learning as keystones of the program. She began her educational career as a high school teacher, teaching courses in English, math, and science. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Scaling and Assessment of an Evidence-Based Faculty Development Program for Promoting Active Learning Pedagogical StrategiesAbstractThis complete research-based paper explores a successful faculty development program aimed atincreasing awareness and use of evidence-based pedagogical strategies among engineeringfaculty across multiple disciplines. Research demonstrates that student-centered, or activelearning, strategies promote greater student learning and achievement. Despite this evidence,however
alternatives to traditional exams such as multiple-choice exams, open bookexams, longer time for exam development. etc. [14], [15], students feelings towardtraditional exams remain similar. It has been shown that high levels of anxiety and stresscan have a negative impact on student performance during exams [2]Although there is research criticizing the efficiency of traditional exams, most courses stilluse traditional exams as their main assessment method[15]. For this reason, this researchproject aims to contribute to improve the efficiency of traditional exams by introducing acoffee break during traditional exams. The following section presents an analysis of theimplications of a traditional exam on the levels of stress and anxiety in students and
.” Review of Educational Research, 76, 413-448.[49] Zimmerman, W., Kang, H. B., Kim. K., Gao, M., Johnson, G., Clariana, R. B., & Zhang, F. (2017). “Computer-automated approach for scoring short essays in an introductory statistics course.” Journal of Statistics Education, 25, 40-47.[50] Tawfik, A. A., Law, V., Ge, X., Xing, W., & Kim, K. (2018). “The effect of sustained vs. faded scaffolding on students’ argumentation in ill-structured problem solving.” Computers in Human Behavior, 87, 436-449.[51] Kim, K., & Tawfik, A. A. (2021). “Different approaches to collaborative problem solving between successful versus less successful problem solvers: Tracking changes of knowledge structure.” Journal of
design. Specific research interests include design metacognition among learners of all ages; the knowledge base for teaching K-12 STEM through engineering; the relationships among the attitudes, beliefs, motivation, cognitive skills, and engineering skills of K-16+ engineering learners; and teaching engineering.Dr. Tamara J Moore, Purdue University Tamara J. Moore, Ph.D. is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Dr. Moore’s research is centered on the integration of STEM concepts in K-12 and higher education mathe- matics, science, and engineering classrooms in order to help students make connections among the STEM disciplines and achieve deep understanding. Her research agenda focuses
distribution. The test results include pressure drop,temperatures, flow rate, energy usage and energy balance (cooling load validation). Initially, thehumidity will not be monitored; however, students are encouraged to discuss the potential effectsof non-uniformity of air/wall temperature on moisture accumulation in building materials. The maintenance cost of the DBT facilities after the project finishes will be absorbedthrough the departmental lab management fund allocated annually. The design and construction of the apparatus for two DBT modules were conducted by agroup of senior design class students and a graduate student (see Figs. 3-5).Implementation of DBT Projects in the ME Curriculum In Spring and Fall semesters of 2006, the DBT
the Policies and Programs That Support Them” explored the challenges that female engineering faculty faced in their careers, as well as the institutional policies and programs (i.e. family-friendly policies, diversity/equity programs, mentoring initiatives, etc.) that helped them to be successful in obtaining tenure. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Leaning into Engineering: Tenured Women Faculty and the Policies and Programs That Support ThemAbstractWhile researchers have documented the barriers that women in engineering programs face (i.e. genderbias, work/family conflict, “dual career” issues, limited access to information networks), few
students the “whys” and “hows” of the communities they want to serve. Theseexplorations lead graduate students in our Humanitarian Engineering and Science (HES)Program to crave for understanding complex relationships among knowledge, power,technology, and society, domains that, thus far, they have learned to see as separate in largepart due to effects of mindsets and ideologies in engineering education and how these shapethe organization of curricula. For example, many students beginning to work on engineering forcommunity development (ECD) crave understanding of how knowledges and technologies canbe transferred across different places to be used by communities addressing a similar problemto gain power in front of more powerful actors (e.g., how
students grow. He has a masters in Civil Engineering. Before Purdue, he received an Erasmus scholarship for an exchange program at the University of Jaen, Spain. He had his undergraduate degree in Civil Engineering at the University of Ibadan, Nigeria.Siddhant Sanjay Joshi, Purdue University, West Lafayette Siddhant is a Ph.D. candidate in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University, West Lafayette. His research interests include understanding how GenAI can facilitate better student learning in computing and engineering education.Dr. Kirsten A. Davis, Purdue University, West Lafayette Kirsten Davis is an assistant professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Her research explores
