ideas that pass Page 11.1192.3through the minds of North Americans, along with their deeply internalized conviction that theirsociety
departments in the school of engineering. These interviews werequalitatively analyzed and coded using thematic analysis [6], [7]. The five lessons learnedpresented below represent preliminary findings of a larger analysis on the politics, processes, andpotential involved in institutional change.Lessons Learned(1) Not all faculty members consistently felt included, nor invited to the tableSome of the faculty members felt that they were already engaged in this type of work, but did notconsider themselves to be a part of this concentrated institutional change effort. These includedboth faculty who were already involved with individual initiatives that align with this changeeffort and also new faculty who were hired with this change initiative in mind
Paper ID #45589An Investigation into the Effectiveness of Web-based Pre-Class Reading ResponsesDr. Simon Thomas Ghanat P.E., The Citadel Dr. Simon Ghanat is an Associate Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering at The Citadel (Charleston, S.C.). He received his Ph.D., M.S., and B.S. degrees in Civil and Environmental Engineering from Arizona State University. His research interests include Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Education.Dr. Mostafa Batouli, The Citadel Dr. Mostafa Batouli is an Assistant Professor of Construction Engineering in the department of Civil and Environmental
the reader are interested in what the textbook canteach them. Readability enhances a text’s ability to covey information. Authors mustkeep in mind that enabling learning is more complex than writing down concepts andideas. A well-written, readable text will clearly identify the essential ideas while the Page 7.1006.2Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition Copyright Ó 2002, American Society for Engineering Educationsurrounding material provides support and enhances reader understanding. Attentionmust be paid to how sentences are constructed and how ideas are
the February 1998 issue of TechnicalCommunication, George Hayhoe called for the same type of collaboration that Paynerecommended in an engineering context: “Technical communicators in the academy and industryneed to explore a new model of education for the next millennium, one that fosters, promotes,and actively pursues learning—and learning to learn.”2 It seems that at our current moment ineducational history, we find a meeting of minds from engineering schools, professionalcommunication programs, and industry on at least one issue: to effectively teach engineering andcommunication, schools and industry need to collaborate on ends and means.This increasing interest in industry/academy collaboration positions teachers as mediators in
Session 1606 Utilizing A Capstone Design Project for EC 2000 Assessment Suzanne D. Bilbeisi, Steven E. O’Hara Oklahoma State UniversityAbstractArchitects and architectural engineers should have the ability to coordinate and integrate themany issues involved in the creation of architecture. This requires them to have a basic workingknowledge of and sensitivity to several disciplines, as well as expertise in their individual field.One measure of this ability is through a comprehensive capstone design experience.Architecture, as a profession, requires the teamwork of professionals
assumptions of faith and divinity, their association with religious traditions raise ahost of issues most educators are not prepared or willing to deal with. A second challenge is thatthese contemplative practices require extensive first-hand experience before an educator is ableor ready to share them with students. This makes the solution not scalable, since it is not realisticto assume that mass numbers of technology and engineering educators will take up and sustainmindfulness meditation practice. Barbezat and Bush (2013) also point out a third and relatedchallenge: That, by nature of their introspective and spiritual nature, contemplative practicesmight raise complex questions about the nature of the mind and self that most educators are
Variables Variable Construct and Source Adaptations to Source Material Interest “Interest” from Godwin’s - Replaced “engineering” with “my major” for students “Engineering Identity Scale” [12] - Replaced “engineering” with “my field” for faculty, staff, and administration / management Mindfulness “Mindfulness Attention Awareness - Changed introductory text to: “Below is a collection Scale” from Rieken et al. [13], of statements about your everyday experience at Cal developed from the prior work of State LA” Brown and Ryan [14] Frustrations “Stressors – Frustrations
Paper ID #16371An Industry-University Partnership to Foster Interdisciplinary EducationProf. Farrokh Mistree, University of Oklahoma Farrokh’s passion is to have fun in providing an opportunity for highly motivated and talented people to learn how to define and achieve their dreams. Farrokh Mistree holds the L. A. Comp Chair in the School of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering at the University of Oklahoma in Norman, Oklahoma. Prior to this position, he was the Associate Chair of the Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering at Georgia Tech – Savannah. He was also the Founding Director of the Systems Realization
/1-2--32505.21. Svihla, V. and Peele-Eady, T.B., Framing agency as a lens into constructionist learning. Proceedings of Constructionism, 2020: p. 313-324, http://www.constructionismconf.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/C2020- Proceedings.pdf.22. Svihla, V., Peele-Eady, T.B., and Gallup, A., Exploring agency in capstone design problem framing. Studies in Engineering Education, 2021. 2(2): p. 96–119. DOI:10.21061/see.69.23. Svihla, V., Peele-Eady, T.B., and Chen, Y. Agency in framing design problems in AERA Annual Meeting. 2019. Toronto, ON, Canada.24. Konopasky, A.W. and Sheridan, K.M., Towards a diagnostic toolkit for the language of agency. Mind, Culture
