research on adultlearners suggests that increased learning gains can be achieved when instruction is designed withstudents’ learning styles in mind [1]-[6]. In addition, several practitioners within the domain ofphysics, as well as engineering education, have noted the importance of teaching with learningstyles in mind [7]-[14]. Furthermore, attention to learning styles and learner diversity has beenshown to increase student interest and motivation to learn. The particular population of students that encompasses the focus of this paper is non-sciencemajors taking introductory physics at American University. Most students take this introductorycourse to satisfy the university’s General Education requirements for graduation. Because thebackgrounds
2005-2267 Successful Research Experience for Undergraduates Program (REU) – The ERC for Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems ELIJAH KANNATEY-ASIBU, JR. Yoram Koren Lenea Howe Engineering Research Center for Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109AbstractThe National Science Foundation Engineering Research Center for ReconfigurableManufacturing Systems (ERC/RMS) was awarded an NSF grant for a ResearchExperience for Undergraduates (REU) program in 1997. The goal of the ERC in
Room IS 203University of ConnecticutThis session aims to empower faculty to consider the implications of a set of standards for inclusive pedagogies developed forpostsecondary STEM classrooms. These Inclusive Standards (I-standards) were collaboratively developed by engineering faculty as theypiloted and engaged in professional learning communities focused on the implementation of Universal Design for Learning and UniversalDesign for Instruction guidelines. Designed with undergraduate STEM courses in mind, the I-Standards outline opportunities andchallenges associated with increasing access and inclusive practices with regard to neurodiversity among learners. Participants will viewexamples of the standards as applied in undergraduate
Paper ID #30196A study of the effects of peer tutoring in relation to student GPADr. Scott Steinbrink, Gannon University Dr. Scott Steinbrink is an associate professor of Mechanical Engineering, primarily tasked with teaching computer methods and design.Mr. Adam Finn NogajDr. Karinna M Vernaza, Gannon University Dr. Karinna Vernaza joined Gannon University in 2003, and she is the Dean of the College of Engineering and Business and a Professor in the Mechanical Engineering Department. She earned her Ph.D. and M.S. in mechanical engineering from the University of Notre Dame. Her B.S. is in Marine Systems Engineering
review on engineering graduate student mental health (work in progress). In 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, number 10.18260/1-2–32242, Tampa, Florida, June 2019. ASEE Conferences. https://peer.asee.org/32242.[15] Sarah Jane Bork and Joi-Lynn Mondisa. Science, engineering, and mathematics graduate student mental health: Insights from the healthy minds network dataset. In 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, number 10.18260/1-2–33255, Tampa, Florida, June 2019. ASEE Conferences. https://peer.asee.org/33255.[16] Sarah Jane Bork and Joi-Lynn Mondisa. Validation of an instrument to measure science, engineering, and mathematics graduate students’ mental health (work in progress). In 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual
Paper ID #38414Reducing Student Resistance to Active Learning ThroughInstructor Development: Project UpdateLea K. Marlor Ph.D. Candidate in the Department of Engineering Education Research at the University of Michigan.Cynthia Finelli Dr. Cynthia Finelli is Professor of Electrical Engineering & Computer Science, Professor of Education, and Director of Engineering Education Research at University of Michigan. In her research she focuses on increasing faculty adoption of evidence-based instruction, promoting students' sociotechnical skills and abilities, and supporting the success of neurodiverse engineering
that field for more than 2 years while studying. He plans to do graduate studies inrisk management.ROBIE CALONGRobie Calong is currently a senior pursuing a Bachelor of Science degree in Computer Engineering Technology atthe University of Houston. His interest, after graduating in Fall 2008, is to pursue a career in hardware developmentand plans to study in Audio Engineering. He is open-minded to learn many different ways and takes prior measures,for example, one of his major interests is to mainly research and develop different methods in problem solving. Hecurrently resides in Pearland, Texas, where he primarily focuses on his studies, while in his leisure time he playsbasketball, surf the interest for new technologies, etc.FARROKH
