administered one month after the end of the precalculus course. We found thatstudents were significantly more likely to retain precalculus objectives when quiz questions hadbeen spaced versus massed. Increasing the number of quiz questions did not significantly affectretention. These findings suggest that educators wishing to increase students’ long-termretention of mathematics knowledge should increase the spacing, rather than the amount, ofretrieval practice in their courses.IntroductionCollege courses require students to learn large amounts of information, but students can rapidlylose the ability to recall information from previous courses or semesters [1 - 4]. This loss ofinformation is especially harmful when success in upper-level courses
for the paceof innovation substantiate the need for STEM, where there is advocacy for “curricula that betterintegrate science and technology knowledge with a broader set of business, entrepreneurship andcommercialization skills that nurture creativity, intelligent risk taking, and ambition” [1].Similarly, in the United States, STEM jobs are predicted to grow almost twice as fast as anyother profession, with over 1 million jobs by 2018 in STEM fields, but with only 16% of degreesanticipated to be awarded in STEM specializations [1]. While similar in some ways, weanticipate that the approach to STEM education may have notable differences between Canadaand the US. Part of our vision is to explore these differences and identify strengths in
Paper ID #21841Impact of Undergraduate Research Experiences on Diverse National and In-ternational Undergraduate ResearchersDr. Jacques C. Richard, Texas A&M University Dr. Richard got his Ph. D. at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, 1989 & a B. S. at Boston University, 1984. He was at NASA Glenn, 1989-1995, taught at Northwestern for Fall 1995, worked at Argonne National Lab, 1996-1997, Chicago State, 1997-2002. Dr. Richard is a Sr. Lecturer & Research Associate in Aerospace Engineering @ Texas A&M since 1/03. His research is focused on computational plasma modeling using spectral and lattice Boltzmann
Justice This workshop was developed to understand critical issues that must be considered when evaluating the how the learning outcomes for a technical course might be framed in the context of social justice.A Faculty that embraces a redefined engineering canonMany of the schools faculty members were skeptical of the need for significant changes tocurricula. Recognizing this, another goal of the RED grant was to: “Createaculturewithintheschoolwherefacultyrecognizetheneedforarevisedcanonthatinfusesprofessionalskillsandvalueswithdisciplinarycontenttodevelopchangemakingengineers.”Consequently, a primary approach for achieving change is to use a transformative and emergentchange model [1] to develop broader support for the
Cognitive Career Theory (SCCT) (Lent, Brown, & Hackett, 1994, 2000) describes therelationship between person, environment, and behavior relative to career choices. SCCTidentifies processes and resulting pathways through which students form academic and careerchoice goals and make decisions regarding necessary actions to attain their goals. Specifically,SCCT posits that students will base their career choice on having 1) the skills and knowledge forthe career, 2) the expectations of the reward for the career, 3) an interest to do the work related tothe career, and 4) a supportive climate for pursuing the career. In particular, the supportiveclimate is based on environmental influences which can be proximal (i.e. direct and immediate)to the
Instruction for K-12 Engineering (Work in Progress)IntroductionEfforts to diversify the engineering workforce are informed by the fact that engineeringcontinues to remain a White, male-dominated profession [1]. Underrepresented students leavescience, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) programs in middle school, highschool, and in undergraduate programs [2]-[4] at a disproportionate rate compared to their Whitemale colleagues.In order to broaden participation and provide equitable engineering education forunderrepresented students, better approaches are necessary to support these students’ pathwaystoward STEM careers. One approach for encouraging diverse participation in engineering isthrough disciplinary literacy instruction (DLI
MotivationTeaming is a core part of engineering education, especially in the first and last years ofengineering when project work is a prevalent focus. There is significant prior literature onengineering teams, but the effects of incorporating diversity into teams are understudied [1]. It isimportant to understand not only the practical outcomes of working in diverse teams, but alsohow the experience of working in diverse teams influences whether students see themselves asengineers and whether or not they feel they belong in engineering. Our project, “BuildingSupports for Diversity through Engineering Teams (NSF EEC-1531586/1531174),” investigateshow students’ attitudes towards diversity influence how they experience working in diverseteams through
