future endeavors. Students, therefore,appear to have accepted that collaborative learning, teamwork and communication skills areimportant aspects of the curriculum. It is time for the faculty to utilize these concepts andenhance the collaborative learning process in engineering programs.It has been mentioned that the development of communication skills is important for engineeringstudents. In fact, it has been written that engineers must become involved in broader issues andvarious non-technical groups10. This often requires the use of presentation and speaking skills.To assist in this effort, the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology requires thatoral communication skills must be demonstrated within the curriculum by each
projects prepare thestudents to undertake capstone design project of significant scope and also do well in their jobafter graduation. The excellent laboratories, dedicated faculty, and outstanding graduates havebeen recognized by the people in the region and the program has received much publicity due toits very high ranking in the review published in the US News and World Report last year. The author established the IE laboratories and was responsible for the first ABET(Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology) accreditation of the program in 1987. Hehas taught most of the courses in the IE curriculum. During the past few years he used theBlackboard Course Info system to enable students to submit their work electronically
Dr. Frank M. Croft, Jr.Associate Professor of Civil & Environmental Engineering and Geodetic Science The Ohio State UniversityFRANK M. CROFT, JR. is an Associate Professor of Civil & Environmental Engineering andGeodetic Science at The Ohio State University. Prior to assuming this position at OSU, he servedon the faculty of the Speed Scientific School, University of Louisville (1976-1984) and WestVirginia Institute of Technology(1973-1976). Before beginning his academic career, Croft was anassociate engineer/scientist with the Douglas Aircraft Company in Long Beach California (1969-1973). Croft holds abachelor of science degree in aerospace engineering, earned at Indiana
to instill this same sort of basic knowledge in its students. In the case of the engineeringstudents who take the course, they are really learning this to enhance their general knowledge.They may never use this information in their future careers, but they will have an understandingof everyday occurrences. Many new technologies that involve genes raise concerns and causedebates because they impact our everyday lives. Some of the major issues related to genetics arethe use of DNA evidence in criminal trials, genetically engineered food products, cloning, andgenetic screening.2 Engineers should be able to form informed opinions about these subjectsbecause they will most likely encounter them in their lives. At some point, they may have
Engineering. As part of their ABET-approved programs they experienced a capstonedesign course2 allowing them to synthesize what they learned in their programs.For researchers at the Center for Design Research at Stanford University, ME310 has long been alaboratory and test bed for design research.3 Much study has been devoted to how designersdesign, how they work in teams and tools that can help along the way. Forerunners of ME310(also labeled ME210, E210, E310) date back, in its current form, to at least 1972. CDR wasestablished in 1985 and research in ME310 has been going on near 25 years. Technology and theexpanding appreciation of what design and design thinking can tackle has changed the scope andtype of engineering design projects worked on in
Education with several teaching awards such as the 2004 National Outstanding Teaching Medal and the 2005 Quinn Award for experiential learning, and she was 2014-15 Fulbright Scholar in Engineering Education at Dublin Institute of Technology (Ireland). American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020Transfer Students in Undergraduate EngineeringAbstract:Transfer students to four-year colleges often face considerable obstacles to college success,including a lack of adequate socialization to the new setting, academic preparation in terms ofpractical knowledge, and college climate norms. In addition, they may find it difficult tointegrate into the informal social groups that
Engineering the Future of Health ASEE 2019 Engineering Deans Council Bruce J. Tromberg, Ph.D. DirectorNational Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering22 Days DisclosuresNo Financial Interests BackgroundUC Irvine (1988): Beckman Laser Institute and Medical Clinic Clinic & Operating Room, Translational Research, Basic Science and Technology, Philanthropy, Commercialization Optics and Photonics Biology & Medicine ~200 people, 22 faculty, 10 departments
