functional analog and digital circuits. As is integrated into the learningoutcomes, students in this course are expected to analyze circuit problems that are different fromwhat they have seen in the class and use what they have learned in the course to designfunctional circuits that satisfy the specified criteria. As an example, after learning about the PNjunction diodes and the structure of half-wave and full-wave rectifiers, they were asked to designa DC power supply that would provide a certain average dc output voltage with a ripple voltageless than the given maximum value.Solving the design problems required students to develop a strong understanding of the materialand achieve a mastery level in mapping the design criteria to the circuit
Paper ID #34091Studying the Impact of Humanitarian Engineering Projects on StudentProfessional Formation and Views of Diversity, Equity, and InclusionDr. Kirsten Heikkinen Dodson, Lipscomb University Dr. Kirsten Heikkinen Dodson is an assistant professor of mechanical engineering in the Raymond B. Jones College of Engineering at Lipscomb University. She graduated from Lipscomb University with her Bachelors degree before completing her Doctoral Degree at Vanderbilt. Upon completing her research at Vanderbilt, she joined the faculty at her alma mater where she has focused on thermal-fluids topics in teaching and
colleges must complete an A. S.degree before transfereing to Drexel University. Maximum of 91.5 quarter credits can betransferred towards Drexel’s B. S. degree in Applied Engineering Technology.Students can be granted either pre-junior or junior status by DU, depending on the number ofadditional courses completed at the community colleges. The remaining 96 quarter credits mustbe taken from AET curriculum for a particular concentration. Most of the program’s courses arelaboratory-and project-based. They provide AET students with unique knowledge andexperience in engineering technology and management. In addition, a simplified articulationagreement with Middle Bucks Institute of Technology was developed. Some courses at MBITare taught using syllabi
to focus on women in computing, in which sheexplored what caused women and other marginalized groups to pursue careers in programmingand software engineering. She described how she derived personal and professional meaningfrom her research: “I think it's a[n] interesting blend of, what you said, personal and research stuff…. I like to do outreach activities…. It's fulfilling and it makes me excited about, okay, I'm here to do research, and I'm going to encourage the next wave of people to do the same.” - AngelAs a result of this integration, Angel reported strong, permanent identification as an engineer, inspite of multiple sources of social pressure to do otherwise: “I do see myself as an engineer…. Alot of people in
database.IntroductionDatabase is a collection of data that organizations and businesses may use frequently. It is veryimportant that this date be valid and consistent as organizations and businesses’ life depends onthis data. To ensure the integrity and consistency of data in a database, the database designers needto consider many rules called business rules or constraints. This is done mainly by action assertionstraditionally implemented in procedural logic buried deeply within user’s application program ina form that is virtually unrecognizable, unmanageable, and inconsistent. This approach places aheavy burden on the programmer, who must know all the constraints that an action may violateand must include checks for each of these constraints. An omission
methods and opportunities set forth byengineering educators and university officials, these engineers’ claims of not being fullyprepared to meet employers’ expectations of leadership competencies are founded in livedexperiences. Corporate officers and high-level managers acknowledge the importance of employingengineers with leadership competency. Technical skills can be leveraged by engineeringleaders. For these reasons and others, employers seek engineering graduates who can leadupon graduation. Reassurance can be established when it is well-understood the colleges anduniversities have assumed an integral role in developing leaders. Hutson et al. concluded, “Asemployers increasingly demand general competencies in professional skills as
to them, but she did notinvestigate the phenomenon in detail.5 In existing studies, there is a challenge in linking thecontent to students’ interest or the classroom environment to their retention in an engineering Page 22.1018.2program.MethodsData for this study were collected from students in a required electrical engineering course atGeorge Mason University. The course, ECE 320 – Signals and Systems II, is the second in aseries of two signals and systems courses in the electrical engineering curriculum and focuses ondiscrete-time signals and systems. Students enrolled in the course are typically at the junior orsenior level. The data
