severalmore steps to follow, however, if we are to put what was learned at the colloquy into action. Thefollowing is a list of near- and medium-term action items compiled by colloquy participants: Develop a full report on the colloquy, its findings, and its implications. Validate the above final list of learning objectives both internally to the colloquy participants and externally to other institutions, and note any new issues or challenges related to achieving them. Develop a collection of distance education projects being conducted among the practice- oriented professions, and encourage the development of such projects. Develop quality assurance mechanisms for assessing and evaluating the effectiveness of
(NIST), Johnson Controls Incorporated, and US Army TACOM / GVSC, Michelin, The Boeing Company, South Carolina Department of Commerce, and Fraunhofer USA Alliance. He serves as the ME Department Capstone Faculty Coordinator, working with industry partners and students to address design and manufacturing challenges. In addition, he leads a multi-university student project focused on distributed design and manufacturing of UAVs. He is the Associate Director of Education and Training at the Product Lifecycle Management (PLM) Center and Director of Exter- nal Engagement for the Virtual Prototyping of Autonomy-Enabled Ground Systems (VIPR-GS) Center at Clemson University.Venkat Jaya Deep Jakka, Clemson UniversityDr. Rahul
eventually led her to a position in IT for a semiconductor IP start-up. Fast forward through coast-to-coast moves to Boston, San Diego and finally Rochester, Kathy spent many years in the fitness industry while raising her daughter, wearing every hat from personal trainer and cycling instructor to owner and director of Cycledelic Indoor Cycling Studio. Kathy draws upon these many diverse career and life experiences while directing WE@RIT. In the spring of 2020, Kathy earned her Master of Science degree in Program Design, Analysis & Manage- ment through RIT’s School of Individualized Study, combining concentrations in Project Management, Analytics and Research, & Group Leadership and Development. An unabashed
engineering student misconceptions in thermal and transport science.Dr. John L. Falconer P.E., University of Colorado, BoulderMichael J. Prince, Bucknell UniversityMargot A Vigeant, Bucknell University Margot Vigeant is an Associate Professor of Chemical Engineering with research interests in Engineering Education and Bioprocess Engineering. She is also Associate Dean of Engineering at Bucknell University.Stephen J Krause, Arizona State University Stephen J. Krause is Professor in the School of Materials in the Fulton School of Engineering at Arizona State University. He teaches in the areas of bridging engineering and education, capstone design, and introductory materials engineering. His research interests are evaluating
AC 2011-1778: UNIT OPERATIONS LAB BAZAAR: INCORPORATIONOF LABORATORY EXPERIENCES IN SIX INTEGRATED PILLAR COURSESMichael Jefferson Baird, University of Pittsburgh Dr. Baird joined the chemical engineering department at the University of Pittsburgh in the spring of 2008 as Instructor of Undergraduate Laboratory Courses. He also teaches a graduate course entitled ”Petroleum and Natural Gas Processing”. Before joining the University of Pittsburgh, Dr. Baird was an associate pro- fessor of chemistry at Wheeling Jesuit University for nine years following his retirement from the U.S. Department of Energy. While at DOE’s National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL) in Pittsburgh, Dr. Baird managed projects involving the
, failure-imbued learning experiences truly offer a glimpse of the real work done inadvanced science and engineering professional environments. Moreover, the greater number ofengineering students going into industry can also benefit from this kind of learning experiencebecause real-world problems and work contexts are not constrained like textbook assignments orlecture halls. Real world problems are messy, require collaboration and often involve moderatefailure from which rebound is necessary, much like a research lab. Interdisciplinary reasoningand problem-solving is so complex and challenging that undergraduates need to can onlydevelop the requisite habits of the mind over four years, not just one time in the capstone designcourse.Design
programs. After learning the digital filterimplementation, students enhanced their skills in the embedded system design significantly sothat they could apply their gained knowledge and proficiency into their senior capstone projects.Our future improvement could include developing more practical projects with applications ofprocessing low frequency signals like instrumentation, vibration, and biomedical signals.IV. ConclusionIn this paper, we have demonstrated the feasibility and our pedagogy for teaching a real-timeDSP course using the 68HC12 microcontroller. We have validated that using the 68HC12microcontroller as a platform in our DSP course is not only cost-effective but also learningeffective. The developed method could be an alternative when
