global, cultural, social, environmental, and economic factors. 3. an ability to communicate effectively with a range of audiences. 4. an ability to recognize ethical and professional responsibilities in engineering situations and make informed judgments, which must consider the impact of engineering solutions in global, economic, environmental, and societal contexts. 5. an ability to function effectively on a team whose members together provide leadership, create a collaborative and inclusive environment, establish goals, plan tasks, and meet objectives. 6. an ability to develop and conduct appropriate experimentation, analyze and interpret data, and use engineering judgment to draw conclusions. 7. an
are going to be shortlisting candidates to join our team at Physio Logy, the company that has revolutionized the science of bodily functions. The candidate we are looking for should have a very strong work ethic, be available 24–7, have the capacity to carry oxygen in the human body and deliver it in a timely fashion when needed. He or she should also be able to carry a heavy load of carbon dioxide and dispose of it according to waste disposal regulations and be willing to work with human resources in regards to salary and fringe benefits. So is everybody clear on the specific requirements of the job?PLATE LETS and MR. WHITE: Yes
understanding forhow to apply that new knowledge” and (ii) “select learning strategy suited for the acquisition ofneeded knowledge”. Tsai and Jannsen [6] reported on the collaboration between departments ofMechanical Engineering and Library on assessment of ABET SO 7. The goal was to incorporateinformation fluency into the curriculum by developing assignments that require students tolocate, evaluate, and apply information in an efficient and ethical manner. As seen from theabove discussion, majority of the schools have implemented assessment of ABET SO 7 throughsome form of an assignment. The Mechanical Engineering Department at Fairfield University switched from the old a– k outcomes to the new 1 – 7 outcomes in 2018. A need was identified for
willenable us to provide additional lectures on engineering concepts like the solid mechanics lecture 14discussed earlier. It will also enable expanded instruction of engineering skills, such as problem-solving strategies, engineering calculations in Excel, literature searches, and interpretation ofcharts and graphs. More emphasis on engineering ethics will also be possible.References¹ Haslam, M., & Gerrick, A. (2022). Guiding First-year Students through the Design Process in Linked Computer Aided Design and Technical Writing Courses. Proceedings of the 2022 American Society for Engineering Education Pacific Southwest Conference
described below. The themes provided the SEL team with meaningfuldata to present to faculty as well as with a starting point to examine the overarching problem anddevelop solutions.Theme 1: Student ExpectationsThis first theme of expectation relates to Prompt 1: What are your expectations regardingengineering department academic culture? Expectations, in this context, are defined as thestudents’ feelings or beliefs around how they interact with different elements in the ENGDdepartment. Culture refers to the outlook, ethics, interactions, and rules of the department such ashow the department operates, what might happen because of a particular action, and howstudents are treated as a member of the department.Student expectations were categorized into
serves as an ABET Commissioner and as a member of ABET’s Accreditation Council Training Committee. He was previously a Member-At-Large on the Computing Accreditation Commis- sion Executive Committee and a Program Evaluator for both computer engineering and computer science. Estell is well-known for his significant contributions on streamlining student outcomes assessment pro- cesses and has been an invited presenter at the ABET Symposium on multiple occasions. He was named an ABET Fellow in 2021. Estell is also a founding member and current Vice President of The Pledge of the Computing Professional, an organization dedicated to the promotion of ethics in the computing professions. Estell is Professor of Computer
beneficiary oftentimes incites avisceral display of emotions as though their work ethic, will, and determination is in question[64]. A belief in meritocracy for white students also makes them believe that they aredeserving—entitled—to whatever success they are granted. In engineering, meritocracy showsitself in the manner “that students must prove themselves to be engineers, and they will make itonly if they work really hard through the ‘death march’ of math and science courses” [62, p. 11].More specifically to engineering, a blind belief of meritocracy in engineering gives a false sensethat, since the education, training, and work is hard, this will set them up for easy and wealthylives [65]. Since these beliefs are so ingrained into their sense of