freshman year up. Inherent to the projectbased approach is the opportunity to work in teams, see the big picture and make technicalpresentations. The University of Colorado has opened a chalkboard-less Integrated TeachingLaboratory. This facility houses numerous project stations, computers and instrumentation thatserves as the nucleus for curriculum reform enabling more hands-on learning.Performance based approaches to education have been described by Spady and Marshall andplaced in three levels: traditional, transitional, and transformational with traits as outlined inTable 1. The traditional approach is best illustrated by the competency based education that hasbeen used in engineering technology programs for years. It is characterized by
Failure AnalysisThe research being conducted under the NSF’s Course, Curriculum and Laboratory ImprovementProgram (CCLI) consists of pre-instruction and post-instruction assessment of student capabilitywith support topics and skills (integration, differentiation, dot product, equilibrium conditions,etc.) across the curriculum. Student responses to these assessment questions are analyzed todetermine the approach which each student took in addressing the problem and to identifyaspects of their thinking process: this is especially important in those problems where thestudents answered the assessment questions incorrectly. The different methods by whichstudents approach these problems are then be categorized and a catalog of the most common“modes of
curriculum—andsuggests how to identify an evaluator and work with him or her to get the maximum benefit fromthe evaluation. Why bring in a separate implementation evaluator?It can be tempting to look at that four-question list and think, “Answering those questions is whata good principal investigator or project management team normally does—why divert preciousfunds to pay for someone else to come in and do it?”There are several important reasons, of which the primary one is that while coordinators shouldaddress those questions throughout the life of a project, they generally don’t. Like experimentaldesign, statistical data analysis, budget planning, time and project management, and otherelements of a major research study, program
experience, comprising curricularexperiences, classroom experiences, and out-of-class experiences [21]. Curricular experiencesencompass students’ unique coursework patterns, their choice of an academic major, the extentof their integration into the field, and their participation in additional academic experienceswithin the general or major field curriculum. (e.g., internships, cooperative education, studyabroad). Classroom experiences include, among other things, types of teaching methodsstudents experience in their classrooms. Finally, students’ out-of-class experiences which includestudents’ living arrangements during school, their level of engagement in co-curricular activities,study hours, family and work commitments, and the support they
Paper ID #35263Engaging Clients in ECE Seminar Course via Clinical ConsultingDr. Peter Mark Jansson, Bucknell University Professor Jansson is currently Faculty Director for the Center for Sustainability and the Environment as well as an Associate Professor of Electrical Engineering at Bucknell University where he is responsible for pedagogy and research in the power systems, smart grid and analog systems areas. His specialties include grid interconnection of large scale renewable power systems, Mach Effect detection and smart grid virtual storage via thermal inertia of buildings. He has previously worked for over a decade
to develop collaborative study groups. Weed out cultures are characterized bystudent perceptions that a class or curriculum is designed to fail a portion of students that are notacademically fit to survive. Tobias found similar results from students who claimed that therewas no sense of community in the classroom and that students were not interested in formingstudy groups due to competitive grading schemes [13]. Astin proposes that students who havecontrasting values and beliefs than the peers in their major are likely to leave that peer group infavor of one that has similar values and beliefs [4]. Referring to Table 1, this is an example of alow trust environment that is fostered by the social norms put in place through the
AC 2012-3120: AT-RISK VISUAL PERFORMANCE AND MOTIVATIONIN INTRODUCTORY ENGINEERING DESIGN GRAPHICSDr. Jeremy V. Ernst, Virginia Tech Jeremy V. Ernst is an Assistant Professor in the Integrative STEM Education program of the Department of Teaching and Learning at Virginia Tech. He currently teaches graduate courses in STEM education foundations and contemporary issues in integrative STEM education. Ernst specializes in research focused on dynamic intervention means for STEM education students categorized as at-risk of dropping out of school. He also has curriculum research and development experiences in technology, engineering, and design education.Dr. Aaron C. Clark, North Carolina State University Aaron C
time-consuming. These issuescould potentially shift the course focus away from experimentation and thus jeopardize thestudents’ interests in this important subject. A Design-Expert software has been integrated intothe experimentation course to help students learn the principles of the DOE. Students have usedthe software for designing the experiments and analyzing the results. This paper presentsexample lecture and experiment to demonstrate the effectiveness of the software. The impact onstudents’ abilities in experimental designs is also discussed.IntroductionLaboratory courses are an important component of engineering education. “Engineering withoutlabs is a different discipline. If we cut out labs we might as well rename our degrees
