Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering. She earned an NSF RIEF award recognizing her effort in transitioning from a meaningful ten-year teaching faculty career into engineering education research. Before her current role, she taught STEM courses at diverse institutions such as HSI, community college, and R1 public university.Ms. Ayla Sevilleno, University of Florida Ayla Sevilleno is pursuing a degree in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at the University of Florida and expects to graduate in Spring 2028.Justin Ortagus, University of Florida Justin C. Ortagus is an Associate Professor of Higher Education Administration & Policy and Director of the Institute of Higher Education. His research typically examines the
grounded theory approach will be followed for data collection andanalysis. A group of STEM career graduates and employers from three universities in a LatinAmerican country are being interviewed since their perception is a good measure of aninstitution's quality and effectiveness [20]. Employers have not been interviewed for this WIP.Study Participant and their recruitmentSeven graduates from three universities in a Latin American country were interviewed for thisWIP. Table 1 presents the participants' data, including the type of University and their QSRankings: Latin America & The Caribbean 2025 [21] (exact Nº blind for review).Table 1: Participant data Nº Gender Engineer Graduation Type of Industry Type of University
managementprofessionals to give students realistic interpretations of various careers and previewsof the work world that exists today.3 The prerecorded interviews were put on aYouTube channel where students could consume the content on demand.At the University of Wisconsin, Madison, first year engineering students interviewedprofessional engineers as part of a technical communications course.4 Students werefree to choose an interview subject or were assigned one. The one on one interviewswere conducted in person or online, and both methods were equally beneficial.Students generally found the interviews straightforward and easy to do. The articledid not state what questions were asked, how many, and who conceived them.Interview transcripts were shared with the
focuses on empowering engineering education scholars to be more effective at impacting transformational change in engineering and developing educational experiences that consider epistemic thinking. She develops and uses innovative research methods that allow for deep investigations of constructs such as epistemic thinking, identity, and agency. Dr. Faber has a B.S. in Bioengineering and a Ph.D. in Engineering and Science Education from Clemson University and a M.S. in Biomedical Engineering from Cornell University. Among other awards for her research, she was awarded a National Science Foundation CAREER Award in 2022 to study epistemic negotiations on interdisciplinary engineering education research teams
graduate education, and a future career inmechanical engineering and design. Sharing these findings highlights the potential forearly-stage research to contribute meaningfully to space exploration and innovation whileeffectively advancing STEM education and experiences at the college level.IntroductionExperiential learning opportunities that bridge the gap between classroom theory and real-worldapplication are essential for fostering effective education for a student of any discipline. In astudy by Alfaro [1], real-world experiences provide students with invaluable experiences throughhands-on projects that are not associated with a letter grade. This can foster skills in creativeproblem-solving, communication, efficient design processes, and an
Engineering Education, 2025 WE’VE GOT THE SOLUTIONS! A CHEMICAL ENGINEERING HIGH SCHOOL SUMMER CAMPKeywords: Outreach, high school, demonstrations, recruitmentIntroductionIn an effort to encourage students to consider engineering as a career path, universities haveinstituted a wide range of programs, including research experiences, internship opportunities,transition programs from high school to college, and summer programs. The type of programvaries based on the target audience, i.e. elementary, middle, or high school students;underrepresented students; rural students; or first-generation students, to name a few. Theprogram type also depends on the resources available, both financial and human, with someprograms involving a
meets these standards, including methods to approach, type of application, andcorrelation to industry experience, are presented in the paper.Lastly, this paper assesses the performance of VMI's CE students by analyzing longitudinal datafrom ethics-related questions on the Fundamentals of Engineering (FE) exam. Taking the FEexam is a key graduation requirement for all CE students at VMI, providing a quantitativemeasure of the effectiveness of the institute's ethics education. This analysis will focus onidentifying trends in student performance over time, offering insights into how well VMIprepares its students for ethical challenges in their professional careers. Overall, this paperprovides a comprehensive review of the integration of ethics in
