of acited reference in an article, conference paper, technical report or other written work is to directthe reader’s attention to information in a previously published (or unpublished) work that isrelated in some way to the author’s research. Professional and research ethics require authors tocite appropriately.Cited references in patent documents serve a different purpose. Patents are legal documents thatdefine the scope of an inventor’s intellectual property rights in a new invention or improvementon an existing technology. The World Intellectual Property Organization defines a citation as areference to another (print or online) document, oral communication, use, exhibition, or othermeans of disclosure “which may affect the patentability
5 4 4.53. This course improved my proficiency in designing ofproducts, equipments, tooling and /or environment formanufacturing systems. 5 4 5 3 4.254. This course enhanced my competency to functioneffectively in a team. 5 4 5 5 4.755. This course improved my ability to identify, formulate, andsolve engineering problems. 4 4 5 5 4.56. This course improved my understanding of engineeringprofession ethical responsibility. 5 4 5 4 4.57. This course helped me to communicate more effectively. 5 4 4 3 48. This course
. CS1 Calc 2 non-Eng Calc 2 Eng Comp Arch CS CoP Stoc Proc CS Ethics Dynamics TAM CoP MatSE Mech CS Systems Statics Solids MatSE CoP Therm & MechFigure 10: Spread of the randexam system from its
the course. 2. Design and 3D Printing in Rapid PrototypingDesign is a crucial component of engineering education. It is outlined in ABET’s courseoutcomes criteria “ c” that students should have “an ability to design a system, component, orprocess to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental,social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability”4. The inclusionof a prototype in the design process helps to improve the final design. Witnessing the results andlearning through failure in the earlier design phase minimizes loss in the later stages of productdevelopment. Creating a physical prototype can be an effective way to observe and assess ideasbefore implementing
# Semester#or#year#studying#abroad# 0%# 20%# 40%# 60%# 80%# 100%# %"Indica)ng"engagement"in"ac)vity"Figure 8. Results from Senior Survey for Participation in Educational Activities and Service –Question was “Did you participate in any of the following activities?” Developing#a#deep#sense#of#empathy#and#concern#for#others# Developing#a#deep#sense#of#ethics#and#morality# Accep0ng#others#as#they#are# Trying#to#change#things#that#are#unfair#in#the#world# Searching#for#meaning
Annual Conference &Exposition. 2005.35. Zhu Q, Zoltowski C, Feister M, Buzzanell P, Oakes W, Mead A. The development of aninstrument for assessing individual ethical decision-making in project-based design teams:Integrating quantitative and qualitative methods. 121st ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition.2014. Page 26.1363.13
,implement, and communicate solutions to their problems. This synthesis of skills is a criticallearning outcome of the capstone course, as it provides students with an understanding of thework they will be doing when they graduate.There are a variety resources that describe the topics covered and desired outcomes of capstonedesign courses. Surveys of capstone instructors 1-3 show that instructors teach a wide range ofsubjects, including oral communications, teamwork, project planning, and ethics, among manyother aspects of engineering design. Moreover, the Engineering Profile 4, developed using datafrom both industry practitioners and design faculty, highlights the importance of bothprofessional and technical skills, describing engineering roles
engineering, civil engineering projectmanagement, ethics, and the capstone design course. Class sizes ranged from 12 to 70.The next section summarizes results for each assessment category. We also analyzed results foreach course, but no patterned differences were found.5.2 ResultsThe quantitative assessment measures consistently show improvements in student writing (Table2). Every statistical measure was significant. Below we discuss a few noteworthy aspects of theassessment.Table 2. Summary of Quantitative Assessment Results No. of courses Assessment Category Quantitative Results (and levels)1 Genre Analysis (Field 4 courses
Paper ID #11285Beyond Margin Notes: Utilizing Technology to Improve Feedback to StudentWritersDr. Carolyn Kusbit Dunn, East Carolina University Carolyn Kusbit Dunn is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Technology Systems at East Carolina University. Dr. Dunn teaches Technical Writing and Technical Presentations, and centers her research on the pedagogy of technical writing and the ethics of risk communication. Page 26.279.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015Beyond
conducted a survey of the 2008 NSF Summit on Globalization during which the topfive competencies were identified. Among these were an appreciation of other cultures, an ability tocommunicate across cultures and in other languages, an ability to work in cross cultural teams and dealwith ethnic and cultural diversity and having an international work/educational experience.6 In additionthe global engineer must have a higher standard of competency in the broad range of electroniccommunication tools over the internet and over a broad range of ethical and professional standards whichincludes a sensitivity to norms other than one’s own country. These attributes among others take on new
customer Be able to analyze and learn from engineering / computer-science failure Identify new business opportunities Think creatively through complex problems Consider the impact of projects or solution on societal and individual needs Work in a team environment Interpret how the individual motivations of clients or coworkers might impact a project or solution Modify projects or solutions based on ethical considerations Pursue service efforts as a professional Pursue service efforts as a private individual Page 26.345.6Table 2: New questions included on the December, 2014, survey of students in the freshmanseminar.Q1: How has your
