Middle Atlantic Regional Conference April 29-30, 2011, Farmingdale State College, SUNYone example of these technologies. The use of Smart Grid can be very valuable to mitigate andlessen the impacts of an energy emergency.Finally, the Engineering Clinic program has been found to significantly impact studentpreparation for professional practice and for matriculation into graduate programs. For example,that a high percentage of Rowan’s engineering students pursue graduate degrees is evidence ofhow Clinic projects awaken interest in research and help lower the perceived barrier betweenundergraduate and graduate work1.AcknowledgementsThe support of the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities is gratefully acknowledged as well as
and various graduate courses. Ms. Knoll earned her M.S. in Construction Management and B.S. in Construction from Arizona State University. Page 15.175.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 An Overview of Teaching Construction Safety to CET/CM Students Author A Author BAbstractThis paper illustrates the need to teach that construction safety is not intuitive. In ourconstruction program, we start teaching safety principles and practices in the student’s junioryear and continue to
alsoinvestigated in the class by coupling different types of analysis to tackle challenging engineeringproblems. Students learn how to work on a multiphysics design project in a team through offlinemeetings, synchronous, and asynchronous communication tools (i.e., Slack and Blackboard).Two third of classes are held in a computer lab of the Department of Mechanical Engineering atHoward University. Some basic concepts/physics and CAE examples are covered during theclasses and students follow the examples on their workstations to practice. And one third of theclasses are performed based on distance learning class. All the learning materials for each classare provided online (e.g., online articles, online tutorials, lecture notes, etc.) for students’ self
for their employees. [5] They were interested in learning from our faculty, a certifiedenergy auditor with USDOE funding in the energy efficiency area, and willing to share theirtraining program and international experience and perspective. Our faculty attended a trainingevent, shared energy audit equipment, and discussed best practices for collecting data fromindustrial systems.Course OverviewThe new course, ECET-53800: Energy Management, is an interdisciplinary course thataddresses the demand for multi-skilled engineers by blending electrical and mechanicalcontent that focuses on applications in industrial systems in manufacturing facilities andcommercial buildings. It is facilitated by one faculty member that teaches in
positive impacts. This paper intends to share findings from the threecohorts of students served by the SEECRS program, and to identify how findings can be utilizedto inform similar support structures at STEM support programs going forward.MethodsThe SEECRS project relies on both formative and summative evaluations from an externalevaluator that includes student surveys and student focus groups. This paper intends to share outintermediate findings of a much larger investigation that will utilize hierarchical linear modelingto analyze the impacts of the program on three cohorts of students when compared to a peergroup not enrolled the SEECRS program. The research group, is currently collecting retention,success (GPA), graduation, and transfer data
grade level, applicationof the engineering design process through redesign and design projects, student teaching ofengineering topics, and team development of interdisciplinary engineering curricula. Pre- andpost-workshop student surveys indicate that the intended learning outcomes of the workshopwere met. The experience positively impacted how students viewed engineering and theirintentions for including it in their teaching.INTRODUCTION “Most people think that technology is little more than the application of science to solve practical problems…They are not aware that modern technology is the fruit of a complex interplay between science, engineering, politics, ethics, law, and other factors. People who operate under
workshop representing approximately a 45% of the faculty.- Once the Committee for Competences had advanced significantly in its job, so that the curricular change process was adequately settling in every Department and Center, another 14 committees were created focusing on the analysis and propositions in specific areas of teaching in Engineering; these were: o Mathematics and Physics o Chemistry and Biology o Computers Programming o Methodologies for teaching - Learning o Innovation and entrepreneurship o Service learning and social responsibility o Design o Graduation mechanisms o Undergraduate – graduate articulation o ABET 2000 processes o Financial impact of the new curriculum o Communication strategies for the national media
is in the areas of design information technology, developing best practices for project security, and construction performance improvement. He has over 30 publications and serves on a number of professional committees such as Construction Industry Institute Benchmarking and Metrics Committee and ASCE construction institute. Dr. Lee has received three Faculty Awards from the University, and recently received the University of Houston Teaching Excellence Award for Tenured/Tenure Track Faculty in 2008.Junshan Liu, Auburn University Mr. Junshan Liu is an Assistant Professor at the McWhorter School of Building Science at Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama. He teaches construction information
