Conference Session

Session 2: Public Policies that Impact the P-12 Pipeline into Engineering and Computer Science Disciplines

Collection

2017 Public Policy Colloquium

Authors

Greg Pearson

/pre-service educators  School, district, state administratorsResearch-based, iterative development processFive partner organizations22-member steering committee (Dean Pines!)Collaboration with TeachEngineering NATIONAL ACADEMY OF ENGINEERINGEnhancing Teachers’ Voices in K-12 Engineering EducationGoal: Bring national attention to the value of involving classroom teachers in policy making related to the implementation of K-12 engineering education.Convocation: Sept. 30-Oct. 1 at the NAS Building; ~100 attendees, majority classroom teachersProducts: Summary report and 3-4 targeted, companion “briefs” NATIONAL ACADEMY OF ENGINEERING Engineering Technology Education in the

Conference Session

Session 2: Public Policies that Impact the P-12 Pipeline into Engineering and Computer Science Disciplines

Collection

2017 Public Policy Colloquium

Authors

James Brown

Conference Session

Session 4: Focus on the Americas

Collection

2017 EDI

Authors

Javier Paez

Conference Session

Workshop 2: New Faculty Mentoring for Research Funding Success

Collection

2017 ERC

Authors

Jean VanderGheynst

levelTable 1 80 60-95 program officers Reduced teaching load and/or a one semester sabbatical Facilitated at the college level Associate Dean and Dean meet with untenured faculty a couple of times per semester Facilitated at the college level Facilitated with money from the vice provost for Proposal development workshops and consultants, particularly for research or college. Expertise obtainedTable 2 182 45-340 CAREER awards

Conference Session

Lunch Table Talk

Collection

2017 EDI

Authors

Jenna Carpenter

CommitteePanelists:Wayne Davis, Dean of Engineering, University of TennesseeMichelle Sabick, Dean of Engineering, Saint Louis UniversityHisham Hegab, Dean of Engineering, Louisiana Tech UniversityAlec Scranton, Dean of Engineering, University of IowaQuestion # 1: Why do you have andsupport a GCSP on your campus?Question # 2: How have youleveraged your GCSP with otherprograms, initiatives & curricula onyour campus?Question # 3: How has your GCSPbrought value to your campus as awhole?Questions?

Conference Session

Session/Panel 4: Cost-sharing & Seed Funding

Collection

2017 ERC

Authors

Jennifer Bernhard

Conference Session

Session/Panel 7: New Research Initiatives and Directions at NSF Including the Process for Shaping Them

Collection

2017 ERC

Authors

Jim Kurose

- government) built upon, driven by, community and agency interests Common approach:  Initial community engagement: level of interest, capacity?  Workshops, engaging community, to determine challenges, opportunities  NSF-internal discussions, informed by workshops  SolicitationTRIPODS Computer Science Research 5 Community 1 2 3 4Smart and Connected Communities Computer Science Research 5 Community 1 2 3 4

Conference Session

New Deans' Orientation

Collection

2017 Public Policy Colloquium

Authors

John English

Conference Session

New Deans' Orientation

Collection

2017 Public Policy Colloquium

Authors

John Mason

Conference Session

Session 3: Data Management, Open Access and Data Sharing

Collection

2017 ERC

Authors

Julia Speer

Conference Session

Session 7: Health

Collection

2017 EDI

Authors

Karen Zaderej

Conference Session

Session 5: Maximizing Your Return on Investment in the ERC

Collection

2017 ERC

Authors

Kenneth Brezinsky; Vahid Motevalli

experience and recruit graduate students”Facilitated Discussions• Summary slide of the keynote and some prepared questions.• Break-out session to address key challenges .• Reporting by break-out groups and discussions8 Chicago Conference Summary Findingsa) Helping faculty to be successful, i.e. getting more funding andnational recognition 1) What does a successful proposal look like, library of successful proposals. 2) Appropriate startup for new faculty and its management. 3) Assist faculty to find collaborators. 4) National recognition; participate/organize wkshps/conf.b) Assist junior faculty, through mentoring, particularly forhighly prestigious and competitive grants. 1) Provide grant writing and proposal development support. 2) Build

