A Successful Interdisciplinary Engineering Design Experience by Dr. Steve Northrup, Dr. James Moriarty, Dr. Glenn Vallee and Dr. Walter Presz, Jr. ABSTRACTAn interdisciplinary team design experience has been successfully integrated into thesenior engineering laboratory effort at Western New England College. The projectobjective was to introduce the students to the design process typically associated with newproduct development. The approach was to have student teams develop a solar poweredvehicle prototype which can transport bottled water between two points on a slopedparking surface as
faculty members. This aspect of the programkeeps the students in touch with the leading edge technology and state-of-the-artinnovative activities in the real world. Nevertheless, project development in each courserequire utilization of the computer programming.The requirement of the “project in each class” poses additional constraints on thestudents’ time, particularly in the junior level classes. These students typically take fourMechanical Engineering courses each semester along with two or three laboratorycourses. Therefore, effective utilization of time plays an important role in the students’performance. Page 7.655.2 Proceedings of the
Editor of Engineering Education.Jeff has taught two other courses primarily using web technology and this work is a direct result of funding from theGeneral Electric Foundation.MARK HICKMANMark Hickman is an Assistant Professor in Civil Engineering and Engineering Mechanics at the University ofArizona. He has taught courses in transportation engineering, engineering economics, and systems analysis for civilengineers.KEVIN LANSEYKevin Lansey is an Associate Professor in Civil Engineering and Engineering Mechanics at the University ofArizona. He was one of the principal investigators on the GE project and is creating the module on fluid mechanicsand hydraulics. Kevin was the College of Engineering and Mines Team Leader for a successful ABET 2000
Association of Continuing Engineering Education (IACEE) board and serves as the SIG liaison. She is currently the Executive Director of the Center for Lifelong Engineering Education at the Cockrell School of Engineering at the University of Texas at Austin. Polito has a B.S. from the University of North Texas and an M.S. in science and technology commercialization from the University of Texas, Austin.Ms. Leslie P. Martinich, Competitive Focus Leslie Martinich, Principal Consultant at Competitive Focus, provides education and consulting services in engineering management. With more than 25 years of experience, she has led teams at IBM, Compaq, Novell, Vignette, and several startup companies. She serves as the lead faculty
beendiscovered that reflect changing work practices introduced with the addition of wirelesslynetworked laptops into the course.VII. AcknowledgementsThis work was funded by grants from Intel Corporation and the National Science Foundation.Bibliography1. Springer, L., Stanne, M. E., & Donovan, S. S. Effects of Small-Group Learning on Undergraduates in Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology: A Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research, Spring 1999, 69(1). 21-51.2. Collofello, J.S. & Hart, M. Monitoring Team Progress in a Software Engineering Project Class. In Proceedings of the 29thASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, 1999. 7-10.3. Fall 2000 CS160 course homepage, http://bmrc.berkeley.edu/courseware/cs160/fall00
Session 1360 Engineering Accreditation In The Philippines Walden S. Rio College of Engineering Central Philippine University Iloilo CityI. Introduction The technological world is moving on at a rapid pace. Each new day offers newdiscoveries, new truths, new and oftentimes better ways of doing things. But, while technologiesprogresses by leaps and bounds worldwide, the Philippines is forced to stand and watchhelplessly by. What is the cause of this helplessness. The reason for
adopt the latest technology and state-of-art in library automation software, theELDC has compiled a Book of Specifications for the proposed system for the automation andInternetworking of Engineering Libraries in Egyptian Universities.The Automated Library System of Engineering Faculties in Egyptian Universities comprises twomain parts: the Library Automation Software and the Computer Network for EngineeringLibraries.The Library Automation Software (LAS) allows the execution of standard library functionsrequired in an academic library, both in Arabic and in English. In so doing, the softwareconforms to existing standards and provides user friendly interfaces. In addition, the requiredsoftware allows the exchange of records with the standard
: Adapted from “Profiles of S A Technikons 1995,” Figure 1.5.3. Figure 2. Technikon Lecturing Staff with M+5 Qualifications (See Figure 1 for technikon abbreviations) While technikon educators devote themselves to attaining higher qualifications, theirability to contribute directly to their institution’s educational mission is diminished. This exacer- Page 2.169.7bates the existing severe shortage of highly skilled educators needed to teach critically under-staffed engineering courses as well as the attendant courses in science, mathematics and the ap-plication of computer technology. To
