, Ruud de Moor Centrum, Open University of the Netherlands.21. Wessner C.W., & Wolff, A.W. (Ed.). (2012). Rising to the Challenge: U.S. Innovation Policy for Global Economy. National Academies - Committee on Comparative National Innovation Policies: Best Practice for the 21st Century. Board on Science, Technology, and Economic Policy, Policy and Global Affairs, National Research Council.22. Wilson, Z.S., Holmes, L., deGravelles, K., Sylvain, M.R., Batiste, L., Johnson, M., McGuire, S.Y., Pang, S.S., & Warner, I.M. (2011). Hierarchical mentoring: A transformative strategy for improving diversity and retention in undergraduate STEM disciplines. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21(1), 148-156.23
and post-baccalaureate formal education as well as pre-licensure experience. Specific emphasis is giventhose BOK2 outcomes that previous survey data identified as being a challenge for manyprograms to address within current curricular design. The curriculum, as developed, isconsidered to be BOK2-complient, in addition to meeting current university graduation andABET/EAC accreditation requirements.IntroductionThe first edition of the Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge for the 21st Century1 (BOK1) wasreleased in January 2004. Based on various inputs, a second edition of the Civil EngineeringBody of Knowledge for the 21st Century2 (BOK2) was developed and released in February 2008.The BOK1 has already impacted accreditation criteria and civil
engineering [2], we wanted to evaluate just how much thisuniversities’ Makerspace impacts student identity development that in turn will influenceretention.Three undergraduate members of our research team searched through all the first and secondsemester interview transcripts looking for mentions of the Makerspace, also searching for avariety of university-specific nicknames for the areas associated with it. Then, we did a deeperlook searching for terms related to “making,” including “building,” “3D printing,” and“designing,” that implied students were using the Makerspace. After collecting all the quotes, wesorted them into five categories regarding the context of mention of the Makerspace: 1. Generic perspectives on the Makerspace student group
Page 13.617.3and discussions of best practices for in-class implementation. As part of the grant, participantswere given laboratory equipment and software for use in their classrooms, providing continuityand motivation to implement these activities in their schools.DECS workshop participants were also given a memory stick containing curricular materials andsupport documentation for the lab experiments. They were encouraged to register on theElectronics in Schools Strategy (EISS) website3. This website provides teachers with access to adedicated training resource and in-depth support material, designed to help promote, teach andsupport Electronics, Communications and Technology (ECT) within school curricula.II PedagogyWorkshops were developed
Page 7.1292.4“Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & ExpositionCopyright © 2002, American Society for Engineering Education”which that competency is correlated. Then we asked that, after considering the key actions, thatthey assess the probability that a student and/or graduate would have the opportunity to actuallytake those actions in each of the settings. Finally, we asked the degree to which the ISUCompetencies collectively cover ABET Criterion 3 and the degree to which all fourteen of theISU Competencies cover the practice of engineering at the professional level. Figure 3 alsoshows an example assessment form for one of the ISU Competencies, “Analysis and Judgment”,that was part of the
more. Finally,the project will develop industry, K-12 and university partnerships to facilitate pathways tocareers in the exciting field of reconfigurable electronics for first-generation, minority and otherunder-served populations, including veterans. In summary, this project will provide the trainingand educational resources and promote best practices for community college, university, andhigh school instructors to enable them to teach new hardware technologies to a broad range ofstudents, including those who have not previously had access to this level of training and careerchoice. This paper will address first year project activities including the Faculty ProfessionalDevelopment workshop on VHDL and FPGA design, the assessment results and
support the schools. Universities need to examine the recognition and reward structure and the impactof this structure on operating decisions which are made. Does the current heavy emphasison research and on publication give the proper balance to the educational mission of theuniversity and to the needs of the students? Is the guarantee of lifetime employment for asignificant element of the university workforce still the best way for the university tomanage its workforce? These are internal university business decisions, but all of thecustomers are greatly influenced by them. All funders of the university enterprise haveboth a right and an obligation to express their opinions on these business decisions. Changes which will impact
