at four North Carolina universities, including UNC-Charlotte.Johanna L OkerlundDr. Richard Jue-Hsien Chi, University of North Carolina at CharlotteDr. David Wilson c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Exploring the STEM Education and Learning Impacts of Socially-Relevant Making through the Challenge Problem of Making Prosthetics for KidsGrowing numbers of learners are engaging in STEM practices and learning through various formsof “Making” [1]. The Maker approach is fundamentally self-driven informal learning that centerson personally meaningful projects using physical and digital fabrication tools, such as 3Dprinters, to design, prototype, and make
skills,sometimes referred to as professional or process skills, are highly valued, they are rarelyexplicitly assessed in the classroom. Assessment serves two purposes: (1) it provides a measureof achievement, and (2) it facilitates learning. The types of assessment used by an instructor alsotelegraph to students what is valued in a course. However, in many instances, the lack ofalignment between instructional methods and assessment detracts from the added value ofengaged student learning environments.Our NSF funded project, “Enhancing Learning by Improving Process Skills in STEM” focuseson the development of instructor resources that support process (or professional) skilldevelopment. These resources are designed to help instructors provide
their questions outside of the class timeframe. In large-size college classes, usingemails and online office hours have been introduced as effective substitutions for face-to-faceoffice hours [1-4]. Moreover, cooperative learning has repeatedly proven to have positiveimpacts on students’ educational experience [3,5]. Cooperative learning, which can beincorporated in classes of any size, enables students to improve their social and team-workingskills. In addition, cooperative learning provides an opportunity for students to discuss theirquestions and overcome challenges within their groups without forming long lines outside theinstructor’s office during office hours.Nevertheless, for certain technical courses in engineering curriculum
Yes 84 Graduate/5th year <1 No 16 n=data from 13 sites, based on approximately 400 post surveys; one term Though student participation and identity varied slightly across universities, when aggregated, approximately 83% each term represented an ethnic minority including Black (73%). Hispanic (6%), and Multi-racial (4%); only 9% self-reported as Asian and 7% as White. Overall, the majority of the students spoke English as their primary language (84%); most of the 16% non-primary English speakers self-reported as of Asian ethnicity. More than half of student participants (59%) identified
consideration of public health, safety, and welfare, as well asglobal, cultural, social, environmental, and economic factors” (outcome 2) as well as “an abilityto recognize ethical and professional responsibilities in engineering situations and makeinformed judgments, which must consider the impact of engineering solutions in global,economic, environmental, and societal contexts” (outcome 4) [1]. Both of these outcomes requirethat students consider the global impact of engineering. Global engineering skills are critical toprepare students for the realities of American competitiveness in global markets [2], and to buildstudents’ interdisciplinary, cross-cultural capacities to tackle grand challenges, a sentimententhusiastically supported by over 120
Foundation'sTransforming Undergraduate Education in STEM program (grant no. 1323259), addresses apersistent problem in engineering education: the discrepancy between the writing skills ofprogram graduates and the demands of writing in the workplace. In the project, new teachingmaterials are based on research about effective writing by civil engineering practitioners. Thematerials are integrated into existing courses and assignments, rather than through majorcurriculum changes, so that new instruction can be implemented more easily and quickly. Thisposter paper provides a brief summary of the project, emphasizing the teaching materials andassessment results from the past three years. More details can be found in several publications[1]-[5].Project Need, Background
engineering graduates is at an all time high,however those same graduates lack interpersonal and social skills that would be required inpresent-day job settings [1]. Some of the skills that these graduates lack are effectivecommunication and teamwork, both skills being of high value and importance in a job setting forengineers that have to work closely and collaboratively with fellow co-workers [1]. Whiletechnical expertise and knowledge have profound impacts on the skills employers look for whenhiring graduates, recently employers have started emphasizing the importance of skills such asintegrity, communication, and flexibility. The emergence of these skills is a result of theeconomic shift from an industrial to an information society [2]. This
How Do Students Respond to Active Learning? A Coding Guide for a Systematic Review of the LiteratureAbstractThis work in progress paper presents an example of conducting a systematic literature review(SLR) to understand students’ affective response to active learning practices, and it focuses onthe development and testing of a coding form for analyzing the literature. Specifically, the fullpaper seeks to answer: (1) what affective responses do instructors measure, (2) what evidence isused to study those responses, and (3) how are course features connected with student response.We conducted database searches with carefully-defined search queries which resulted in 2,365abstracts from 1990 to 2015. Each abstract was screened by
