Advisor to the leadership at Sisters in STEM. Sreyoshi frequently collaborates on several National Science Foundation projects in the engineering education realm, researching engineering career trajectories, student motivation, and learning. Sreyoshi has been recognized as a Fellow at the Academy for Teaching Excellence at Virginia Tech (VTGrATE) and a Fellow at the Global Perspectives Program (GPP) and was inducted to the Yale Bouchet Honor Society during her time at Virginia Tech. She has also been honored as an Engaged Ad- vocate in 2022 and an Emerging Leader in Technology (New ELiTE) in 2021 by the Society of Women Engineers. Views expressed in this paper are the author’s own, and do not necessarily reflect those
-identified as part of a racial or ethnic minority; the remainder identified as White.Each of these seven students participated in one 60–90-minute semi-structured interview [54-55].Interviews were designed to create a space for the participants to reflect on their K-12experiences and how those K-12 experiences influenced their decision to major in engineering.The first three student participants were interviewed in-person in a private office on theuniversity campus. The remaining four students were interviewed via Zoom. As a first step to theinterview, all participants were asked to develop a timeline of their formative experiencesleading to becoming an engineering major. Timelines were developed initially by students at thebeginning of the
learned”. The reflective component is critical for students toconsider how elements of their design worked or failed to meet their design expectations.Likewise, as a pedagogical instrument, the reflective component of the presentation offers thestudent a formative opportunity to “rethink” how any future instance of similar design practicemight be enhanced.PedagogyCorrect content with fitting assessments can only have the greatest impact if aligned withstrategic and purposeful pedagogical approaches. The THTR59700 course is at the core activelearning-oriented and engages technical knowledge across students' academic advancement,keeping the developmental growth of students in mind. In particular, the pedagogicalframeworks that most clearly relay
; for example, Chen et. al. states that “[s]tudents from all backgrounds may find theexperience [of an unexpectedly poor academic performance] threatening to their competence, butstudents from minority groups must also contend with anxiety that this performance ‘confirms’negative academic stereotypes attributed to their group memberships”[10].Often, these biases and stereotypes reflect an automatic judgment without an awareness ofindividuals’ specific abilities or experiences [11] [12]. Thus, the format of assessment, rather thanthe rigor, quality, or intended learning can have undue effect on educational outcomes. Forexample, IGEN performed a case study on a top-ranked physics program which noticed its“passage rate [for a qualifying exam] had
,sequential, mixed methods approach (N = 163) was used to assess the importance of industrymentor and teammate support using quantitative data analysis techniques followed by thematic(qualitative) analysis to explain those results.Likert-type items were analyzed using exploratory factor analyses and resulted in six constructs.Two constructs reflected student perceptions of their learning: engineering design and decision-making skills and adaptability skills. Two forms of support emerged from the factor analysis:industry mentor support and teammate support, and two control variables also emerged: designself-efficacy and preparedness. Support and control variables were then used as dependentvariables in regression models for the two learning outcomes
Engineering Student Teams) program is a GVT programestablished in Canada. It was designed to create a realistic work experience for engineeringstudents within a virtual global team project. They were involved in active experiments whilelearning and reflecting on a new experience with a learning concept known as global competencymodules (GCMs), which is a key component of GVT that supports virtual learning andcollaboration activities globally, including intercultural competence, decision making,communication, and relationship building. The InVEST study showed that intercultural activitiesprovide a unique lens to students to exhibit intercultural sensitivities to virtual global teamprojects and can facilitate better collaboration with students from
(hereinafter referred to as 2011 Plan).2011 Plan is another major strategy that reflects the national will after the 211 Project and 985 Pro- 1ject. The implementation of this project is a strategic measure and a practical need to promote theintensive development of higher education, and a major action to deepen the reform of scientificand technological system.The construction of world-class universities and first-rate disciplines (hereinafter referred to asDouble First-rate Initiative) was a crucial measure taken by the Chinese government in October2015, to improve higher education after 211 Project and 985 Project, and to ensure that the nationbecomes rich in human-resource potential. It is also
