hired employees, asked to review their knowledge of mechanical properties inmaterials and report their recommendations in a memorandum to their project manager. Thisactive laboratory exercise is part of a sophomore-level materials science course that is designedinto the mechanical engineering curriculum at Union College. The course also partially fulfills awriting requirement that all Union students must fulfill before graduation. The emphasis onmechanical properties makes relevant the understanding of materials science to the processingand design issues in mechanical engineering.BackgroundThe materials science course at Union College is taken by all mechanical engineering majorsduring their sophomore year. A chemistry prerequisite is required
AC 2012-3001: BACCALAUREATE DEGREE COMPLETION: STUDENTRECRUITMENT, OUTREACH, AND RETENTIONDr. Hamid Y. Eydgahi, Bakersfield College Hamid Y. Eydgahi is the Dean of Instruction (CTE) at Bakersfield College in Bakersfield, Calif. He has an undergraduate degree in mechanical engineering technology, n M.B.A., and a Ph.D. in operations and technology management. He held a number of engineering and project management positions in private industry for more than 10 years, before joining higher education.Dr. Julio R. Blanco, California State University, Bakersfield Julio R. Blanco is the Dean of the School of Natural Sciences, Mathematics, and Engineering and As- sociate Provost for Grants, Resource Management, and
Session: 2263 A.R.I.S.E. CENTER: DEVELOPING INDUSTRY PARTNERSHIPS1 MARTHA A. CENTENO, JULIE A. JACKO, MARC L. RESNICK / MARCIA GROH-HAMMOND, SETH BERKOWITZ, AMANDA M. MITSKEVICH, JANET PARKER, JOHN SCHMIDT Florida International University / NASA – K.S.C. Miami, Florida 33199 / Kennedy Space Center, Florida 32899AbstractWe have developed a partnership between NASA and Florida International University (F.I.U.) toestablish the Applied Research in Industrial and Systems Engineering (A.R.I.S.E.) Center. Theintent of this
/html/survey_instruments.cfm.Brandsford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (1999). How people learn:Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washinton, DC: National Academy Press.Birol, G., Liu, S., Smith, H. D.,& Hirsch, P. (2006). Educational modules in tissueengineering based on the “How People Learn” framework. Bioscience Education E-journal, 7, 1–13.Cox, M. F., & Cordray, D. S. (2008). Assessing pedagogy in bioengineeringclassrooms: Quantifying elements of the “how people learn” model using the vanitobservation system (vos). Journal of Engineering Education, 97(4), 413-431.Cox, M. F., &. Harris, A. H. (2010). Comparison of pretenured and tenuredengineering professors’ pedagogical practices within undergraduate
helpful to bear in mind that thermodynamics is a physical science of energy. Thermody-namics has a great deal to do with the transfer, storage, and conversion of energy in quasi-equilibrium processes, but it has little to do with dynamics of particles and rigid bodies from themechanics point of view.III. Conservative and Nonconservative ForcesIn mechanics,5,6,7,8 forces may be classified as conservative forces or nonconservative forces. Aforce F is a conservative force if it is derivable from a potential function φ of space variables Page 7.845.3 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference &
is based on the widely publicized book “How PeopleLearn” (HPL). The HPL teaching framework presents the learning material as a series ofchallenges that are posed through a “Legacy Cycle.” Three VANTH modules, covering sevenchallenges, were tested in an undergraduate Mechanical Engineering course in Fall 2003. Theclass (N=32) was divided into two groups, control and trial, based on a random assignment.The control group performed the challenge in a traditional way (pencil and paper) while thetrial group solved the challenge using the VaNTH material located at a website. For eachgroup, a pre-test, post-test, and affect ranking were administered. The students were alsosurveyed on the learning effectiveness of the various components of each
AC 2011-2488: USE OF SOFTWARE AGENT-MONITORED TUTORIALSTO GUIDE STUDENT LEARNING IN COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN, ANAL-YSIS AND MATHEMATICS PROJECTSJack L. Beuth, Carnegie Mellon University Jack Beuth received his Ph.D. in Engineering Sciences from Harvard in 1992. He has been on the faculty of the Carnegie Mellon University Department of Mechanical Engineering since 1992. Dr. Beuth’s re- search is in the areas of solid mechanics and manufacturing. He is currently working on projects in four areas: The Mechanics of Laser- and Electron Beam-Based Manufacturing Processes, Interfacial Tough- ness Testing of Thermal Barrier Coatings, Development of an In-situ On-chip Tensile Testing Platform, and the Modeling of Fracture