actualindustrial combustors? (The answer is that it can be used to show trends when changesare made to operating conditions that can impact, for example, heat transfer and pollutionemissions.)Another benefit to students of using industry adjuncts is access to potential internshipsand permanent positions after graduation. The students can get a better idea about thecompany by listening to some of its top employees. They already have significantexposure to academia through their traditional full-time professors, but many have hadlittle contact with practicing engineers. Our experience has been that students ask lots ofquestions throughout the semester about what it’s like in the “real world.” Thesediscussions give students more information about what type
Paper ID #22449Why Educators Need to Team with Industry Professionals in Software Devel-opment EducationDr. Gregory Kulczycki, Virginia Tech Dr. Kulczycki has extensive experience in research and development both in academia and industry. He received his doctorate from Clemson University in 2004 and began working as a professor at Virginia Tech shortly thereafter. In 2011 he went to work for Battelle Memorial Institute as a cyber research scientist, while continuing to be involved in teaching. He is currently back in the computer science department at Virginia Tech as a professor of practice, where he teaches, designs
build processes to purify specialty gases, as well as create solutions within the semiconductor and aerospace industries. I am also the founder of High Plasma LLC a company devoted to designing and building sterilization technologies for cannabis cultivators and processors to ensure their grown product meets regulatory standards. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.comExperiential Entrepreneurship in Food Engineering: Student Perspectives onThree Student-Initiated VenturesMr. Prince Mensah Atsu, Rowan University Prince Atsu is a Ph.D. candidate and graduate research fellow in Chemical Engineering at Rowan University
and courses are an excellent way to satisfy graduation requirements as many ofthese classes totaling 16 credits may count towards general education requirements and thestudent's major.The valuable academic experiences are complemented with the central offices of program staff.In this way, students can easily visit staff offices to discuss their latest new venture idea or totackle a tough legal, financial or ethical question. The program directors are seasoned in theentrepreneurial community, pairing practical experience with a top-tier education to coach teamsand individually mentor students.3.5 Seed Fund and InternshipsA $50,000 seed fund is available each year for students of the Hinman CEOs Program, theHillman Entrepreneurs Program, and
ofpowering snowmaking machines for a local ski resort. The high school students formed smallerteams to compete with each other for designing the best concept. Each team then gave a formalpresentation at the end of the year. The high school students loved the project and theengineering experience, and most of them entered engineering or science programs atuniversities after graduation. Assessment interviews revealed that the undergraduates, through Page 22.1581.5their mentoring, enhanced their engineering experience and their commitment to continuing tograduation in engineering. This partnership with AMES is an excellent model of an activity thatwas
the structure of communication systems. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 An Institutional Excellence in Teaching Workshop Adapted from the ExCEEd ModelAbstractThe American Society of Civil Engineering’s Excellence in Civil Engineering Education(ExCEEd) Teaching Workshop has been delivered each year since 1999 with great success andbroad recognition. The elements of the workshop are practical and promote best practices inclassroom instruction. The workshop was modified for delivery at a public polytechnicinstitution to faculty in disciplines as diverse as computer science, the humanities, and dentalhygiene. The contents of the ExCEEd workshop as well as its
mentioned above? Theauthor’s answer, based on her experiences from the last eight years of teaching at Elizabethtown College,has to do with the concept of the computing project and the way how these projects are created. 2Obviously, university students develop a taste for research, not only in practice-oriented issues, but also intheoretical concepts related to the respective project area. Their projects are comprehensive and thecomplexity involved is high. Usually, the number of projects is reduced to one per course and someinstructors do not even assign such projects in computing disciplines. The project results are due at theend of the