Conference Session

Session 3: Export Control

Collection

2017 Public Policy Colloquium

Authors

Kevin Wolf

positively enumerated, they will be described using the defined term “specially designed” 3Definitions Rules in 2015 and 2016 BIS and DDTC published proposed rules revising definitions to improve harmonization between the EAR and ITAR on June 3, 2015 ● BIS proposed rule: 80 FR 35586 ● DDTC proposed rule: 80 FR 31525 BIS and DDTC published final rules on June 3, 2016, with an effective date of September 1, 2016 ● BIS final rule: 81 FR 35586 ● DDTC interim final rule: 81 FR 35611 DDTC published a final rule further revising definitions in the ITAR on September 8, 2016 (81 FR 62004) BIS FAQs available at https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/2012-03-30

Conference Session

Panel: Infrastructure and Logistics Engineering

Collection

2017 EDI

Authors

Marc Brazeau

• 7 in Mexico VOLUME EMEA 1.8 M 5.3 Million Vehicles LATAM 37 Manufacturing Facilities 561K • 1 in Brazil Presence in 150+ countries EDI Infrastructure & Logistics EngineeringFCA Supply Chain Management Logistics Service Industry Marketing Suppliers Manufacturing Dealers Consumer

Conference Session

Session/Panel 6: Federal Research and Government Relations in “a New World”

Collection

2017 ERC

Authors

Matt Hourihan

S&T Funding in the NewAdministration & CongressMatt HourihanMarch 8, 2017For the ASEE Engineering Research CouncilAAAS R&D Budget and Policy Programhttp://www.aaas.org/program/rd-budget-and-policy-program Copyright © 2015 American Association for the Advancement of Science 8/26/15 1 Where We Are and Upcoming Milestones FY 2017 DOD S&T in FY 2017 Appropriations percent change from FY 2016 levels, nominal dollars  Appropriations stuck since fall 15%  Trump Admin budget amendment

Conference Session

Session 4: Building a New Partnership – progress of Manufacturing USA, the NNMI

Collection

2017 Public Policy Colloquium

Authors

Michael Molnar

-sustaining after federal startup investment ends.• Workforce training and development is an essential component in institute focus. Federal startup investment: $70M - $120M/institute over 5 years Institute Consortium owners must have minimum 1:1 co-investment Manufacturing USA Strategic Goals• Increase the competiveness of U.S. manufacturing.• Facilitate the transition of innovative technologies into scalable, cost-effective, and high-performing domestic manufacturing capabilities.• Accelerate the development of an advanced manufacturing workforce.• Support business models that help institutes become stable and sustainable. https://www.manufacturing.gov/files/2016/02/2015-NNMI

Conference Session

Session 5: Future of Aerospace; US Commercial Space Enterprise

Collection

2017 EDI

Authors

Mike Cacheiro

Conference Session

Session 3: P-12 Education

Collection

2017 EDI

Authors

Nikole Collins-Puri

Conference Session

Session 4: Focus on the Americas

Collection

2017 EDI

Authors

Nilza Aples

University ofTechnology, JamaicaEngineering DeansInstitute Conference,Biltmore HotelPresented by Prof. Nilza Aples - DeanApril 3, 2017 1 History and Background• Established 1958 as Jamaica Institute of Technology• Changed to the College of Arts, Science and Technology in 1959• Granted University status in 1995 2 Our VisionThe University of Technology, Jamaica will:• Offer innovative, transformational, profession-driven and leading-edge programmes• Have in place high quality staff who are professionally competent, innovative and leaders in their own field• Operate with high quality environment. 3

Conference Session

Session/Panel 4: Cost-sharing & Seed Funding

Collection

2017 ERC

Authors

Pamela Norris

Conference Session

Session 3: Data Management, Open Access and Data Sharing

Collection

2017 ERC

Authors

Patricia Brennan

Conference Session

Session/Panel 4: Cost-sharing & Seed Funding

Collection

2017 ERC

Authors

Randolph Moses

. • Sponsor 70%; State 15%; OR/college/dept 5%/5%/5%• Other Cost Share: • Most c/s is in-kind e.g. % time of faculty and key staff • Up to 10% cash matched 1:1 College/Dept• We require 2-4 weeks to develop cost share plans • It is rarely formulaic, and often requires 1-1 negotiation. Some offices require 2 weeks lead time