both formal and informallearning opportunities.This paper presents STEM-UpTM to the engineering community as a comprehensive best-practicethat makes math and science a common vernacular within an underrepresented community. Thispaper is not a qualitative or quantitative study in the traditional sense of formal research. Rather,this paper highlights aspects of STEM-UpTM as an informal science initiative that has created amenu of opportunities – i.e. a value chain - to broadly engage an entire community in creating a Page 25.268.3sustained network for an affinity toward science, technology, engineering and math.Literature ReviewIn the last
ABETaccreditation visit.II. How EAC contributes to ABET 2000 ComplianceEthics enters into the ABET 2000 accreditation process particularly in criterion 3f and 3h of thewidely discussed a-k criteria of outcomes and assessment for all engineering programs. Thesestate that all engineering graduates must have: · an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility (3f) · the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global and societal context (3h).Ethical considerations are also relevant to criterion 4, which states that all engineering studentsshould have a "major design experience"… based on the knowledge and skills acquired in earlier coursework and incorporating
AreasHistorically, software written for vehicles has been based on proprietary tools and softwareengineering processes3. The trend in the automobile industry is of increasing integration ofsoftware with digital and mechanical systems. Areas of impact range from vehicle power plantcontrol to that of integrated entertainment systems complete with Internet access. The sheer bulkof code integrated in a typical vehicle is pushing the engineering of software systems out of theproprietary realm and into software engineering mainstream where the automotive industry mustadapt best practices for control of software system reliability and complexity. The amount ofdevelopment activity directly related to software engineering has risen, in some cases, to 40% ofthe
leadership roles in the industry. Thus,the program objectives are to educate men and women to: • Have a basic understanding of the fundamentals of Computer Science, Electrical and Computer Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, and Systems Engineering. • Apply these abstract concepts and practical skills to design and construct robots and robotic systems for diverse applications. • Have the imagination to see how robotics can be used to improve society and the entrepreneurial background and spirit to make their ideas become reality. • Demonstrate the ethical behavior and standards expected of responsible professionals functioning in a diverse society.Thus, the program tackles head-on the challenges of providing
oranother to some ethical basis, customs, rules or traditions. Examples used in a ‘new’ mandatoryfirst year “Practical Engineering” course (Engineering 5 first offered in 2003) are described [5].Examples with greater complexity and subtlety are used as assignments and for class discussionin an undergraduate junior/senior course (IE334, Organizational Planning and Control). Finally,in several graduate courses in the program that the author directs there is appreciable focus onissues that have unavoidably ethical content affecting the global commons, marketing, facilitiesdesign and location, design, sustainability, and human resource development and cultural issues.First yearThe course, Engineering 5, is scheduled every semester to afford the
MEP Director have focused on developing and implementing high impact practices known to promote student success and persistence. In addition to her work as a practitioner in supply chain and engineering student success, Gerica is a qualitative researcher who centers the lived experiences of various engineering education stakeholders; including faculty, staff, students, and employers; in order to gain greater clarity on the current status of the engineering educational landscape. Gerica believes that each person’s experiences and perspectives are important to understanding the current state of engineering education and thus critical for developing strategies toward a path forward
Engineering and Technology at National University and leads the computer sci- ence program. He served as the chair of the department of Management and Information Systems (2002 – 2004.) and more recently as the chair of department of Computer Science and Information Systems at National University. Dr. Farahani’s research interests are in optimization theory and algorithm design. He is also interested in mathematics and computer science education focusing on innovative integration of technology to enhance teaching and learning in these areas.Dr. Mudasser Fraz Wyne, National University I have a Ph.D. in Computer Science, M.Sc. in Engineering, and B.Sc. in Electrical Engineering. Currently I serve as a Chair for Department of
those dispositions, skill levels,and practical tasks that are reasonably expected of graduates.6Within the United States, a similar call has been made for incorporating an entrepreneurialmindset into undergraduate engineering curricula. EM is a multi-faceted concept comprising awide range of characteristics, skills, and attitudes; its curricular presence is often implemented inways that enable an institution to best leverage its resources, including faculty background,available partnerships, and funding opportunities. 7 As defined by KEEN, entrepreneurial mindsetis a habit of mind geared toward action; a way of thinking about the world that empowers peopleto identify opportunities and create value in any context.8 Network members from more than
