decade at Rowan University in their ECE department as well as in the power and consulting industries for over 3 decades. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2022 2022 ASEE Middle Atlantic Section 2022 Fall Conference Building/Testing Novel Sensor Technology in Summer Research & Independent Study Luka Baramidze, Peter Mark Jansson Bucknell UniversityAbstractPractical learning is an inherent part of the engineering curriculum. Engineering students bestlearn the course material through intensive hands-on experiences. Research and
hand calculations over the use of software, but we believe this approach to be a disservice to engineering students in an introductory course because it is in stark contrast to what they will encounter during their careers. A well-designed, relevant, and engaging curriculum will provide ample opportunities for rigorous exploration of the concepts. We believe that aligning the curriculum more closely with modern practices (i.e., emphasis on software, real data sets, etc.) and integrating oral and digital communication principles into this course represents a natural progression for an engineering statistics curriculum. Our goal in thisTable 3 – Redesign Roadmap SM19
educational and research program in sustainability. This program hasnumerous sources of funding, including the National Science Foundation’s Integrative GraduateEducation and Research Traineeship Program (IGERT) and International Research Experiencesfor Students Program (IRES), the US Department of Education’s Graduate Assistance in Areasof National Need (GAANN), and the National Collegiate Inventors and Innovators Alliances(NCIIA) as well as private foundations. We present our plan to create an innovative sustainableengineering program, with primary research foci in green construction and sustainable water use.This interdisciplinary initiative involves faculty and students from across the University ofPittsburgh. To best address global concerns, we
to connect the abstract concepts of the Page 10.822.5classroom with the real world.Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition 5Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Education Paper # 854 Through an experiment of this type, undergraduates can integrate a number of conceptslearned in the engineering curriculum and get a feel for the variety of aspects of biomedicalengineering including transport processes, bioelectrical phenomena, osmotic pressure, proteinassay, and
aspects while mitigating any drawbacks will be pivotal in harnessing the fullpotential of ChatGPT as a transformative tool in higher education.3. Exploring Solutions to Teaching Challenges ChatGPT can be integrated into education as a valuable support tool, contributing to variousfacets such as curriculum design, teaching practices, educational assessment, and the organizationof teaching materials. However, the efficacy of ChatGPT in education is contingent on thejudicious utilization and skills of both instructors and learners. Numerous studies underscore anotable concern regarding the accuracy and credibility of information generated by ChatGPT [14],potentially impinging on its effectiveness in an educational context. Consequently, there is
Conference & Exposition Copyright© 2004, American Society for Engineering Education Session 1166Bibliography[1] Faste, R., B. Roth, and D.J. Wilde, “Integration of Creativity into the Mechanical Engineering Curriculum,”ASME Resource Guide to Innovation in Design Education, Cary A. Fisher, Ed., American Society of MechanicalEngineers, New York, 1993.[2] Carroll, Douglas R., 1997. Integrating Design into the Sophomore and Junior Level Mechanics Courses,Journal of Engineering Education. 86(3):227-231.[3] Ribando, Robert J. and Edward A. Weller, 1999. The Verification of an Analytical Solution: An ImportantEngineering Lesson, Journal of Engineering Education. 88
,develop, integrate, and deliver affordable technologies for improving warfighting capabilities.”6Due to this focus on cutting-edge technology, AFRL requires personnel with the rigor of anengineering background. As part of AFRL, the Space Vehicle Directorate is especiallyconcerned with space technologies, and the Astronautical Engineering program is particularlysuited for support of the Space Vehicles Directorate. As shown in Tables 1 and 2, theAstronautical Engineering curriculum includes the common core and also engineeringfundamentals of linear systems analysis, control and state space concepts, and intermediatedynamics. The program also includes the more advanced space engineering concepts ofintermediate space flight mechanics and two of the
AC 2011-1707: ENGINEERING IN EARLY EDUCATION: A MULTICUL-TURAL COMPARISON OF WEB RESOURCESAikaterini Bagiati, Purdue University, West Lafayette Having acquired a Diploma in Electrical Engineering and a Masters Degree in Advanced Digital Com- munication in the Aristotle University in Greece, and after having worked as an educator both in formal and informal settings for 10 years now, I have, since January 2008, started the PhD Program in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. My research interests are : Developmental Engineering; Engineering in PreK-3; Early Engineering Curriculum Development; Use of Art to enhance Engineering Design; Educational Software; Educational RoboticsSo Yoon Yoon, Purdue
