) thermite B 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 0 20 40 60 80 100 SiO2 content (weight %) Former Army PECASE recipient
manufacturing, aviation, and other industries. • These tools have been used to good effect in health care, but too rarely and not spread widely. President’s Council of Advisors on Science and TechnologyOverarching Goals: Potential actionsfor the Federal Government 1. Accelerate alignment of payment systems with desired outcomes: better care at lower cost 2. Increase access to relevant health data and analytics 3. Provide technical assistance in systems engineering approaches 4. Involve communities in improving health care delivery 5. Share lessons learned from successful improvement efforts 6. Train health professionals in new skills and approaches President’s Council of Advisors on Science and TechnologyGoal 1: Accelerate
3 Points:1) ManufacturingisnotAgriculture2) OurManufacturingFirmsareIncreasingly:“HomeAlone”3) Small,mid-sized,andstart-upfirms–mostofU.S. manufacturing-can’tgetfinancingto “Scale-Up” innovaPveproducPon4) StronginnovaPoncapabilitymeansstrongproducPon capability • Emergingadvancedtechnologyfields5)ManufacturingispartoftheinnovaPonsystem6)WorkforceTraining/EducaPon–theissues7)WhatGermanycanteachus:strongecosystem8)Jobs–HowmanufacturingsectoraffectsU.S. servicessector 4PointOne:ManufacturingisnotAgriculture • ForalongPmewethoughtmanufacturingwasagriculture. • In1900halfofpopulaPonfarming
120 118 116 1 Gray bars indicate14 recessions 012 010 01965 - Jan 1975 - Jan 1985 - Jan 1995 - Jan 2005 - Jan
research, information technology, and especially clean energy technology…” • Increase investment in clean energy tech by 1/3 • Expand ARPA-E and 3 new Energy Innovation HubsTHE FEDERAL R&D INVESTMENTR&D Priorities Jobs / Innovation / Economy Health National Security Energy gy Democrats Republicans Clean Energy Energy Security Action on Global Resource Management Climate ChangeTHE FEDERAL R&D INVESTMENTInnovation / Entrepreneurship ARPA-E Conventions Sec. Locke – Catalyzing University Research for a Stronger Economy forum (Feb 2010) DOC Innovation Forums (4 in
Educational AssistanceCURRENT LAW:Section 127 of the taxcode enablesemployees to receiveup to $5,250 ineducational benefitseach year from theiremployer tax-free.Expires Jan. 1, 2013.Education, businessand labor groupsseek to make itpermanent. BILLS TO WATCH•PATENT REFORM•ENGINEERING EDUCATION FORINNOVATION (E-2)•TAX TREATMENT OF EMPLOYER -PROVIDEDEDUCATION SUPPORT. Elementary and Secondary Education ActHearings begin this week in the House onreauthorization.Congress will examine lessons learnedfrom No Child Left Behind law.Senate Committee held hearings last yearand is now preparing to write legislation. PATENT REFORMReplaces “first to invent” with“first to file” system used inmost countries.Alters grace-period
•• Annual NGI conferences •• Hosting regional workshops •• NOAA OAR – NSF – USGS – EPA – DOD connections •• Executive and Advisory Councils’ contributions NGI Years 1 NGI Years 1 3 Collaborations 3 Collaborations northern gulf institute NGI Project Development northern gulf institute and Management Processes and Management Processes MultiInstitutional Collaboration Issues •• Proposal Development
– Auburn UniversityExplicit Research Parameters •Total Research Expenditures •Research Expenditures/Faculty Evolving Changes in Research Parameters •Balance Total Research Exp. Res. Exp./Faculty all(25%) none 1/2 1/2 15% current 10% ? ? •Definition of Faculty Research Active Faculty All Tenured & Tenure Track Faculty current Future Considerations The Database •192 Schools Reported Research Expenditures to ASEE on Time (6 Additional Schools Reported Information Updated in Time for Publication) •24 Schools (12.5%) Were Contacted Regarding Substantial Changes in Research
: 2% $8.9 billion (includes basic NIST research and NSF 2% applied research) 9% EPA 1% NASA DHS 7% 1% DOD 35% NIH 13
Deans/ partners Studies Curriculum Dept./ Outreach College partners March 15, 2010 Building and Sustaining Partnerships •strong management & flexibility •appropriate evaluation •leveraging for impact and sustainability + + March 15, 2010 Global partnerships Beyond 1:1 Collaborations Transformational Global Phenomena Developing Countries* Interdisciplinary approaches *Engineering Solutions for the Base of the
advance thinking and foster network to discover discovery and nurture new – Leading collaboration on ground opportunities to breaking programs improve business and life – Identifying the next set of technology breakthroughs 20 ©2009 HP Confidential ©2009 HP LABS INNOVATION RESEARCH PROGRAM Program Intent – IRP creates opportunities for breakthrough collaborative research between HPL and university researchers WW – Goals for our RFP program 1. Provide opportunities for HPL researchers to collaborate with current partners and explore new research relationships
to Know • What are your research and educational objectives? – This is what directs your proposal to the appropriate program • What is your approach? – Outline — just a few sentences • What is the specific research contribution you will make to the knowledge base (the intellectual merit)? • If successful, what will be the benefit to society (the broader impact)?Thank You!Backups 12 Steps to a Better Proposal 1. Know yourself ‐ strengths/weaknesses 2. Know the program from which you seek support 3. Read the program announcement and GPG 4. Formulate clear and appropriate research and education objectives 5. Develop a viable plan 6. State your objectives up front in your proposal 7. Frame your
