University of Applied Sciences in Groningen, where he taught both in Dutch and in English. During this time his primary teaching and course develop- ment responsibilities were wide-ranging, but included running the Unit Operations laboratory, introducing Aspen Plus software to the curriculum, and developing a course for a new M.S. program on Renewable Energy (EUREC). In conjunction with his teaching appointment, he supervised dozens of internships (a part of the curriculum at the Hanze), and a number of undergraduate research projects with the Energy Knowledge Center (EKC) as well as a master’s thesis. In 2016, Dr. Barankin returned to the US to teach at the Colorado School of Mines. His primary teaching and course
this grant, he advised over 500 individual calculus students on their course projects. He was given an Outstanding Advising Award by USF and has been the recipient of numerous teaching awards at the department, college, university (Jerome Krivanek Distinguished Teaching Award) and state (TIP award) levels. Scott is also a co-PI for a Helios-funded Middle School Residency Program for Science and Math (for which he teaches the capstone course) and is on the leadership committee for an NSF IUSE grant to transform STEM Education at USF. His research is in the areas of solution thermodynamics and environmental monitoring and modeling.Prof. Carlos A. Smith PhD, University of South Florida Carlos A. Smith is a Professor
contacted at tal2@psu.edu.Mark Wharton, Pennsylvania State University Mark J. Wharton is an Assistant Professor of Electrical Engineering at Penn State. He teaches undergraduate courses in Electronics Electronics I, II, and III) and Senior Project Design, the EE capstone design course. He received his B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Penn State and his M.S. from the University of Colorado in Boulder. Prior to working at Penn State, Mark spent over Page 13.690.1 30 years in industry as an Electronic Design Engineer. He can be contacted by phone at 814-865-2091 or by email at MarkWharton@psu.edu.John
students).After the arrangement of these features twelve types of homogeneous groups were formed: • Public Spanish high school, • Transfer, • Private English high school • Private high school • Rural high school • Pre-basic • Academic difficulties, • Graduate in five years, • Coop, • Private English freshmen, • Public Spanish freshmen, and • Pre-basic freshmen.Fifty five students participated in this project. Twenty three were females and twenty two males,all of them were undergraduate students ranging from the freshmen to the fifth-plus year.Students’ were asked to complete a questionnaire regarding demographic and high school relatedfactors, such as the type of high school they attended, the language of instruction (English orSpanish or
fully incorporate the breadth and depth of knowledge and skills comprised in RPTwork. This belief is supported by Dauer and StGermain’s (2006) assertion that traditionalapproaches to radiological training may not be enough to facilitate deep learning. Theywarn that adherence to traditional educational approaches may result in workers withknowledge and skills deficits. They encourage the exploration and evaluation ofalternative learning philosophies that use such learning strategies as: inductivediscussion, self assessments, case studies, demonstrations, projects, prompting andcoaching, interactive lectures, and guided reflection. We have attempted to incorporatemany of these strategies into our theoretical and instructional design framework
highlighted word of mouth,workshops, and literature as the most common diffusion channel to raise awareness.18 Diffusionof Innovations was also used to investigate the diffusion of the Engineering EducationCoalitions’ SUCCEED program.19 In another engineering education context, Montfort et al.investigated the adoption of a Capstone Assessment Instrument through interviews finding thatspecific university context and perceptions greatly affected adoption decisions.20 Similar toMontfort et al., in this study we investigate early adopters through qualitative interviews.Theoretical FrameworkIn this paper we use the framework of Diffusion of innovations. Through interviews we arespecifically investigating the initial stages of the innovation-decision
course,additional exposure to PHA’s can help refine student understanding and appreciation for theinsight PHA’s can provide, helping students determine appropriate materials of construction aswell as the manner in which components are assembled and how the overall system may bedesigned to minimize safety hazards, with economic impact as a continuing consideration.Starting last year, in the fall semester of 2012, we asked that students perform a simplified PHAas a part of one of their small design projects. This systematic review of their process designshelped clarify the need for appropriately placed pressure relief valves and rupture discs, flow