purpose. We argue that when such design problems fall short, it notbecause they are not authentic, but because they may be missing other elements. Perhapssurprisingly, even in the popular culture design problems, this missing element may bemeaningfulness or relevance [15], a central tenant of constructionist learning [6].Engineering courses tend to privilege the technical aspects of engineering [16], though analysisof authentic engineering design practice characterizes this work as sociotechnical [17, 18], andresearch has increasingly suggested reflecting this in engineering programs is valuable [19, 20],providing students with opportunities to grapple with complex factors and ethics [21, 22]. Suchproblems create opportunities to connect with the
the engagement levels could be analyzed.In addition, affective engagement data was also collected via class reflection papers at the end ofeach semester in the third and fourth semester of the program. The third-semester reflectionpaper assignment had 12 prompts which asked students to discuss their reasons for applying,their expectations for the program, and their perceived role in the program. The fourth-semesterreflection paper was more open-ended and asked students to reflect on their overall experience inthe Endeavour Program and also to describe how they felt that the pandemic had impacted theircollege experience. The reflection papers had no page limit but had a minimum lengthrequirement of two pages.Data AnalysisDescriptive
developing pedagogy that encourages students in reflective learning and personal self reflection in engineering classes in addition to her passion for engineering ethics and conceptual learning.Dr. Alison R. Kennicutt, York College of Pennsylvania Alison is an Assistant Professor of Civil Engineering at York College of Pennsylvania. She received her B.S. in Civil Engineering and her M. Eng. and Ph.D. in Environmental Engineering from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute in Troy, NY. Her research interests are in drinking water treatment of emerging contaminants and the production of disinfection byproducts. At York College, Alison loves to use hands- on exploration, both in the field and the lab, to trigger curiosity and get
theexperiment. All the students in civil engineering (100%) agree that the use of the device reflectedtheir course content, reflected real practice, reflected their academic area, practice and coursecontent, while slightly more than 50% of the students in other STEM disciplines agree the same.All the civil engineering students (100%) agree that using the device helped them developinterest in the subject area while 60% agree that they have become motivated to learn the coursecontent because of using the device. Most of the civil engineering students (80%) agree that theirknowledge in the subject area increases after they used the device, while 60% agree that usingthe device has increased their confidence in the subject area. The percentage change
we discuss NO CHANGE course outcomes for engineering education pedagogy. the relevance of this course to other MADE environmental grand challenges. We are unsure exactly what the reviewer is asking us to do. 1 In the Discussion, comment on how you could improve We have discussed our study limitations CHANGE MADE and extend data collection in future iterations in order to and have provided reflections on how we learn more about the cognitive and
Research uses 2 or 3 Research uses and cites sources and barely cites sources and generally 3 or more sources. them. cites them. Ideas generated are one2b) Define the person’s or are missing. Ideas generated reflect Ideas generated reflect Ideas generated reflectproblem, review
organizational aspects.The term ‘polarity’ reflects the way certain organizational aspects are commonly perceived asirreconcilable as co-existent. When the resources required to conduct various organizationalfunctions are finite, one can imagine how difficult it would be to negotiate priorities whenorganizational actors or units have a hard time seeing the value of organizational aspects otherthan the ones they are advocating for. The tendency to reduce the complexity of organizationallife into what is explained only by one or few of the organizational aspects, cannot but result in a‘paradox’ - the organizational elements are logical when considered independently, but seemcontradictory when juxtaposed [2]. In other words, without understanding their
personal nature of the direct emails; theyincluded mention of the participants’ names, universities, and the name(s) of identified K-12STEM outreach program(s). The response rate may have also been affected by the COVID-19pandemic, which caused major disruptions in higher education, starting around mid-February2020.Program coordinators represented 46 distinct colleges and universities and provided informationon 131 K-12 STEM outreach programs, with 34 program coordinators describing more than oneprogram. Table 3 summarizes characteristics of survey respondents and Table 4 of programs.The total number of institutions in Table 3 reflects the number known to the authors, includingfrom direct emails and respondents who supplied their affiliations when
who takes the leading role.Informal STEM Learning OpportunitiesProductive informal STEM education aims to engage “young people in STEM learning andactively [support] inclusion and [broaden] participation by young people in STEM learning”[12]. Science museums provide a wide range of informal STEM education programs for childrenand their families. Positive benefits of these programs have been widely documented, but someresearchers argued that science museum programs reflect dominant cultures [13]. Families inunderrepresented populations can be isolated from this content. STEM night programs, anotherpopular informal STEM program, encourage local family involvement. Educators attempt toreflect the local population’s characteristics such as