customers, in practice and research. REFERENCES[1] Rasdorf, W. J., “Computer Programming in the Civil Engineering Curriculum,” Journal of Professional Issues inEngineering, 111:4, pp. 141-148, October 1985.[2] Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET), Accreditation Criteria for Engineering Programs,2007-2008, Baltimore, MD, 2007 (http://www.abet.org/forms.shtml).[3] Brady, A. H., “The Introductory and Service Courses in Computing: Some Experiences and a CriticalAssessment,” ACM SIGCE Bulletin, 2:2, pp. 31-36, June-July 1970.[4] Gruener, W. B., and S.M. Graziano, “A Study of the First Course in Computers,” ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 10:3,pp. 100-107, August 1978.[5] Austing, R.H., B.H. Barnes
Engineering Initiative Act in an attempt toincrease the number of engineering graduates statewide, thereby increasing the number ofengineering graduates at Kansas State University (K-State) by 60% over a ten-year period2. Inaddition, the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST) developed areport that calls for “one million additional college graduates with bachelor or associate degreesin [science, technology, engineering, and mathematics] STEM fields”3. However, according tothe National Research Council, many undergraduate engineering programs fail to attract andretain students in engineering4. Ohland et al. found that 93% of engineering students enrolled inengineering courses after eight semesters had declared themselves
) database.Dr. Catherine E. Brawner, Research Triangle Educational Consultants Catherine E. Brawner is President of Research Triangle Educational Consultants. She received her Ph.D. in Educational Research and Policy Analysis from NC State University in 1996. She also has an MBA from Indiana University (Bloomington) and a bachelor’s degree from Duke University. She specializes in evaluation and research in engineering education, computer science education, teacher education, and technology education. Dr. Brawner is a founding member and former treasurer of Research Triangle Park Evaluators, an American Evaluation Association affiliate organization and is a member of the Amer- ican Educational Research Association and
fields. Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics High School teachers areasked to nominate students for participation in the program. This program was founded in 2002and is funded by the Historical Electronics Museum with a grant from the Northrop GrummanCorporation. Speakers in the YESS have presented on topics as diverse as plasma physics, stealthradar, biomedical imagery, super computers/micro technology, aeronautical engineering,astrophysics and satellite reconnaissance.This year, the program has been revised from a strictly seminar series, to a hands-on programdesigned to help students understand the engineering method. In seven sessions, students learnhow to go from theory to modeling, designing, building, and testing. The hands-on
technologies. This level includes allcharacteristics of Level 4. • Process change management • Defect prevention • Technology change management Page 9.1316.4 Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright ©2004, American Society for Engineering EducationPeople Capability Maturity ModelThe CMM is designed to measure process capability rather than the capability of people in theorganization. In 1995, Curtis, Hefley and Miller proposed the people capability maturity model8to measure and improve the knowledge and skill of the workforce
that are simply computationally efficient.• Increased natural language processing (NLP) capabilities that allow more powerful ITS and provide psychologically valid models of language and knowledge representation.• Advances that make technology readily accessible to students.• A demonstrated need for teaching problem formulation skills in engineering curricula, as evidenced by the EC 2000 criteria [1].Our goal is a design for an ITS that teaches key concepts of probability and statistics, encodes andretrieves problems, and assists students in solving problems while based on psychologically validmodels of reasoning. We believe this will have the following benefits:• Students will be able to explore, adapt and augment a large database of
AC 2011-17: INTEGRATING ENTREPRENEURSHIP INTO MANUFAC-TURING ENGINEERING EDUCATIONNing Fang, Utah State University Ning Fang is an Associate Professor in the College of Engineering at Utah State University, USA. He has taught a variety of engineering courses such as metal machining, design for manufacturing, and engineer- ing dynamics. His areas of interest include computer-assisted instructional technology, curricular reform in engineering education, the modeling and optimization of manufacturing processes, and lean product design. He earned his Ph.D., M.S., and B.S. degrees in mechanical engineering and is the author of more than 60 technical papers published in refereed international journals and conference
systemsengineering technology and introducing new technologies and excellent traditional productionmeasures to make a multi-step use of substance”.5 The experience in China with ecologicalengineering is similar in that the focus is on working with ecological processes in systemsdesigned to meet human needs (such as pisciculture). A significant difference, however, is thatthe Chinese do not rely heavily on self-design and often there is substantial human interventionto maintain the system.6In the introduction, we present a definition for ecological engineering that is a slightly modifiedversion of Mitsch’s: Ecological engineering is the design of sustainable systems consistent with ecological principles that integrate human society with its