individual goals and perceptions of theVTS activity, the overall class consensus indicated a positive reception of the experience. Asseen in the Collective Orientation scores, the VTS experience notably impacted the students'perspectives on collaboration. The lower pre-VTS Collective Orientation scores are consistentwith what students shared in the interviews, as most are apprehensive of working in teams,highlighting concerns that were formed from past experiences, unknown work ethics of others,and varied abilities within a team. One student noted: “I usually resent [groupwork] and I’m immediately like, ‘Oh my God, no!’ I don't really want to do group work as much. I didn't really have a bad group work experience except for like
less common due to the extended thinkingrequired. It is also possible that these “visible” codes represent language that is accessible tostudents who are still learning the language of design—and that the LbE debrief may be a venuefor instruction on these types of arguments. We also noticed that the design context, holistic statements, and sets of artifacts play aprevalent role in the types of arguments made by students. For example, in a comparison sessionabout graphic design, students’ attention was expectedly turned toward aesthetic. The fewexamples where “scientific principles” emerged as a justification all related to a CO2 car project.And the comments coded as “ethics” all seemed to stem from a single controversial image. It
. In additionthe ARCE students are immediately engaged on the project since they need to understand thebuildings existing strengths and weaknesses.Grading - With multiple faculty and students with different department grading cultures, thecourse requires the creation of a transparent and equitable grading system. Individual professorswith varied backgrounds have differing expectations and needs within the course. Students bringdiverse capabilities and work ethics to the course. Unlike other courses that utilize teams, in thiscourse each student brings a unique expertise to the team. If a single member is not performing,it is not likely that the rest of the team will not be able to “cover” for that member. A simple toadminister yet fair grading
, communication, and theassessment of skills. A fully customizable training tool assists in the training of standardizedpatient actors. In addition, the software allows for 1) controlled access, 2) live & archivedviewing with blinded “grading” & “scoring” of items and the ability to generate more than 50reports.Types of standardized patient (SP) encounters include a) clinical skills, b) ethical dilemmas, and c)communication (such as communicating bad news). Participants who utilize the SP labs forformative and summative experiences include 1) multidiscipline academic programs(undergraduate/graduate nursing, physician assistant, physical therapy, women’s health, radiologytechnology, couples and family therapy, creative arts therapy, and behavioral
assessment 16. Theeffectiveness of the software implementation had been previously validated by an action-research study 17. This study showed instructors considered the software enhanced studentengagement and learning, while students described OASIS as easy to use and helpful inimproving skills and understanding. Given this positive evidence, it was decided to providehigh-school students with their own version of OASIS (School OASIS), the dual aims beingto improve the physics skills of incoming engineering students and to promote theUniversity‟s engineering courses. Additionally, since appropriate ethical requirements havebeen met, the wealth of data collected by School OASIS can be used in judging student-intake quality and for educational
22.1337.3 This paper focuses on Step 9 which enhances experiential learning and student growthvia a formal reflection process which must be structured, with objectives, critical thinking,sharing and learning. It may be done throughout the project or before, during, and aftercompletion of project. It may be conducted in the classroom, at the worksite or at the finalcelebration or presentation. It may involve students, teachers, sponsoring agencies, and recipientsof project deliverables. Reflection assists in connecting and crystallizing real world servicelearning experiences.Reflection John Dewey3, the early 20th century progressive educator, published, supported andpromoted reflection in education and ethics as a perpetual process by
students can usethe tools. During these sessions, students must apply concepts learned in lectures, use complexlaboratory equipment to build experiments, develop hardware debugging skills.According to4, there are 13 fundamental objectives of Engineering Instructional Laboratories,that students should understand or acquire skills in: (1) Instrumentation; (2) Models; (3) Page 22.1590.3Experiment; (4) Data Analysis; (5) Design; (6) Learning from Failure; (7) Creativity; (8)Psychomotor; (9) Safety; (10) Communication; (11) Team work; (12) Ethics in the Laboratory;(13) Sensory Awareness. In the current laboratory setting and approach there are