verbal protocols as well as the participants’ non-verbal cues or observational protocol. Used in the data collection, the design challengespresented involved different scenarios depending on the participants’ academic level. Someexamples of the design challenges can be seen in Table 1. Following the data collection, therecorded think-aloud protocols were segmented into individual utterances and coded using the 17mental processes for solving technological problems, defined and validated by Halfin (1973).The operational definition of each mental process is provided in Appendix A. Based on a reviewof the literature, the mental process of modeling was determined by the researchers to be toosimilar to the other codes of model/prototype constructing
into a one-page report for each student toprovide them with sought feedback. Sample reports are illustrated for discussion with conferenceattendees whose valuable feedback is considered to improve future reports.Motivational attitudes and behaviors instrumentsThe Likert-scale assessment tools used in this study are shown in Table 1 and 2. Themotivational attitudes instrument, consisting of 20 items, is shown in Table 1. The first 10 itemsare classified as intrinsic in nature and the last 10 items as extrinsic.Attitudes: How often are you motivated by the following attitudes? (Students rates themselveson the following questions using a 10-point Likert scale from “Rarely” to “Most of the time”)1. Apply professional skills 11
Collaboration with an NSF-funded Engineering Research CenterUndergraduate research experiences are known to benefits students ([1], [2], [3], [4], and [5],among others). Lafayette College, like many small liberal arts colleges, prides itself on an abilityto offer research experiences to students. The latest National Survey of Student Engagementresults for the college indicate that, “By their senior year, 50% of students have done researchwith a faculty member” (web link to be provided in final paper). Research experiences forstudents also benefit faculty members at small colleges by keeping the faculty members engagedin their areas of expertise; many small colleges, including ours, also consider continuingengagement in research when evaluating a
students identifyingundergraduate engineering students as role models.IntroductionUniversity-based outreach initiatives are a major driver in K-12 engineering education. In theUnited States, an estimated 600,000 K-12 students participate in university-led engineeringoutreach annually [1]. Reaching students as young as elementary school is important as studentsform their interests and impressions in engineering and other STEM disciplines early [2], [3],[4], [5] and those interests often decline in middle school [5], [6], [7], [8]. It is widely believedthat university outreach programs can increase and broaden participation in engineering studyand careers by introducing youth to undergraduate students as engineering role models. To thisend
Microde- vices Laboratory at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory. Dr. Fontecchio received his Ph.D. in Physics from Brown University in 2002. He has authored more than 75 peer-reviewed publications. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 A Project-Based Approach to Develop Engineering Design Process Skills Among High School Students (WIP)IntroductionImplementing engineering curriculum in high school improves student learning and achievementin science, technology and mathematics, increases awareness of the contributions of engineers tosociety, and promotes student pursuits of STEM careers [1]. In a 2009 report, the Committee onK-12 Engineering Education from the National
integratedinstitutional network of supports that increases students’ self-efficacy, sense of belonging to theirmajor, and belief in the importance of their contributions to society. These are key factors thataffect retention in STEM fields [1]-[7]. The FS2 program is funded by the National ScienceFoundation, is focused on engineering and computer science (CS) majors and is designed toimprove retention and graduation rates. The FS2 program is currently in the fourth and finalacademic year and has engaged 470 first-year engineering and computer science students. Thepaper describes the main challenges in implementing these retention initiatives in a small collegesetting and outlines approaches to overcome these challenges.GoalsThe primary goals of this five year
conducted using environmental scans and the Classroom Observation Protocol for Undergraduate STEM (COPUS)1 to assess the classroom climate of faculty in the experimental (ISE-2) and control groups. Student surveys were also administered to students who were taught by ISE-2 faculty and control group faculty to assess student engagement and classroom climate. While the project is still ongoing, feedback from faculty regarding ISE-2 have been positive. Introduction The National Science Foundation, through EEC-Engineering Diversity Activities, awarded “Improving Student Experiences to Increase Student Engagement” (ISE-2) to Texas A&M University. ISE-2 is a faculty development program that focuses on reducing implicit
Sensorimotor Neural Engineering (CSNE) for two summers, engaging in engineering research and writing pre-college engineering curricula. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Neuroscience and Engineering: Interdisciplinary STEAM Curriculum at a Girls Middle School (Work in Progress) Background To support students’ meaningful learning, the Framework for K12 Science Education emphasizes the importance of incorporating engineering practices in science instruction [1]. Students who are more actively engaged in engineering design will be better equipped to participate in and contribute to addressing societal and environmental challenges in the