entrepreneurship program which enrolls over 1000 students from all majors. As part of the program, she has established en- trepreneurship capstone, global entrepreneurship, and women and leadership courses and initiatives. Her research has focused on the assessment of entrepreneurship education, the impact of entrepreneurship education on engineering students, IP policy as it relates to undergraduates, and women and leadership. Prior to her work in academia, Duval-Couetil spent several years in the field of market research and busi- ness strategy consulting in Europe and the United States with Booz Allen and Hamilton and Data and Strategies Group. She was recently elected to the board of the United States Association for Small
, Millennium Project. University of Michigan.13. Ericsson K.A. (1999). Creative expertise as superior reproducible performance: Innovative and flexible aspects of expert performance. Psychological Inquiry, 10, 329-333.14. Ericsson, K.A., Krampe, R.T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of Page 15.151.18 expert performance. Psychological Review, 100, 363-406.15. Fitts, P.M., & Posner, M.I. (1967). Human Performance. Belmont, CA: Brookes Cole.16. Guilford, J.P. (1967). The Nature of Human Intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.17. Jansson, D. G., & Smith, S. M. (1991
though the objects discussed in the course (e.g. gear or linkage Mechanisms) are very concrete. Especially the symbolic representation of mechanisms is meaningless to most students if they cannot establish the mapping relation between abstract symbols and realistic mechanisms in mind.(2) There is no close relation between the individual course contents. It is not necessary, for example, the chapter “Cam Mechanisms” and “Gear Mechanisms” in a given order to teach. As a result, the students are not capable of integrating the diverse knowledge from the course to solve practical kinematic problems later by their project or capstone design.(3) Only by the chapter “Cam Mechanisms”, the students can acquire design ability
. degree in Engineering Education from Purdue University in 2013, M.S. degree in Biomedical En- gineering from Purdue University in 2009, and B.S. degree in Material Science and Engineering from Tsinghua University in China in 2007. Her research interests focus on educational studies that can help improve teaching, learning, and educational policy decision makings using both quantitative and qual- itative research methods. Her current research project in National Center for Engineering Pathways to Innovation (Epicenter) focuses on measuring engineering students’ entrepreneurial interests and related individual characteristics. Her Ph.D. dissertation involved using statistical modeling methods to explain and predict
publicspeaking and presentations.Engineering students are not often required to present complex ideas to technical and non- Page 8.1199.6technical audiences that mirror the design meetings and public information meetings that real Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition 2003, American Society for Engineering Educationengineers must participate in. Many students make presentations in upper division designcourses, often as part of group work, but it remains unclear how much class time is devoted todeveloping presentation skills in the average capstone or
arereinforced in senior lab. The content and structure of the introductory statistics course andefforts to integrate these concepts into senior lab will be discussed.1. IntroductionUndergraduate chemical engineering education emphasizes analysis and then design. In thetypical curriculum, the majority of the technical credit hours are devoted to fundamental science(e.g., general chemistry, physics, physical chemistry, and organic chemistry) and engineeringsciences (e.g., mass and energy balances, thermodynamics, transport processes, reactionengineering, process dynamics and control). The student is then asked to synthesize this materialin unit operations and then the capstone design course. However, the majority of graduates arehired as Process
-Hill Book Co., NewYork, 1978, pp. 173-182.2) Hurley, R. B., Decision Tables in Software Engineering,, Van Nostrand Reinhold Data Co., New York, 1983.3) Ertas, A. & Jones, J., The Engineering Design Process,, 2nd ed., John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1993, pp. 75-79.4) Wilcox, A.D., Engineering Design Project Guidelines,, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1987.5) Boylestad, R and Nashelsky, L., Electronics Devices,, 7th ed., Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jew Jersey, 1999, Chapter 11.6) Gottfried, B. S., & Weisman, J., Introduction to Optimization Theory, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1973.DOMINGO L. UYDomingo Uy is currently an Assistant Professor of Electronics Engineering Technology at Fort Valley
