Teaching STS to Engineers: A Comparative Study of Embedded STS Programs

Bryn Elizabeth Seabrook; Kathryn A. Neeley; Kari Zacharias; Brandiff Robert Caron

Download Paper | Permalink

Conference: 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Location: Virtual On line
Publication Date: June 22, 2020
Start Date: June 22, 2020
End Date: June 26, 2021
Conference Session: Sustainability and Social Responsibility
Tagged Division: Liberal Education/Engineering & Society
Page Count: 21
DOI: 10.18260/1-2--35281
Permanent URL: https://peer.asee.org/35281
Download Count: 729

Paper Authors

biography

Bryn Elizabeth Seabrook University of Virginia

visit author page

Bryn Seabrook is an Assistant Professor in Science, Technology, and Society at the University of Virginia. She received her Bachelor of Arts in Humanities, Science and Environment with a minor in Vocal Performance in 2012, a Master of Science and Technology Studies in 2014, and a Doctor of Philosophy in Science and Technology Studies in 2016, all from Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. Her research interests include public participation in science, bioethics, negotiating the environmental – consumer nexus, and the role of STS in engineering education.

visit author page

biography

Kathryn A. Neeley University of Virginia

visit author page

Kathryn Neeley is Associate Professor of Science, Technology, and Society in the Engineering & Society Department of the School of Engineering and Applied Science. She is a past chair of the Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division of ASEE and is particularly interested in the role of liberal education in developing engineering leaders.

visit author page

author page

Kari Zacharias Concordia University

biography

Brandiff Robert Caron Concordia University

visit author page

...

visit author page

Download Paper | Permalink

Abstract

Teaching STS to Engineers: A Comparative Study of Embedded STS Programs

The field of Science, Technology, and Society (STS) draws from a full range of disciplines in the social sciences and humanities to examine how science and technology simultaneously shape and are shaped by society, including politics and culture. Although engineering educators and employers have recognized the importance of professional (nontechnical) skills for over 100 years, the instructional strategies and institutional arrangements necessary to help students develop these skills have not yet settled into a widely adopted standard. Many engineering programs have turned to STS to provide students with conceptual tool kits to think about engineering problems and solutions in more sophisticated ways. Some programs feature standalone courses on the sociocultural aspects of technology and engineering, often taught by faculty from outside the engineering school. Others incorporate STS material into traditional engineering courses, e.g., by making ethical or societal impact assessments part of capstone projects.

This work in progress paper draws on the research team’s personal experience to examine the character of an atypical, but potentially very powerful, model: STS programs embedded in engineering schools in the United States and Canada. The authors expand on previous scholarship by Kathryn Neeley, Caitlin Wylie, and Bryn Seabrook in “In Search of Integration: Mapping Conceptual Efforts to Apply STS to Engineering Education,” as presented at the 2019 ASEE annual conference, to examine how STS is incorporated in engineering education. While Neeley, Wylie, and Seabrook focused on broad trends within a single, large professional society (ASEE), this study focuses on two particular embedded STS programs, with an emphasis on how the research team describes STS for engineers and encourages meaningful integration.

What does the field of STS offer engineering students? What core STS concepts and approaches do we teach to engineering students? The authors explore these and other related questions by analyzing how a small sample of programs became embedded within engineering schools, how each program attends to accreditation outcomes, and how they approach teaching STS to engineers. In future work, the research team hopes to create a preliminary typology of embedded STS programs, explore the term “embedded,” and find commonalities in the courses offered in embedded programs.

Citation
Format

Seabrook, B. E., & Neeley, K. A., & Zacharias, K., & Caron, B. R. (2020, June), Teaching STS to Engineers: A Comparative Study of Embedded STS Programs Paper presented at 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual On line . 10.18260/1-2--35281

TY  - CPAPER
AB  - Teaching STS to Engineers: A Comparative Study of Embedded STS Programs

The field of Science, Technology, and Society (STS) draws from a full range of disciplines in the social sciences and humanities to examine how science and technology simultaneously shape and are shaped by society, including politics and culture. Although engineering educators and employers have recognized the importance of professional (nontechnical) skills for over 100 years, the instructional strategies and institutional arrangements necessary to help students develop these skills have not yet settled into a widely adopted standard. Many engineering programs have turned to STS to provide students with conceptual tool kits to think about engineering problems and solutions in more sophisticated ways. Some programs feature standalone courses on the sociocultural aspects of technology and engineering, often taught by faculty from outside the engineering school. Others incorporate STS material into traditional engineering courses, e.g., by making ethical or societal impact assessments part of capstone projects.

This work in progress paper draws on the research team’s personal experience to examine the character of an atypical, but potentially very powerful, model: STS programs embedded in engineering schools in the United States and Canada. The authors expand on previous scholarship by Kathryn Neeley, Caitlin Wylie, and Bryn Seabrook in “In Search of Integration: Mapping Conceptual Efforts to Apply STS to Engineering Education,” as presented at the 2019 ASEE annual conference, to examine how STS is incorporated in engineering education. While Neeley, Wylie, and Seabrook focused on broad trends within a single, large professional society (ASEE), this study focuses on two particular embedded STS programs, with an emphasis on how the research team describes STS for engineers and encourages meaningful integration. 

What does the field of STS offer engineering students? What core STS concepts and approaches do we teach to engineering students? The authors explore these and other related questions by analyzing how a small sample of programs became embedded within engineering schools, how each program attends to accreditation outcomes, and how they approach teaching STS to engineers. In future work, the research team hopes to create a preliminary typology of embedded STS programs, explore the term “embedded,” and find commonalities in the courses offered in embedded programs.

AU  - Bryn Elizabeth Seabrook
AU  - Kathryn A. Neeley
AU  - Kari Zacharias
AU  - Brandiff Robert Caron
CY  - Virtual On line 
DA  - 2020/06/22
PB  - ASEE Conferences
TI  - Teaching STS to Engineers: A Comparative Study of Embedded STS Programs
UR  - https://peer.asee.org/35281
DO  - 10.18260/1-2--35281
ER  -