, 2018 Algebra-Related Misconceptions Identified in a First Year Engineering Reasoning CourseBackground:Students join engineering programs with a significant level of knowledge; some of thisknowledge is correct and some incorrect [1, 2]. Students’ pre-instructional knowledge is definedas “preconceptions”. It has been shown that educators need to assess these preconceptions,because they affect new learning, especially since learning depends on whether the newknowledge agrees with or contradicts existing preconceptions [2].Preconceptions that are consistent with the concepts learned in class are called “anchoringconceptions”[3]. Preconceptions that are inconsistent with concepts learned in class are termed“alternative
summers, engaging in engineering research and writing pre-college engineering curricula. Her research interests include physics and engineering education and teacher professional development. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Integrating Authentic Engineering Design into a High School Physics Curriculum (Work in Progress)Background and ObjectivesThe Framework for K-12 Science Education calls for the integration of engineering practicesinto pre-college science classrooms [1], because “providing students a foundation in engineeringdesign allows them to better engage in and aspire to solve the major societal and
categorized as over 99% rural, and it is common forschools to be separated by 30-40 miles or more [1]. Therefore, teachers in these areas aretypically the only teacher in their content area and lack the support, resources, and professionalopportunities required to develop effective teaching strategies. However, these teachers havesignificant influence over the development of their students, since they may be the onlymathematics or science teacher their students ever have while in that building. Many of theseteachers have 5-7 different preparations of classes per day and only one planning period. Whenpolicies and assessment methods change, such as with Common Core and Next GenerationScience Standards, these solitary STEM teachers may struggle to
applied behavioral science with a scope of practice that includesscreening, assessment, treatment, and technology/instrumentation related to the areas of fluency,speech production, language, cognition, voice, resonance, feeding and swallowing, and auditoryhabilitation/rehabilitation [1]. Speech-language pathologists (SLPs) receive hundreds of hours ofclinical training involving direct patient care. SLPs are keenly aware of the many ways thattechnology can be applied to improve outcomes for patients with speech, language, voice, andswallowing problems. Their training however does not provide the technical knowledge andexperiences to design and implement technologies to support their clinical practice and patients.In contrast, engineering students
EPICS High in 2012.The ASU program currently serves 800 high school students within 32 schools in the PhoenixMetro area. The EPICS High model is integrated into existing classroom frameworks. Teachers aretrained on the EPICS high curriculum that is then incorporated into their STEM or CTE classesor in afterschool clubs. The curriculum is grounded in design education and service learning andpromotes engineering for social good (social entrepreneurship), see figure 1. Figure 1By pairing meaningful community service with engineering instruction, EPICS High provides aconduit for students to engage in project-based learning to master course content while fosteringgreater civic responsibility and
identity plays in learning. The investigation began by analyzing anational data set of students’ leadership development experiences and the self-reported impact ofthose experiences. The data was used to explore the leadership experience and perception of theimpact of these experiences of engineering students when compared to their peers in other STEMfields and those outside the STEM fields. Initial results indicate significant differences betweenthese groups.IntroductionAs society finds itself facing ever more complex challenges, many have rightfully called fortraining greater numbers of engineers to provide our workforce with the skills needed tosuccessfully design solutions to these challenges [1]. However, designing these solutions isdifficult
, we also used a targeted mailing campaign to recruit studentsfrom a nearby school district where over 60% of the students are members of anunderrepresented ethnic minority [1]. As a result of these efforts, there were 58 applicants for the40 available camp spots. Fifty-four percent of applicants were members of the underrepresentedminority groups (40% Hispanic, 9% Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander, and 5% AfricanAmerican). In addition to the ethnic diversity of our applicants, the selected participants also hadpublic (89%), private (5%) and homeschool (5%) educations, as well as a wide range ofacademic abilities (68% of applicants had 3.7 GPA or higher; 11% had a 2.9 GPA or lower). Asa result of this diverse applicant pool, we sought out the