Integrative Graduate Education Research Traineeship (IGERT). He is the co- author of five refereed journal articles, four book chapters, twelve refereed conference proceedings with full paper, and holds two co-patent applications. Dr. Cruz was awarded funding to support his research from the Consolidated Central Valley Table Grape Pest and Disease Control District, the CSU Program for Education and Research in Biotechnology and the California Energy Research Center. His referee experience includes perennial membership on program committees for the IEEE Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI), the IEEE Conference on Artificial Intelligence for Industries (AI4I). He was also the Finance and Registration
studies, forearthquake preparedness [16]–[18], disaster impact mitigation [19], [20], flooding policies [21],territorial risk management [22], and construction projects [23].Learning Goal and TopicsThe goal of the proposed game is to familiarize players with the community resilience-basedmulti-criteria decision-making process and its fundamental concepts including equity. The gameis designed as a cooperative board game to emphasize the feature of multi-criteria decision-making by facilitating discussion among players who would have different weights on theconsidered criteria. The multi-criteria nature can demonstrate all the different facets a structuralengineer will need to consider as they design infrastructure for communities and work to
sustainorganizational initiatives [31]. The fundamental principles for AI suggest that the inquiry shouldbegin with appreciation, should be collaborative, and should be applicable. AI begins with theidentification of positive attributes and then connects those attributes with the community’svision and action for change [32]. Thus, AI research methodology is highly generative in natureand consists of a 4-D cycle of phases: discovery, dream, destiny, and design. For example, AIresearch methodology places emphases on strategically engaging stakeholder representatives(key faculty at the host institutions, students, and graphic artists) in a networked improvementcommunity in order to gather relevant contextually bound data pertaining to each
and qualitative methods were utilized in this study. Factor Analysis (FA) was used to assess the validity of using CT scales in an HBCU environment, and to help investigate the impact of immersive technology on participants CT skill levels. The results of the FA aligned with previous research findings and provided the research team with a more refined set of CT scales for use in an HBCU environment. Semi-structured student interviews were used to gain insight into students’ perceptions and attitudes toward the incorporation of VR into an engineering curriculum, and to further explore the relationship between VR fidelity and scalability of a
autoethnographic, ethnographic, and qualitative interview projects on a wide- range of topics, has taught research methods at the introductory, advanced, and graduate levels, and has trained research assistants in diverse forms of data collection and analysis.Robert L. Nagel © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Student competency, autonomy, and relatedness in a practice-oriented engineering program: An application of self-determination theoryAbstractFor engineering students, how might three basic needs—competency, autonomy, andrelatedness—promote intrinsic motivation among students? In this
University during his employment with MIT. Dr. Reid served as NSBE’s highest-ranking officer, the national chair, in 1984–85.Dr. Morgan M Hynes, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Dr. Morgan Hynes is an Assistant Professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue Univer- sity and Director of the FACE Lab research group at Purdue. In his research, Hynes explores the use of engineering to integrate academic subjects in K-12 classrooms. Specific research interests include design metacognition among learners of all ages; the knowledge base for teaching K-12 STEM through engi- neering; the relationships among the attitudes, beliefs, motivation, cognitive skills, and engineering skills
extensive experience in management & development of the schedules, provision of cost control services. In addition to this he has provided risk analysis services for the large institutional building, Pipelines & infrastructure projects, and Transmission lines. Vishal has the opportunity to work with the one of the best research groups in India, Canada and Germany. His area of interest is infrastructure management, risk analysis, simulation and 3D Modeling.Ms. Neetu Sharma, University of Alberta Neetu Sharma is a graduate student with the University of Alberta School of Business. Her research interests include corporate social and environmental sustainability and cross-sector initiatives in the fields of