, be a catalyst for interaction with outside “suppliers” such as math and physics, and be ameans for communicating program objectives to students.IntroductionIn November 1996 the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) approvedEngineering Criteria 2000, Criteria for Accrediting Programs in Engineering in the United States(ABET, 1996). The new criteria represent a paradigm shift in accreditation from a highlyprescriptive set of criteria to a relatively simplified, flexible set of outcomes-based criteria whichfocus on the attributes engineering graduates are to have. These attributes are, •an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering; •an ability to design and conduct experiments as well
remainingrespondents (5.3%) saying communication skills are important. None of our respondentsdoubted the importance of communication skills. In fact, one of our respondents said, “Tosucceed, engineers must have tremendous communications skills.”At our university, our communication initiatives already take globalism somewhat into account.In our Communication-Intensive (C-I) courses, we emphasize 4 modes of communication:written, spoken, visual, and technological. Of these, only 2 are language specific. However,even when working in language-specific modes, rhetorical strategies that consider audienceneeds are taught so that language can be supplemented with graphical information, calculations,or other non-linguistic elements. The visual and technological modes
Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology; National Science Foundation Document NSF 96-139, © 1996.3. Webster’s New World Dictionary; Guralink D. B. ed, Simon and Schuster, ©1980.4. Bloom B. S. and Krathwohl D. R.: Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: the Classification of Educational Goals, by a Committee of College and University Examiners. Handbook I: Cognitive Domain; Longmans, Green New York, © 1956.5. Wnek G. E. and Ficalora P. J.: Relating the Macroscopic to the Microscopic - A Vital Way to get Freshmen to Understand Chemistry; Chemtech © 1991 pp. 662-6646. Hudson J. B, Palmer M. A.: Selection of Topics for an Integrated Materials Chemistry Course for Engineering Majors
Specifications,HayGroup (available at www.hayresourcesdirect.haygroup.com), 2005.11. D.A. Kolb, Experiential Learning, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1984.12. E. Rutz and V. Westheider, Learning Styles of Engineering & Engineering Technology Students –Similarities, Differences and Implications for Effective Pedagogy, paper 2006-419, Proceedings of the AmericanSociety for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exhibition, Chicago, IL, June 18-21, 2006.13. N.E. Cagiltay, Using learning styles theory in engineering education, European Journal of EngineeringEducation, 33(4), 415-424, 2008.14. S.K. Hargrove, J.A. Wheatland, D. Ding, and C.M. Brown, The Effect of Individual Learning Styles onStudent GPA in Engineering
Teaching a Civil Engineering Materials Class Zhanping You / Sanjeev Adhikari Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Michigan Technological University 1400 Townsend Drive, Houghton, Michigan, 49931 - 1295 zyou@mtu.edu, sadhikar@mtu.eduAbstractThe objective of this study is to present the experience of teaching a Civil Engineering MaterialsClass. This course is designed for junior and senior undergraduate students. This class coversdifferent materials such as steel, aluminum, various alloys, aggregate, portland cement, portlandcement concrete, asphalt, asphalt mixtures, and wood
industry consortium for governing Distributed Ledger Technology. And coordinating efforts with industry, academia and government stakeholders to create commonly accepted standards for Airworthi- ness Engineering Training. In his experience, Rentsch has represented the interests of the U.S. aerospace industry as a member of the AIA-ASD-ATA-eBusiness S1000D Council, the AIA-ASD Integrated Logis- tics Support Specification Council and continues to support these communities. Rentsch has a Bachelor’s Degree in Mechanical Engineering and Ocean Engineering from the University of Rhode Island and a Masters Degree in Business Administration from George Mason University.Prof. Jason M Merret, University of Illinois at Urbana
the 2011 New Jersey Section of ASCE Educator of the Year award as well as the 2013 Distinguished Engineering Award from the New Jersey Alliance for Action.Dr. Stephanie Farrell, Rowan University Dr. Stephanie Farrell is Professor and Founding Chair of Experiential Engineering Education at Rowan University (USA) and was 2014-15 Fulbright Scholar in Engineering Education at Dublin Institute of Technology (Ireland). From 1998-2016, Stephanie was a faculty member in Chemical Engineering at Rowan. Dr. Farrell has contributed to engineering education through her work in experiential learning, focusing on areas of pharmaceutical, biomedical and food engineering. She has been honored by the American Society of Engineering