Session 2525 An Outreach Effort - The Connections Program Steven H. Chin, MaryJac Reed, and Ardoth Hassler Catholic University of America/Catholic University of America/Georgetown UniversityThe School of Engineering within The Catholic University of America (CUA) has an affiliation with the localhigh schools in the Washington DC area whose goal is to stimulate interest in engineering among high schoolstudents. There are currently 14 participating high schools, many of which include a student population withhigh minority and female enrollment (two of the schools are all-girls
tofaculty member, it is also important to build connections with faculty who are having similarexperiences during a similar time frame. The need for connections and the potential lack ofpossibilities inside a home department suggest looking outside of engineering and sciencedepartments to find peers. Peer mentoring is accepted as useful for students, and the samebenefits that come from learning from others are valuable for new faculty. By seekinginterdisciplinary peers, the effects of "data" sparsity are reduced, especially since problems facedby first year teachers are rarely discipline-specific. New faculty benefit from multipleinformation channels about their institutions. In addition, discussions about teaching among aninterdisciplinary group
(visually/graphically) and quantitatively(numerically). The interactive simulator should stimulate users’ curiosity and accelerate learningby active, “what- if” inquiry and experimentations, and thus, enhance their experience andcomprehension. Each and every one of these new tools, when designed well and used creatively,may qualitatively enhance the learning environment. Introduction What are “sampling” and “aliasing” and why they are important? In science and engineering, sampling means “discrete
Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2001, American Society for Engineering Education”The Investigator component of the ROBOLAB software was developed to support theselearning processes and philosophies in several ways. First, ROBOLAB provides aprogramming environment that can be open-ended and complex enough for a multitude ofsolutions to a programming problem, yet confined and simple enough to not overwhelm astudent of any age or experience level. Secondly, ROBOLAB facilitates intuitiveprogramming. For example, because of ROBOLAB’s graphical nature there are few, if any,steps involved between generating the flow-chart or block-diagram style logic of a program onpaper and creating its direct
AC 2011-253: INDUSTRY AND EDUCATION: A WINNING COMBINA-TIONCraig J. Gunn, Michigan State University Craig Gunn is the Director of the Communication Program in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Michigan State University. His duties include the integration of communication skill activity into all courses within the mechanical Engineering program, including overseas experiences. He works closely with the Cooperative Engineering Education Division of the College of Engineering to monitor the com- munication skills of students who co-op during their college years. He is currently the editor of the CEED Newsbriefs and is co-author of a number of textbooks focusing on engineering freshmen orientation
Session - Multimedia Project Based Teaching: A Case Study from a Hydraulics Class Philip T. McCreanor, Mercer University School of EngineeringAbstractHydraulics is currently taught as one-half of a 3-credit course in the Environmental EngineeringProgram at the Mercer University School of Engineering. The topics covered include fluidproperties, fluid pressure, forces on submerged surfaces, fluid flow in pipes, pipelines, pipenetworks, and pump design and selection. The first semester this course was taught the materialwas presented topic by topic. This created a very choppy course
Session 1202 Integrating Graduate and Undergraduate Education Through Student Design Competitions Daniel P. Schrage, Professor School of Aerospace Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta, GA 30332-0150 ABSTRACTThe Georgia Tech graduate program in Aerospace Systems Design was initiated in 1984with two rotorcraft design courses as part of the Georgia Tech (U.S. Army ResearchOffice sponsored) rotorcraft center of excellence. The American Helicopter Society(AHS)/industry student design
personnel training is carried out insome engineering departments of our university. The training objective is decided accordingto the three categories. The first category is a program for Master of Engineering includingBachelor of Engineering, i.e. Bachelor and Master combined program, in which the trainingprocess will be optimized and the training of “the both ends will be intensified, and themiddle will be optimized”. One end refers to strengthening basic education on modernengineering technology and comprehensive personnel quality, and the other end is to enhancethe practical engineering training with a macro-concept, including engineering scientificresearch, comprehensive ability training in designing and the training of comprehensiveability