that reflect gender stereotypes when doing a routinesearch,” was that 42.9% of females report as true compared to 34.4% of males. Furthermore,students seem to recognize gender bias when searching online with Latinx students reportingthe highest at 28.8% with the least being those who identified as Other at 16.1%. Our survey didnot directly ask students whether they had heard of or were aware of the concept of algorithm.bias. The survey questions were to determine if students had perceived any bias in their dailyinteraction with search engines and AI. Fig. 3. Government should regulate search engine resultsAdditionally, most students (83%) agreed that private companies should regulate themselveswith regard to correcting
examining and creating a comprehensive roadmap for includinginnovative ideas and best practices in engineering curriculum enhancements.The opportunity for this workshop was created by a confluence of needs, resources, and interdisciplinaryinterests. Integrating previous experiences with service learning and social innovation learningopportunities, our interests matched NSF IUSE’s exploration and development (E&D) implementationframework. The workshop, funded by NSF, implemented and reflected the steps of design thinking asincreasing the engagement of students is a classic human-centered opportunity. This opportunity prioritizesthe engagement of the targeted stakeholders, rather than experts who are often at a distance from theproblems they seek
students in engineering education programs have typically been trained through ABET-accredited engineering programs. Despite ABET’s communication requirement, engineeringundergraduate students have limited opportunities to learn to write in their discipline [7]. Often,explicit writing instruction is limited to two courses: one in first-year writing, and one thatfocuses on engineering writing. The other writing engineering students do is integrated implicitlyin design and laboratory coursework. In these contexts, writing practices are often renderedinvisible as students are asked to fill forms, draw sketches, and incorporate appropriate equationsinto reports rather than write essays or reflections [6]. Instructors do not emphasize writingprocesses
anonline environment. To reflect the differences between online teaching during the pandemic andtraditional online teaching, remote instruction has been labelled emergency remote teaching(ERT) [2]. The abrupt and emergency nature of the transition to ERT (hereafter called remotelearning) has led to the notion that the quality of higher education decreased as a result of thepandemic. But, at the present time, insufficient evidence is available to assess to what degreehigher education and learning may have been compromised by the shift to remote learning. Earlyresearch assessing the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on higher education in China andSouth Korea has found that students engaged in increased and proactive communication withpeers and
feedback on how well an initial list of practices aligned with engineers’own academic and professional engineering experiences and asked for suggestions of additionalpractices that were reflective of their experiences. In addition, our team reviewed responses froman earlier study phase in which participants identified types of engineering skills they felt wereimportant in their work to capture those practices not on our original list [34]. Our team thensought feedback on the clarity of items through an informal focus group of undergraduate andgraduate engineering students in one of the authors’ labs. Finally, we conducted pilot interviewswith an additional seven engineering students to further check clarity and comprehensiveness ofthe list of
. Creativity is needed tofind paths of integration, as it is pointed out in the report released by the National Academies ofSciences, Engineering, and Medicine arguing for the integration of STEM with the arts and thehumanities [3].Lastly, as the social impact of technology and science becomes more pervasive and complex, theneed for a more integrated, post-disciplinary approach to their understanding grows in urgency.This paper is ultimately part of a larger conversation about the educational system at the collegelevel and the impact this model has on the conception and application of science and technologyin today’s world.1. Two Cultures: STEM, the Arts and the Humanities at an Engineering SchoolOur reflections are based on our experiences at a small
students’perceptions of and reflections on the skills developed throughout the courses taken throughouttheir undergraduate engineering curriculum. Students in a senior design sequence were surveyedduring each semester of the course about their perceptions of senior design and the skills andprevious courses that were most relevant to design. The study was conducted within a large,public, MSI over the course of five semesters of the Mechanical Engineering Senior designsequence. Relationships between particular course groups and the skills students perceived asimportant for design were found. The results demonstrate that students perceived EngineeringCore Courses, Engineering Design Courses, and Engineering Track Core Courses as important inpreparing them for