volunteers to support the goals of the program. Webelieve the VISTA program can be a source of institutional support to NSF grantees and we urgeothers to investigate these opportunities in their own state or institutional systems.S-STEM PEEPSPEEPS is an S-STEM scholarship and support program at California Polytechnic StateUniversity, San Luis Obispo. The aim of the program is to support students from under-resourced backgrounds in as many ways as possible to help them complete engineering degrees.The 13 students in the program receive up to $10,000 per year of financial scholarships and awide range of other support throughout their time at Cal Poly. We designed the cohorts aroundthe Posses Foundation Scholarship program [1]. Initially, we helped to
Univer- sity. She is teaching math methods classes. Her research interests are in math methods and in teacher preparation. She is also interested in online education research.Andrew Strom, Corona Del Sol High School Andrew Strom has been teaching mathematics at Corona Del Sol for 21 years. He has taught a variety of subjects: Algebra 1-2, Geometry, Algebra 3-4, Honors Algebra 3-4, Pre-Calculus, Honors Pre-Calculus, College Mathematics and AP Statistics. Andrew enjoys the beauty of mathematics and loves working with young people.Prof. Constantinos PattichisHuan Song c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Multidisciplinary Modules on Sensors and Machine
educational research in engineering and science HE-programmes. From 2012 until now she’s the vice dean of the Faculty of Engineering Technology (KU Leuven, Bel- gium). In her research she’s focusing on the transition from secondary to university within the STEM- field. She’s the project coordinator of the two following Erasmus+ projects: (1) readySTEMgo, in which she focuses on early identification of STEM readiness and on targeted academic interventions (see http://iiw.kuleuven.be/english/readystemgo) and (2) PREFER, in which she studies professional roles and employability of future engineers (see http://preferproject.eu/). Greet Langie is committee chair capacity building within SEFI, she’s a member of the SEFI Physics
EE program, as well as the electricpower engineers’ and managers’ enthusiasm for hiring students from this program.The goals of the S-STEM EE Scholars Program at Suffolk University were to: 1. Provide a pathway to a future in EE, particularly power engineering, for talented students with limited financial means. Special emphasis was placed on recruiting underrepresented minorities from BPHS. 2. Build on the EE program’s sense of community with specific activities for S-STEM Scholars. 3. Improve the awareness of S-STEM Scholars’ career interests and values, particularly as they relate to career decision-making and workplace satisfaction.The objectives of the program were to: 1. Increase the number of EE majors from
research labs fully contained and established at each of thefour participating member institutions and it evolved into a collaborative effort to shareeffective new green technology content. Its goal was to impart skills to faculty members ofthis network in order to strengthen their capacities and arm them with additional resources tosupport their efforts in recruiting and retaining students, and in particular, minorities andfemales in STEM programs offered at their institutions.San Antonio College (SAC) as part of this network worked continuously on developing andimplementing new undergraduate research projects related to green technologies for the entireduration of this partnership making a commitment to 1) encourage STEM faculty to attend Re
in lectures and recitations; midterm course evaluations as formativefeedback; and advocacy with colleagues to catalyze diffusion beyond these early courses.The project has two foci. The first is to provide support and recognition to enable faculty whoteach the critical early core courses to adopt evidence-based practices and target deep andtransferable learning within and across disciplinary domains. Evidence-based instructionalpractices are defined as those derived from research on cognition and how people learn [1-3].Examples include presenting authentic real-world problems for students to solve, providing in-class opportunities for peer-to-peer learning, and supporting self-directed learning. Thesepractices are designed to enable students
workforce needs. Therefore, it isimportant to consider the professional development of community college faculty. Faculty incommunity colleges need to have training and preparation that allows them to provide engagingand content-relevant curriculum to their students.1 Context-based learning approaches have beenidentified as one type of pedagogical approach that can encourage student persistence to degreeand facilitate student learning.1Research shows that community college faculty need exposure to this teaching method as well asto other pedagogical approaches that encourage hands-on experiences for students.2 Access toprofessional development opportunities that expose faculty to these methods is needed so thatcommunity college students receive an
Engineering and Director of the Texas Sustainable Energy Research Institute at The Univer- sity of Texas at San Antonio. Her research expertise is in: (1) mathematical programming and optimiza- tion techniques for analyzing large-scale, complex systems under uncertainty, and (2) big data analytics for manufacturing processes. She is member of INFORMS, IISE and ASEE. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018A Multidisciplinary Approach to Support Undergraduate Students and Improve Retention and SuccessAbstract:Our University has seen rapid growth in the last 10 years; however, student income levels havenot improved, and our university is considered a low-income serving