cultural andintellectual domination of the Europeans [6]. This historical has implications for how science,technological, and engineering knowledge has been created and the voices that have been left outof the creation of that knowledge [7]. Additionally, criticism of surface-level, performativedecoloniality (e.g. official statements) shows that there is room to create more practical,meaningful tools for moving from statements to action [8]. Little has been done in STEM fieldsto connect disciplines with decoloniality, thus the opportunity to focus tools for decoloniality insystems engineering is fruitful.Most curricula then recommend their set of stakeholder analysis that they think are appropriate totheir domains. Additionally, there is a
is to glean information about the interdisciplinary nature of learningand practicing engineering [Figure 3]. This goes back to our previously stated assumptions of theinterconnectivity of learning experiences, engineering for this study specifically. The responsesto this question show that all of the participants rank Education as the most highly significantinfluence to humanitarian engineering. Technology, Medicine, Business, Economics, andArchitecture are also ranked as highly significant. Language Arts and Kinesiology followed inthe ratings as being significant to Humanitarian Engineering whereas Fine Arts, Philosophy,Gender Issues, and Pop Culture Media represent topics that are of neutral significance. Whendisaggregated, results differ
new technology and methods, etc. Incidentally, manycompanies are sending their engineers to regular universities for economic and managementtraining on the continuing education basis.However, because the basic economic training has not been provided before graduation, theseshort-term advanced courses might not produce the expected results. On the other side, if thistraining includes the basic courses, it will cost much more than if it was done during the originaltraining at the maritime school, and it will take valuable time.V. Marine Engineering Management Program Page 4.372.5As an alternative to the existing marine engineering curriculum a
engineering and mechanicalengineering. The motivation for the program is twofold: First of all, the dramatic drop in the costof sensors, computers and actuators is making possible entirely new classes of products, capableof both automating nontrivial tasks as well as performing functions not possible before.Secondly, robotics has proven to be an excellent means to excite pre-college students aboutscience, technology, and engineering. While much of the technical foundation for the newprogram is drawn from Computer Science, Electrical, and Mechanical Engineering, we believethat Robotics Engineering is on the path to emerging as an independent discipline with its ownintellectual goals and body of knowledge. Thus, graduates from the program are expected
is tied to the ABET accreditation process.1. IntroductionDespite widespread acknowledgment that effective written communication is as essential forlearning as for disseminating ideas and discoveries, teaching writing and improving the qualityof student writing remain challenges for educators in engineering. National studies, such as thoseconducted by the Commission on Writing1 and the Boyer Commission on EducatingUndergraduates in the Research University2, argue that writing is a central means for developingstudents’ critical thinking, communication, and metacognitive skills. These studies urge reforms,suggesting that educators pay greater attention to writing instruction in all disciplines and urgingscience, technology, engineering, and
, we emphasize engineering first,before the fancy technologies, or concurrently at best with these “technotoys” wherepossible.Take the “G” out of Diff EQThe “G” is for “guess”; we will discuss this shortly. That so much attention is given toDifferential Equations is not without bases. We feel very strongly about this. The realworld is dynamic. Everything we do has some element of time in it and so a rate quantitycan be attributed to it. Moreover, in engineering systems, we talk about variability,changes, robustness, sensitivity, reliability, dependability, operational envelope, and soon, all of which involve relative measures of one quantity to another. And when explainthese relative measures with respect to time, we end up with time-rate
learning.“ISEUC is based on international best SE education practices, accreditation standards, creditprograms and professional education” and provides undergraduate and graduate credit courses,as well as post-graduate professional education courses 11. The goal for the ISEUC is to provideaccess to software engineering education for software-intensive industries on a global scale frominternational universities with established programs or degrees in software engineering. Thecourses are primarily delivered asynchronously using Web-based technology, but also includesome synchronous delivery, including either face-to-face, video conferencing, or interactivesessions. For more information or to consider becoming a member, visit www.iseuc.org.Current