cultivate the future soft robotics workforce, our survey assessed student’sgrowth in respect to the learning objectives (LOs) of the clinic which emphasized soft roboticknowledge and experience. In addition, our survey asked students to report on the clinic’sinfluence on their future goals and career preparation. This paper provides updated surveyinformation, comparing outcomes of Fall 2023 and Spring 2024 survey data, and shares the resultsof the student-developed modules in the first year of the Cultivate Soft Robotics clinic experience.Project OutcomesThe Spring 2024 semester recruited 7 junior and 2 senior mechanical engineering (ME) studentsto the soft robotics clinic project, 8 of which were returning students. An additional
, Indiana University-Bloomington Dr. Kelli Paul is an Assistant Research Scientist at the Center for Research on Learning and Technology at Indiana University where her research focuses on the development of STEM interests, identity, and career aspirations in children and adolescents.Lauren Penney, Indiana University-Bloomington ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Enhancing Engineering Education for Homeschool Families Through MAKEngineering Kits (Work in Progress)IntroductionAccording to the United States Census Bureau [1], the average percentage of school-agedchildren being homeschooled in Fall 2022 was 6%, which was an increase from 3% of school-aged children being
enhance educationalexperiences, and assist in broadening participation in STEM [3], [7], [8], [9], [10]. Hence, K-12educators find robotics to be a promising choice to integrate into STEM education. In this sectionwe dive into each of these three areas in more detail. Achieve STEM competencies and provide career awareness: Integration of roboticsinvites critical thinking, communication, collaboration, and creativity into the learningenvironment [4], [10]. These skills, when paired with problem-solving, help build connectionsbetween academic and social knowledge [11]. Thus, robotics creates a platform to learn 21st-century skills and paired with models like project-based learning, robotics helps train learners tothrive in the current
education to explore how language, race, and socialization shape engineering pathways and engineering practice. In 2025, Dr. Mejia received the Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE) Award for his contributions to engineering education.Dr. Laurie O Campbell, University of Central Florida Laurie O. Campbell, Ed.D., is an Assoc. Professor of STEM and Instructional Design and Technology, at the University of Central Florida. She pursues research related to STEM curriculum and STEM identity among underserved and underrepresented populations, pDr. Florencio Eloy Hernandez, TAMUCC Hern´andez currently serves as a Professor of Chemistry and Dean of the College of Science at Texas A&M
, methodology, findings, andconclusions and implications are presented.Background The relatively low number of tenured and tenure-track female faculty in STEM fieldscontinues to be a concern for universities and colleges, and for good reason. In a report by theCommittee on Maximizing the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering,Beyond Bias and Barriers, the following summary findings were asserted: 1. Women have the ability and drive to succeed in science and engineering. 2. Women who are interested in science and engineering careers are lost at every Page 23.1088.2 educational transition. 3. The problem is not simply
serving northeast Indiana. PFW is ametropolitan, non-selective, institution with a high percentage of under-prepared, first-generation,low-income, commuter students, many of whom work. The mission of the PFW College ofEngineering, Technology, and Computer Science (ETCS) is to provide a comprehensive educationthat will prepare career-ready graduates for a variety of roles in engineering, polytechnic, computerscience, and leadership, serving the needs of northeast Indiana and beyond.In 2016, PFW (then IPWF) was awarded an NSF grant (Award #1565066)—the overarching goalof the project is to increase the number of students who complete degrees in engineering,technology, and computer science. Like many similar institutions, PFW struggles with
Communication is widely misunderstood, and while this is perhaps especially truein STEM disciplines, STEM is not alone in their misconceptions. Outside of CommunicationStudies, Interpersonal Communication (IPC) tends to be treated as a personality trait (Okoro,Washington, & Thomas, 2017; Pert, 2019), and on popular career websites and in professionalcontexts alike, is most often defined in terms of “people skills,” “personal skills” (Doyle, 2021),or even “friendliness” (Indeed, 2021). IPC is also frequently discussed as a set of traits that areinherent to a person.However, the role of IPC in everyday professional communication is much deeper and morecomplex than cordiality; it is essential to functionality and effectiveness across disciplines
academic success and optimal emotional development of their students. Unfortunately,engineering students often do not have access to such relationships. Were engineering educatorsto better recognize the importance of these relationships and contribute to creating such acommunity, they could help to ensure engineering students were able to thrive academically andemotionally.C. Absence of Harassment and Expression without FearIn the United States, harassment is a growing problem in science, technology, engineering, andmathematics (STEM) fields [14]. Harassment can be verbal, physical, or sexual and include anyunwelcome or unfavorable behavior due to one’s identity (e.g., gender, race, age, religion).Harassment has adverse impacts on career outcomes