partners. Highlighted in this paper is what is hoped to be the first of many state-of-the-art centers,the Hydraulics Research and Education Center at Youngstown State University. With generousdonation from Parker Hannifin Corporation, curricular innovations are being brought to theforefront of pedagogical advancement.1. INTRODUCTION The Parker Hannifin Hydraulics Research and Education Center at Youngstown StateUniversity is a prime example of integrating an industry-sponsored program with curricularinnovation. Such a center, described below, provides the opportunity to design and developmulti-disciplinary experiments and creates project opportunities for students both in thelaboratory and in the field. Furthermore, it sets the
ElementsAbstract:Geometric Dimensioning and Tolerancing (GD&T) is an extremely important skill formechanical engineering students who will mainly design mechanical devices and components.However, a GD&T course is typically not included in an undergraduate mechanical engineeringcurriculum. In our mechanical engineering curriculum, bits of basic concepts of GD&T arebriefly mentioned or discussed in several different courses. It has been observed in the lastseveral years that some students in their senior capstone project designs still didn’t know how toproperly define assembly dimension tolerances or component dimension tolerances. In the lasttwo years, the authors used one and a half weeks out of a total of a fifteen-week semester toteach GD&T
of teaching by repeating lines or drawings which has definitely helped me with my problem of having uneven lines in my sketches and overall confidence in my ability as an artist.” “The most beneficial features of the app were easily-to-navigate modules, and the bridge game. I could see younger students playing the in-app game and improving their drawing skills without even knowing it! The Sketchtivity app proved to be very fun and beneficial to an engineering curriculum.” I thought the lessons would be boring because we were taught how to draw and stay inside a picture in elementary school, but the program used a red shade to criticize each drawing and gave you a score. This kind of criticizing made each
., S.A. Brownell, and A.T. Dale, The wicked problems in sustainable engineering (WPSE) initiative: Pilot results of a cross-institutional project-based course offering in American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition. 2014: Indianapolis, IN.12. Matthews, D.H., Far-post assessment of a sustainability engineering high school outreach program, in American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition. 2011: Vancouver, BC.13. Sattler, M.L., V.C.P. Chen, B.H. Dennis, S.P. Mattingly, K. Rogers, Y. Pearson Weatherton, M. Rani, and K. Kositkanawuth, Integrating sustainability across the curriculum: Engineering sustainable engineers, in American Society for
Paper ID #37158Cross Review of Collaboration in a Design-Build StudioSaeed RokooeiMohsen Garshasby (Assistant Professor) Mohsen Garshasby is an Assistant Professor in the Building Construction Science program at Mississippi State University. Dr. Garshasby is an architect, researcher, and educator who currently teaches collaborative studio(s) and integrated building systems within the College of Architecture, Art and Design at Mississippi State University.Afshin Hatami © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com
STEM QuESTS: A Design Challenge to Broaden Student Engagement in STEM EducationAbstractEngineering competitions are a popular mechanism to engage students in engineering and, morebroadly, in STEM studies and careers. Participants typically work in teams to solve real-worldproblems, integrating conceptual learning with hands-on activities. Engineering designchallenges provide an authentic engineering experience that integrates science, mathematics, andengineering principles and helps students develop innovative design thinking. They also improvestudent engagement, motivation, and self-efficacy, and provide students the opportunity todevelop important “21st Century” professional skills.As an alternative to the
developing fundamental design skills and aptitudes in pupils. Problemsolving, creative thinking and practical skills are integrated into a unique set ofsubjects with a common philosophy grounded in design. “Designing is a demandingand complex problem solving activity of great economic importance and sketchinghas an integral part in this” 1. A central focus is placed on sketching and the influencethat technological education has in the development of pupils’ ability to sketch. Theimportance of sketching will be explored under three facets which are cognitiveimplications, educational significance and the economic benefits.Educational SignificanceThe value of freehand drawing in technology education cannot be underestimated. Ithas been found that