peers,faculty, and family [10], [19] but are extended to include any institution or person whoserecognition of an engineering identity matters to the recipient. These definitions guidedconversation around the process in which recognition is qualified and interpreted by participantsin this study.This study proposes a model of determining meaningful recognition and examines the proposedmodel’s use as influenced by participants’ time spent practicing and developing an engineeringidentity. Rather than reflect on the “strength” of an engineering identity, this use of participants’experience with an engineering identity is derived from the existing work that considersbiographical and time-oriented trajectories of identity development [24], [25
moststraightforward STS content of any CES course. Finally, the CES component of the capstonecourse requires students to perform a “Real-Time Technology Assessment” of their own project,incorporating sociotechnical thinking into the engineering design process. CES members have reflected a great deal on how to best maintain the critical eye towardtechnology and society that they bring from their STS training while participating in thepractical, day-to-day goings on of an engineering and computer science faculty. In a piece in thejournal Engineering Studies (the inaugural paper in the journal’s “Critical Participation”category), CES faculty described the tensions that result from the position of CES within afaculty of engineering. Locally, the place of
towards tutoring and the impact of serving asa peer educator, and 3) whether level of commitment to group SI correlated with tutors’perceptions of how they were impacted.Forty-one individuals who served as peer tutors at Northeastern University between 2005 and2018 were invited to respond to online surveys. Those who completed the online survey wereinvited to participate in follow-up phone interviews. Subjects were asked about their experienceswith SI, their motivations to provide instruction, their level of commitment to the program,and—as they reflected on their college and post-graduation endeavors—their perceptions of thevalue of their tutoring experience. Statistical comparisons were drawn from the responses of 20female and 9 male tutors to
andidentity, and encouraging career-related reflection. This review provides insight into the nuance ofthe breadth of students’ experiences in student organizations to inform future work examining thecontextual influence of experiential learning on engineering students’ professional development.IntroductionEngineering education programs aim to prepare graduates to transition into the 21st centuryworkforce as professional engineers with a breadth of technical and interpersonal skills and a senseof professional responsibility. Multiple competing influences have contributed to engineeringeducation’s current overcrowded curriculum, which largely focuses on technical knowledge [1].This technical focus is increasingly being questioned amidst calls for
course learningoutcomes) rather than direct measures (e.g., work produced by students evaluated against criteriathat reflect the learning outcomes). While beyond the scope of the present study, examiningdirect evidence of students’ learning and development in this course context would be a usefulnext step. Our future work also seeks to understand how students identify their own and others’strengths and their conceptions of the design process. Individual student interviews along withanalysis of student free responses around design and project management will be used to furtherinvestigate these questions. In the present study, researchers hoped for a higher survey responserate to allow for group comparisons across various identities (i.e., race
example,between the years 2000 and 2015, the percentage of engineering bachelor’s degrees earned byHispanics has increased from 5.8% to 10.7%, while the percentage for African Americans hasdeclined from 5.6% to 4.0% (Gibbons, 2009; Yoder, 2016). If the goal is to achieve parity inrepresentation that reflects national demographics, this lack of progress is problematic. For thisreason, African Americans are the minority group that is of most interest in this study.In pursuit of progress, many national and university-based efforts have focused on increasingthe number of African American men and women in STEM, in general, and engineering andcomputer science, specifically. For example, universities with Minority Engineering Programshave an explicit
(IMSE) Day at The University of Texas at El Paso,with a goal of providing students from El Paso - Cd. Juarez region with opportunities to growand develop engineering and leadership skills. Considering the global use of green engineeringand green manufacturing technologies by industries for minimizing environmental impact andincreased resource utilization, IMSE day 2016 was specifically geared towards introducingstudents to new information age technologies and their application in the fields of greenmanufacturing and engineering. The conducted workshops and seminars are based on the theme“Internet of Things” (IOT) to reflect the interdependent nature of manufacturing processes andthe ability of IOT to improve visibility in manufacturing. The