validation, financial knowledge, motivation and self-efficacy, and social support[1], [3], [4]. The research questions are designed with TSC in mind and to support achievementof the purposes of the project. The research questions guiding this grant are: RQ1: What are assets, factors, and strategies that enable access for two- year college students to engineering transfer pathways? RQ2: Do assets, factors, and strategies vary in magnitude and/or presence across student demographics, locations, institutions, or intention to transfer? RQ3: How does use of digital learning tools and resources impact transfer outcomes for pre-transfer engineering students? RQ4: To what extent can transfer outcomes be
Session xxxx Can ASCE Cover the “E” in the MOE? Robert J. Houghtalen, P.E. Department of Civil Engineering, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology John A. Casazza Department of Continuing Education, ASCEAbstractThe American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) is beginning to move the profession in thedirection of requiring a certain body of knowledge (BOK) for professional licensure. This BOKwould be obtained through a baccalaureate (BS) degree, work experience, and a master’s degreeor equivalent (MOE). The “or
projects.There are a variety of approaches to outreach, but those that involve undergraduate engineeringstudents accomplish two goals: 1) encouraging more K12 students to consider engineering bybreaking stereotypes, and 2) involving the undergraduate engineering students in meaningfulcommunity engagement, which they will hopefully continue throughout their careers. There are several reasons that involving undergraduates in outreach is particularlyeffective, primarily because they can break the stereotypes of engineers that most K12 studentshave in their minds. Obama administration officials have met with business executives andschool deans in order to better understand the barriers to creating more engineers, which wereidentified as scientists
, regulate, shape, critique,publicize, and study science, including government scientists, funding agency officers, science-focused interestgroups, science communicators, academics, museum curators, and others.The Graduate Certificate in Innovation, Technology and Society. Social entrepreneurs understand that withinnovation comes responsibility. With past technological fixes contributing to global warming, market crashesand animal extinction, we need creative minds to develop strategies that address the root causes of complexproblems and incorporate them into viable business models. The Graduate Certificate in Innovation,Technology and Society provides you with an environment in which engineers and non-engineers work togetherto cultivate innovative
Session 3275 Teach Less Better Ronald P. Krahe, P.E. Associate Professor of Engineering Penn State Erie, The Behrend CollegeAbstractWhat are we trying to accomplish? Many of us feel the pressures of adding more and more material tothe curriculum. Just keeping up with technology can be a challenge in itself. At the same time, business,industry, and society are telling us that our teaching is vastly overrated, irrelevant and ineffective.Several interesting approaches have been suggested in literature to address
of the interstate highway system on poor and minority communities in American cities. New Visions for Public Affairs, 7 (April), 9-21.Khan, B., Robbins, C., and Okrent, A. (2020). The State of US Science and Engineering 2020. National Science Foundation, (January 15th).Leydens, J. A., and Lucena, J. C. (2018). Engineering Justice : Transforming Engineering Education and Practice. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2018. Web.McGinn, R. E. (2003). Mind the gaps: An empirical approach to engineering ethics, 1997–2001. Science and Engineering Ethics, 9 (4), 517-542.Rabins, M. J. (1998). Teaching engineering ethics to undergraduates: Why? What? How? Science and Engineering Ethics, 4 (3), 291-302.Sensoy, O., and DiAngelo, R
, technology integration, online course design and delivery, program evaluation, and assessment. Dr. Lux’s current research agenda is STEM teaching and learning in K-12 contexts, technology integration in teacher preparation and K-12 contexts, educational gaming design and integration, and new technologies for teaching and learning.Dr. Brock J. LaMeres, Montana State University Dr. Brock J. LaMeres is a Professor in the Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering at Mon- tana State University (MSU) and the Director of the Montana Engineering Education Research Center (MEERC). LaMeres is also the Boeing Professor at MSU where he is responsible for initiatives to im- prove the professional skills of engineering
approach.AcknowledgementsThank you to Patti Cyr, Robin Borkholder, and Elizabeth DeBartolo for their support and guidancein the development of the entrepreneurial mindset focused activity presented in this paper. Aspecial thanks to Tony DiVasta and the Toyota Production Systems Lab at RIT for supporting thestudents in the set-up and data collection of the production system prototype.References[1] L. Bosman, and S. Fernhaber, “Teaching the Entrepreneurial Mindset to Engineers.” Springer, 2018.[2] KEEN Engineering Unleashed. Website: https://engineeringunleashed.com/ Kern Entrepreneurial Engineering Network. [Accessed February 15, 2022].[3] C.S. Korach and J. Gargac, “Integrating Entrepreneurial Mind-set into First-Year Engineering Curriculum through
communication skill. It has, therefore, become vitallyimportant for programs in engineering to provide the necessary tools for their students toexcel in the world outside the university during their experiential learning experiences. Thisfocus along with the increased emphasis on communication excellence in the classroom hasprovided another vital link between the academic and industrial worlds. When studentsbegin their experiential learning assignments, there are many things that are flowing throughtheir minds. They consider the money that they will be earning as part of the work force.They are also entering, in most cases, an environment that is unfamiliar to them. They havenot previously been in positions that have required them to become the