: n Peer assessment n Practitioner assessment How are the U.S. News Best Graduate Engineering Schools Ranking Weights Selected? w The selection of the engineering weights are based on several factors. They are: n 25+ years of experience in doing academic rankings n Education literature n Discussions with engineering educators n In the end U.S. News makes its best judgment ASEE is Very Important to the U.S. News Graduate Engineering Rankings 1. U.S. News uses ASEE’s exact same definition of research expenditures on the U.S. News engineering stat survey 2. In early January as part the yearly data collection cycle U.S. News and ASEE compare the U.S. News collected research
) 9Technology Investments to Spur Economic Growth* Technology Highlights in the 2011 Budget Promote the Commercialization of promising technologies: The Budget proposes $12 million in the National Science Foundation (NSF) for a new Innovation Ecosystem in which universities partner with other institutions to increase the impact of the most promising innovations through commercialization, industry alliances, and start‐up formation. *Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) February 1, 2010 10 Filling Gaps ENG overall
Directorate for Engineering FY 2011 Budget Request Thomas W. Peterson Assistant Director for Engineering March 16, 2010March 16, 2010 ENG Use of ARRA Funding • Young Investigators • Education and Workforce Development • High Risk / High Reward • Translational Research ENG Use of ARRA Funding • Young Investigators – 80 additional CAREER awards – 15 additional BRIGE awards – 16 additional GRF in addition to the 80 Women in Engineering (WENG) GRF Fellows funded annually by ENG – 1 additional IGERT in the area of energy • Education and Workforce Development – 40 Postdocs in Industry – 17 additional REU/RET awards – 76 additional Education awards
, Colorado State U, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, U Colorado (Boulder) • Mechanisms: ? • Objectives: create and speed the commercialization of renewable energy technologies, energy management systems, and energy efficiency 30 References 1 AAAS R&D Budget and Policy Program Guide to R&D Funding Data Historical Table 1 available at http://www.aaas.org/spp/rd/guihist.shtml 2 “Federal Government is Largest Source of University R&D Funding in S&E; Share Drops in FY 2008”, Ronda Britt, NSF 09318 available at http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/infbrief/nsf09318/ 3 Map of DOE Laboratories from http://www.science.doe.gov
ERC Meeting and Engineering Ed and Centers March 16, 2010 Allen L. Soyster Brief History and Present Facts • EEC Division formed in 1992 • 50 ERCs (since 1984) • Four Foci üCenters (65% funding) üHuman Resources (10%) üEngineering Education (10%) ü(Stipend – GRF, IGERT, K‐12, Brige)(15%) • 138 million (Request for 2011) EEC Objectives for 2020 1. Enhance the K‐12 Pipeline and its Diversity; * 10% of all matriculates study engineering. 2. Promote the Success of the Undergraduate Learning Experience; * 3 of 4 students complete BS in engineering. 3. Improve the Pathway to Graduate Engineering Programs for US and Permanent Residents
of the design; as well as, their experience indecision-making, are ample reasons why their expertise would enrich students’ learning andbrings them (the students) closer to the realities of the workplace. (1)Employers, by and large, are generally satisfied with the basic technical preparation of today’sgraduates, but find them largely unaware of the vital roles that engineers play in bringingproducts and services from a “concept stage” to the marketplace. An important reason for this“drawback” is that faculty members, today, often lack industrial experience and/ or any othertype of practical experience. This is particularly troubling when faculty members, straight out ofgraduate school and have absolutely no experience “under their belt
. In fact, design courses, in general, have emerged as a means for students to beexposed to some flavor of what engineers actually do; and also, could learn the basic elements ofthe design process by being involved in real design projects. There have even been formalproposals for curricular goals and assessment measures for design-based curricula. Thisargument is driven by a widespread notion that the intellectual content of design is consistentlyunderestimated (1).This paper reviews research on design thinking as it relates to how designers think, learn andmake decisions, which is an important reason why design is not easy to teach. Design thinkingis, in general terms, complex processes of inquiry and learning that designers perform in
general, and to the use of modern pedagogicalskills in particular. The paper also argues that any meaningful change in Region’s classroompractices today (dominated by traditional lecture-based methods) must be mandated andsupported by the university administration. What is necessary to create a change, is for thedepartment or college, to have a comprehensive and integrated set of components: clearlyarticulated expectations, opportunities for faculty to learn about new pedagogies, and anequitable reward system.Introduction“To teach is to engage students in learning.” This quote, from Education for Judgment byChristenson et al, (1) captures the meaning of the art and practice of pedagogies ofengagement. The theme advocated here is that student