CFD Lab 1 questions CFD Lab2 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Set-up & Data Data Reduction Uncertainty Comparisons & Documentation Verification Acquisition & Analysis Analysis EFD validation & Reporting a. Facility & a. Control a. Process raw a. Estimate a. Benchmark Environment parameters data error data b. Determine
theengineering clinic students at the College of Engineering for their support in developing theexperiments.References1. Marchese, A. J., Constans, E., Dahm, K., Hollar, K., Hutto, D., Johnson, F., Sun, C. vonLockette, P., Kadlowec, J., Cleary, D., and Sukumaran, B. (2001). The Sophomore EngineeringClinic I: Integrating Statics, Solid Mechanics and Product Development in a Sophomore LevelDesign Course. ASEE Annual Meeting, Albuquerque, NM.2. Johnson, F. S., Hutto, D., Dahm, K., Marchese, A. J., Sun, C., Constans, E., Hollar, K. andvon Lockette, P. (2001). An Investigation into Interdisciplinary Team Teaching in Writing andEngineering: A Multi-Year Study. ASEE Annual Meeting, Albuquerque, NM.3. Jahan, K. and R.A.Dusseau (1998) Environmental Design for
Session 3215 Research Experiences for Undergraduate Students in Structural Engineering Anant R. Kukreti University of Cincinnati1. Introduction This paper describes the experiences provided in a five-year Site for undergraduate researchin "Structural Engineering" with a special focus on techniques to study the "Development ofEnhanced Materials, Structural Components and Structural Assemblages Used for SeismicPerformance Evaluation Studies." The Site was offered at the School of Civil Engineering andEnvironmental Science
Page 9.231.9 architectural ` Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering Education 4. Mitgang, L. “Back to School: Architects Sound Off on 10 Critical Issues Facing Architectural Education.” Architectural Record. September, 1999. 5. Marx, J. “A Proposal for Alternative Methods for Teaching Digital Design”, Automation In Construction, 9. (2000). 6. Jonson, B. (2002). Sketching now. Journal of art design and education, 21 (3), (246 – 253). 7. Chastain, T., Kalay, Y., and Peri, C. (2002). Square peg in a round hole or horseless carriage
). β is the number of balls successfully transferred (2 ≤ β ≤ 10). λ is the number of balls “dropped” during the run (not in the final or initial container or the device at the end of the run) ( λ ≤ 8). µ is the weight of the device in pounds (µ ≤ 5.0). δ is the volume (in cubic feet) of the container (actually the cube of its longest edge dimension) (δ ≤ 4.0). Figure 1: Problem Statement for Innovative Design Problem grade all four categories on the basis of 0 to 100+: 100 =A; 75= B; 50 = C; 25 = D; 0 = F 85-100 65-85 40-65 15-40 below 15appearance: looks fantastic
were also invitedto participate in discussion groups and to respond to a series of open-ended questions about thecompetition (see Appendix B).ResultsTable 1 illustrates the results of the numerical part of the survey. Fifteen students in class 1 and 5students in class 2 completed the survey. The mean and standard deviation were calculated forboth classes individually, together, and together without the outlying answers. Page 9.580.2 “Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2004, American Society for Engineering Education
Promotion of Final Year Capstone Projects Aaron S Blicblau School of Engineering and Science, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, AustraliaIntroductionIn many engineering courses around the world one of the key aspects required of the studentsis that they complete an independent project in their final year of studies. Project work is nowconsidered to be an important part of an engineer’s training4-6. Students enrolled in their finalyear of mechanical engineering at Swinburne University of Technology are required toundertake and complete a final year project (major capstone project). Students may select aproject from a list
– Demographics. http://www.entreworld.com/. 6. Manufacturing News- South Dakota facts 7. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Employment Situation Summary, December 5, 2003. http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit/nr0.htm. 8. Makeki, R. & Ellerbruch, E. (2000). Great Plains Rapid Prototyping Consortium. OIA – Partnerships For Innovation proposal #0090422 to the National Science Foundation. South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD. 9. Thomas, A. J. and Webb, D; (2003), Quality Systems Implementation in Welsh Small- to Medium-Sized Enterprises: A Global Comparison and a Model for Change, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, vol