AC 2010-2309: DESIGN FOR ASSEMBLY IN MANUFACTURING ENGINEERINGTECHNOLOGY PROGRAM: EXPERIENCE AND SUCCESSGuanghsu Chang, Minnesota State University, MankatoWilliam Peterson, Minnesota State University, Mankato Page 15.353.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Design for Assembly in Manufacturing Engineering Technology Program: Experience and SuccessAbstractThis paper discusses various aspects and models of how Boothroyd Dewhurst’s Design-For-Assembly (DFA) methodology can be integrated into Manufacturing Engineering Technology(MET) curricula. The DFA methodology involves a team that includes all the concurrentengineering disciplines
during industry internships and site visits.Although the case method teaches specific technical contents and problem solving skills, it alsointegrates general educational skills. Collaborative education can be used effectively in a case-study environment. The use of the sciences, mathematics, technical writing, and oralcommunication knowledge as well as the SCANS 2000 skills can be integrated easily in casestudies. Finally, case studies can make classroom learning an enjoyable experience.One of the greatest challenges that most students face during the course of their higher educationis relating classroom topics to real-life situations. Students enrolled in the first circuit analysiscourse or in college physics, for example, may be engaged in
B.S. degree from Cal Poly Humboldt was in EnvironmentalResource Engineering with a minor in Native American studies of Culture and Community. Currently Iam finishing a Master's in Engineering and Community practices from the same institution. My passionand focus lies around collaborating and supporting communities' capacity towards energy autonomy,climate resilience, and health and habitat restoration.Our positionalities and who we are is an integral part of this work as the purpose of this WIP paper is toexplore centering Indigenous knowledge and ways of being in a collaborative autoethnographic researchproject. This mirrors the spirit of the program which is among the first of its kind in the United States asan Indigenous-centered graduate
potential benefitsand challenges of supporting multidiscipline teams in an academic curriculum. Whilemultidisciplinary project-based learning and multidisciplinary service-learning are not new ideas,rarely is the team composition considered in relation to the impacts to student learning andperception.This work examines the experiences of three multidisciplinary, sustainability focused teamsproviding solutions for use and education in communities considered food-deserts. The threeteam structures vary in degree of multidisciplinary composition, one of the EPICSdifferentiators. Students were asked to define multidisciplinary teams and then reflect on theirown team experiences and team compositions. Transcripts of focus group interviews with currentand
arrive at the best solutions and that confusion and uncertainty are clarified through questioning and discussion that differences and conflicts occur, that they must be acknowledged, and the best way to deal with them is constructively and openly.Engineering curricula today are packed with technical content. Increasingly, there is so much forstudents to learn about their chosen discipline that there is little space in the curriculum forcoursework that deals directly with these kinds of issues. It is hard to find space in the typicalengineering curriculum for a course in teamwork skills. The theme of this paper is that strategiesfor guiding students in their acquisition of teamwork skills can be integrated in their
a full-scale prefabricated lattice structure as a part of a two-day course on design and construction of spatial structures organised by ArchiVision Company in Shiraz, Iran 1.2. IntroductionDesign of structures, in general, and that of spatial structures, in particular, can be consideredas an integrated process involving the following main steps: Arrangement of the main structural components to satisfy the needs of a structural project referred to as the ‘Conceptual Design’, which
enhancingteamwork skills among STEM students, underscoring the importance of behavioral theory ineducational strategy development.IntroductionTeamwork in STEM education holds paramount significance as it mirrors the collaborativenature of modern professional workplaces. STEM field involves solving complex problems thatrequire multidisciplinary approaches with effective teamwork [1]. This necessity is reflected inthe curriculum of STEM education, which frequently incorporates project work and groupassignments to simulate real-world challenges. These educational strategies are not just aboutteaching technical skills; they are also about fostering an environment where students learn tocollaborate effectively, share ideas, negotiate solutions, and manage group