societies. He has taught 18 different undergraduate and graduate courses related to transportation as well as undergraduate capstone design courses. Nambisan also has been very active in leadership roles of several professional societies and organizations such as the American Society of Civil Engi- neers (ASCE), American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), Council of University Transporta- tion Centers (CUTC), Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), and Transportation Research Board (TRB). His current appointments include those as a member of the Educational Activities Committee which reports to ASCE’s Board of Direction; Chair of the ASEE Civil Engineering Division; member of the Executive Committee of CUTC
course work, must appropriate to the discipline. meet the minimum credit hour foundation course requirements (Table 6.1) in each curricularThe Integration of Content Baccalaureate degree category.programs must provide a capstone or integratingexperience that develops student competencies in 6.3.15 Upper Division Course Work: Studentsapplying both technical and non-technical skills in shall successfully complete a
].Survey Design and MethodologyThis research project was reviewed and determined to be exempt by our college’s InstitutionalReview Board (IRB). Our experimental setup consisted of two groups of students at a largeMidwestern R1 University, in an undergraduate, pre-capstone SE course. We utilized a quasi-experimental pretest-posttest hybrid between groups and within groups design for this study. Thecontrol and treatment groups consisted of successive cohorts of sophomores/juniors from CS andComputer Engineering, one section each. This SE course was a mandatory component of theiracademic progression towards earning their degree.The treatment group was taught using PI while the control group received instruction throughtraditional lectures. The
. Page 22.248.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Assessment Based on Howard Gardner’s Theory of Multiple Intelligences Mysore Narayanan, Miami University, Ohio.Abstract Scholars in the area of cognitive science and educational psychology agree that‘assessment’ as ‘learning’ should not be treated like a third-party research project orsome administrator’s questionnaire. Assessment must be actually viewed as acommunity effort or nothing. Assessment must be driven by a faculty's owncommitment to reflect, react, innovate and improve. Educators have also recognized thatit is very important that instructors make a strong effort to teach to the
Network Installation, Maintenance andManagement - A Proposed New Curriculum for Undergraduates and Postgraduates,” The Australian ComputerJournal, vol. 30, pp. 111-119, (1996).3. S. P. Maj, G. Kohli, and D. Veal, “Teaching Computer and Network Technology to Multi-Media students -a novel approach,” presented at 3rd Baltic Region Seminar on Engineering Education, Goteborg, Sweden,(1999).4. E. T. Workforce, “Educating the workforce for the new millenium,” in Campus Review, (1996).5. D. J. Ewing, “Microcomputers systems 1: a computer science and engineering capstone course,” ACMSIGCSE Bulletin, vol. 25, 155-159, (1993).6. M. Gschwind, “Preprogrammable hardware for educational purposes,” ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, vol. 26, 183-187, (1994).7. W. A. Coey, “An
addressing lab questions. Four full-time faculty createdmultimedia content and follow-up exercises for assessment of student learning outcomes. Duringthe asynchronous lab session, students are required to read the lab instructions and watch shortvideos before beginning the lab exercise or project. A pilot class simulates the online course withthe newly developed content. The flipped classroom method shows promise based on studentfeedback and comparing student learning outcomes between the pilot class and the face-to-facecourse. The feedback from student surveys is discussed as well as suggested improvements ofonline course instruction.KeywordsOnline, Flipped Classroom, Short Videos, Adaptive LearningIntroductionCTU is a private for-profit university
figures such as object-strip color22, purely kinematic principles23, or spectraldistribution24. These approaches are attractive because their features are efficient to compute, andthey have inherently manageable search spaces.C. Suggested Course ExercisesThe intents of these exercises are to reinforce specific material in the host course and to provideguided procedures for other aspects. (More comprehensive experience could be assigned forcourse projects, honors research, capstone design work, etc.) Consider exercises for the threesuggested topics, i.e. image processing, embedded systems, and artificial intelligence, as shownin Table 1. A basic processing pipeline is assumed here that uses background subtraction to findobject blobs and that
, making, while business training might prioritize and self-directed learning. Incorporating tools like AI- scenario-based leadership, risk assessment, and assisted personalized learning or experiential projects strategic thinking; bridges abstract concepts with practical significance. These approaches promote motivation and ownership o Public libraries, community centers, and online of learning while reinforcing the development of platforms can host free workshops on digital higher-order thinking skills vital in the modern world. literacy, critical thinking, and cybersecurity awareness to