Page 4.50.4extensive technical knowledge into a capstone design project. In terms of student learningoutcomes, how does faculty define appropriate levels of mastery from lower to upper divisioncurricula? At the program level, the curriculum will truly become integrated as a result offocusing on student learning outcomes. For example, at the New Jersey Institute of Technology,the departmental faculty were asked to review ABET-related learning outcomes and prioritizethem across the curriculum [21]. The result clearly demonstrated that the conceptualization ofspecific learning outcomes changed over the course of the curriculum.The focus on learning outcomes reinforces the need for cross-discipline and cross-institutionalcollaboration. Not only
. Cicciarelli, “Use of pre-recorded video demonstrations in laboratory courses.” Chemical Engineering Education 47 (2), 133-136 (2013).21. The Foundation Coalition, “Forming student engineering teams.” available at www.foundationcoalition.org/ teams, last accessed January 2014.22. S. Feichtner and E. Davis, “Why some groups fail: a survey of students’ experiences with learning groups.” Organizational Behavior Teaching Review 9, 58-71 (1984).23. J. Brickell, D. Porter, M. Reynolds and R. Cosgrave, “Assigning students to groups for engineering design projects: a comparison of five methods.” Journal of Engineering Education 7, 259-262 (1994).24. C. Heldt, “Peer evaluation in chemical engineering capstone design via wikis.” Chemical Engineering
the students they focus on and the types ofproblems they address. Many, if not most civil engineers are familiar with the Steel Bridge and Concrete Canoecompetitions. The first national level steel bridge competition was held in 1992 and continuesthrough today. It is sponsored by the American Institute of Steel Construction and the AmericanSociety of Civil Engineers and its mission is“to supplement the education of civil engineeringstudents with a comprehensive, student-driven project experience from conception and designthrough fabrication, erection, and testing, culminating in a steel structure that meets clientspecifications and optimizes performance and economy” (14). In this competition, the all bridgedimensions are set and the
through education research and service in Graduate Student Government.Dr. Lisa Benson, Clemson University Lisa Benson is a Professor of Engineering and Science Education at Clemson University. Her research focuses on the interactions between student motivation and their learning experiences. Her projects include studies of student perceptions, beliefs and attitudes towards becoming engineers and scientists, and their development of problem-solving skills, self-regulated learning practices, and epistemic beliefs. Other projects in the Benson group involve students’ navigational capital, and researchers’ schema development through the peer review process. Dr. Benson is an American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE
Paper ID #46692Laboratory Fixture for Heat Transfer Using a Hair DrierProf. timothy C scott, Sweet Briar College Engineering Professor of Practice, Wyllie Engineering ProgramMr. Lemuel T Curran, Sweet Briar College Lem Curran is a licensed educator and mechanical engineer with over 25 years of experience in engineering design, advanced fabrication, and STEM education. He currently manages the engineering lab at Sweet Briar College, supporting student projects, faculty research, and curriculum development in courses such as Capstone, Thermodynamics, and CAD. He has also taught engineering, robotics, and fabrication at
anonymous indirect assessment in the form of a survey. Thesurvey questions focused on the students’ perceptions of their learning experiences, classroomand project engagement, confidence in applying theoretical concepts, and the perceivedrelevance of lab activities to practical applications. Findings revealed that 50% of the reportingstudents felt "very satisfied" or "satisfied" with the open-ended lab experience, while 83% foundthe experiences "extremely effective" or "effective" in enhancing their understanding of corefluid mechanics concepts. These results suggest that while satisfaction levels vary, students feltthe labs were highly effective and thus achieved their primary educational objectives. The pilotstudy supports further implementation
implement data tablesand graphs into an ELN, and most computers already include software that will produce tablesand graphs.ELNs in Undergraduate EducationThe following section borrows heavily from Cardenas (2014)3. There are a few examples in theliterature regarding ELNs in undergraduate education. Meyer et al described the use of anHTML-based laboratory notebook (design journal) in a capstone digital systems course atPurdue4 . Assessment of the students’ laboratory notebooks showed improvement when twotablet PCs were allocated per team, but the students reported that the HTML format was ahindrance to maintaining their notebooks, and indicated a preference for a commercial ELN Proceedings of the 2014 American Society for Engineering
Project Management Professional.Joseph Speight, United States Military Academy Joseph Speight is an Army Engineer Officer and Instructor in the Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering at USMA. He graduated from USMA in 2013 with a Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering. In 2017, he received a Master of Science in Geological Engineering from the Missouri University of Science and Technology. In 2022, he earned a Master of Science in Civil and Environmental Engineering from Stanford University. He is a licensed Professional Engineer. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Running Out of Classroom Space? Maybe It’s a Schedule