AC 2010-2422: INTEL: PRESENTING REALISTIC EXERCISES IN A STATICSCLASSChristine Valle, Georgia Institute of TechnologySue Rosser, Georgia Institute of TechnologyJanet Murray, Georgia Institute of TechnologyWendy Newstetter, Georgia Institute of TechnologyLaurence Jacobs, Georgia Institute of Technology Page 15.786.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 InTEL: Presenting Realistic Exercises in a Statics ClassAbstractStatics, a foundational engineering course, introduces a unique approach to problem solving,which is characterized by model-based reasoning. The major intended course outcome is forstudents to develop the ability to create and utilize
material to help students learn and gain knowledge more effectively.We always try to address most of these issues by paying attention to the delivery mode, keepingin mind different options that students appreciate, some feel more comfortable with face-to-faceformat while others prefer online mode of delivery. This paper examines some of the deliverymodes used to achieve these objectives especially by our institute.GLOBAL IMPACTFor over two centuries, the competencies that engineers have been expected to gain fromengineering education have been associated with countries [17]. Increased mobility in the Page 20.4.2workplace is
abackground that differs from typical engineering upperclassmen. In particular, they have alreadyseen the topics of modeling using transfer functions, state space and simulation diagrams,frequency response, and the rules for sketching Bode plots, and typical response of first andsecond order linear systems. With this in mind, the author has developed a series of laboratoriesto foster understanding of control systems topics. In particular, labs 2 and 4 seek to enhanceunderstanding of the Bode and Root Locus plots respectively by requiring the students togenerate these plots from experimental data. The sequence begins with time and frequencydomain system identification, segues through basic control actions, experimental determinationof the Root Locus
Interactive Web Activities for Online STEM Learning Materials Alex Edgcomb and Frank Vahid Department of Computer Science and Engineering University of California, RiversideAbstractWe are developing a repository of parameterized interactive web activities to aid in learningSTEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math) concepts. Much web-based materialtoday, including online textbooks, online tutorials, and MOOCs (massive open online courses),include quiz-like activities to support interaction with the user. Varied customizable interactiveactivities, such as drag-and-drop definition matching, or shooting or navigation games driven byquiz-like
Paper ID #42944Unmasking Cognitive Engagement: A Systematized Literature Review of theRelationships Between Students’ Facial Expressions and Learning OutcomesMr. Talha Naqash, Utah State University, Logan Mr.Talha Naqash is currently pursuing his doctoral studies in Engineering Education at Utah State University. With a profound educational background spanning multiple disciplines, he holds an MS in Telecommunication and networking. His extensive research contributions are reflected in numerous publications and presentations at prestigious IEEE; ASEE conferences, Wiley’s & Springer Journals. His research primarily
Paper ID #10249Improving retention of student understanding by use of hands-on experi-ments in StaticsProf. Carisa H Ramming P.E., Oklahoma State University Carisa Ramming joined the faculty at Oklahoma State University as an assistant professor in January 2009 after a stint as a visiting professor in the School of Architecture during the 2007-2008 academic year. Professor Ramming is a graduate of Oklahoma State University with a Bachelor of Architectural Engineering degree in 2001 and dual masters degrees; Master of Science in Civil Engineering with an emphasis in Construction Engineering and Master of Architectural
Session 2147 Project LIVE: A Classroom for Students on the Go J. R. Porter, J. A. Morgan, and J.A. Ochoa Engineering Technology and Industrial Distribution Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843Abstract The classical lecture environment represents one of the most important opportunities todirectly interact with students, allowing professors to leverage an array of communication andteaching techniques and to be immediately responsive to students’ questions. However, during alecture students must absorb considerable amounts of new information