gender.This is an interesting observation since it applies to both the young daytime students and theolder nighttime students. Our curriculum is Architectural Engineering Technology andConstruction Management Engineering Technology, currently a male dominated profession, andour classes are predominantly male. The ratio is usually five female students in a class of 25students. One statistical distinction is 90% of the women students are in the Architecturecurriculum. The male students are 40% in Architecture and 60% in Construction Management.The women, whether in the day class or the evening class, far outpace the men. They workharder, pay more attention, do more work, show more interest, and usually find time to beinvolved in our various
gender.This is an interesting observation since it applies to both the young daytime students and theolder nighttime students. Our curriculum is Architectural Engineering Technology andConstruction Management Engineering Technology, currently a male dominated profession, andour classes are predominantly male. The ratio is usually five female students in a class of 25students. One statistical distinction is 90% of the women students are in the Architecturecurriculum. The male students are 40% in Architecture and 60% in Construction Management.The women, whether in the day class or the evening class, far outpace the men. They workharder, pay more attention, do more work, show more interest, and usually find time to beinvolved in our various
, andmethodological dimensions of prominent critical social theories and social-justice educationalapproaches—Bourdieuian Analysis of Capital (BAC), Funds of Knowledge (FoK), Community CulturalWealth (CCW), and an emerging Veteran Critical Theory (VCT)—in light of military culture and militarystudent experience in engineering. Mutual consideration of each approach, seeking points of similarityand difference, results in an integrated social critical theory space tuned to the unique tensionsexperienced by military students in engineering. The current work will help add a critical focus to theexamination of military student experience in institutions of higher education and help address calls forasset-based, liberative approaches to research and practice for
integrals are also applied to topics from energy/, and momentum/impulse.• Vector Calculus and Vector Products By this point in the course, students have already been exposed to vectors and the dot product in physics, and to dot and cross products in calculus. This section works with vector notation and introduces integration of vectors. The section wraps up by revisiting rotational motion, torques, and angular momentum as examples of applications of the cross product.• Simple Differential Equations Differential equations are handled throughout the calculus sequence; they are introduced at the very beginning, and solution of simple separation of variables problems is an element of the first semester. In this section, the differential
outside of corporations.The work presented in this paper borrowed ideas on opportunity identification and marketresearch from the Opportunity Thinktank [9], a set of seven modules that help undergraduateengineering students establish an entrepreneurial mindset through opportunity identification.Different from their work, this paper emphasizes on how to integrate entrepreneurial mindsetconcepts in the teaching of entire engineering design process.Design and ImplementationIn contrast to the existing work, entrepreneurial mindset materials were incorporated in a first-semester freshman Introduction to Engineering course, tightly integrated in an open-endeddesign project. The entrepreneurial materials on opportunity identification, market research
Paper ID #18049Work in progress: First-Year Students’ Definitions of Engineering PracticeMrs. Teresa Lee Tinnell, University of Louisville Terri Tinnell is a Curriculum and Instruction PhD student and Graduate Research Assistant for the Speed School of Engineering and College of Education and Human Development at the University of Louisville. She received a Bachelors in Mathematics and Physics and Masters in Teaching STEM education from the University of Louisville. She is a prior Project Lead the Way Master Teacher and Secondary Educa- tion Engineering Instructor, leading the creation of two engineering programs for
for future career opportunities [1], such as jobs involving datamanagement and analysis. To help fill this gap, academic libraries and other entities often offershort-format instruction on such topics, as well as in related topics, such as conducting literaturereviews, understanding the research lifecycle, and issues regarding scholarly publishing [2].Although commonly associated with STEM (science, technology, engineering, and math)disciplines, data analysis and related skills and knowledge have become an important componentof research in many academic fields, including humanities and social sciences [3]. If training inthese skills is not integrated into their program’s curriculum, students may be expected to learnsuch skills on their own [4