?IntroductionIn the Rowan University Department of Biomedical Engineering, we offer a yearlong, team-based longitudinal Biomedical Engineering design course involving junior and senior students.Through this course, student teams interact with clinicians and industry experts outside of theuniversity in a professional setting, and work to fulfill an unmet need in the medical field viaengineering design within realistic economic, social, ethical, and manufacturability constraints.Previous work has shown that active engagement in the design process for actual, real-worldproblems like these reinforces concepts and improves learning [1, 2]. In our course, each team isactively engaged in the design process throughout the yearlong course, which culminates in
, where they have to sort throughprior knowledge to identify what applies and recall how to apply it. Students’ rehearsal habits areinsufficient for developing this type of contextualized, contingent, and interconnected knowledgestructure.Changing students’ scripts for learning is hard and takes time. Conceptual change literatureidentifies four conditions required for such changes to occur: 1) students must experiencedissatisfaction with their current beliefs and behaviors (they are insufficient); 2) the new beliefsand behaviors must make sense (they are intelligible); 3) students must be able to apply the newbeliefs and behaviors (they are plausible); and 4) the new beliefs and behaviors must be fruitfuland endure challenges (Bendixen 2002
as 5=StronglyAgree, 4=Agree, 3=Neutral, 2=Disagree, 1=Strongly Disagree. All errors stated are 95%confidence intervals around the means. The Rowan University IRB approved this study, andparticipants were provided an explicit opportunity to refrain from completing the survey. Noidentifying information was collected, nor were any rosters of attendees generated or collected.Therefore, all assessment is anonymous and in aggregate.Preliminary Assessment of Student Attitudes and PerceptionsStudents reported a large increase in their awareness and understanding of the field of biomedicalengineering. When asked whether they knew what biomedical engineering was prior to theworkshop, the average response was 3.8±0.3. Ninety-seven percent of students
UndergraduateRankings” of schools with doctoral programs [1]. This list represents the perceived topprograms as ranked by department heads across BME programs in the nation. With that list ofschools, three qualities of each program were considered as metrics of curriculum breadth anddepth: track or concentration offerings, curriculum structure, and curriculum flexibility. All theinformation about the qualities of each program was gathered through public use websites andfiles found on the programs website.To compare curriculum structures, core curriculum requirements (engineering and generaleducation) and the BME curriculum requirements, along with electives for all three categorieswere tabulated. Required courses were sorted into general descriptions including
attention ofany class [1]. Fourteen students have successfully graduated from the program since itsinception in 2012.Program ActivitiesCLEAR Scholars meet monthly during the fall and spring semesters for activities that connectthem to academic and career development resources, as well as helping them developrelationships with one another and with the CLEAR Scholars coordinator. A typical schedule ofactivities for the year is shown in Table 1. Resources for Success Workshops includepresentations from on-campus programs that support academic success, particularly those thatare especially relevant to success in engineering, such as the Math Assistance Center; as well asactivities that reinforce student self-efficacy, such as developing time management
the results are available inboth figure and table formats.The module that was developed involves: (1) Having students model propane pyrolysis using a simplified approach, the pseudo-steady state hypothesis (PSSH), which is covered in Chapter 9 of the Fogler text. (2) Presenting the students with experimental results that well match the results of the PSSH model, and other experimental results which the PSSH model is incapable of explaining. (3) Discussing the assumptions behind the PSSH model and how these relate to the physical situations in the experiments, and also exploring how to develop a more rigorous model. (4) Sharing the results of the already-completed simulations, challenging students
Arbor) and her Ph.D. (2015) in Bioengineering from the University of Pennsylvania. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Effective Use of Engineering Standards in Biomedical EngineeringIntroductionThe use of engineering standards is an important skill for biomedical engineering (BME)students to succeed in their post-baccalaureate careers in the engineering profession [1].Engineering standards provide a framework for establishing and defining design constraints,working within regulatory and policy guidelines, and for developing and implementingappropriate design verification and validation methods [2,3]. Across BME departments there is astrong emphasis on the use of standards in Capstone or