, it will still be a great opportunity to personally experience theother departments. Although even laypersons will have some vague idea associated witheach subject of the engineering, it is often beyond their imagination to realize what eachmajor is really doing. For example, when we asked the visiting high school students inthe university open house about what was their impression of mechanical engineering, acommon answer was to repair their cars. Indeed, few of them could recognize thatrobotics or even thermal and fluids were within the realm of Mech anical Engineering.Further, with the development of the technology, most projects today require cooperationfrom many disciplines. It will be advantageous to the students to have a broad
Session 2364 Team-based Learning in an Engineering Materials Course Patricia M. Shamamy, P.E. Lawrence Technological UniversityAbstractTo encourage teamwork, students in the traditional first course in Engineering Materials aredivided into groups of five, with the group further broken down into two teams of two studentsand one “manager.” Each team of two works together to prepare a “Competency Assignment”which usually covers 3-4 chapters. In the typical class of 25 students, the five “managers” worktogether to prepare one Competency Assignment. Every three weeks (in a 15
Science and Technology. He recently became the Director of the CooperativeEngineering Program, a cooperative program between Missouri S&T and Missouri StateUniversities. Proceedings of the 2009 Midwest Section Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education
were charged $350 to coverdaily lunches, two snacks per day, supplies, a t-shirt, insurance and other camp related expenses.College of Engineering scholarships were available for students in need. ESA participants werecharged $650 to cover three meals per day, two snacks per day, a t-shirt, insurance, supplies,resident hall costs and other camp expenses. The Razorback Solar Boat Competition wassponsored by the College of Engineering and the Arkansas Science and Technology Authority(ASTA), whose funding for the program came from NSF. Students in the Razorback Solar BoatCompetition were awarded scholarships based on need, as either partial or full scholarships.Students in How It’s Done—Chemical Engineering Style were awarded scholarships from
Paper ID #14065Concept of Implementing the Programs of Additional Professional EducationWithin the Cluster SystemAlina Ilyasova, Institute of Additional Professional Education Kazan National Research Technological Univer-sity Alina Ilyasova was born in 1972. She received the specialist degree from the Institute of Management and Territorial Development, Kazan (Volga region) Federal University, Kazan, Russia in 2014. She is postgraduate student of the Department of Engineering Pedagogy and Psychology of the Kazan National Research Technological University, Kazan, Russia.Prof. Mansur Galikhanov, Kazan National Research
Paper ID #19843Responsive Teaching in Undergraduate Engineering CoursesDr. Aaron W. Johnson, University of Michigan Aaron W. Johnson is a postdoctoral research fellow at the University of Michigan. He received his Ph.D. in Aeronautics and Astronautics from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 2014, after which he served as a postdoctoral research fellow at the Tufts University Center for Engineering Education and Outreach. Aaron also obtained a master’s degree from MIT in 2010 and a bachelor’s degree from the University of Michigan in 2008, both in aerospace engineering.Dr. Cynthia J. Finelli, University of
Paper ID #13318Social Justice in Control Systems EngineeringDr. Kathryn Johnson, Colorado School of Mines Kathryn Johnson is an Associate Professor at the Colorado School of Mines in the Department of Elec- trical Engineering and Computer Science and is Jointly Appointed at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory’s National Wind Technology Center. In the fall 2011, she was a visiting researcher at Aal- borg University in Denmark, where she collaborated on wind turbine control research and experienced Aalborg’s Problem-Based Learning method. She has researched wind turbine control systems since 2002, with numerous
seen at the high school level. Since user-friendlycomputing technology was relatively new, this major curriculum change was truly innovative.Over time, the course naturally evolved but maintained its focus on a skills-based approach tolearning computing tools. In recent years, the course was divided into segments surroundingspecific computing packages such as Excel, Matlab, and HTML programming. The course wassatisfactory in instructing students in how to use the software, but was less effective in teachingthe students how to apply the problem solving process and then use the computing tool as an aidin solving engineering problems. Now that technology has advanced to become more easilyavailable to more people and that students are more