Page 7.1150.7Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2002, American Society for Engineering EducationPurpose: Project #1 is a 100 point, team-based assignment that involves creating a 15minute long presentation for students enrolled in EM301/A, Thermodynamic. Thecontent of the presentation must s trongly relate to Thermodynamics and have directrelevance to the audience.Objectives:§ Improve ability to work effectively on teams.§ Enhance creativity through the creation of a relevant and appropriate presentation.§ Practice ME401 design process.§ Design presentation with your audience in mind.§ Create activities to stimulate audience interest and
Paper ID #42943A Systematized Literature Review on Problem-Solving in STEM EducationExploring the Impact of Task Complexity on Cognitive Factors and StudentEngagementMr. Zain ul Abideen, Utah State University Zain ul Abideen is a Graduate Research Assistant and Ph.D. student in the Department of Engineering Education at Utah State University (USU). With an undergraduate degree in Computer Engineering and a Master’s in Engineering Management, coupled with over 12 years of teaching experience with undergraduate engineering students, Zain is currently dedicated to pursuing a Ph.D. in Engineering Education at USU in Logan
startup developing visual learning media for schools. From 2011 to 2016, he was technical specialist (Airflow, Combustion and Thermodynamics) with Fiat Chrysler Automobiles, and played a key role in the redesign of their V6 gasoline engine to achieve improved fuel economy and performance. He also served as a Mentor and reviewed technical training programs. From 2002 - 2010, he was Assistant Professor at the Department of Mechanical Engineering, Purdue University School of Engineering at IUPUI (Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis) where he experimented with several teaching approaches inspired by the ASEE National Effective Teach- ing Institute Workshop. His 2009 ASEE (American Society for Engineering
Paper ID #10471Embedded computing reinforces and integrates concepts across ECE curricu-lumDr. Harry Courtney Powell, University of Virginia Harry Powell received the B.S. in Electrical Engineering the University of Virginia in 1978, a M.S. in Electrical Engineering in 2006, and the Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering in 2011. Dr. Powell spent over 20 years in industry designing computer controlled automated systems before returning to academia in 2001. He was appointed to the faculty in 2013, and teaches courses in electric and electronic circuit analysis, electromagnetic energy conversion, embedded computing, and the 4th year
Concepts Learning Using Technology for Rapid Feedback and Student Engagement John C. Chen,* Jennifer A. Kadlowec,* and Dexter C. Whittinghill Departments of *Mechanical Engineering and Mathematics Rowan University, Glassboro, NJAbstractIn this project our goal is to improve student learning in the foundation mechanics course Statics.In this case improved learning is defined as knowledge retention (durability) and knowledgeapplication in a different environment (transferability). We aim to do this by providing rapidfeedback to students of their understanding of key concepts and skills being presented. Thefeedback system acts as the focal point and
AC 2012-3933: A FIRST TAKE ON AN INDIVIDUAL DATA GENERA-TION ASSIGNMENT FOR OPEN-ENDED MATHEMATICAL MODEL-ING PROBLEMSProf. Heidi A. Diefes-Dux, Purdue University, West Lafayette Heidi A. Diefes-Dux is an Associate Professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue Uni- versity. She received her B.S. and M.S. in food science from Cornell University and her Ph.D. in food process engineering from the Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering at Purdue Univer- sity. She is a member of Purdue’s Teaching Academy. Since 1999, she has been a faculty member within the First-year Engineering program at Purdue, the gateway for all first-year students entering the College of Engineering. She has coordinated
approach, called the content-centered or the list of topics approach, theinstructor consults one or more textbooks and makes a list of important topics to be covered duringthe semester. Subsequently the time to be allotted to each topic and the number and types of testsare decided. This approach is simple for the instructor. However, it does not address the big pictureof how the course contents fit into the program students are enrolled in, and what students shouldlearn so they are better prepared for the following courses and career paths. Being mindful of thisbig picture is very important for an instructor in an undergraduate aerospace engineering program.Therefore, for the flight dynamics class the author used the second approach, called the
Paper ID #38503Developing a Global Competency Mindset in an International, Faculty-ledProgram in Brazil Focused on Sustainable EnergyDr. Courtney Pfluger, Northeastern University Dr. Courtney Pfluger took a position in Fall 2011 as an Assistant Teaching Professor at Northeastern University as a part of the First Year Engineering Faculty and affiliated Faculty in the Chemical Engineer- ing Department. Dr. Pfluger redesigned and piloted the first-year curriculum which included engineering design and computational problem solving using the Engineering Grand Challenges as real-world appli- cations of global issues. She