University Gregg M. Warnick is the Director of the Weidman Center for Global Leadership and Associate Teaching Professor of Engineering Leadership within the Ira A. Fulton College of Engineering and Technology at Brigham Young University (BYU). The center provides oversight for leadership development and inter- national activities within the college and he works actively with students, faculty and staff to promote and develop increased capabilities in global agility and leadership. His research and teaching interests in- clude developing global agility, globalization, leadership, project management, ethics, and manufacturing processes. Gregg has lived in numerous locations within the USA and Europe and has worked in many
Technological University AJ Hamlin is a Senior Lecturer in the Department of Engineering Fundamentals at Michigan Technolog- ical University, where she teaches first-year engineering courses. Her research interests include engineer- ing ethics, spatial visualization, and educational methods. She is an active member in the Engineering Design Graphics Division of ASEE and is currently serving as the Associate Editor of the Engineering Design Graphics Journal. Page 26.381.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Comparison of On-line versus Paper Spatial Testing
ethics. This urges a different teaching pedagogy for a GeDC from that which isrequired for teaching a course in a student’s major discipline 2.Course: Introduction to Water Resources ManagementIntroduction to Water Resources Management, a three credit hour course, has been taught tofulfill the general education-natural science requirement for non-Water Resources Management(Non-WRM) majors and the core course requirement for freshmen Water ResourcesManagement Department (WRM) majors. Three major programs, Water ResourcesManagement, Geology and Geography require WRM 2200 as a core course. Each semester, thiscourse is taught in three sessions with twenty students per session by two or three instructors.The university catalog description of the
formultidisciplinary, project-based engineering experience for students at all levels3.The seven major course topics of FECI are measurements, engineering professions, teamwork,problem solving, communication, design process, and safety, professionalism, and ethics. Inaddition, FECI serves as engineering students’ Rowan Seminar course, which is a collegesuccess course and has objectives in writing and critical thinking, library research skills, Page 26.400.2cooperative learning, and classroom management skills. As such, students taking FECI areexpected to learn to take measurements in a laboratory setting, analyze and communicate theresults of those
semester of junior year to allow student to pursue a study-abroad. If studying abroad,IE students take their technical elective courses in their last two semesters of study. Note that ourprogram requires an internship. We included a seminar course in our curriculum before theirinternship where resume writing, interview skills and ethical issues are covered. Freshman Sophmore Junior Senior Intern. Fall Spring Fall Spring Fall Spring Fall Spring Intro. Hum
and Function”, Chemical Page 26.440.16 Engineering Education 31, 152-157.15- Haile, J.M. (1997), “Toward Technical Understanding. 2. Elementary Levels”, Chemical Engineering Education 31, 214-219.16- Haile, J.M. (1998), “Toward Technical Understanding. 3. Advanced Levels”, Chemical Engineering Education 32, 30-39.17- Freeman, W.J. (1994), “Role of Chaotic Dynamics in Neural Plasticity”, Progress in Brain Research 102, 319.18- Searle, J. (1992), “The Rediscovery of the Mind”, MIT Press, Cambridge MA.19- W.G. Perry, Jr., Forms of Intellectual and Ethical Development in the College Years. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York
ethically responsible ways. Students are involved more, and teachers control less. 3. Content is used to build a knowledge base, to develop learning skills, and to foster student self-awareness of their abilities. Teaching approaches accounts for students’ learning strategies and prior knowledge. 4. Together, students and teachers create motivating learning environments that encourage students to accept responsibility for their learning. 5. Assessments are implemented to promote learning and to develop self and peer assessment skills, not to evaluate performance primarily.In a meta-analysis of 119 studies, across grades K-20, Cornelius-White found that learner-centered variables such as incorporation of higher-order
school and high school girls topromote computer science and robotics. 11 His Arts and bots is a combination of crafting andcommon robotics programming that promotes collaborative “expression-focused robots”rather than competition based robotics.12In our work, co-robots are introduced as pedagogical tools to utilize engineering design as amotivator to teach Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics through practicalhands-on activities to students. Engineering education assists development of engineering“habits of mind” including systems thinking, creativity, optimism, collaboration, effectivecommunication, and ethical considerations.13 This paper reports on the first year of a multi-year project to engage middle and high school students
area ofconcentration in an effective, ethical, and clearly communicated way. Tying all the subjects ofan engineering education together into a professional toolset, however, is difficult. ABET, the higher education accrediting body that helps set an engineering student onto theroad towards professional licensure, puts forward several criteria that help shape the student’sexperience and make it more likely they will be successful in their chosen field. Specifically,ABET General Criterion 3 (Student Outcomes) and General Criterion 5 (Curriculum) outline aneducation grounded in math, science, and engineering that is capped with an all-encompassingdesign experience.2 Crucially, this design experience helps the student make the
camp with learning blocks creates a totally immersiveand engaging environment for the learner. At the same time, these learning blocks allowfor entrepreneurial concepts to be embedded inherently. The character traits of successfulentrepreneurs, as defined by state school standards, are adaptability, creative thinking,ethical behavior, leadership, positive attitude, and risk-taking.1 These character traits willalso be focused on in terms of outcomes.Mater ials and methodsEntrepreneurship and deeper learning outcomes have been a recent focus of industry andeducation with many new studies outlining how these skill sets can substantially changethe outcomes of students. Research findings demonstrate improved student outcomes,higher levels of