. Planned and managed changes 3. Unplanned revolutionary changesProbably the most famous step model of change is Rogers’ (2003) Diffusion of Innovation thatdescribes diffusion as the process by which (a) an innovation (b) is communicated throughcertain channels (c) over time (d) among the members of a social system. Rogers conceptualizesfive steps in this process: 1) knowledge, 2) persuasion, 3) decision, 4) implementation, and 5)confirmation. Rogers is famous for the S-curve relationship between time and the number ofadopters. Rogers writes that “The dominant viewpoint is that social change is caused by bothinvention (the process by which a new idea is discovered or created) and diffusion, which usuallyoccur sequentially.”Clearly, defining or
Teaching Portfolio,” Center for Teaching Excellence, Iowa State University,http://www.cte.iastate.edu/campusprograms/portfolio.html, accessed June 11, 2004. This site provides a well organized list of ideas for teaching portfolio content inclusion, along with an annotated list of suggested resources.Diamond, Robert M. Preparing for Promotion and Tenure Review: A Faculty Guide. Boston, MA: AnkerPublishing Co., Inc., 1995. This brief, quick-to-read guide emphasizes ways to emphasize quality and significance of work in your documentation.Rodriguez-Farrar, Hannelore B. “The Teaching Portfolio.” The Harriet W. Sheridan Center for Teaching andLearning, Brown University, http://www.brown.edu/Administration/ Sheridan_Center
Classification of Safety KnowledgeFigure 2. Change in process safety related content knowledge during VITDP project period.How the freshmen are learning is another important element in the VITDP instructionalenvironment. We performed a content analysis from two reflective journals all students wereasked to submit during the latter weeks of the semester and after the completion of the VITDPproject. The journal prompts were: (a) Describe how this VITDP project has made you: 1) consider the definition of safety, 2) think about safety analysis, and 3) consider how safety aspects can be applied in ChemE design. (b) How did safety considerations influence or cause your team to consider changes or additions to the process design? (c) Which
;3.0 0Physics Lab A 20(maximum 20 points) B 15 C 10Classification Senior 15(maximum 15 points) Junior 10 Sophomore 5 Subjective Criteria (maximum 50 points) Category Division PointsLetter of Recommendation Very High 25(maximum 25 points) High 20
Session 1526 Teaching Theoretical Stochastic Modeling Courses Using Industrial Partners and Their Applied Problems Timothy I. Matis, Linda Ann Riley New Mexico State University Department of Industrial Engineering P.O. Box 30001 – MSC 4230 Las Cruces, NM 88003-8001 This paper describes a pilot project funded by the National Science Foundation’s CourseCurriculum and Laboratory Improvement program that addresses the common learningchallenges of engineering students enrolled in an undergraduate stochastic processes
), Dissertation Abstracts International, DAI-B, 63(03), 1512.4. Huxley, M. (2003). Pro/E Wildfire: Intuitive, scalable. CADalyst, 20(2), 30-36.5. Rong, Y. and Bai, Y. (1997). Automated generation of fixture configuration design. Journalof Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 119, 208-219.6. Newman, W. and Lamming, M. (1995). Interactive system design. New York:Addison-Wesley Publishers.7. O’Charoen, V., Kashef, A., and Gilpin. A. (2002). ToolTRAIN: An Interactive ComputerizedMultimedia Tutorial for Modular Fixturing Design Instruction. Proceedings of the 56th AnnualMid-Year Conference of the Engineering Design Graphics Division (EDGD), ASEE, Berkeley,CA, 133-138.8. Gay, L. (1996). Educational research: competencies for analysis and application
publicprojects. This decision has its roots in federal legislation (The Flood Control Act of 1936)6. Inengineering economic analysis, project benefits are favorable consequences of the projects andproject costs are monetary disbursements required of the sponsor. The term disbenefits is alsoused to represent the negative consequences of a project to the public. In relation to publicprojects, these terms can be easily estimated within reasonable accuracy. A public project isacceptable if the benefit-cost ratio (B-C ratio) is greater or equal to 1.0. Incremental analysis is Page 9.720.2used when there are several mutually exclusive projects or mutually