into the basic workings of a blockchain. We did not, however, completeany deep analysis on how the mining and hashing works in the blockchain. This is one topic wewould like to further research.6.2 Conclusions and Next StepsIn conclusion, we have achieved the major objectives laid out in Section 2. However, we alsoidentified numerous topics that could be a fertile ground for many exciting and rewarding researchand capstone projects as listed below.It is exciting to share our journey of creating a private blockchain network. We believe that thevirtual machines and hands-on lab exercises being passed down will be valuable to the academiccommunity interested in learning and/or teaching the inner workings of blockchain. We hope thatwith the
solutions andtheories are non-existent. Hence, it was not surprising to find that over 1/3 of the literature in thereview highlighted the importance of these types of experiences. As a result, learning by doing,especially in a group, is broadly recommended by the literature [e.g., 6, 26, 79]. Some note itsvalue to developing interest, some to demonstrating expertise, and some to enjoying meaningfulwork. Moreover, providing a safe environment for trialing various leadership behaviors alsoprovides a learning opportunity for all [11, 26, 27, 66]. However, group work is not a silverbullet; Rosch’s [28, 29] research found that group environments (such as are experienced in classor upper-division capstone projects) without mentoring, scaffolding, and
science, novel methods for environmental re- mediation, and microelectronics including surface acoustic wave (SAW) devices. In addition to teaching in the field of electrical engineering, he coordinates the senior engineering capstone program which is a multidisciplinary, two-semester course sequence with projects sponsored by industrial partners. Within this role, he focuses on industrial outreach and the teaching and assessment of professional skills. He received his Ph.D. and S.M. degrees from MIT in 2007 and 1999, respectively, and a B.S.E.E. degree from the University of Virginia in 1997.Dr. Hayrettin B. Karayaka, Western Carolina University Bora Karayaka is an Associate Professor at the College of Engineering and
served more than 2000students since its inception.Dr. Wickliff is blessed to work daily in the area of her passion – developing young professionals – in herrole at Texas A&M University. She is the Director of the College of Engineering’s, Zachry LeadershipProgram and a Professor of Engineering Practice. At Texas A&M University, she has taught Capstone Se-nior Design and Foundations of Engineering courses, but now teaches Engineering Leadership Develop-ment courses. She has also taught Project Management and Risk Management courses for the Universityof Phoenix.Dr. Wickliff has been honored with University of Houston’s Distinguished Young Engineering AlumniAward, the Black Engineer of the Year Career Achievement Award for New Emerging
existing UW study abroad infrastructure.Learning TheoryEngineering Rome incorporates project-based experiential learning, which has shown to be atype of active learning that is crucial for the development of an appreciation for lifelong learning.Lenschow14 explains that: “Project-based learning (PBL) is winning ground in industry and at a slower rate in universities and colleges. PBL is pedagogically based on constructivist learning in a setting represented by Kolb’s learning cycle. Kolb observed that students learn in four different ways: Kolb’s idea is that the cycle shall be repeated. The cycle is best started with concrete experience, proceeding to abstraction.”14The basic classroom premise of the course involves
societal challenges; and 4)perform data collection, analysis and presentation in order to answer research questions andshare research results with a professional audience. The course also emphasized critical thinking,multidisciplinary perspectives, leadership and team-based problem solving. To achieve thecourse learning objectives, the course focused on problems associated with an aging sewersystem, generally, and the lack of local sewer infrastructure data, specifically. This course wasexperimental in that it introduced design thinking through an experiential learning project earlyin engineering students’ academic careers. Traditionally, design capstone courses are offeredtoward the end of students’ course of study after core courses and textbook
penetration in the workplace of our graduates. In a biennialsurvey of recent engineering graduates from Penn State reported below, we have found distinctlymodest levels of importance in the respondents’ work assigned to “Importance of Working on anInternational Project.” Although this importance rating has been creeping up since the firstsurvey of 1993 graduates, it is still below a 3 on a 5 point scale. Conversely, the respondentsrated study abroad experiences highly (3.5 to 4.5) even if they did not have one, and most didnot. So those surveyed have very positive attitudes towards engagement with the rest of theworld, but they are not yet rating its significance to their work very highly. Both these findingswould seem to challenge the view that our