Zealand. While in Shanghai, I also began to play badminton a bit more seriously. Although I had played badminton competitively before in Pakistan, the quality of the opponents I faced in China honed my ability to a level I had never experienced before. A rather debilitating knee injury slowed down my semi-professional career, but I recovered enough to still win a number of championships and local tournaments. Its difficult to describe one’s entire life in a handful of words, but I’ve given it my best shot. Onwards and upwards has been my personal mantra throughout my academic and professional career. I now hope to continue my previous research in mechanical design while addressing the biggest problems in Engineering
mechanics and bioprocess engineering. She began her position as Director of Community Programs and Diversity Outreach at the Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences in 2003. In partnership with faculty, postdoctoral fellows, and graduate students, she develops and implements programs for K-12 students, teachers, un- dergraduates, and families that are designed to increase scientific and engineering literacy, and to inspire people with diverse backgrounds to pursue science and engineering careers. At the undergraduate level, she directs a Research Experiences for Undergraduates program that brings students to Harvard for 10 weeks to work in research laboratories. This program hosts between 45-70
take mathematically intensive engineering courses tounderstand engineering subjects deeply. Without a strong foundation in math concepts and underlyinggoverning equations, engineering students will not understand more complex, higher-level concepts in theirfuture graduate studies and future careers. When teaching mathematically intensive engineering courses,professors usually show detailed derivations of theorems, principles, and governing equations todemonstrate how theorems, principles, and governing equations are obtained.However, during this process, engineering students often feel bored and disengaged because examples ofhow the educational content is applied in their daily lives are lacking [1]. In another words, engineeringstudents are
, faculty are at the very heart of the student experience. We strive to create a collaborative, inclusive, and stimulating learning environment that emphasizes care for the whole person. Faculty and staff in our department offer student support that goes beyond the classroom and extends to career counseling and mentorship. Course outcomes are regularly examined and adjusted to respond to the needs of our constituents. Faculty are committed to practicing continuous improvement through professional development activities and pedagogical research that broaden our spectrum of teaching and learning strategies. Student responses indicate that faculty-student relationships was by far the most
when a mentor and a mentee are atapproximately at the same level of their personal, professional, or academic path [1], [2], [5], [6].Peer mentorship has been shown to introduce a level of reciprocity, mutuality, and interpersonalcomfort that may not be available in traditional mentorships, allowing for trust and credibility tobe built in the two-way relationship [1], [2], [5]–[7]. This is due in part to their developmentalneeds, whether that is in career or academic aspects, unfolding at similar times [6]. Identity,belonging, student experience, and emotional competency have all been shown to haveimprovements when in a positive peer mentorship as well as increased retention, particularly forthose who are underrepresented or in the first year
computerengineering portion. Typical course topics in the materials and mechanical engineering portionof the course included: metals and atoms, hardness testing, microstructures and properties,Hooke’s Law, and the design of trusses. Typical course topics in the electrical and computerengineering portion included Ohm’s Law, the resistor color code, equivalent resistance, power,digital logic, ASCII, and concepts regarding computer programming like basic variables andconditional statements. In addition to these technical topics, professional orientation toengineering was addressed with lectures on career opportunities, resume development, etc.Centered on preliminary topics in computer, electrical, materials, and mechanical engineering,past versions of EG 101
enrollment and retentionrates. To attract the younger generation to machining industry careers, more attention needs to bepaid to incorporating novel training methods that are more appealing and engaging to youngerstudents. Interactive training programs with game-like elements (gamified training programs) arepotentially a viable solution to effectively addressing the shortcomings of traditional trainingmethods.The process of gamification, defined as implementation of game-specific mechanics anddynamics in non-gaming applications [5] has been of interest in machining-related applications,including workforce development. As video games are designed with the goal of providingenjoyment to the user, potential benefits of gamification include enhanced