of the curriculum were required in terms ofminimum credit hours. These requirements were mostly analytical components of the curriculumbut general education minimums were also stated. Starting in the year 2000, ABET undertook amajor shift in policy by focusing on program outcomes rather than program inputs. Instead oflisting curriculum components, outcomes, currently eleven2, are now required: “(a) an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering (b) an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data (c) an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs (d) an ability to function on multi-disciplinary teams (e) an ability to
toroids are derived. Keeping with the RF integrated circuit theme, inductors can beimplemented using a variety of spiral types (rectangular and octagonal to name a few).Rectangular structures are the easiest to derive and the derivation is primarily based on the self-inductance of a rectangular section of metal. ❈ ❈ ❈ ❈ ψ = ∫ B • dS I = ∫ H ⋅ dl ψ = LI (3)An interesting issue arises with IC inductor modeling, arising not only from the inductance itselfbut also from the materials making up the inductor. The layer capacitance must be included inany
author gratefully acknowledges Monash University Malaysia, in particular toAssociate Professor Maki Habib for his support. Special thanks goes to Mr Paneer and MrShahrul for their laboratory technical support.Bibliography1. B. Koyuncu and K. Balasubramanian, “A microprocessor controlled automatic sun tracker”, IEEE trans. onConsumer Electronics, Vol. 37, No. 4, pp 913 – 917, (1991)2. D. Yogi Goswami, Frank Kreith and Jan F. Kreider, Principles of Solar Engineering, Second edition,Taylor and Francis publishing, ISBN 1-56032-714-63. M. Tiris and C. Tiris, “Optimum collector slope and model evaluation: Case study for Gebze, turkey”, J.Energy and conversion Mgmt, Vol. 39, No. 3/4, pp 167-172, (1998)4. S. Bari, “Optimum slope angle and orientation of
students share their best solution with the class. Emphasize the diversity of thought and that there is no one right answer to the problem.Step 3 – B Present each group with a letter from a student describing the problem he/she is 30 minutes experiencing with his/her cast and a box of materials. Please note it is important to reinforce here that in addition to solving the problem, the student’s design must be stable enough to hold the “broken bone” in place. Representation of the broken bone will be a Popsicle stick held together by a glue stick and covered with playdoh. Emphasize that the materials in the box may represent any materials the
. Nocito-Gobel, et al, “Project-Based Introduction to Engineering – A University Core Course”, Submitted to the Proceedings of the 2004 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. 3. Aliane, B., et al,”Project Planning and Development for Engineering Freshman”, Submitted to the Proceedings of the 2004 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. 4. Hoit, M, Ohland, M., “ The Impact of a Discipline-Based Introduction to Engineering Course on Improving Retention”, Journal of Engineering Education, January 1998, pp.79-85 5. Severance, F.L., Suchowski, M., Miller, D. “Benefits of a Hands-On Introduction to Electrical and Computer Engieering”, Proceedings of the 2003 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
load application. The stress at fracture using this flexure test is known as the flexural Page 9.1101.5 “Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering"strength, modulus of rupture, fracture strength, or the bend strength. For a rectangular crosssection, the fracture stress σfs is equal to σfs = 3FfL/2bd2 whereFf is the load at fracture; L is the distance between support points, b the specimen width, and dthe specimen thickness/depth. It is important to note that σfs depends on specimen size
engineering was found by the authors’review of ABET criteria.Reviewing the guidelines specified by the Accreditation Board Engineering Technology(ABET), one notices a correlation between these guidelines and music. In the ABET2004-2005 criteria for “Accrediting Engineering Programs,” the “Program Criteria forElectrical, Computer, and Similarly Named Engineering Programs” section states in“Criterion 3. Program Outcomes and Assessment” specifically that “Engineeringprograms must demonstrate that their graduates have: (a) an ability to apply knowledgeof mathematics, science, and engineering; (b) an ability to design and conductexperiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data; (c) an ability to design a system,component, or process to meet desired
Average Writing Assignment Average (a) (b) Page 9.420.7 Figure 5. (a) Data from Spring 2003 term. (b) Data from Fall 2003 term. Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for