categories that captured broader themes. Therelationships between the initial codes were examined to understand how different conceptswere interlinked. For example, codes related to recognizing personal biases were grouped, whilethose about actionable strategies against systemic racism were categorized separately. 3)Development of Final Themes. In the final phase, the categories developed during axial codingwere synthesized into overarching themes. These themes represented the core insights derivedfrom the data, reflecting students’ understanding and personal engagement with the issues ofsystemic racism and hostile design. The iterative process of developing and refining themesfollowed best practices in qualitative research, ensuring a rigorous and
developingengineers who are aware of and engaged with the ethical dimensions of their work, educatorscontribute to the creation of a workforce that values and serves societal interests. Our goal ofpresenting our project as a work in progress to this conference is to garner discussion and feedbackon our design prior to project implementation furthering iterative research design andstrengthening our approach to student learning.This project brings coupled ethical-epistemic analysis from the field of philosophy and reflectivepractice from the field of cognitive design theory to the field of engineering education. This early-stage, exploratory project will study the effectiveness of leveraging adapted existing pedagogies(reflective practice) alongside new
cases, it lacks many best practices of student learning. We have no rubrics, nohomework or tests. We do not have a pre-conceived approach, structure, or answer for theproject at the beginning of the course. Individual faculty and PM teams may structure details ofthe project design and execution in different ways. Yet, the course has endured and has beensuccessful in training both undergraduate and doctoral students to address the complex problemsthey will face in their careers. Alumni point to the course as a defining moment in theirundergraduate experience, a fulfilling course to round out their technical path. “Every day of mywork now is an EPP Project,” is a common refrain. Doctoral students are thankful for theopportunity to practice
developing a sustainable, well articulatedmodel for pre-engineering education will require a substantial, long-term commitment to affect theeducational reform and cultural change that our experience and the literature indicate will berequired. Our development plan is based upon Michael Fullan’s compelling design foraccomplishing systemic improvement in education, which argues that the culture of communitiesand organizations must be changed before changes in their structure will be successful 11,12.Development Plan and Program DesignOur five-year plan aims at initiating cultural change in stages: first, within our partnering entities;then, through dissemination of our experience and best practices developed at the local level,expanding change to the
integrates these program students into a single cohort.IntroductionThe honors program at The Citadel provides an exceptional learning experience foroutstanding students. It has been admitting 20-24 students each year and has an 85 percentretention rate for all four years. The honors program attributes its success to a number ofspecific high impact practices including; 1. Assigning a honors faculty advisor; 2. A honorsstudent association responsible for social and academic activities; 3. Maintaining cohesion byplacing each cohort into nine honors courses in the first three years; 4. Providing honorseminar classes; and 5. Requiring two honors directed research projects. Together thesepractices provide students help in their acclimation and later
students are members ofclubs and classes throughout the Philadelphia School District and participate in various Page 15.1060.9competitions during the academic year. Mentors spend three hours a week at an assigned school.In total five schools were visited during the six week competition period for BEST Robotics. Inaddition, in 2006, almost two dozen Robotics educators, from the School District of Philadelphia(SDP), gathered at Villanova University' s Center for Engineering Education and Research(CEER) to take part in an AT&T sponsored three-day computer-aided design workshop. Thisprogram was repeated in 2007 when 26 teachers visited Villanova
literature fell into the engineering domain andthat each lab type had value while focusing on different learning objectives. The authorsdid acknowledge that no standard criteria to measure the effectiveness of the lab work hasbeen developed. Several other researchers have demonstrated the effectiveness of virtuallabs in the sciences. For example Shin8 and colleagues found virtual labs in chemicalengineering “help students to understand the fundamentals of unit operations…” and hadother learning benefits. The authors note, “It is also expected to contribute to increasingstudents’ adaptability by working in real world process plants after graduating.” Anadditional example is the Virtual ChemLab9 which provides a parallel to this project.The creators
literature fell into the engineering domain andthat each lab type had value while focusing on different learning objectives. The authorsdid acknowledge that no standard criteria to measure the effectiveness of the lab work hasbeen developed. Several other researchers have demonstrated the effectiveness of virtuallabs in the sciences. For example Shin8 and colleagues found virtual labs in chemicalengineering “help students to understand the fundamentals of unit operations…” and hadother learning benefits. The authors note, “It is also expected to contribute to increasingstudents’ adaptability by working in real world process plants after graduating.” Anadditional example is the Virtual ChemLab9 which provides a parallel to this project.The creators
