were recruited from the pool of faculty members teachingthe courses whose exams were processed in phase one. As instructors, these faculty membersare very familiar with the language that ought to be discipline-specific for the courses that theyteach. This aspect of the research has passed the ethics review at the institution where this studywas conducted.The methodology of this phase of the research involves training, calibration, quantitative datacollection, and debriefing of each participant. A condensed methodology is described below:1. Participants were recruited using a standardized email request. In some cases, participants were asked in-person as a follow-up to the email, to ensure that the email was read.2. A Doodle.com account was
. Students then integrate the non-technical framework from Stages 1-3 and the technical material from Stage 4 within a problem-solving exercise. The exercises necessarily vary across courses, but they share commonelements: hands-on involvement of the student (e.g., through a laboratory or in-class exercise),analysis of real-world data or simulation (e.g., electroencephalograms during a brain-computerinterface), and reflection on ethical or practical issues raised by the data (e.g., whether the dataindicate an acceptable level of performance, given cost constraints). Instructors are urged toconnect their activities to local resources whenever possible (e.g., research laboratories or designfirms). Successful applications will not only make the GC seem
Page 24.556.14 Education Conference 2011: Developing engineers for social justice: Community involvement, ethics & sustainability 5-7 December 2011, Fremantle, Western Australia, Engineers Australia, 2011, p. 448.13. M. Hall & K. M. Elliott, Journal of Education for Business, 2003, 78:6, 301-307, DOI: 10.1080/0883232030959861714. M.M. Jennings & D. J. Dirksen. Facilitating change: A process for adoption of web-based instruction. p. 111-116 in Web-based instruction Educational Technology Publications, Inc, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey,1997.15. D. Gilbuena, C. Smith, B. Brooks, M. Miletic, & M. Koretsky, Research in Engineering Education Symposium, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 2013
engineer.I have doubts that I will be successful in my undergraduate engineering program.I sometimes wonder if engineering is the career for me.I can work well with people from other disciplines.I can work well with people from different countries.I am good at developing creative solutions to problems.I am good at communicating my ideas to others.I am good at solving problems that I’ve never encountered before.Knowledge of the engineering professionSuccessful engineers need to be creative.Successful engineers work well in teams with people from different disciplines.Successful engineers need to be effective communicators.Engineers need to consider the ethical implications of their work.Engineers often work in teams with members from other
University after 32 years. For the last 12 years there, she was the Vice Provost for Education and Professor in the Department of Engineering and Public Policy. She has designed and taught several interdisciplinary courses including ethics of science and technology, environmental science, technology and decision-making and radiation, health and policy. Her research has ranged over: risk assessment and communication, green design, bioelectromagnetics, education in general and pedagogies for the modern-day literacies such as scientific, environmental and global literacy. Dr. Nair chaired the national Global Learning Leadership Council of the American Association of Col- leges & Universities (AAC&U) from 2010 to 2013
, perceived cultural distance, and english self-confidence. Retrieved from ProQuest, TheUniversity of Texas at Austin.5. Ye, Y. (1992), Chinese students' needs and adjustment problems in a U.S. university. Retrieved from ProQuest,The University of Nebraska, Lincoln.6. Baxter Magolda, M. B. (2001). Making their own way: Narratives for transforming higher education to promoteself-development. Sterling, VA: Stylus.7. Baxter Magolda, M. B. (2008). The evolution of self-authorship. In M. S. Khine, (ed.), Knowing, knowledge andbeliefs: Epistemoloigcal studies across diverse cultures. New York: Springer.8. Perry, W. G. (1970). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years: A scheme. New York:Holt, Rinehart and Winston.9. Belenky, M. F
Geometric Laser System Optical Devices Optics FundamentalsFresh 1 Science Introduction to Introduction to Laser Elective Solidworks Photonics Components12th College English Elective/ Ethics/ Physics Introduction to Photonics Digital ElectronicsGrade Algebra Workplace Government Computers Concepts Communications Physical Power Transfer