effectiveness of interdisciplinary instructional designpractices.IntroductionEngineers bear the professional responsibility to ensure that a given project benefits society bytaking into account the impact of human and social factors when making engineering decisionsand communicating technical expertise. Given the importance of such considerations [1], ABETaccreditation criteria explicitly target them as expectations for professional readiness. Inengineering and engineering technology curricula, project-based learning from freshman projectsto senior capstones and human-centered design [2] are highly effective pedagogies that areintegral to the curricula for all the students in the programs. To address societal factors inengineering design, an
her college’s leadership teams for both multi-disciplinary capstone design and outreach program development.Dr. Jacqueline R. Mozrall, Rochester Institute of Technology (COE) Jacqueline Reynolds Mozrall, Ph.D. is a Professor and Associate Dean in the Kate Gleason College of Engineering at RIT, previously serving as Department Head in Industrial and Systems Engineering. She performed ergonomic training, job/workplace design, and product development functions in manufac- turing and office environments for several years. Most recently, she has been engaged in research and activities related to the recruitment and advancement of women students and faculty in STEM-related areas. She has a keen interest in undergraduate
]. These frameworks ensure that engineering graduates meet industryexpectations, adapt to technological advancements, and foster effective multidisciplinarycollaboration. Given these factors, embedding professionalism into engineering curricula is widelyrecognized as critical to career success and long-term professional development. [7]-[9]As an ABET-accredited institution, in our institution, professionalism is integrated into curricularand co-curricular activities including freshman design courses, senior capstone projects,professional seminars, and extracurricular activities such as ASCE student chapter events, mockinterviews, and competitions. Project-based learning pedagogy has also been incorporated intojunior-level design courses; however
inequities in student success; and (c) cultivate more ethical future scientists and engineers by blending social, political and technological spheres. She prioritizes working on projects that seek to share power with students and orient to stu- dents as partners in educational transformation. She pursues projects that aim to advance social justice in undergraduate STEM programs and she makes these struggles for change a direct focus of her research.Dr. David Tomblin, University of Maryland, College Park David is the director of the Science, Technology and Society program at the University of Maryland, Col- lege Park. He works with STEM majors on the ethical and social dimensions of science and technology. David also does
engineering courses, communication skills are not taught explicitly;however, students are expected and held accountable for being able to speak and write well.Consequently, there is a need to change university engineering programs in order to provideopportunities for students to develop communication skills (Pet-Armacost, & Armacost, 2003).The importance and need for oral and written communication skills in engineering has beenclearly recognized. Engineering students who have good communication skills are more likelyto succeed and advance in the professional world than those who don’t.Team-Working Skills in EngineeringIn today’s work environment, project tasks generally involve the establishment of teams formedby people from different functional
.” These terms describe the relative degree to which a given course contributes to an outcome based upon the breadth and depth of relevant subjects covered in the course. The following guidelines are used in determining the ratings.∀ ≠ minor: The topic is introduced in course lectures, laboratories, homework assignments, Page 15.653.4 projects, etc. Lecture time devoted to the topic is on the order of one week during the 3 semester. The topic is covered on tests and exams, but
and learning process. The goal of this project is to explore the educational philosophiesenacted in the most impactful undergraduate classrooms, according to graduate students’perceptions, in order to give the new educator a foundation for their own course design process.Previous ResearchWhy Examine Students’ Perceptions of Learning Environments?At the start of the new semester, students enter a classroom not as “blank slates,” but withparticular conceptions about teaching and learning based on their prior experiences5. As a result,the effects of learning activities and perceptions of classroom interactions among the instructorand the students may differ by student5,8. Further, research has also shown that students’conceptions about teaching
, theSBP objectives were to (1) increase motivation for engineering academic study, (2) reinforcepersonal commitment among students early in their engineering academic career to aid retention,(3) increase skill in areas with relevance to the study of Engineering, and (4) ensure effectivenessof programming to achieve these objectives amongst a primarily Hispanic/Latinx studentpopulation. In order to achieve these objectives, the program then selected the followingelements for implementation in the SBP:1) Introduce key skills necessary for engineering academic study.2) Introduce engineering design activities/skills, and a guided experience in a group design project as a precursor to student’s future capstone engineering design