educators need to consider at thetime of developing their teaching philosophies, summarized below: a) Their objectives in teaching. b) Tools and methods used to achieve those objectives c) Tools and methods used to measure the achievement of objectives d) The self-reflection on why teaching is important for themThe goal of this paper is to analyze each one of these critical points, guiding faculty members towardsbuilding a document consistent with their interests and institutional mission. Page 9.405.1 “Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition
attributes including key words of the title, abstract,first page, or even the total piece of writing.This ease in looking up information has given rise to the concept of information overload, and topotentially obtain knowledge, a la Drucker, from this activity often requires an elaborate proce-dure, such as an Internet search engine. In similar fashion, a key finding from How People Learnis: To develop competence in an area of inquiry, students must: (a) have a deep foun- dation of factual knowledge (information), (b) understand facts and ideas in the context of a conceptual framework, and (c) organize knowledge (information) in ways that facilitate retrieval and application.7What then is knowledge as utilized in Davis’ four
-Samii, and E. Michielssen, “Electromagnetic Optimization by Genetic Algorithms,” John Wiley &Sons Editor.V. J. Rayward-Smith, I. H. Osman, C. R. Reeves (Editor), and G. D. Smith “Modern Heuristic Search Methods,”John Wiley & Sons EditorJ. B. Temes, “Teaching electromagnetic waves to electrical engineering students: an abridged approach,” IEEETrans. Educ., vol. 46, pp. 283-288, May 2003.Baren, M.R.; Watson, J., “Developing communication skills in engineering classes,” In Professional CommunicationConference, 1993. IPCC 93 Proceedings. 'The New Face of Technical Communication: People, Processes, Products', pp. 432-437, Oct. 1993.FABIO URBANI has been a Visiting Associate Professor of Engineering Technology at UTB since 2002. Sincethen, he
Defense of a Little Theory.” Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 128(4), 206-11.4. Jones, J. B. (1998). "The Non-Use of Computer in Undergraduate Engineering Science Courses.” Journal of Engineering Education, January, 11-23.5. Whiteman, Col. W. E., and Col. K. P. Nygen. (2000). Achieving the Right Balance: Properly Integrating Mathematical Software Packages into Engineering Education. Journal of Engineering Education, July, 331-36.6. Jewell, T. K. (2001). "Teaching Hydraulic Design Using Equation Solvers." Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 127(12), 1013-21.7. Kohler, R. L., D. A. Sabotini, and L. D. Fink. (2002). "Laptops in the Classroom: Do They Make a Difference?" Journal of Engineering
Critical Thinking Skills in DFM Small Projects, Proceedings of ASEE Annual Conference, June 22-25, 2003, Nashville, TN.6 Rantanen, K., Levels of solutions, URL: http://www.triz-journal.com/archives/1997/12/d/index.htm , viewed on 1/3/20047 Zlotin, B., Zusman, A., Managing Innovation Knowledge, URL: http://www.triz- journal.com/archives/1999/04/c/index.htm , viewed on 1/3/20048 Prusak, Z., Fostering Inventiveness in Engineering Education – an International Perspective, Proceedings of ASEE Annual Conference, June 16-19, 2002, Montreal, QC, Canada.9 http://www.societehisto.org/Musee/Recits/patenteux.html viewed on 1/6/200410 Lean Product Development Group. URL: http://www.lean-product-development.com/issues.htm
Session 1725 The Dilemma of Education in Participatory Design: The Marketplace Value vs. Community Value Kun-Jung Hsu Department of Construction Technology Leader University, Taiwan.AbstractThe concept of “participatory planning/design” has gradually become one of the main themesin professional design and social science. However, because behavioral patterns in spacedesign are closely related to the values of the designers concerned, the pursuit andconstruction of a good place is a basic and normative proposition in the
Session Using Case Studies to Teach Engineering Design and Ethics Larry G. Richards, Michael E. Gorman University of VirginiaAbstract:At the University of Virginia, we have developed (researched and written) a set of case studiesfor teaching engineering ethics, engineering design, and environmental issues. These cases havebeen used in a course on Invention and Design, and in other courses offered by our Division ofTechnology, Culture, and Communications (TCC). Many of these cases have been published inbook form 1. Others are available through the course website for