Paper ID #37427Comparing labs before, during, and after COVID in aMeasurements and Analysis CourseBridget M. Smyser (Teaching Professor) Bridget Smyser is a Teaching Professor in the Mechanical & Industrial Engineering department at Northeastern University. She holds a BS in Chemistry from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and a Ph.D. in Materials Science and Engineering from Worcester Polytechnic Institute. Her research interests include capstone design and lab pedagogy, , effective methods to teach technical communication, and integrating diversity, equity, and inclusion concepts into engineering
findings. Assessment Instrument Overview As described in the Introduction, we chose to use these 3 constructs (of 6 available from the Intercultural Knowledge and Competence VALUE Rubric) to evaluate participant intercultural awareness gained through M&M programming: Cultural SelfAwareness (knowledge), Openness (skills) and Empathy (attitude). Our research team chose this instrument because of the theoretical alignment with our research objectives. Theoretical perspectives in which this instrument is grounded were also described in the Introduction. Regarding criteria for assessing at each level of this rubric, one moves progressively from Benchmark (1) to Milestones (2, 3) and then to Capstone (4
Paper ID #37969Toy Adaptation in a Laboratory Course: An Examination of LaboratoryInterests and Career MotivationsDr. Alyssa Catherine Taylor, University of California, San Diego Dr. Alyssa Taylor is an Associate Teaching Professor in the Shu Chien-Gene Lay Department of Bioengi- neering at the University of California San Diego. Dr. Taylor has twelve years of experience teaching across bioengineering laboratory, introductory, and capstone design classes. Through work such as toy adaptation described in this paper, Dr. Taylor seeks to prepare students to engage in Universal Design and consider accessibility in their
Paper ID #38851Literature Exploration of Graduate Student Well-Being as Related toAdvisingDr. Liesl Klein, Villanova University Liesl Krause-Klein is a assistant teaching professor at Villanova University in their electrical and computer engineering department. She graduated from Purdue University’s Polytechnic institute in 2022. Her research focused on student well-being. She is currently in charge of curriculum for capstone projects within her department.Dr. Greg J. Strimel, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PPI) Greg J. Strimel, Ph.D., is an associate professor of Technology Leadership and Innovation and program
robotics, biomedical devices, and engineering education. He teaches introductory design, mechanics, mechatronics, capstone design, medical devices, and product design & entrepreneurship. His interests in design education includes increasing student motivation, teamwork, hands-on projects, and integration of theory into design projects. In 1999 he co- founded Coactive Drive Corporation (currently General Vibration), a company that provides haptic solutions. In 2016 Nate co-founded eGrove Education, Inc. an educational software company focused on teaching sketching and spatial visualization skills.Carolyn L Sandoval (Associate Director) © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022
. The bonds of “shared struggle” wereforged through study groups, course project teams, and senior capstone project. Studyparticipants reported forming peer study groups to be crucial to their academic learning andformation of social connections. Daniel was proactive in starting and joining study groups: Because most of them were engineers, we just started studying together. So, I just met people in my dorm that were like exceptionally good in certain subjects. One guy literally sat down for two hours to teach me a concept that like I was really struggling with. So having a friend group to fall back on if I don’t understand something has been big for me.When study participants entered “in their major,” they reported
Participation was less than 100% because some students were allowed to use prior work experience to earn theirinternship credit or substitute the internship with a capstone project. Internship participation has risen from 84% ofgraduates in 2015 to 96% in 2019.12 At MECC, the internship was not offered for credit (either as an elective or required) in the Electrical and CNCEngineering Technology programs.The challenges surrounding finding an internship were reflected in the MWCC InternshipSurvey. Finding an internship was by far the most difficult aspect of the internship. 78% of thewomen and 64% of the men reported that finding an internship was somewhat difficult, difficult,or very difficult. In comparison, 66% of white students, 59% of Hispanic