Paper ID #18652Development and Assessment of a Combined REU/RET Program in Materi-als ScienceDr. Noah Salzman, Boise State University Noah Salzman is an Assistant Professor at Boise State University, where he is a member of the Electrical and Computer Engineering Department and IDoTeach, a pre-service STEM teacher preparation program. His work focuses on the transition from pre-college to university engineering programs, how exposure to engineering prior to matriculation affects the experiences of engineering students, and engineering in the K-12 classroom. He has worked as a high school science, mathematics, and
and will have to beextended for that. Despite these limitations, we believe that the model can help other facultyeducators in their efforts to develop symbiotic relationship between development of facultymembers and building of institutions.Acknowledgements We thank all the college authorities for allowing us to conduct the programs at theircolleges and all the participants for their whole-hearted support for the programs.References1. Minter, R.L., The Paradox of Faculty Development. Contemporary Issues in Education Research, 2009. 2(4): p. 65-70.2. Aspiring_Minds, National employability report of engineers 2016, Aspiring Minds.3. Chakrabarty, R. Only 7 per cent engineering graduates employable: What's wrong with
and professionals to meet challenges and needs in the power gird modernization2-6.Keeping in mind that the advent of telecommunication, computing, and monitoring technologies,new approaches have been possible in the electrical power systems. Many grid operations arevitally dependent on monitoring, collecting, processing transmitting and sharing data. Powerengineering has commoditized the electric network and computation solutions, finding the off-the-shelves products that fit the needs, by defining a logical mapping between desired functionsand communication standards. To train students in smart grids require a creative curriculum thatcrosses traditional engineering divisions3,7-12. For example, students taking advanced courses inthe power
least contemporary, if not in front of the leading technologies of a society.Rapid technological changes make even more difficult the task of shaping the cultural profile offuture inhabitants of an interconnected world. More than other learning environments, higherengineering education faces greater demands from the global market - workforce. Moreover,life-long learning is a recognized necessity. Remote experimentation appears to be a valuabletraining tool for life-long, engineering education.Although students have remote access to many “mind-artifacts” (e.g., texts, figurative or non-figurative knowledge representations and inferences) – using either the Internet or theirUniversity intranet – they do not yet have open access to the laboratory
and the engineering profession,” International Journal of Engineering Education 18 (3): 295–300, 2002.[8] Lattuca, L.R., P.T. Terenzini, J.F. Volkwein, and G.D. Peterson, “The changing face of engineering education,” The Bridge 36 (2):6–44, 2006.[9] Bransford, J.D., Brown, A.L. and Cocking, R.R, “How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and Page 22.939.14 School,” Washington DC: National Academy Press, 1999.[10] Interactive Digital Software Association, “Essential Facts about The Computer and Video Game Industry”, http://my.tapwave.com/developers/docs/IDSABooklet.pdf, 2002.[11] Sanderson, A., Millard, D
’ conceptual learning, drawn from additional venues such as concept maps or semi-structured student interviews.This work was generously supported by the National Science Foundation through DUE-0717536. Page 25.256.9ReferencesActivities Based Physics webpage; http://physics.dickinson.edu/~abp_web/abp_homepage.html, accessed10/12/10Bernhard, Jonte. Improving Engineering Physics Teaching - Learning From Physics Education Research.In Physics Teaching in Engineering Education. 2000. Budapest.Bransford, J., Brown, A., and Cocking, R. 2000 How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience and School.Washington, D.C.: Commission on Behavioral and Social
as multidisciplinary design projects. Priorcoursework usually has a maximum of three students in a project and no multidisciplinaryopportunities other than a mandatory co-op program.In order to promote an interdisciplinary team approach to design for monitoring structures, aproject-based learning approach was selected to support the process of inquiry and learningsince “real world engineering projects come to fruition only through the efforts of teams focusingon real projects”5. In addition, project-based learning requires students to engage in designthinking in a systems level collaboration on teams communication in terminologies anddefinitions outside of their respective disciplines5,6. With this in mind, the course was dividedinto four