. (2012): Learning From Working On Others’ Problems: Case Study Of An Interdisciplinary Project-Based Global Service-Learning Program. Paper presented at the American Society for Engineering Education.16. Mohtar, R. H., & Dare, A. E. (2012). Global design team: A global service-learning experience. International Journal of Engineering Education, 28(1), 169-182.17. Johri, A. (2009, October). Preparing engineers for a global world: identifying and teaching strategies for sensemaking and creating new practices. In Frontiers in Education Conference, 2009. FIE'09. 39th IEEE (pp. 1-6). IEEE.18. Jesiek, B. K., Haller, Y., & Thompson, J. (2014). Developing Globally Competent Engineering Researchers: Outcomes
a better understanding of the K-12 issues that impact enrollment at post-secondaryinstitutions, and to generate research to answer the question of how stakeholders frommany levels – K-12 teachers, university professors, industry, and governmentrepresentatives – can advance the state of engineering and engineering technologyeducation. Coupled with the information from the aforementioned surveys, the ideas andsuggestions from conference attendees and current research in the field of K-12education, Dougless, Iversen and Kalyandurg (2004) have developed a set of sixguidelines for improving K-12 engineering education and outreach: 1. Hands-on learning: Make K-12 science curriculum less theory-based and more context-based, emphasizing the
Page 23.767.3survey for the 2011-2012 academic year.MethodologyThe basic research questions of the project are focused on the attitudes of the students towardsservice-learning and on the impact of S-L on student performance. Over the last eight years, S-Lhas been integrated to various degrees (ranging from 5% to 100% of the grade awarded) in anaverage of 30 engineering courses, and 42 faculty have attempted to implement it (approximatelyhalf of the faculty in the College of Engineering). In 2011-2012, a total of 1059 (unduplicated)students were engaged in S-L projects in the College of Engineering (out of a total enrollment of1828 full time undergraduate and graduate students). Those students contributed for a total of48,368 hours of work for
a different developing country.The invitations originated with overseas friends, but the U.S. colleagues were brought inas official paid consultants. The assignment in Jordan was long-range and specific:“Help us design a new engineering college that will meet ABET standards.” In the formerSoviet Republic of Moldova, the assignment was short-term and generic: “You have twohours to teach us about the credit hour system in American higher education.” And so wewent and received appropriate compensation and gratitude for our contributions, but anagging question remained: “What aspects of U.S. higher education should be exportedoverseas and what are the U.S. practices that, like some wines, do not travel well?”The seminar in Chisinau, capital of
disciplines and warrantfurther study with a larger sample of ET students.While student GPA at graduation is a valid measure of how students perform in the classroom,not all learning is best measured by a graded, quantitative scale. To measure classroomperformance in a “non-graded” way, the “seriousness of purpose” measure was conceptualized.The measure is intended to evaluate the student’s ability to apply what he or she has learned inan open-ended and practical way. In engineering and ET fields, the senior capstone course iswhere theory and practice collide, so assessing students on their capstone performance is alogical way to measure classroom performance. The qualitative measure of “seriousness ofpurpose” provides an alternative way to measure
degrees into five or sixyear program?” It is imperative for every college or university to realize that the answer is notaddition of classes that specifically address all these competences. We should be able toaccomplish preparing our graduates for a career in industry if every professor will endeavor toincorporate these industry practices into their courses as they go along. As globalization andrapid technology innovations continue to rise, financial constraints continue to make itincreasingly difficult for colleges and universities to provide all the resources needed cope oraddress these changes and impart the necessary competency.One approach that is being used to address some of these problems is the Problem-based learning(PBL). Some
x x Real-life monitoring project x x Scholarship Prizes for best designs x x Scholarship Incentive for earning A/B x x Paid working hours for project work time x Field Trips to Clean Energy Centers x Description of Methodological ApproachAcross all three cohorts, data were collected using a mixed-methods approach. The externalevaluator and the faculty coordinated with the Institutional Review Board (IRB) prior tocollecting data. This research paper is based on secondary analysis of data collected for
survey took approximately 15-25 minutes forstudents to complete. At the conclusion of the survey, students could click an externallink to log their name and email address; this entered them into a raffle to win a $50 giftcard as incentive.The assessment survey was written following best practices for survey development[14] and with the support of the Center for Research on Learning and Teaching inEngineering. The survey was developed to assess three main factors: how studentsperceive safety to be a part of their profession, how often students consider safety as achemical engineering student, and their confidence in completing safety-related tasks.The pre and post survey were identical. The survey data analyzed here consists of twoparts: 1