active andcollaborative strategies that engage students in their own learning, and in relevant ways, arehighly successful across all disciplines (not just STEM) …” [1], [2]. Our ultimate goals are tomaximize instructional effectiveness and, therefore, student success in, and engagement with,STEM. By “success,” we are referring to a range of variables, including improved completionand pass rates, grade improvement, improved attitudes toward STEM, and improved study andengagement habits.Need for the Project. Institutional data at NDSU uniformly indicates the need for increased resources aimed atbolstering the adoption of innovative learner-focused teaching practices in STEM - especially ingateway courses. The John N. Gardner Institute for
learning platforms.Despite the clear value of increasing access to a variety of students, there is strong evidence thatmany students find succeeding in online courses challenging[1]. In the Department ofBioengineering at the University of Washington, we have recently moved our professionalprogram to a fully online format. Here, I present the structure being used for two fully onlinecourses in the Master in Pharmaceutical Bioengineering program that promotes the success ofour students.Many online programs rely entirely on recorded material, assignments, and discussion boards.This delivery method is effective and allows students to progress through the courses atindividual paces. However, this format does not provide a strong learning community
. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018IntroductionScholarships in Engineering, Science, Mathematics and Computer Science (SESMC, “seismic”)is an NSF S-STEM project at Allan Hancock College (AHC), a community college in SantaMaria, California. SESMC was funded at $600,000 for five-years. The first set of scholarshipswas awarded during academic year 2013–14, and the final set was awarded during 2017–18.Project activities were based on four foundations blocks: Financial, Academic Skills,Involvement, and Commitment/Motivation (Figure 1). Each scholar was awarded up to $6,000per year. Scholars were required to attend group study sessions, workshops, guest speaker talks,etc., as well as meet twice per semester with a faculty mentor in
. in Learning, Teaching, and Social Policy from Cornell University, and an Ed.M. in Administration, Planning, and Social Policy from the Harvard Graduate School of Education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 The Diversity of College Engineering Degrees: The Roles of Geography and the Concentration of Engineering Degree Production Executive SummaryIntroductionTo meet the growing demand for a larger technological and scientific labor force in the UnitedStates, a prominent policy goal is to expand and broaden participation in science and engineeringcollege programs (e.g., [1], [2]). Previous
assist the student in the design process. Included withDigiScope are a library of sampled ECG signals from the PhysioNet ECG database [1]. Once afilter is designed in DigiScope the processing results can be visualized on the included databaseof electrocardiograms.We included concepts of real-time digital signal processing in a book developed for this coursesome time ago [2]. In the Spring semester of 2018, we added lab experiments with real-timemicrocontroller programming of the signal processing algorithms in addition to analysis of pre-recorded signals with the DigiScope program. After an acceptable filter is designed, DigiScopeprovides the coefficients of the designed filter that the students use to implement the filter as areal-time digital
vs. 4-year institutions)are made to feel as outsiders in STEM. Each SEECRS scholar is paired with a faculty mentorwho engages in ongoing mentor training.The project evaluation will determine the efficacy of the project activities in achieving theirintended outcomes. Specifically, we will collect data to answer the research question: To whatextent can a guided pathways approach provide a coordinated and supported STEM experienceat Whatcom Community College that: (1) increases student success, and (2) positively shiftsstudents’ STEM self-identity? The evaluation will employ a quasi-experimental research design,specifically a pretest-posttest design with a matched comparison group.Our first cohort of 14 students was selected over two
engineering-related question and defend their position in front of others, f. Able to describe examples of applications and outline the state of the art in nanobiotechnology, g. Able to contribute to and build upon team ideas through discussion. Active learning can be twice as effective as traditional lecturing4, which is why active learning wasat the core of our design of this course. Indeed, the class-time was structured around three different types ofactivities: 1. Lectures 2. Case studies 3. Case historiesIn-class participation was also encouraged and relevant comments or in-class discussions were rewarded withextra points in the course’s final grade. Lectures made up less than half of the overall class time
nature of this project will foster students’ development ofessential skills in team-work, communication, and time-management, serving them well intotheir professional careers.1.0 Introduction & RationaleAs part of an NSF funded Advanced Technological Education grant (DUE #1400490),Bellingham Technical College (BTC), in partnership with Western Washington University(WWU) and the Pacific Northwest Center of Excellence for Clean Energy (Center), developed anew career-training pathway in Clean Energy that advances the academic capabilities of studentsand increases employability of regional graduates [1]. This work included the development of anAssociate in Applied Science-Transfer (AAS-T) degree with specialized certificates in the areasof power