the class will have about thirtystudents.Future ActivitiesApprovals for the courses in Electronics For Criminal Justice (ADMJ 432) and ComputerSecurity For Criminal Justice (ADMJ 433) should be completed by the spring of 2003,before the ASEE 2003 meeting. They will be part of a curriculum in Private Security atPenn State Fayette. Students will be advised to take IST 110 in the fall 2003 semester andthe computer security course will be offered in the following spring 2004 semester.It is not surprising that an engineer has developed a set of criminal justice courses withinthe nature of the multidisciplinary environment at Penn State Fayette. Since Penn StateFayette is a small campus, creative curriculum integration is more feasible than at
Mendoza, New York City College of Technology Benito Mendoza is an Associate Professor of Computer Engineering at the New York City College of Technology (CITY TECH). Before he joined CITY TECH, he worked as a Postdoctoral Research En- gineer at ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Company. His areas of interest include Multi-Agent Systems, Bio-Inspired Systems, Context and Situation Awareness, and Artificial Intelligence in Educa- tion and Intelligent Tutoring Systems. He holds a PhD. in Computer Science and Engineering from the University of South Carolina and an MSc in Artificial Intelligence and a BSc in Computer Science from the University of Veracruz, Mexico.Farrukh Zia, New York City College of Technology
comparable engineering schools and their workload showed that facultymembers tend to work 50.5 hours during an average work week. Faculty members spend amajority of their time on teaching undergraduate students (56 percent), and on institutionalservice (15 percent), and research/scholarship (12 percent). Forty-seven percent of facultymembers describe their primary professional research as program/curriculum design, and more Page 14.1185.8than 50 percent admitted that they are not engaged in funded research. The most commonscholarship activity that most of faculty members are engaged in is making presentations at
Session 2793 A Model for Faculty Involvement in Closing Outcomes Assessment Loops Franklin G. King, Keith A. Schimmel North Carolina A&T State UniversityAbstractTwo key questions related to implementing the ABET EC2000 criteria are how to effectively usevaluable faculty time and how to effectively evaluate outcomes assessment data to makeimprovements in a program. An outcomes assessment model to address these issues ispresented. In this model, faculty time is limited to the evaluation of courses and the review ofsummarized results processed by administrators and staff. A critical
depends strongly on theparticular design project selected.Capstone projects are an important component in the engineering curriculum that combinevarious aspects of students’ learning into an integrated team project to address real-world,complex problems. Capstone projects frequently involve multiple elements including design,simulation, fabrication, validation, and cost analysis. This complexity requires system thinkingand can easily become interdisciplinary [1, 2]. Due to reporting requirements, interaction withcustomers and sponsors, and collaboration among different team members, these projects alsoprovide an excellent opportunity for practicing and improving written and oral communicationskills [3]. Capstone projects are considered an
Paper ID #23690Work in Progress: Strategic, Translational Retention Initiatives to PromoteEngineering SuccessDr. Elizabeth Anne Stephan, Clemson University Dr. Elizabeth Stephan is the Director of Academics for the General Engineering Program at Clemson University. She holds a B.S. and a Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Akron. Since 2002, she has taught, developed, and and now coordinates the first-year curriculum. As the lead author of the ”Thinking Like an Engineer” textbook, currently in its 4th edition, she has been the primary author team–member in charge of the development of the
engineering, which can tip the scales in the students’ decision orability to stay in engineering [1]. Gateway courses to advanced study in engineering, such asCalculus II, have been historically perceived by students to be the most difficult [2]. Anecdotalreasons for this could include the complexity of the calculus curriculum, the amount ofbackground knowledge needed to keep pace with learning, and lack of time for conceptexploration and engagement during class. Studies have shown that self-efficacy is morepredictive of mathematics performance than prior mathematics experiences and measures ofmathematics anxiety [3], [4].Self-efficacy can be defined as an individual's belief in their innate ability to achieve goals, andis based on both skill mastery
. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020First-graders' Computational Thinking in Informal Learning Settings (Work in Progress)IntroductionRecently computational thinking has emerged as a fundamental skill for pre-college students. One way ofintegrating this new skill into the curriculum is through integrated STEM education. The importance ofSTEM education as a driving force for economic stability and growth is unquestionable and has been acatalyst for change across the globe in recent years. Given the growth of technology and digital computersin the 21stcentury and the demands for professionals and engineers with computer science and problem-solving skills, computational thinking (CT) has gained