): p. 273-278.15. Kardos, G. Engineering cases in the classroom. in National Conference on Engineering Case Studies. 1979. Wasington, DC: American Society for Engineering Education.16. Garg, K. and V. Varma. A study of the effectiveness of case study approach in software engineering education. in Software Engineering Education & Training. 2007.17. Downe‐Wamboldt, B., Content analysis: method, applications, and issues. Health care for women international, 1992. 13(3): p. 313-321.18. Hsieh, H.F. and S.E. Shannon, Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 2005. 15(9): p. 1277-1288.19. Yadav, A. and B.E. Barry, Using case-based instruction to increase ethical understanding in
Page 24.297.3between computer and paper based exams, and, if so, what factors contribute to any differences?MethodsDescription of CourseThis study was conducted with students enrolled in the first of two courses of the FEH program.In this first-semester course, students studied problem solving by utilizing algorithmdevelopment and computational tools such as Excel, MATLAB, and C++ programming. Thecourse also covered the topics of academic integrity, engineering ethics, data analysis, teambuilding, and the engineering design process. The grade breakdown for the course is shown inTable 1. Table 1: Grade breakdown for a first-year engineering, first semester course. Grade Category
ethics, and piano technology.Dr. William R Loendorf, Eastern Washington University William R. Loendorf is a Full Professor, Emeritus of Engineering & Design at Eastern Washington Uni- versity. He obtained his B.Sc. in Engineering Science at the University of Wisconsin - Parkside, M.S. in Electrical Engineering at Colorado State University, M.B.A. at the Lake Forest Graduate School of Management, and Ph.D. in Engineering Management at Walden University. He holds a Professional En- gineer license and has 30 years of industrial experience as an Engineer or Engineering Manager at General Motors, Cadnetix, and Motorola. His interests include engineering management, technological literacy, improving the competitiveness
exogenous constructs impacting students’ pursuit of entrepreneurship minorPossession of the entrepreneurial mindset is perhaps the ultimate exogenous factor that mayinfluence students’ intention to minor in entrepreneurship. Kriewall11 organized a panel sessionat the annual meeting of the National Collegiate Inventors and Innovators Alliance with theintention of discussing the “defining characteristics of entrepreneurial engineers.” The panelidentified eleven attributes they felt were necessary for entrepreneurial engineers: “…integrity, tenacity, ethics, creativity, intuition, a deep knowledge of engineering fundamentals, the ability to engineer products for commercialization, a penchant for lifelong learning, an ability to
practical toarrange an industry internship when the student is not being paid under the T32 grant and caninstead be paid by the industry host site. There is considerable variation and uncertainty about policy with respect to intellectualproperty generated as part of an off-campus training experience. This is consistent with theauthors’ experience. In addition, we note that our trainees to date have demonstrated a high rateof interest in intellectual property and other issues related to entrepreneurship. Hence, we havetried to address this challenge by creating opportunities for students to learn about practical,legal, and ethical issues of intellectual property management. In conclusion, this analysis suggests that successful
outcomes in the course are focused on theengineering profession: explain the basic practice of engineering, describe background histories,impact on society, skills employed, and professional/ethical responsibilities; summarize theknowledge bases, skills, problem types, and analysis techniques of the four engineeringdisciplines offered at Quinnipiac University; and analyze information provided and learned tomake an informed decision about choice of an engineering major. These outcomes are focusedon raising student knowledge of engineering disciplines in order to enhance their ability to makean informed decision about choice of an engineering major.An important part of the course designed to solidify the class discussions is the hands-on
knowledge, education, technical, ethical and communication skills. Professor Moustafa’s expertise c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Paper ID #10957 is in the areas of machine design, computer aided design and solid modeling. Moustafa taught courses in 2-D and 3-D Cad, statics and dynamics, strength of materials, design of machine elements, mechanical systems design and senior design project. He is in charge of the senior design project for the mechanical engineering technology department. He encourages seniors to work on practical projects. Some of these projects are provided by local
Paper ID #9145Implementing Telecommunication’s Switching and Routing Laboratory Prac-tices: Migration to a Distance Learning based InstructionDr. Rigoberto Chinchilla, Eastern Illinois University Dr. Rigoberto Chinchilla: PhD in Integrated Engineering, (Electrical and Industrial), Ohio University. Is an Associate Professor of Applied Engineering and Technology at Eastern Illinois University (EIU) since 2004. His teaching and research interest include Quality Design, Biometrics and Computer Security and ethics, Automation and Telecommunications. Dr. Chinchilla has been a Fulbright Scholar and a United Nations Scholar