the last three years, and thus has been steadily increasing the extent ofsustainability concepts included in the courses. Recently, instruction in sustainability conceptswas expanded from the Design III course to the Design II course, as a result of the instructorreceiving internal grant funding for a course-redesign on a Title V I-CARE (Integrating a Cultureof Academic and Research Engagement) federal grant. For the course re-design, a newinstructional module was created on heat integration in chemical processes, and then a short termstudent project was assigned to students.The sustainability concepts that are discussed in the Design II and Design III courses are (1)recycling of unreacted feed or other chemical; (2) heat integration; (3
the gains in student learning, engagement, andskills in the existing course to verify instructor perceptions. Therefore, our goal was tobenchmark a broad snapshot of the current laboratory course sequence before implementing anycourse changes. Due to the complexity of the course learning objectives, the authors took amulti-dimensional approach. By using both self-assessment and direct assessment methods withvarious tools in each of these categories we sought to capture the effects of our currentpedagogical practices while creating a platform to assess future changes to the laboratorycurriculum. The four outcomes of interest were developments in knowledge, laboratory skills,attitudes, and writing skills.Table 1: Proposed assessments that cross
ability to monitor and control theirown learning) and knowledge of effective study strategies. This paper presents preliminaryfindings on this intervention. Pre-post results are discussed for students who received themetacognitive awareness and study strategy intervention versus those who did not.IntroductionRetention and graduation are prominent concerns in engineering education. In 2007, the averageretention rate at U.S. engineering schools was just 56% [1]. Using 2016 data from 150engineering schools, Veenstra et al. [2] states that the 5-year graduation rates vary widely amongcolleges of engineering and is related to the first year retention rate. The research implies thatcolleges with a 90% first year retention rate have a 72% 5-year
considered one of the most effective tools toincrease enrollment and students’ retention. The program activities also impacted other studentsoutside the program, because student clubs, mostly managed and run by students, created anenvironment that appealed to their fellow students outside the NSF-STEM program. As a result,the number of active students in clubs’ activities has significantly increased. The details andimplementation process of the STEM program and its assessment process will be presented anddiscussed during the 2018 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings.1. IntroductionThis NSF S-STEM program (award #11540000) started in the fall of 2012. The program is titled“Increasing Student Enrollment and Achievement in Engineering and Engineering
the increase of quality assurance and regulations set forth by government agencies,recording of data and results will be an important skill for those students to have. For instance,electronic notebooks can comply with CFR Title 21 Part 11: Electronic Records and ElectronicSignatures of the United States Food and Drug Administration.With increase of personal technology and implementation of “cloud” storage, many companiesare implementing some form of electronic laboratory notebooks. • In 1997, Collaborative Electronic Notebook Systems Association (CENSA) was formed through the support of eleven major pharmaceutical and chemical companies. [1] • In 2014, Takeda Pharmaceutical published an article regarding their E-Notebook Project
Institute, which is a two-day teachingworkshop that introduces community college engineering faculty to the CALSTEP curriculum,and assists faculty in implementing the curriculum and developing alternative teaching andlearning strategies to increase enrollment and improve teaching effectiveness. Results ofcurriculum development and the implementation of the Summer Engineering Teaching Institutewill be highlighted in this paper, as well as future plans to maximize the impact of the program inincreasing access to engineering education among thousands of community college engineeringstudents and strengthening engineering transfer programs in the state.1. IntroductionAddressing the retention problem in the first two years of college is one of the
. Thedemonstration will also include pre- and post-demonstration reflection activities to help studentsface their misconceptions, a feature that has been demonstrated to be key for learning fromdemonstrations [1].The activities will be piloted for the first time during the Spring 2018 semester. In addition tothe previously mentioned reflection activities, improvements in student learning of key conceptswill be assessed indirectly by comparing achievement on relevant quiz and exam questions from2017 and 2018. These preliminary results will be presented at the 2018 ASEE AnnualConference, where the author hopes to receive feedback and ideas for improvement.Activity 1: McCabe-Thiele Quiz GameThe McCabe-Thiele method is a traditional graphical method for