percentage, many students may choose to transfer toClemson, and the number of students choosing to transfer has been increasing over recent years.The goals of SPECTRA are as follows: (1) to provide scholarship opportunities to low-income students who wish to pursue engineering or computing at Clemson (2) to build cohorts of transfer students to support their transition into Clemson University while also allowing for the ACE fellows program to aid in the training and practice of PhD candidates who wish to pursue careers in academia (3) to assess its progress both internally and externally to assist the transfer students best and improve the programThe ACE Fellows aspect is part of the SPECTRA program. It involves taking
to 2018, the BA/BS degree increased from 735 to 1,529 in 2018. This is anincrease of 108% from the level reached in 2012 [2-4].NYC LSAMP Alliance ActivitiesNYC LSAMP Research Assistantship - The NYC LSAMP Undergraduate Research Programserved as the heart of the NYC Alliance. The program included research experiences on or offCUNY campuses, international research, research enrichment and career development. LSAMPScholars engaged in High Impact activities during their stay in the program. At the end of PhaseV seventy to eighty students participated each semester in the academic year research program.Twenty-five to thirty NYC LSAMP Research Scholars conduct research during the summer atCUNY. On average, twenty NYC LSAMP Research Scholars secure
-focused laboratory report writing.Introduction Engineers need to have strong communication skills to carry out their day-to-day workand to advance in their careers. Engineers spend almost two thirds of their overall work time onsome form of written or oral communication [1]. Of that, half the time is spent on writtencommunication – preparing proposals, reports, memos, feasibility studies, white papers,operating manuals, engineering specifications, business letters and responding to emails. Rhodes[2] summarizes it well in his paper that “Long after most professional engineers have ceased tointegrate a differential equation, they are still required to write technical reports”. Despite the importance and the amount of time engineers
literate and economically competitive national citizenry [6], [9],[10], and even about the formative effect that post-secondary education can have on career pathsand life satisfaction [11], this study focuses specifically on how students choose betweenengineering and the physical sciences. We seek to investigate what factors guide their choice,including their prior knowledge and/or opinions about the differences and similarities betweenengineering and the physical sciences. Eventually, we aim to help to answer the larger question:How can post-secondary education systems (and even K-12 systems) better advise studentsinterested in engineering or the physical sciences to choose the academic and professional pathsthat align well with their values
-12classrooms in the US due to insufficient numbers of high quality engineers that will meet thedemands of the 21st century jobs [1], [2]. The incorporation of engineering in K-12 classroomshas grown in popularity since the publication and widespread adoption of the Next GenerationScience Standards (NGSS) [3] and its supporting Framework [4]. This focus on “engineering inK-12” has spurred invigorated educational research endeavors seeking to understand the impactof engineering activities on students' learning outcomes and interest in STEM careers [5]. The overarching goal of this study is to share results of a systematic review ofengineering education research published broadly across the K-12 education research field over arecent 10 year period
Paper ID #37369State of Evaluating the Effectiveness of TeachingDevelopment Programs for Students in EngineeringJutshi Agarwal (Doctoral Candidate) (University of Cincinnati) Jutshi Agarwal is a Doctoral candidate (graduation date: July 2022) in Engineering Education at the University of Cincinnati. She has a Master's degree in Aerospace Engineering from University of Cincinnati and a Bachelor's degree in Aerospace Engineering from SRM University, India. Her research areas of interest are graduate student professional development for a career in academia, preparing future faculty, and using AI tools to solve non
different trends for each gender based on the graph. The percentage of men tends to bemoderately confident or somewhat confident with applying sustainability into their designs. 50%of women reported being not confident in applying sustainability, and only 12% of womenreported being very confident. Because the alumni participants had little to no coverage ofsustainability concepts during their undergraduate career, it‘s assumed that this directly affectedtheir confidence levels in applying sustainable practices in their work. As shown in Figure 10, itis possible to influence confidence levels and one's ability to add sustainability into their designwork.Figure 10. Alumni results for the question “Before working in industry, how confident were you
systems. STS Postures integrate three modes of doing: 1) Body/Mind fusion; 2)Data collection techniques; and 3) Systems thinking skills. STS postures takes a traditionallypassive educational environment and introduces movement and change making to theengineering curriculum. Instead of sitting in seats in the classroom, we encourage students tomove about. We try out different ways of holding ourselves and moving (literally our bodies) inrelation to each other, STS, engineering, education, and technological artifacts. This change inposture is key to having agency in directing the future of science and technology, whether intheir own education, their extracurricular work, or their careers. Body/Mind fusion is a correctiveto thinking in science and