anonymity encouragesincreased participation by quieter, less confident students. The entire class can be polled quicklyso the lecturer knows whether to review the material again or continue on. Students canparticipate easily without risk of being embarrassed in front of their peers by a wrong answer.This is particularly true for students that may be less willing to speak publicly because English isa second language. The anonymity of responses also encourages more candid answers toquestions involving ethical quandaries. Regularly polling the class about problems encouragesstudents to remain engaged. If students see that a significant portion of the class reached thesame wrong conclusion about a particular question it may reassure them that they are
AC 2011-516: USING A SERIES OF ADVERTISING VIDEOS TO ILLUS-TRATE SOLID MECHANICS AND MATERIAL-RELATED DESIGN IS-SUES IN THE ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY CURRICULUMJason K Durfee, Eastern Washington University Professor DURFEE received his BS and MS degrees in Mechanical Engineering from Brigham Young University. He holds a Professional Engineer certification. Prior to teaching at Eastern Washington Uni- versity he was a military pilot, an engineering instructor at West Point and an airline pilot. His interests include aerospace, aviation, professional ethics and piano technology. Page 22.1604.1
AgricultureHealth/water supply/sanitation Consumption and production patterns Protection of wildlifeHousing Waste management BiodiversityWelfare and quality of life Transportation Sustainable forest managementCultural Heritage Mining Global climate change/sea level risePoverty/Income distribution Economic structure & development Sustainable use of natural resourcesCrime Trade Sustainable tourismPopulation Productivity Land use changeSocial and ethical valuesAccess to
problems, design solutions using theirunderstanding, consider the ethical implications of their designs, and interact with the customerthrough verbal and written communication means. Two of these assignments are discussed inthis paper: the design of a force transducer for medical rehabilitation, discussed in detail, and thedesign of an accelerometer based impact measurement system for a package delivery company.Load Cell Transducer MEA ExerciseIn this MEA, teams of two or three students are assigned to work as engineering consultants forthe owner of a fictitious company, “Rehab-o-Rama”, which manufactures physical rehabilitationequipment. The students are given a memorandum from the owner, requesting that the studentsdesign a class of load cell
engineers use in professional practice15. Professional Development – Student development in ethics, etiquette, interviewing, presentations, “dress for success”, and interpersonal skills is an integral part of the EPD sequence. Graduates of the program frequently refer to the positive impact the professional development activities had on their experiences as interns and ultimately in the careers. Citizen Development – Students learn that engineers are servants to society through presentations, reading activities, and a minimum of 70 of hours of community service that they complete while at Itasca. Examples of the activities include road-side clean- ups, recreational trail maintenance, local
communicateeffectively‖[11].What engineers need to experience and know, in addition to ―hard‖ knowledge, is ―process-oriented skills and awareness-oriented skills‖ [1]. Process-oriented skills include―communication, teamwork, and the ability to recognize and resolve ethical dilemmas‖ [1].These skills are powerful when combined with awareness skills involving ―understanding theimpact of global and social factors, knowledge of contemporary issues, and the ability to dolifelong learning‖ [1]. But what are the most effective ways of incorporating process andawareness-oriented practices into engineering curricula already crowded with necessary science,math, and disciplinary courses? How can engineering schools, which must ensure that theirstudents graduate with
. Pirsig’s examples include ego, anxiety, boredom, impatience, and aninability to re-evaluate facts that might seem unimportant. Dealing with hang-ups can be assimple as taking a break from the problem for a while. How can you avoid losing your gumption about publishing a paper, in a collaborativeenvironment like a large research group? Here are some points to watch out for. 1. Agree on authorship – Who will be an author? a) Agree on roles in writing, and define who will prepare materials such as figures and tables, and who will write the different text sections. Be clear on the roles of each author in the paper, and ensure that the ethical expectation that each author must make a substantial
straightforwardproblems; 4. Analysis- solving complex problems, developing process models and simulations,troubleshooting equipment and system problems; 5. Synthesis- designing experiments, devices,processes, and products; 6. Evaluation- choosing from among alternatives and justifying thechoice, optimizing processes, making judgments about the environmental impact of engineeringdecision, resolving ethical dilemmas. Levels 1-3 are commonly referred to lower-level skills andLevels 4-6 are considered to be higher level skills. It is through the use of games that instructioninto the higher levels is possible as they present the students with continuous change, reflectionon decision making, strategy, and other key components of the higher-levels. Thus, gamingpresents