Session 1526 A State-of-the-Art Energy and Electric Drives Laboratory Designed and Implemented by Undergraduate and Graduate Students Steven M. Hietpas Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science South Dakota State University, SD 57007AbstractEnergy Conversion courses for the past 100 years have primarily focused on the fundamentalconcepts of machine theory and the conversion between mechanical and electrical energy. Based onthese concepts an undergraduate energy conversion course would typically cover
present, civil engineering studentsare not adequately prepared in newly developed technologies in asphalt pavement design andconstruction.II. Challenge for undergraduate educatorsHow can we make sure that today’s young and dynamic engineering students are educated in thelatest asphalt technology so that they can apply these techniques effectively into practice? Theanswer is by providing practical education and training in asphalt mixture production facilities,equipment of construction, methods of construction, contracts, plans and specifications, basicstatistics, and quality control techniques. With this goal in mind, the Civil and EnvironmentalEngineering (CEE) department at WPI has adopted a philosophy of strong practical experience inits
SESSION 2320 Thermodynamic Cycles: A Multimedia, Independent Study Course Christine E. Hailey, David E. Hailey Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering / Department of English Utah State University Abstract During the 1999-2000 academic year, we developed a one-hour multimedia course covering the final third of a traditional thermodynamics course. In the paper we use the term “media” to describe the manner in which the content is delivered. The thermodynamics course is delivered via CD-ROM or Internet. We introduce the
Physics webpage; http://physics.dickinson.edu/~abp_web/abp_homepage.html, accessed10/12/10Bernhard, Jonte. Improving Engineering Physics Teaching - Learning From Physics Education Research.In Physics Teaching in Engineering Education. 2000. Budapest.Bransford, J., Brown, A., and Cocking, R. 2000 How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience and School.Washington, D.C.: Commission on Behavioral and Social Science and Education, National ResearchCouncil.Carlton, K. (2000), 'Teaching about heat and temperature', Physics Education, 35 (2), 101.Chi, M. T. H. Commonsense Conceptions of Emergent Processes: Why Some Misconceptions AreRobust. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2005. 14. 161-99.Chi, M. T. H. (2006). Laboratory methods for assessing experts’ and
Students’ Cognitions When Using an Instructional CD For Introductory Thermodynamics Roman Taraban Arne Weigold Department of Psychology roman.taraban@ttu.edu arne.weigold@ttu.edu Edward E. Anderson Department of Mechanical Engineering ed.anderson@ttu.edu Texas Tech University Lubbock, TX 79409 M. P. Sharma Department of
Paper ID #19401Impact of a Sophomore BME Design Fundamentals Course on Student Out-come Performance and Professional DevelopmentDr. Christa M Wille, University of Wisconsin, Madison Christa Wille is a Biomedical Engineering doctoral student at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. She received an undergraduate degree in Biomedical Engineering and went on to get her clinical doctorate in Physical Therapy at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. She advanced her clinical skills through a Sports Physical Therapy Residency at UW Health. Although continuing to practice Physical Therapy, Christa has returned to academia to continue
Paper ID #14971Measuring Student Response to Instructional Practices (StRIP) in Traditionaland Active ClassroomsMr. Kevin A. Nguyen, University of Texas, Austin Kevin Nguyen is currently a Ph.D. student in the Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Education department at University of Texas at Austin. He has a B.S. and M.Eng in Environ- mental Engineering both from Texas Tech University. As an engineering education researcher, he has worked on projects regarding self-reflection, teamwork, active learning, and participatory science com- munities.Dr. Maura J. Borrego, University of Texas, Austin
theirunderstanding of design itself: To focus the design process on the needs of the user and customer rather than on the capabilities of technology requires a change in mindset, one often resisted by engineers. We were surprised to find that the journals helped to change their minds. Journals actually gave the students a place to think through their objections to the principles of user-centered design, allowing them to convince themselves of the value of these principles. 8These practical studies of the ways in which students benefit from writing that takes placeduring the “thinking” phases of projects give credence to the concept of invention, whichhas been dismissed by some as a romanticized mystification. Even though it is not yetfully