, etc.). Department chairs or faculty can be brought in as guest lecturers for this purpose.However, too much of this can be boring. In my experience, students are “starved” for specific information on the engineering disciplines.Provide them with reading material such as brochures from the engineering professional societies (e.g.,ASCE, ASME, IEEE) or material from Introduction to Engineering textbooks (e.g., Reference 7). Of mostbenefit are descriptions of the various subfields within each discipline. As an example, the Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE) is organized into 35Technical Societies (aerospace and electronics systems, antennas and propagation, broadcast technology,circuits and systems
Session 2563 CASE STUDIES IN ENGINEERING ETHICS Jon E. Freckleton, P.E. Rochester Institute of Technology Rochester, New York 14623ABSTRACT The case studies presented in this paper are based on 22 years of experience at two majorUS companies, four years on active duty in the military, and 11 years of teaching. Cases arepresented first as the situation, with the results of action taken in a later section so that they canbe used for discussion with students. These occurred over a career that started as a new collegehire and
Figure 1. The reasons why the impacts on the student attitudes were not aspositive as desired are not known. However, making a significant change in student attitudes Page 11.746.7towards engineers’ influences on society in a 1-credit course with other primary goals may beoverly optimistic. At the end of the course, minority students had a significantly higher (p =0.09) response than male students to the question “technology plays an important role in solvingsociety’s problems.” Other differences between men, women, and minority student attitudeswere not statistically significant. strongly 5 agree 4 Response 3
ofparticipation from members of the Civil, Engineering Management, Engineering Technology,and Industrial Engineering groups. The survey questions explored faculty perceptions ofengineering leadership and their perceived role of engineering leadership content in engineeringand engineering technology programs. The broader goal of this survey was to understand whatengineering educators identify as important topics in the concept of Engineering Leadership andtheir overall impression of the importance of Engineering Leadership in undergraduatecurricula.Data and FindingsBoth data collection methods collected demographic information from over 100 participants. Toprovide insight into the backgrounds and characteristics of authors actively publishing
Paper ID #13075Engineering Graphics Concepts: A Delphi StudyDr. Mary A. Sadowski, Purdue University, West Lafayette Mary A. Sadowski has been at Purdue since 2003 and until September 1, 2011 served as the Associate Dean for Undergraduate Programs and Learning in the Purdue College of Technology where she provided leadership for strategic initiatives in undergraduate education. As a professor of Computer Graphics, her research interests include enhancing visualization skills, cre- ative thinking, and learning styles. She is currently funded to begin gathering data to create a concept inventory for engineering graphics. As
from the University of Iowa. His research involves musculoskeletal biomechanics with a focus on computational methods. He is also deeply interested in engineering education and especially creating opportunities for underrepresented minorities and women in the field.Miss Heather Rae Aschenbrenner Page 26.415.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015Coordination of Pre-College Summer Programs to Create a Pipeline into BiomedicalEngineeringIntroductionCurrent political and academic discourse is riddled with a call for more students to graduate andenter into Science, Technology
advisor who takes a special interest in helping a student develop into asuccessful professional. Mentoring is a professional as well as a personal relationship. It is with this spiritin mind, mentoring is compared among some of the US and Puerto Rican engineering schools of similarsizes.Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Puerto Rico at Mayagüez (UPRM), Puerto RicoThe department has about twenty full-time faculty members and one is currently on a leave of absence.During the preparation for an ABET (Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology) visit, the needfor undergraduate student mentoring was felt. The department has a full-time student counselor;however, there happened to be cases where some specific technical
2017 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Section Annual Conference Hypothetical Cases in Engineering Ethics Steve E. Watkins Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, Missouri USA and United States Air Force Academy, Colorado USAAbstractAn important educational subject for engineering students is engineering ethics. Commoninstructional objectives are to develop knowledge of ethical principles, e.g. professional codes,and to apply these principles to specific situations. Case studies are useful instructionalexamples and exercises and cases are central to student ethics competitions. Historical casestudies emphasize