another suggestion is to drop the ‘E’ from ET. Although advocatesmay issue well-intended motives for the validity of such proposals, we reason that rebranding isunnecessary, it is at best ineffective and at worst may be entirely devastating for ET programs Page 24.187.2across the nation. First, there exist about 60 programs in the US that offer the B.S. or B.A. in GeneralEngineering2. The degree often points to a more flexible curriculum allowing students to exploreareas of their interest with an interdisciplinary or cross-disciplinary flavor that may involve theapplied sciences and other non-engineering fields. Programs may specify a
Paper ID #25394Multi-Learning Techniques for Enhancing Student Engagement in Cyberse-curity EducationDr. Te-Shun Chou, East Carolina University Dr. Te-Shun Chou is an Associate Professor in the Department of Technology Systems at ECU. He received his Bachelor degree in Electronics Engineering at Feng Chia University and both Master’s de- gree and Doctoral degree in Electrical Engineering at Florida International University. He serves as the program coordinator of the Master program in Network Technology for the Department of Technology Systems and the lead faculty of Digital Communication Systems concentration for the
curriculum, including engineering mechanics courses and related courses in other curricula. Once these have been identified, it is possible to suggest case studies to support the topics.3. Develop the master plan to link courses, topics and course objectives, and case studies. Page 8.400.2Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & ExpositionCopyright © 2003, American Society for Engineering Education4. Draft an action plan to write case studies to fill in the gaps, and begin writing the case studies.5. Prepare the case studies. These cases will address the following elements of each case
drawsheavily from the degree of freedom analysis taught in the introductory material and energybalances course.IntroductionMultiple effect evaporation is an industrially important unit operation. It is the foundation ofseveral industries, including, for example, the production of sugar, which had over $6.9 billion inrevenues in the United States alone in 20081. Teaching multiple effect evaporation in the junioryear of the chemical engineering curriculum reinforces and integrates key topics from thesophomore year such as mass and energy balances, structured problem solving, and steam tablecalculations. As a side benefit, teaching multiple effect evaporation allows the opportunity todiscuss the work of Norbert Rillieux2, and his role as an inventor
Paper ID #26049A Simple Physical Model to Assist in Fluid Mechanics CalculationsDr. Anne Dudek Ronan P.E., New York University Anne Dudek Ronan, Ph.D., P.E., is an Industry Professor in the Department of Civil and Urban Engi- neering NYU. Although her main area of interest is Water Resources Engineering, she teaches across the curriculum – from the freshman Introduction to Civil Engineering course to graduate classes in Ground- water Hydrology and Surface Water Pollution. She also advises PhD and Masters degree students and is faculty adviser for two student clubs. Previously, Anne was an Adjunct Professor at The Cooper
important components of earthquakeengineering. The master’s curriculum has greater adaptability for an intervening disaster due tothe research directive despite of this deficiency. The students chose to engage the new master’scourse a couple of years early with uniform consensus. Page 22.1425.3 ProcedurreThe centrral phenomeenon is the in ntervention of o a synchro nous disasteer event on student learning.To examine the naturre of this pheenomenon, a qualitative research deesign was
; the information provided here can serve as a general guideline, but successfulapplicants will carefully review the specific requirements of each program to which they apply.Overview of the “Typical” Application ProcessMost graduate programs in the United States are set up on an academic calendar year, whichtypically begins in late August or early September. Some graduate programs will only admitnew students to start in this “fall” term, while others will admit most students in the fall and asmaller cohort in the January term. The “fall start” is assumed throughout this document, sincethat is the most common timeline; if you are applying to begin graduate school in a differentterm, you will need to adjust the timelines suggested here
Riley, 2003. Integrating Communication and Engineering Education: ALook at Curricula, Courses, and Support Systems, Journal of Engineering Education, October 2003, 325-238.3 Hendricks, Robert and Eric Pappas, 1996. Advanced Engineering Communication: An IntegratedWriting and Communication Program for Materials Engineers, Journal of Engineering Education, October1996, 343-352,4 Sullivan, Francis and Robert Baren, 1997. Simulating the Workplace in an EngineeringTechnology Course: A Rhetorical Model, Journal of Engineering Education, July 1997 279-284.5 Sharp, Julie et al, 1999. Four Effective Writing Strategies for Engineering Classes, Journal ofEngineering Education , January 1999, 53-576. www.onlineethics.org7