, club meetings may offer a social network and connection toother more senior students in the engineering program. They can encourage students to engagewith the development of interpersonal skills and work ethic. These experiences may also broadenstudent’s perspective, with the realization that more than high grades contribute towards hiringdecisions. Motivation Construct Engagement Mean Standard Deviation Significance Senior Design 4.02 0.77 Seminar 4.07 0.61 Intrinsic Motivation 0.94 Club Meeting 4.11 0.70 Total
field in his first year as an employee of Academic Technologies. The cooperative en- vironment in Academic Technologies has improved Erik’s ethical, professional and personal involvement during the past years.Mr. Gil Paquian Jr., UTEP Academic Technologies Gilbert Paquian has always been fascinated with how things work. During his undergraduate career pur- suing a degree in Mechanical Engineering at the University of Texas at El Paso, his project-oriented work with Academic Technologies and the completion of an internship with W. Silver Incorporated, a local steel mill, were able to satisfy his curiosity learning about the inner workings of various machines, electrical components and computer software. After
data has been used in bothclinical and classroom settings 11 where the video data is used to assess numerous topics relatedto education. Obtaining video data outside of a clinical or classroom setting introduces manydifficulties in the data collection design because of camera and microphone placement 14 andbecause of potential ethical issues related to capturing video data 11, 13. These difficulties need tobe considered in the design of an experiment when capturing video data for analysis and will bediscussed.Most assessment of student learning obtained from a learning cycle in courses similar to themechanics course used in this study uses closed ended questions 8, 17, 18. Closed ended questionshave a unique solution and usually only have a
compare students’ metacognitiveresponses with those criteria that leaders in engineering and education have determined arenecessary for a sustained and successful engineering workforce. We have pulled the followingskills from the Engineer of 202014: strong analytical skills, practical ingenuity, creativity,communication, business and management, leadership, high ethical standards, professionalism,dynamism, agility, resilience, flexibility, and lifelong learning. We can see from studentresponses that EPICS has impacted their practical ingenuity, creativity, communication, businessand management, leadership, professionalism, resilience, and flexibility from the followingstudent comments (and others previously listed): ● Practical ingenuity
questions rather thanperception-based questions, the researchers felt that the risk of deception was not severe enoughto expose the survey to this potential source of error. Our survey with the slight deception hadalso passed ethics approval.Sexuality: In an early iteration of the survey, participants were asked to self-identify theirsexuality. Care was taken to design this question to be inclusive, but concerns were still raised,primarily because of the plan to have parents of the participants sign the letter of consent. In thisprocess it was reasonable to expect that parents may read a completed version of the survey. Itwas also reasonable to expect that participants in this age group may be questioning theirsexuality, but may not have yet
habits of mind.Engineering habits of mind refer to the values, attitudes, and thinking skills associated withengineering and include systems thinking, creativity, optimism, collaboration, communication,and an attention to ethical considerations. Wing (2006) also connects computational thinking toengineering thinking, as she defines computational thinking as not simply programming but theoverlap between mathematical thinking and engineering thinking. Likewise, Barr andStephenson (2011) compare computational thinking capabilities across computer science,mathematics, science, social studies, and language arts. For example, learning to implement aparticular algorithm in a computer science context would be analogous to following anexperimental
provideinsight into how nanoscale sensors might be used to map the brains functions. Discussion ofrecent advances in neurological interfaces, imaging, and interfaces not only highlight thecontinuing evolution of science and engineering but also provide a framework for discussion ofthe difference between current science fiction and future science reality and the potential societaland ethical implications of “Reverse Engineering the Brain.” In Fall 2015, much of thediscussion focused on two themes: 1) the potential benefit of healing wounded veterans and others suffering from neurological impairments, and 2) the potential risks described in therecently released movie “Terminator Genisys.”This module includes three short activities the students rotate
activity. Additionally, these activities could be expanded if basic waterquality analysis equipment is available. For example, the water could be assessed pre and postpurification so students have more quantitative data to factor into their assessment.Measurements such as turbidity, suspended solids, total dissolved solids, biochemical oxygendemand (BOD), coliforms, and nitrate could be conducted as part of the class and also serve as amethod of introducing those contaminants. Another possible option is to make this set ofexercises a multidisciplinary effort, where students taking an environmental course in sociologyor philosophy such as Population and Global Issues or Environmental Ethics complete the taskstogether and engage in debates using
current professionalgraduate students of a university industrial distribution program, through industrial distributiontrade organizations and online networking or recruitment sites.All potential participants were emailed a link to an online study hosted by Qualtrics. The surveybegan with an introduction explaining that the purpose of the study is to identify genderperceptions related to the trends, challenges, and opportunities for women interested in orcurrently engaged in a career in industrial distribution. All survey questions were anonymouswith an opt-out feature if a respondent did not choose to answer. We received IRB approval priorto running the study, and all respondents were treated ethically. Of the original 293 participants,282