Page 24.737.12 ethics and have understood that this profession needs lots of interaction”.ConclusionsThe DPO-SP program provides critical academic and social support for students during their firsttwo years of their undergraduate experience. Our data indicates that participation in the programcontributes to: • Better understanding about the academic requirements that are unique to the College of Engineering. Participants indicate that before participation in the DPO-SP they were not aware of the academic requirements to be admitted to the College of Engineering. • Participants learning to work using structured schedules that allow for balance between studies and social life. This structure resulted in
toseveral topics by the faculty at the start of the semester, and they were encouraged to select atopic that was relevant to themselves, their families, or just of great interest. Some of theproposed topics centered on maintaining the ecosystem and tourism of our island, meeting theneeds of a population facing drought conditions, and maintaining a balance between refineryplants and the communities that surround them. Unlike the traditional composition course,students also discussed sustainability ethics in order to better understand some of the argumentsthey would come across in the articles they were gathering. Additionally, the size of the classallowed time to show videos that pertained to the students’ specific research topic. Like
ways that preserve and enhance foundations of culture, rather thansimply colonize them into a single homogeneity. Hence, an education that is shaped withphilosophy based on global approaches and ethics, rather than a single worldview, isnecessary for a genuinely intercultural electronic global village, to produce self-capable,self-determined, competent learners. The products of Western educational approaches,although valuable, should be examined carefully through a cultural lense, as well as withan open mind about their utility in a variety of disciplines, educational platforms andcontexts.Bibliography[1] Adams, G. & Markus, H. R. (2004). Epilogue: Toward a Conception of Culture Suitable for a Social Psychology of Culture. In M
socialization in chemistry and history. Higher Education, 2006. 54: p. 723-740.8. Blackmore, K. and K. Nesbitt. Identifying Risks for Cross-Disciplinary Higher Degree Research Students. in Proc. Tenth Australasian Computing Education Conference. 2008. Wollongong, Australia.9. Vanstone, M., et al., Interdisciplinary Doctoral Research Supervision: A scoping review. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, in press 2013.10. Goodyear, R., C. Crego, and M. Johnston, Ethical Issues in the Supervision of Student Research: A Study of Critical Incidents. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 1992. 23(3): p. 203-210.11. Nisselle, A. and R. Duncan, Multiple supervisors from multiple disciplines: Lessons from the past as
studies at the Instituto Tecnol´ogico de Celaya, M´exico. Her research interests are in the field of Process Systems Engineering, and include the analysis and design of thermally coupled and alternative distillation configurations, the design of nonideal distillation systems and the synthesis, optimization and control of chemical process with recycles streams.Prof. Ramirez Apud Lopez Zaira, Universidad de las Americas Puebla Zaira Ram´ırez is Science, Engineering, and Technology Education Ph.D. Student at Universidad de las Americas Puebla in Mexico. She teaches ethics and development complex thinking skills related courses. Her research interests include faculty development, outcomes assessment, and creating effective
semesterrepresents half a year of enrollment).The biological engineering program used this course to meet several a-k outcomes during ABETaccreditation in 2009. This service-learning component was used to successfully illustratestudent mastery of the following outcomes: (a) an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering (b) an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, Page 23.248.9 manufacturability, and sustainability (d) an ability to function on multi-disciplinary teams (h
objectives vs others.The experiment gives students exposure to Instrumentation, Models, Experimentation, and DataAnalysis (objectives 1-4 of Feisel and Rosa8). The use of a guitar string as the vehicle forlearning allows the students to develop Psychomotor (the ability to actually touch andmanipulate the device) and Sensory Awareness (objectives 8 and 12, respectively.) The exercisealso helps reinforce “soft skills that are so important in professional practice: Safety,Communication, Teamwork, Ethics (objectives 9 – 12). Tuning, fret positioning, the tone controlcircuit relate to Design (objective 5). Finally, although not intentional, students will sometimesget exposure to objective 6: Learning from Failure. The portability and affordability