Conference Session

Session/Panel 2: New Opportunities – Breaking into Federal Agencies that are New for You

Collection

2017 ERC

Authors

Reginald Williams

5-20 years Discovery & Invention (Basic and Applied 4-8 years Science)Focus 2-4 years Leap Ahead Innovations Technology (Innovative Naval Maturation Prototypes) ≈ 12% ≈ 50% 1-2 years (FNCs, etc.) Quick Reaction &

Conference Session

Session 5: Impact of Federal R&D

Collection

2017 Public Policy Colloquium

Authors

Richard Brown

2016 CoE Research Expenditures 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0FY 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15ASEE Data Myriad Genetics Genetic Testing for Hereditary -  Breast and Ovarian Cancer BRACA 1 & BRACA 2 -  Uterine Cancer -  Colorectal Cancer -  Pancreatic Cancer -  Prostate Cancer TypeMark Skolnick Peter Meldrum BioFire Rapid Cycle PCR -  Respiratory Panel (20 viruses & bacteria) -  Blood Culture

Conference Session

Session 3: Export Control

Collection

2017 Public Policy Colloquium

Authors

Robert Hardy

information, equipment or software, are not technology or technical data that arises during or results from fundamental research”(EAR 734.8 Note 1; ITAR 120.49(a) Note 1)• Deleted from Final EAR Rule which now states only that information that is not intended to be published is not fundamental research.• ITAR ??• Recent NAS report calls attention to conduct issue The Bottom Line• Many changes helpful to universities in ECR• Migration of controlled items to EAR and harmonization of many controls beneficial• “Defense services” in ITAR longstanding concern which ECR changes over time would largely have addressed but status now uncertain• Proposed ITAR exclusion of sponsor proprietary review from fundamental research remains major

Conference Session

Session/Panel 2: New Opportunities – Breaking into Federal Agencies that are New for You

Collection

2017 ERC

Authors

Rosemarie Hunziker

Conference Session

Session/Panel 7: New Research Initiatives and Directions at NSF Including the Process for Shaping Them

Collection

2017 ERC

Authors

Sohi Rastegar

M3C COPN BSBA ACQUIRE NewLAW 2-DARE HyBi MIKS ODISSEI PSBRAdvancing Communication Quantum InformationResearch in Engineering (ACQUIRE)• Key Idea: Address key engineering research challenges to enable room temperature, chip-level transducers, repeaters, systems and architectures for a secure, scalable quantum communication network.(1) Reproducible room temperature single photon sources and detectors on a chip,(2) Low-energy quantum devices such as repeaters and memories,(3) Generation of quantum entangled Qbits scalable to multi-Qbits, and demonstration of a secure

Collection

2017 EDI

Authors

Thomas Russell

Investigate INNOVATE 10-30 years Technologies TRL 3-4/5 6-15 years Fundamental Research Fundamental/Disruptive Technologies TRL 1-3 Basic

Conference Session

Session/Panel 2: New Opportunities – Breaking into Federal Agencies that are New for You

Collection

2017 ERC

Authors

Tom McCreery

Conference Session

Cool Ideas

Collection

2017 EDI

Authors

Scott A Ashford; Gregory Washington; Molly M. Gribb P.E.; Bob Kolvoord; Jim Garrett; John English; Ronald Harichandran

ENGINEERING DEANS INSTITUTE 2017 Cool Ideas Session April 3, 20171. Change Team for Diversity,Equity, and InclusionScott Ashford, Kearney Professor and Dean Goal 1 in our strategic plan is to become a model of an inclusive and collaborative community • Disrupted faculty hiring process for diversity • Last three years over half new hires women and minorities • Added Associate Dean for Faculty Advancement • Primarily to guide recruitment and P&T process • Unexpected benefit as resource for faculty in need • Established the “Change Team” in Fall 2016 • 25 faculty and staff across the college • Did not turn out as expected3 Change Team for College of Engineering as