AC 2010-2255: EXTROVERT: SYSTEM FOR LEARNING ACROSS DISCIPLINESNarayanan Komerath, Georgia Institute of Technology Professor, Daniel Guggenheim School of Aerospace Engineering.Marilyn Smith, Georgia Institute of Technology Associate Professor, Daniel Guggenheim School of Aerospace Engineering. Page 15.572.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 EXTROVERT: SYSTEM FOR LEARNING ACROSS DISCIPLINES ABSTRACTThe EXTROVERT project builds resources to enable engineers to solve problems cutting acrossdisciplines. The approach is to enable learners to gain confidence with the process of
Session 2273 BME GOES TO THE MOVIES: DEVELOPING ETHICAL PERSPECTIVE IN BIOENGINEERS S. Brophy, K. Bliley, A. Gray, C. Mathieson, E. Mowry, J. CollinsDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235Abstract As bioengineering students enter their new profession they must become sensitiveto the ethical ramifications of their work. Bioengineering educational programs seekopportunities to engage students in the exploration of ethical dilemmas in bioengineering.Our involvement with the VaNTH ERC and the learning sciences’ principles that guidetheir design of instruction has provided us with
Paper ID #42689Ill-Structured Design Challenges in First-Year CoursesMadalyn Wilson-Fetrow, University of New MexicoProf. Anjali Mulchandani, University of New Mexico Dr. Anjali Mulchandani is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering at the University of New Mexico. She leads the Environmental Resource Sustainability group, which studies themes related to environmental and water resources engineering, atmospheric water harvesting, waste-to-energy technologies, and environmental remediation. Her work integrates and highlights science communication and community needs-based
Page 5.128.6prior work in cataloging and disseminating courseware. This evolution emphasizes interactivityand learning with the goal to connect like-minded users in engineering and the sciences, in orderto encourage user-to-user communication and community building. In this new approach, userswill have a wealth of services available to them in addition to a collection of educationalsoftware and learning resources. Ultimately, services will allow all users to search and retrieve aset of resources based on particular pedagogical methods and content-based concepts withinengineering and the sciences, e.g., teaching “teamwork” or “freshman design”, in contrast to onlyretrieving specialized pieces of software for a particular application, such as a
websitesaid “A significant problem in learning physics is being able to memorize all the information Ineed to know”. Most of our Community College students have trouble in the understanding of“to memorize” versus “to remember”. “To memorize” can be misinterpreted by communitycollege students to represent a rote learning of physics with a grading rubric adhered to the exactwords and numeric values in a physics textbook example. “To remember” involves awillingness of oneself in judgment and will be strengthened by repeated exercises. The Minds-on together with Hands-on practice is the corner stone of engineering literacy, summarized in a2020 publication by The International Technology and Engineering Educators Association(ITEEA) and archived by
Paper ID #28232How to be an effective journal and conference paper reviewer withoutbeing a jerkDr. Julie P Martin, Clemson University Julie P. Martin is the Editor-in-Chief of the Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering. She is an associate professor of engineering education at The Ohio State University, a past president of WEPAN, and a Fellow of ASEE. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021Reviewers and editors are essential to the publishing process, and yet no one evertells us how to write a constructive review. Reviewers typically
of Minds and Machines, vol.9, No.1, 20044. A.H. Johnstone, J. Chem. Ed., 74, 262, 19975. http://www.pogil.org/6. D. Hanson, “Instructor’s Guide to Process-Oriented Guided-Inquiry Learning”, Stony Brook University, SUNY, http://www.pogil.org/uploads/media_items/pogil-instructor-s-guide-1.original.pdf7. R Waters, M McCracken, “Assessment and Evaluation in Problem Based Learning”, Proceedings of Frontiers in Education, 19978. R. Felder, D. Woods, J. Stice, A. Rugarcia, Chem. Engr. Education, 34(1), 26–39, 20009. R.M. Felder and L.K. Silverman, “Learning and Teaching Styles in Engineering Education.” Engineering Education, 78 (7), 674, 198810. G. Lawrence, People Types and Tiger Stripes, 3rd Ed. Center for Applications of
Music-Based Emotion and Social Interaction Therapy for Children with ASD Using Interactive Robots Paul Azzi1, Conor Sheridan1, Matt Spadafora1, Chung Hyuk Park1 (PI) 1 Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Engineering and Applied Science, The George Washington University, DC {pazzi, conorsheridan, mspad3, chpark}@gwu.edu Myounghoon Jeon2 (PI), Ayanna M. Howard3 (Senior Consultant) 2 Department of Cognitive and Learning Science, School of Sciences and Arts, Michigan Technological University 3 School of Electrical and Computer Science, College of