such as teachers, family members, and members of theoutside community. There are many reasons to engage in community-centered instruction: toexpose students to real-world ethics and government policy; to practice communication withpeople outside their own academic and social community; to promote student reflection on howtheir work affects their community and how community affects their work; to provide a benefitto the community (a design of a useful device, information gathering and analysis); to engender asense of professional responsibility; to provide a cultural context for their work, and additionalfocus on social issues. Experiential clinical and service-learning programs involving localcommunities have been performed in the health
interpret data. 3. an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs. 4. an ability to function on multi-disciplinary teams. 5. an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems. 6. an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility. 7. an ability to communicate effectively. Page 10.291.4 8. the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global and societal context. “Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2005, American
-author of six textbooks in the areas of parallelcomputing, computer ethics, and computer concepts. Page 10.846.12 Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2005, American Society for Engineering Education
, as well as technical competency 1.The ME program employs an overall Professional Component Plan with the following structuredsub-plans with defined measures to quantify and assess professional experiences: 1. Engineering Design Plan (teaching and practicing of design skills) 2. Professional Communications Plan (conveying designs and interacting with peers) 3. Professional Skills Plan (teaching and implementing of design tools) 4. Professional Ethics Plan (evaluating and practicing appropriate professional behavior)The professional plans aid in the coordination efforts of multiple faculty members and multiplecourses across all four years of the curriculum. The plans also facilitate the assessment of resultsand progress of
Page 10.1158.6lectures to instill the values that create an open and trusting community. Along withProceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Educationdeveloping tomorrow’s leaders goes the responsibility of teaching these talented studentsthe importance of ethical behavior.3.2 MentoringA common thread among students who pursue businesses is the value of on-sitementoring. This consists of two levels. The first level is provided by the faculty and staffof the Hinman CEOs Program. As discussed above, they spend extensive time withstudents to help them overcome the many barriers associated with starting and
component of the course.A team written report was required. The course underwent a major revision in 1991 when thefaculty member who initiated and taught the course left the University. However, the course hasbeen taught, each fall and spring semester to between 35 and 65 students since 1980, and thecourse has continued to evolve. The current course content includes: engineering in the globalprospective, the design process, shop practice, introduction to manufacturing, engineeringcommunications, specifications, personality and group issues, codes and standards, intellectualproperty, engineering ethics, and introduction to engineering economy.The course is usually the first engineering course taken by a mechanical engineering student.Therefore, part
: few try to fail. Team failures are often the fault of the leader, ratherthan the fault of the team members. So, good leaders strap the team on their back and get towork.Just as the team cannot succeed without a good leader, the leader cannot succeed without goodteam members. The leader is responsible for selecting members of the team that support thevision, have the skills necessary and will fill in gaps that exist in the leader’s skill set. Whenselecting research graduate students it is important that they have: 1. Excellent technical backgrounds, 2. An excellent work ethic. 3. Good communication skills, especially written. 4. Creativity. 5. A desire to make the team successful while improving individual resumes. 6
the APM, are designed to help students develophigher order intellectual abilities needed for lifelong learning and success. All students mustdemonstrate accomplishments in the following ZULO before they graduate: Information Literacy and Communication (ILC): Students who graduate will be able to recognize information needs, access and evaluate appropriate information to answer those needs, and communicate effectively to a variety of audiences in English and Arabic. Information Technology (IT): Graduates will be able to use information technology to solve problems and communicate in an ethical way. They will also be critically aware of