. Prins, R., “A Team-Based Design Competition For Freshman Engineering Students That Emphasizes Sustainable Design”, AC 2009-445, in Proceedings of the 2009 ASEE Annual Conference, Austin, TX, June 14-17, 2009. 11. Ochs, J., Getzler-Linn, L., Huyck, M., Schaffer, S., Raber, M., “Assessing Team Work And Ethical Awareness In Interpersonal Undergraduate Teams and Entrepreneurial Student Start-Ups: report #1”, AC 2009-1735, in Proceedings of the 2009 ASEE Annual Conference, Austin, TX, June 14-17, 2009. 12. Larkin, T., “Peer Review From A Student Perspective”, AC 2009-1689, in Proceedings of the 2009 ASEE Annual Conference, Austin, TX, June 14-17, 2009. 13. Morse, A., “Application of The Exceed Teaching Model To
engineeringeducator to act in the several different cultural environments, which mobility has imposed as afact of life for researchers and teachers at graduation level. Not to mention the necessary newcompetencies of educators such as: evaluation management; development competencies;communication skills; teamwork; ethics and intercultural competencies07.Summarizing the knowledge in engineering is important however nowadays it is not enoughbecause of the changes in the educational system and the new kind of student that requiredifferent approaches concerning to teaching. So it became imperative to be prepared for this neweducational community, where the teachers are the guiders in the new path that is now theaccomplishment of the formation of engineers.5. The
; however, theconventional approach is to include only the minimum needed. The engineering habits of mindemphasize skills such as systems thinking, creativity, optimism, collaboration, communicationand ethical considerations. These principles are covered, with different depth levels, by eachengineering program studied. The intent of the ICE-HS framework is to provide schools theflexibility they need to select the resources that best fit their objectives while maintainingcommitment to the general principles.The proposed ICE-HS framework includes courses similar to other programs in engineering ingrades 9-12, introducing the threads of design and technology. In contrast to the conventional
instructional design.17 The focus is on whether or not theteacher does the following: 1. Meets state professional standards or has appropriate academic credentials 2. Possesses technology skills necessary to teach on-line 3. Plans, designs, and implements on-line strategies that encourage active learning, interaction, participation, and collaboration 4. Promotes student success with regular feedback, prompt response, and clear expectations 5. Models, guides, and encourages legal, ethical, and safe technology use 6. Has experienced on-line learning from the perspective of a student 7. Is responsive to on-line students with special needs 8. Creates and implements on-line student assessment strategies that assure validity and
felt thestudents should take personal responsibility to be actively involved in their learning agenda,shape a vision for their leadership and learning that would guide their planning process whilethey deliberately focused on increasing their self-awareness and understanding of a leader‟ssocial/ethical responsibilities.The three-course series began with a thorough base-line assessment of the individual graduatestudent‟s competencies, personal values, learning style, leadership aptitude and other data (bothqualitative and quantitative) regarding their personality profile and emotional intelligence. Eachof these areas was seen as a critical ingredient contributing to the leadership capacity buildingprocess. Students used the data as a
databases tomaximize relevancy describe specific reasons for choosing the resource based on their researchtopics. One more student who chose Academic Search Premier explained why: “This, for mytopic, worked best. Web of Science is also a great choice and was helpful, but I needed lesstechnical articles. I was looking more for the ethical and social base for my argument, so thebroader view in EBSCO gave me good results.” Although this student chose a general rather thana specialized database for robotics research, she had a clear reason for doing so. Beginning Developing ExemplaryAcademic Search Premier (34) 11 21 2Engineering Village (37) 4
Contribution Award as well as the ”Excellence in the Use of Technology ” (research) at EIU. His publications include: ”Ethical and Social Consequences of Biometric Technologies in the USA”, ”Technology in Central America and the Impact on CAFTA” and ”Design of an Industrial Control Laboratory” amongst others. Dr. Chinchilla has been awarded numerous grants and serves in numerous departmental and university committees at Eastern Illinois University.Mr. Harold Jay Harris, Eastern Illinois University School of Technology Page 22.697.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011
3 103 toronto 3 26 other 6 65 correction 3 104 university 3 27 total 6 66 costs 3 105 while 3 28 will 6 67 current 3 106 widgets 3 29 with 6 68 driving 3 107 actions 2 30 would 6 69 example 3 108 agency 2 31 all 5 70 first 3 109 allowed 2 32 alternative 5 71 flaps 3 110 analysis 2 33 decision 5 72 following 3 111 axes 2 34 ethics 5 73 give 3 112 back 2