AC 2011-2759: RESTRUCTURING THE ROBOTICS LABORATORY ANDENHANCING THE ROBOTICS CURRICULUM AT RITChristopher M. Greene, Rochester Institute of Technology Assistant Professor in Manufacturing & Mechanical Engineering Technology. Dr. Greene’s primary areas of research are in manufacturing systems, quality engineering, engineering education and the electronics manufacturing domain. Dr. Greene has also participated in several funded engineering education pro- grams aimed at advancing opportunities in Alabama’s Black Belt. Dr. Greene worked previously as a manufacturing scientist in the Micro-Electronics Division of IBM.Dr. Scott J.. Anson, P.E. , Rochester Institute of Technology Dr. Anson is the Manufacturing
majority (female) andgender minorities. They range from early career to late career. They have family backgroundsthat range from growing up around highly educated family members to being the first in theirfamilies to attend college. Geographically, our panelists represent the West, South, Midwest, andNortheastern U.S. And their career paths are all very different. Their diversity brings a breadth ofexperience and depth of insight that promises a vibrant panel experience on the topic of genderharassment.Tamara Floyd Smith, Ph.D., P.E., is Dean of the Leonard C. Nelson College of Engineeringand Sciences at the West Virginia Institute of Technology. Prior to this position, she served asassociate provost and as professor of chemical engineering at
AC 2009-1032: THE IMPACT OF REFLECTIONS IN SERVICE LEARNING ANDOTHER UNDERGRADUATE TEAM PROJECT LEARNINGMargaret Huyck, Illinois Institute of Technology Margaret Huyck is Professor in the Institute of Psychology, Illinois Institute of Technology. Her areas of expertise include adult development and program evaluation. She has been working with the IPRO Program at IIT for many years. She was a co-PI on an NSF CCLI-1 grant for adapting an EPICS Service Learning Pathway at IIT; and is the PI for a collaborative project funded with an NSF CCLI-2 grant to measure and identify best practices in multidisciplinary teamwork and awareness of ethical issues.Kristin Bryant, Illinois Institute of Technology
Paper ID #41810Board 241: Developing PLC and Robotic Automation Technician CertificateProgram for Service IndustriesDr. Shouling He, Vaughn College of Aeronautics and Technology Dr. Shouling He holds a position of professor of Engineering and Technology at Vaughn College of Aeronautics and Technology, where she teaches various courses in Mechatronics and Electrical Engineering. Her academic and educational interests focus on Robotics and Automation, Machine Learning, and Mechatronics Education. She has authored over 50 papers published in journals and conferences.Dr. Douglas Jahnke, Vaughn College of Aeronautics and Technology
and relationships of peoples andorganizations involved in technological development.”1 Harris et al2 describe theirapproach to engineering ethics as bridging the gap between theory and practice usingcurrent case studies available such as Hurricane Katrina and global warming. Fledderman3seeks to provide a text and a resource for the study of engineering ethics and to help futureengineers be prepared for confronting and resolving ethical dilemmas that they mightencounter during their professional careers. Martin and Schinzinger4 provide anintroduction to the key issues in engineering ethics, taking account of both specificorganizational contexts and broader technological trends. Baura5 approaches engineeringethics from an industrial perspective
. Martins, C. Riegle-Crumb, C.C. Seepersad, (2017). “A Measure of Affect towards Key Elements of Engineering Professional Practice,” Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Columbus, OH, June 26-29, 2017. 4. E. D. Tate and M. C. Linn, “How does identity shape the experiences of women of color engineering students?,” Journal of Science Education and Technology, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 483–493, 2005.5. K. L. Tonso, “Student engineers and engineer identity: Campus engineer identities as figured world,” Cultural studies of science education, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 273–307, 2006.6. K. L. Tonso, “Teams that work: Campus culture, engineer identity, and social interactions,” Journal of engineering education, vol
Mathematics from New Mexico State University, a MS in Industrial Engineering from Georgia Institute of Technology, and a BS in Mathematics from the United States Military Academy at West Point. Prior to becoming a Professor in the School of Pure and Applied Sciences at Florida SouthWestern State College (FSW), she served as a Quartermaster officer in the United States Army, where she retired as an Academy and Associate Professor from the Department of Systems Engineering at West Point. She currently teaches math and engineering courses at FSW, as well as operations management courses for the University of Arkansas. Her research interests include optimization and engineering education. c