, J.C. & Turbini, L.J. Operations Research 47(2), 221-234 (1999).26. Meacham, A., Uzsoy, R. & Venkatadri, U. Journal of Manufacturing Systems 18(5) 311-322 (1999).27. Department of the Navy. (Best Manufacturing Practices Program, Philadelphia, 1997).28. Navy, Dept. of the (Best Manufacturing Practices Center of Excellence, Office of Naval Research (ONR),http://www.bmpcoe.org/guideline/books/egd/index.html).29. U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. P2/Finance. EPA-742-B-96-008. (Tellus Institute, 1996).30. James, R.W. & Alcorn, P.A. A Guide to Facilities Planning (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1991).31. Sule, D.R. Manufacturing Facilities: Location, Planning, and Design (PWS Publishing Co., Boston, 1994).32. Tompkins, J.A., et al
and guidance for all 11- to 14-year-olds that promotes the diversity of engineering careers available and the variety of routes to those careers, and includes opportunities to experience the workplace. • Support for teachers and careers advisors in delivering careers information so that they understand the range of career paths, including vocational/ technician, and have the opportunity to experience a 21st century engineering workplace for themselves. • This programme is best achieved if Government works in partnership across the engineering industry, professional bodies and third sector.The first key hurdle here is practical implementation. Discussions are ongoing about howlong would it take for
Paper ID #24771Applied Knowledge Retention – Are Active Learning Tools the Solution?Dr. Sushil Acharya, Robert Morris University Acharya joined Robert Morris University in Spring 2005 after serving 15 years in the Software Indus- try. His teaching involvement and research interest are in the area of Software Engineering education, Software Verification & Validation, Data Mining, Neural Networks, and Enterprise Resource Planning. He also has interest in Learning Objectives based Education Material Design and Development. Acharya is a co-author of ”Discrete Mathematics Applications for Information Systems Professionals
National Science Foundation (NSF). Dr. Lord is a fellow of the ASEE and IEEE and is active in the engineering education community including serving as General Co-Chair of the 2006 Frontiers in Education (FIE) Conference, on the FIE Steering Committee, and as President of the IEEE Education Society for 2009-2010. She is an Associate Editor of the IEEE Transactions on Edu- cation. She and her coauthors were awarded the 2011 Wickenden Award for the best paper in the Journal of Engineering Education and the 2011 Best Paper Award for the IEEE Transactions on Education. In Spring 2012, Dr. Lord spent a sabbatical at Southeast University in Nanjing, China teaching and doing research.Dr. Matthew W. Ohland, Purdue University
engineering tools necessary for engineering practice. Theprofessional outcomes include (d) an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams (f) anunderstanding of professional and ethical responsibility (g) an ability to communicate effectively(h) the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global,economic, environmental, and societal context (i) a recognition of the need for, and an ability toengage in life-long learning (j) a knowledge of contemporary issues.In traditional coursework, assignments can be designed to elicit artifacts that can demonstratemastery of desired outcomes. Project-based service-learning experiences, however, often do notfollow prescribed timelines and the scaffolding around the
23.716.6Hypothesis and Experimental MethodologyWe conducted this research using sections of a three credit graduate course in software systemsdesign. The participants were working professionals enrolled in a professional master’s degreein software engineering that requires industrial experience for admission so it is likely hadexperience working in teams. They would also have had experience participating on teamprojects in other courses in the program as software systems design is not the first course in theprogram. However, none of those courses would have provided guidance or training inteamwork.The data collected was from three different sections of the same course. One section was thecontrol group. The other two sections were the condition groups. Prior
selection, and computer tools. Page 11.1327.54.) Process design and improvement. Students will be introduced to methods of identifying the most damaging part of the process flow through material and energy balances. Common practices for reducing energy consumption and waste will be discussed. In addition, strategies for environmentally sustainable product packaging and delivery will be presented.5.) End-of-use strategies. This module addresses strategies and challenges associated with reducing the environmental impact of a product after it has been used by a consumer or business. Discussion will focus on re-use, remanufacturing