Manual, retrieved on March 2012, http://www.nmsu.edu/manual/documents/intro.pdfSince 1989, UACH has worked cooperatively with NMSU to create and advance programs ofhigher education, to promote culture and to perform activities of research and outreach.Examples of collaboration include joint research projects, externally funded service programs,cultural exchanges, and dual and joint degree programs.EDUCATION MODEL DESIGNED FOR THE AGREEMENTThe educational model selected was a Dual Degree program that is an agreement allowing theparticipant students to receive two separate engineering degrees. The degree comprises 9semesters of academic work to meet the credit hour requirements at both institutions. In addition,to the course work, UACH
hasstrengthened the integration of government, universities, research institutes, and industryenterprises. The joint participation of many stakeholders has brought a large-scale,multi-layered and comprehensive educational reform. The Outstanding Engineers Plan has avery important role as a model and guidance for higher education in cultivating talents tomeet social needs, adjusting the structure of talent cultivation, improving the quality oftalents cultivation, promoting educational reform, and enhancing graduates’ employability.One important feature of the Outstanding Engineers Plan is “in-depth participation ofindustries and companies in the whole educating and training process”. The OutstandingEngineers Plan regards school-enterprise cooperation as
chemistry. He is currently involved in a research project that aims to develop an observation protocol for STEM lessons and relevant training materials that are directed at improving the quality of STEM instruction in K-12 spaces. His primary research interests include assessment of student learning in STEM contexts, exploration of how integrated STEM is enacted in the secondary level (especially in chemistry classes), and assessment and promotion of students’ conceptual understanding of chemical concepts.Khomson Keratithamkul, University of Minnesota Khomson Keratithamkul is a PhD candidate in the STEM Education program at the University of Min- nesota. His research interests primarily revolve around K-12 STEM education
, we designed the course to enable learners to learntechnical engineering skills and provide access to higher education by awarding academic creditsat the end of the program. We used a combination of remote and local staff as facilitators inaddition to technology tools for online and active learning. The overall structure of our course isset up as an active, blended, collaborative, and democratic learning space. In light of the unique educational context, we describe in this paper our course designprocess, and then we explore student artifacts, interviews, observations, and surveys to answerour three objectives. In doing so, we believe this research and application example can contributeto the literature by understanding an implemented
Paper ID #29351The Relationship between Teamwork and Innovation Outcomes in anEngineering Thermal Science Course: An Entrepreneurial MindsetSimulationMs. Thien Ngoc Y Ta, Arizona state university Thien Ta is a doctoral student of Engineering Education Systems and Design at Arizona State University. She obtained her B.S., and M.S. in Mechanical Engineering. She has taught for Cao Thang technical college for seven years in Vietnam. She is currently a graduate research associate for the Entrepreneurial Mindset initiative at the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State University. Her doctoral research focuses on
to establish the Department at Wake Downtown. In addition, the Chair must lead faculty in their mission of education, research, and service. This charge includes working with faculty and the university to develop the Department’s vision, to articulate and implement a Departmental strategic plan, and to achieve the goal of creating an innovative educational environment for engineering students. The Engineering Chair and faculty will be expected to work together toward the goal of establishing ABET accreditation soon after graduating the first class of students from the program. The Chair is also charged with promoting the Department through alumni, donor, community, and industrial engagement. The Chair will be responsible for establishing a
increasing self-learning ability as digital natives, and the increasing callings for pedagogicalinnovationsinengineeringeducationcanbeidentified.Thus,weintroducementorgroupsasacommunitycombinguniversityacademics,industrystaff,andstudentsfortwopurposes:innovateuniversity-industrycooperationchannelsoastocontributetohigh-qualityresearchandteaching,andengagestudentsinup-to-dateresearchsoastofacilitatethedevelopmentofremixingcompetencyandholisticdevelopment. The mentor groups for students include a distinguished industry supervisor who is usually a chiefengineer in industry, an industry supervisor among the distinguished supervisor’s team, and oneuniversitysupervisorwhoseresearchfieldissimilarorcomplementarywiththeindustrysupervisors.Toconsideruniversity
process, the technique is collaborative learning. Ifformal structures exist to guide student interaction, the process is considered cooperativelearning.6,7 PBL, a form of cooperative or collaborative learning, introduces engaging real-world, ill-defined, scaffolded problems for students to solve, usually as part of a group.8 Previouswork has shown that PBL activities can substantially improve student learning9 and thatcooperative learning in general promotes academic success, quality of relationships, and self-esteem.10This work details the problem-based learning application of a fluid-powered gantry crane,previously designed and fabricated on a small scale by senior mechanical engineering students11,to courses including: Mechatronics, Fluid
., Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, digitalversion, 1-11.Bocchini, P., Frangopol, D., Ummenhofer, T., and Zinke, T. (2013). Resilience and Sustainability of the CivilInfrastructure: Towards a Unified Approach. J. Infrastruct. Syst., 10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000177 (Jul. 1, 2013).Booth, K., Cooper, D., Karandjeff, K., Large, M., Pellegrin, N., Purnell, R., Rodriguez-Kiino, D., Schiorring, E., &Willett, T. (2013). Using Student Voices to Redefine Success: What Community College Students Say Institutions,Instructors and Others Can Do to Help Them Succeed. Berkeley, CA: The Research and Planning Group for CaliforniaCommunity Colleges (The RP Group).Brewer, M.L., van Kessel, G., Sanderson, B., Naumann, F., Lane, M
or engineering. The primary reason for choice ofmajor reported by 78% of first year female students (n = 39) engaged in the WISE program wasthat they were good at math or science. The second most reported reason at 70% (n = 35) wasthat they wanted to be able to get a well-paying job after graduation. Third, 54% (n = 27)reported that they liked to solve problems, and 44% (n = 22) reported that they were attracted bychallenge of a difficult curriculum. The fifth most reported reason for majoring in science orengineering at 42% (n = 21) was to use science or engineering to address social problems.Goals for participating in the WISE mentoring program. Students were asked to rank choicesindicating their reasons for voluntarily participating in
fit with the pedagogical principles of active learning.In the critical time just before graduation, capstone courses provide engineering students withan opportunity to apply the analytical and technical knowledge learned throughout theundergraduate curriculum in the context of the actual practice of engineering [7]. In a survey of444 ABET-accredited engineering institutions, capstone courses were typically one or two-semesters long, ran parallel class and project requirements, used extensive team-based activities,and culminated in a final project that often originated from industry or faculty research [8]. Thisdesign process offers a distinct learning opportunity for students by providing structuredoccasions to collaborate with each other
Study Focus – ME310Stanford University’s ME310: Project-Based Engineering Design Innovation & Developmentcourse challenges students to work in teams to explore design innovation opportunities inareas of interest to partner companies from diverse industries. This year-long course sequencehas engaged graduate engineering students in industry-sponsored projects where they learn tonavigate various phases of integrated design since 1967. More on the evolution of the coursecan be found in [31]–[36].The contexts, needs and requirements of each project are open for student teams to discoverand specify for themselves. The learning journey includes iterating the processes of studyingpotential contexts, need finding, benchmarking, ideation
. TheEmerging Scholars Program involved students solving challenging calculus 1 problems inworkshops in which trained graduate students facilitated the problem-solving process usingSocratic questioning and offering help when necessary. Subsequent research by Treismanindicated that offering freshmen a non-threatening, small-group but challenging environment toexplore math concepts impacts participants' success in these subjects and motivates them topersist [10], [11], [12].Funded by the National Science Foundation, the PLTL model was first developed for GeneralChemistry at the City College of New York in the early 1990’s and later extended to math,biology and engineering courses. The PLTL model has become a nationally recognized andreplicated model of
groups to solve problems [1]. Collaborative learning has been describedin college level courses in various forms [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]. Educators employing collaborativeor cooperative learning methods reported greater student satisfaction with the learningexperience [4], [5], reduction of anxiety [7], and concluding that student performance wasgreater than individual students could have achieved working independently [2], [6].In a comprehensive metaanalysis of 225 studies comparing student performance inundergraduate science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) courses when usingtraditional (lecturing) methods vs. active learning, the results were overwhelmingly in favor ofactive learning [8]. For example, the results of this
, and ethnic diversity. Among its 3100 undergraduate students,around 39% are recipients of Pell grants, and 29% are pursuing majors in STEM fields. Thecampus faces challenges as a significant number of students come from K-12 systems thathaven't adequately prepared them for college-level math and science. Additionally, manystudents work over 20 hours per week, often off-campus, and spend an average of 2 hours dailycommuting on public transportation.These circumstances contribute to lower retention and graduation rates, particularly affectingstudents from racial and ethnic minorities who are already underrepresented in the STEMworkforce. Notably, recent data shows that only about 45% of all majors manage to graduatewith a bachelor's degree