haveintensely busy schedules and feel many demands. It is important to combine this awareness withthe requirements of successful cultural change work when designing session length and sessionfrequency. In order for cultural change to be implemented and sustained it is important thatCDCCP sessions be scheduled over a 12-month period to allow for habituation of the newlyacquired perspectives and skills and for the creation of the neuropathways that facilitate thesenew behaviors and thought patterns.16 After initially experimenting with two-hour sessions, itwas quickly discovered that while two hours respects faculty time constraints, the sessions weretoo short for the faculty to experience the impact and depth of the material. Thus, after twosessions
classroom learning, laboratory experiences and cooperative education alliances withindustry.”The school offers graduate and undergraduate degrees showcasing the best of RobertMorris University’s practical, real-world philosophy of engaged and applied learning. Inbiology, environmental science, pre-medical, mechanical engineering, and mathematics,our faculty are experts in their fields.Close ties to the business world allow our students to tackle real problems under theguidance of their professors. Internships and research are key to our curriculum, helpingour graduates gain subsequent employment. Students work with sophisticated labequipment, such as our 7,500-square-foot Engineering Learning Factory and dedicatedscience laboratories in physics
305Learning [2], “digital competence” and ”learning to learn” are among eight key competences forcitizens in order to easily adapt to a rapid changing and highly interconnected world. The importance of computing and computers in engineering education has been knownfor several years and several educators have shared their experiences and activities in this regard.For example, in [3-5], engineering education researchers in the disciplines of civil engineeringand computational science have developed special software tools which enhance the academicenvironment. These computer-based instructional guides supplement the teacher in the classroomby providing design examples, additional practice problems in the computational aspects of thefield, and
for transportation engineering education.By using the practical problem of designing a road and structuring the presentation of materialaround the student’s efforts, the authors aim at providing relevant experience to students that willprepare them for future challenges. As an end-state, it is hoped that teaching methods, as used inConstruction Management and the Introduction to Transportation Course, will facilitate thedevelopment of graduates who have reached the highest levels of Blooms taxonomy and are ableto synthesize, evaluate and characterize the efficacy of the construction methods they utilize. Page 15.416.16Bibliography1
think about why a new technology or idea is important. Why was a particular technologydeveloped? Why was it important for the developer or designer? Why was it important to theircommunity? Understanding motivates can help students think about later impacts and who may ormay have been left out of the design process.The Step-in, Step-out, Step-back GTR can be used to help students understand diverse perspectivesand learn from them. The modern workplace is made of teams. Graduates need to be able to engagein appropriate interactions with those that they may not agree with or fully understand. Solutions totechnological, health or social concerns need to be developed from teams with diverse perspectives,or suboptimal outcomes can occur. We can help
technology and will continueas long as technology evolves. The debate is always about what topics to add and which topics tode-emphasize or eliminate. It still tends to be a roadblock to change and problematic if there is aneed for a paradigm shift in the curriculum.To the second point, most faculty that teach advanced manufacturing or mechanical engineeringtechnology have backgrounds that do not include any familiarity with the modern digitaltechnologies that are the enablers of Industry 4.0/smart manufacturing. As a matter of fact, untilrecently if one was a graduate of a traditional four-year mechanical engineering college onewould most likely also not have had any courses concerning these topics. It has only beenrecently [13] that there have
Page 26.168.8to ensure the team is on track to fulfill the “terms” of their contract. From the outset, studentsare working to achieve a common goal: Use Microsoft Office Suite skills to convince fellowclassmates that their team has the best travel package.The application of employability skills is inherent in the design of the project. As noted, studentswork as a team to name their business, settle on a logo, decide their country of choice, determineMicrosoft Office Suite applications that might enhance their project but are not required for thecompletion of the project, etc. Obviously, communication skills are crucial to the successfulcompletion of the project as are research and inquiry skills (geography/attractions), organization,teamwork